# data[].attributes.body
First Article

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
Department of Chemistry, New Jersey City University, Jersey City, NJ 07305, USA

Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.

Received: 29 June 2020 / Revised: 15 July 2020 / Accepted: 16 July 2020 / Published: 18 July 2020

As the world endures the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, the conditions of 35 million vulnerable individuals struggling with substance use disorders (SUDs) worldwide have not received sufficient attention for their special health and medical needs. Many of these individuals are complicated by underlying health conditions, such as cardiovascular and lung diseases and undermined immune systems. During the pandemic, access to the healthcare systems and support groups is greatly diminished. Current research on COVID-19 has not addressed the unique challenges facing individuals with SUDs, including the heightened vulnerability and susceptibility to the disease. In this systematic review, we will discuss the pathogenesis and pathology of COVID-19, and highlight potential risk factors and complications to these individuals. We will also provide insights and considerations for COVID-19 treatment and prevention in patients with SUDs.

1. Introduction

The novel coronavirus 2019, now officially termed as SARS-CoV-2, causes the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) by infecting the respiratory system [ 1]. The disease was first detected and reported in Wuhan, China, in December 2019 [ 2], and has now spread to over 150 countries on all continents except Antarctica. According to the World Health Organization (WHO) Coronavirus Disease Dashboard, the global tally of coronavirus cases has approached 13.5 million, with a death toll of over 580,000 [ 3] at the time of writing (15 July 2020). The United States alone has counted over 3.4 million infections and over 131,000 deaths, contributing more than a quarter of both overall infections and deaths globally (John Hopkins University Coronavirus Resource Center) [ 4]. The WHO characterized the COVID-19 as a pandemic on 11 March 2020 [ 5]. The fatality rate of the disease is particularly high among patients who are older and who have underlying health issues, such as cancer, diabetes, and compromised lung function or lung disease.

The United Nations (UN) reported that 35 million people worldwide suffer from substance use disorders (SUDs) [ 6]. In the U.S., the number of individuals experiencing SUDs is 20.3 million [ 7]. A large number of individuals with SUDs have underlying health conditions, particularly cardiovascular and lung diseases and hepatitis C or HIV-1 infections. Together with complicated socioeconomic issues, these populations are particularly vulnerable to COVID-19 [ 8]. Despite the fact that researchers and clinicians around the world have collected and disseminated tremendous amounts of data on COVID-19, we have very little knowledge of the interactions and comorbidity of COVID-19 and SUD. In this review, we will analyze relevant COVID-19 and SUD literatures, and highlight the susceptibilities and vulnerabilities for individuals with SUD.

SARS-CoV-2 is known to attack the respiratory tract and could lead to severe lung damage or pulmonary fibrosis [ 2]. Smokers of tobacco and marijuana, and possibly people who vape [ 9], are susceptible to chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) [ 10, 11], which could cause severe complications of COVID-19 and lead to a higher fatality rate [ 12, 13]. Other substances of abuse, such as opioids and methamphetamine, function increasingly through the brain and immune system to indirectly affect the respiratory system. Opioid use disorder (OUD) tends to slow breath rate and decrease blood oxygen content (hypoxemia). An extended period of hypoxemia is one of the major causes of overdose fatality. COVID-19, which shrinks lung capacity, could heighten the condition caused by opioid overdose [ 14, 15]. Methamphetamine may contribute to pulmonary hypertension and edema through cardiomyopathy and restricted blood circulation [ 16]. Many substances of abuse also impair the bidirectional interactions between the brain and immune responses, resulting in an increase in the infection rates among individuals with SUDs. Some drugs exert proinflammatory effects in the central nervous system (CNS), leading to neuroinflammation. The buildup of proinflammatory cytokines and chemokines in the CNS may exaggerate the already excessive inflammatory response in the peripheral tissues of COVID-19 patients.

In addition to pathological risks that patients with SUDs are facing, highly risky behaviors can put them into even greater jeopardy in the pandemic. Suicide mortality associated with SUDs is significantly higher compared to the general population across all categories, including age, gender, income, and education, and the relative risk of suicide is more prominent in women. People with multiple alcohol, drug, and tobacco use disorders are at a particularly heightened risk of suicide [ 17]. In a position paper, the International Society of Addiction Medicine (ISAM) Practice and Policy Interest Group noted that people with SUDs suffer from serious health complications, including chronical infections, weakened immune systems, various respiratory, cardiovascular, and metabolic disorders, and a range of psychiatric comorbidities. While they are stigmatized and marginalized with limited access to healthcare, the difference in perceived danger and risk-taking behaviors may put people with SUDs at a higher rate of mortality [ 18]. Due to the lack of research on SUDs and COVID-19, the group also put together recommendations for health service providers and policymakers regarding the comorbidity of COVID-19 infection and SUDs [ 18].

2. SARS-CoV-2 Infection and COVID-19 Pathogenesis

Coronaviruses are named for their crown-like spikes protruding from the surface of the virion, and can be classified into four genera, known as α, β, γ, and δ. There are seven known coronaviruses that can infect humans. Four of them, α-coronaviruses 2229E and NL63, and β-coronaviruses OC63 and HKU1, infect people on a regular basis and cause common cold symptoms. The other three, all belonging to the β-coronavirus subfamily, are believed to have originated from bats and evolved through jumping animal species to become new human coronaviruses [ 19, 20]. These include the SARS-CoV, the coronavirus that caused severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) outbreak in 2003, the MERS-CoV, the coronavirus that caused Middle East Respiratory Syndrome (MERS) outbreak in 2012, and the SARS-CoV-2, the novel coronavirus that is causing the current COVID-19 pandemic railing the whole world.

Like all other coronaviruses, SARS-CoV-2 contains a single-strand (ss) RNA genome. The sequence of the 29,903 nucleotides (nt) long SARS-CoV-2 genome was first reported by Chinese scientists and made publicly available on GenBank with accession number MN908947 [ 21]. The genome organization of SARS-CoV-2 is similar to that of other representative β-coronaviruses. As illustrated in Figure 1a, it is comprised of a 5′-untranslated region (UTR), and at least ten open reading frames (ORFs) that encode non-structural and structural viral proteins, followed by the polyA tail at the 3′-end. The first ORF is the 21,291-nt replicase gene, ORF1ab, encoding 16 non-structural proteins (NSP1-16). The subsequent ORFs encode four structural proteins, spike (S), envelope (E), membrane (M), and nucleocapsid (N), as well as several accessory proteins that do not participate in viral replication and transcription. Structural proteins are important in maintaining viral structural and genomic stability. An illustration of SARS-CoV-2 viral structure is shown in Figure 1b. The S protein is responsible for infection and transmission. Non-structural proteins, such as the RNA-dependent RNA polymerase (NSP12), have functions in viral genome transcription and replication. The SARS-CoV-2 genome was found to have 79.6% sequence similarity to SARS-CoV, and shares 96% identity at the whole-genome level to a bat coronavirus (Bat CoV RaTG13) detected in Rhinolophus affinis [ 20].

Similar to SARS-CoV, SARS-CoV-2 recognizes the angiotensin converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) receptor by its S protein and utilizes it for cell entry [ 20, 22]. The heavily glycosylated S protein triggers virus cell entry by fusing the receptor binding domain (RBD) on the S1 subunit to the host ACE2 receptor, engaging the transition of S2 subunit to a stable post-fusion conformation [ 23]. Cryo-electron microscopy (EM) structures of the pre-fusion [ 23] and post-fusion structures [ 24] of the S protein have been reported. The SARS-CoV-2 S protein has been shown to have a much higher binding affinity to the ACE2 than the SARS-CoV S protein [ 23, 25]. The S protein contains 22 N-linked glycans, and the complex glycosylation is likely to play a role in shielding and camouflaging for immune evasion of the virus [ 26, 27]. The S protein is activated by type II transmembrane serine protease (TMPRSS2), a host protease co-expressed with ACE2 on the cell surface [ 24, 28]. In cells not expressing TMPRSS2, other proteases, such as cathepsin B/L, may activate the S protein and facilitate viral entry [ 29].

Upon cell entry, SARS-CoV-2 has a similar life cycle and pathogenesis as other β-coronaviruses, including SARS-CoV and MERS-CoV [ 30]. Upon ACE2 receptor binding, the virus fuses its membrane with the host cell plasma membrane, releasing its genomic RNA into the cytoplasm. Since the viral RNA is similar to the human messenger RNA (mRNA), it triggers the host ribosome to start translating the viral RNA and producing viral proteins. The viral replicase ORF is translated into two overlapping polyproteins, PP1a (NSP1-11) and PP1ab (NSP1-16), which require extensive processing. NSP5, the 33.8-kDa main viral protease (M pro), also referred to as the 3-chymotrypsin-like protease (3CL pro), performs the function by autolytic cleavage of the protease itself, and then subsequently digests the polyproteins into 16 non-structural proteins. NSP12, known as the RNA-dependent RNA polymerase (RdRp), together with NSP7 and NSP8, carries out the critical process of the viral RNA synthesis, and is central to the viral replication and transcription cycle. The N-terminal non-structural protein, NSP1, has been shown to bind to the 40S small ribosomal subunit, shutting down all host cell protein production by blocking the mRNA entry tunnel. NSP1 binding to ribosomes and blocking host cell translation effectively inhibits type-I interferon (IFN-I)-induced innate immune response by turning off the retinoic acid-inducible gene (RIG)-I antiviral sensor [ 31]. The inhibition of the IFN-I-induced innate immunity allows the assembly of viral particles inside the host cell. The newly produced structural proteins, S, M, and E, are inserted into the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) or Golgi membrane, while the N protein associates with the newly synthesized viral RNA to stabilize the genome. The viral particles are assembled into the ER-Golgi intermediate compartment (ERGIC), fuse with the plasma membrane, and bud off the host cell. The released virions will further infect more cells. The functions of other NSPs are not fully understood. A comparative structural genomics study revealed a possible functional intra-viral and human-virus interaction network of NSPs [ 32]. Recurrent mutations in the SARS-CoV-2 genome have been identified in some NSPs and the S protein, suggesting ongoing adaptations of the coronavirus through transmission [ 33]. Particularly, the D614G mutation in the S protein makes it more stable, and the virus becomes more infectious and transmissible [ 34, 35]. This mutated virus is the dominant form in Europe and North America since March 2020 [ 36].

3. Vulnerability of Substance Use Disorders (SUDs) in COVID-19

Underlying medical conditions can put individuals at increased risk for severe illness from COVID-19. The comorbid conditions include COPD, cardiovascular diseases, other chronical respiratory diseases, diabetes, obesity, and cancer. According to a large-scale study with 72,314 cases conducted by the Chinese CDC, case-fatality and mortality rates are significantly increased in patients with comorbid conditions comparing to those with no underlying conditions ( Table 1) [ 12]. In a study in New York City, the epicenter of the COVID-19 pandemic in the U.S., comorbid conditions are highly associated with hospitalization and severity of the illness ( Table 2) [ 37].

A nationwide case-control study in Korea also confirmed that diabetes, hypertension, and chronic respiratory disease, among others, were associated with severe COVID-19 [ 38]. Individuals with SUDs commonly experience respiratory and cardiovascular disorders, including hypertension and COPD, and have undermined immune systems, making them particularly vulnerable in COVID-19. A significant portion of individuals with SUDs have underlying medical conditions, and are more likely to be marginalized. According to a recent study in British Columbia, Canada, among 19,005 individuals who had one or more non-fatal overdose events between 2015 and 2017, 10,649 (56.0%) had a record of receiving social assistance, and 5716 (30.0%) had no fixed address record. These individuals with a history of overdose are more likely to have at least three known chronical conditions associated with COVID-19 severity, including chronical pulmonary disease, diabetes, and coronary heart disease, with adjusted odds ratios (ORs) to be 2.01, 1.24 and 2.08, respectively, with reference to people without an overdose [ 39]. During the COVID-19 pandemic, risks of abusing substances and addictive behaviors are also increasing. The stress and social isolation associated with the response to COVID-19 increases the risk of alcohol abuse and misuse, which is known to suppress immune systems and cause emotional dysregulation [ 40]. A study in China showed that relapses of alcohol and smoking abuse were prominent (18.7% and 25.3%, respectively), and 32.1% of regular drinkers and 19.7% of regular smokers increased alcohol and cigarette consumption [ 41].

SARS-CoV-2 can attack and damage human organs through two major events: direct viral attacks against target organs and abnormal immune responses and inflammation [ 42]. Initial evidence focuses on the damage to the respiratory system and the lung, and is correlated with clinical symptoms of the patients [ 2, 12, 20, 21]. The identified viral entry receptor, ACE2, is abundantly expressed in the epithelial cells along the respiratory tract and the lung alveoli [ 29, 43, 44]. High level expression of ACE2 receptors is also reported in organs and tissues outside the respiratory system, including the heart, kidney, and intestine [ 45]. Therefore, these organs are the potential targets of and could be damaged by SARS-CoV-2. As mentioned earlier, smoking of tobacco and marijuana directly impairs respiratory system. Other substances of abuse can cause cardiovascular diseases, which amplify respiratory and pulmonary complications. We will discuss these complications in the next section.

More severely, ACE2 is abundantly expressed in vascular endothelial cells [ 45]. Several clinical cases have been reported to indicate direct involvement of vascular endothelial cells in COVID-19 pathology at different organs, suggesting that the damages to the lung, heart, kidney, liver, small intestine, and bowel, are actually caused by endotheliitis (endothelialitis). Direct viral infection of endothelial cells induces inflammation and inflammatory cell death at the endothelium ( Figure 2) [ 46]. Comparing lung tissues from deceased patients of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) associated with influenza and COVID-19, the lungs from COVID-19 patients displayed distinctive vascular impairments of the pulmonary vessels. Most significantly, viruses were found inside the endothelial cells of the lung tissues from COVID-19 patients, which disrupted cell membrane, caused prevalent thrombosis with microangiopathy, and induced elevated intussusceptive angiogenesis [ 47]. A greater number of ACE2+ endothelial cells were found in COVID-19 patients, correlating to changes in endothelial morphology, including disruption of endothelial cell junctions, cell swelling, and detachment from the basal membrane. The presence of the SARS-CoV-2 virus inside the endothelial cells, together with the induced inflammation, may directly contribute to the endothelial injury [ 46, 47]. Although there are no reported cases yet, one potential target of SARS-CoV-2 infection is the brain microvascular endothelial cell (BMVEC). BMVECs line up the microcapillary beds and form the blood-brain barrier (BBB) together with brain astrocytes and pericytes. The BBB prevents pathogens and toxins from trespassing into the brain side. Tight-junction (TJ) protein complexes, composed of occludin, claudins, junctional adhesion molecules (JAMs) and membrane-directed scaffolding protein zonulae occludentes (ZO), form a physical inter-endothelial barrier that strictly controls migration of molecular and cellular contents from the circulation into the brain ( Figure 2) [ 48, 49]. High expression of efflux pumps and stereospecific solute transporters at the endothelium additionally limits molecules from crossing the barrier [ 50, 51, 52]. The BBB plays an essential role in protecting the brain from pathogen invasion. Viral infection of BMVECs could result in endothelial dysfunction, leakage, and even rupture, and is detrimental to the BBB integrity. The damaged BBB allows the virus to migrate into the brain side, and infect neuronal tissues [ 53]. Another possible route of CNS invasion could be through invading the peripheral nerve terminals and then entering the CNS via trans-synaptic transfer [ 54]. The first case of meningitis associated with SARS-CoV-2 has been reported, in which viral RNA was detected in the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) of the patient [ 55]. Clinical evidence from Wuhan, China showed that more than 1/3 of COVID-19 patients had neurological symptoms, and CNS involvement was linked to the prognosis and severity of the disease [ 56, 57]. Substances of abuse have been shown to severely compromise the endothelial barrier at the BBB, leading to increased BBB permeability and possibly intensified brain damage in COVID-19 ( Figure 2).

The other aspect of COVID-19 pathology involves abnormal immune responses, which could exaggerate into a cytokine storm [ 58, 59]. SARS-CoV-2 dramatically promotes host cell kinase activities, including casein kinase II (CK2) and p38, and stimulates production of diverse cytokines [ 60]. Evidence has shown that COVID-19 elevates proinflammatory cytokines and chemokines, including tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α, interleukin (IL)-1β and IL-6, granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF), interferon γ (IFN-γ)-induced protein-10 (IP-10), monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 (MCP-1), and macrophage inflammatory proteins-1α (MIP-1α) [ 61, 62, 63]. Although there has been no reported evidence, it is possible that pattern recognition receptors, such as toll-like receptors (TLR3, TLR7, and TLR8), RIG-I, and nucleotide-binding oligomerization domain (NOD)-like receptors (NLRP1, NLRP3, and NLRP12), are also activated by COVID-19 through innate immunity [ 64]. It has been reported that IL-6 was significantly increased in severe COVID-19 cases, and its level was closely correlated with the severity of patients [ 65]. Human bronchial epithelial cells infected with SARS-CoV-2 showed elevated expression of type I and type III IFNs and IL-6 [ 44]. Furthermore, type I interferon, IFN-α, stimulates the expression of ACE2, the molecular target of SARS-CoV-2, in primary human nasal epithelial cells [ 43]. Type III interferon, IFN-λ, has been shown to disrupt the lung epithelial barrier by direct inhibition of lung epithelial proliferation and repair, contributing to COVID-19 pathogenesis in the lower airways [ 66]. The upregulation of IL-6 and other proinflammatory cytokines was also observed in SARS cases [ 67] and influenza infection [ 68]. Substances of abuse can induce high level of expression of proinflammatory cytokines and chemokines in the CNS and cause neuroinflammation, which can worsen inflammatory responses in COVID-19. Details will be discussed in the next section.

The bidirectional communication between the brain and the immune system plays a critical role in COVID-19 pathogenesis. It has been well established that brain-immune interactions are widespread and significant. For instance, the immune system produces hormones and neurotransmitters [ 69, 70, 71], while the anterior pituitary cells in CNS produce proinflammatory cytokines, such as IL-6 [ 72]. Microglial cells are immune effectors in the CNS, which produce and secrete cytokines and neurotrophic or neuron survival factors upon inflammation and injury [ 73]. For pathogen infections, the innate immunity provides the first line of defense through recognition of pathogen-associated molecular patterns (PAMPs), initiating nonspecific cellular and humoral responses and rapidly activating nonspecific neural responses, including systemic hormonal responses through the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis ( Figure 3) [ 74]. Consisting of the hypothalamus of the brain, and endocrine organs, the pituitary and cortex of the adrenal glands, the HPA axis is responsible for systematic inflammation control. The paraventricular nucleus (PVN) of the hypothalamus plays the main governing role of the HPA axis, releasing a wide range of neuropeptides, including the corticotrophin-releasing hormone (CRH) and arginin-vasopressin (AVP). These neuropeptides reach the anterior pituitary (AP) to activate corticotrope cells to secrete adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH). ACTH subsequently enables the synthesis and secretion of glucocorticoids in the zona fasciculata of the adrenal cortex through melanocortin type 2 receptors [ 75]. The physiological feedback loop involves releasing immune mediators and cytokines, such as IL-1, IL-6, and tumor-necrosis factors (TNFs), by the innate immune system to activate neural responses, which amplify local inflammation to contain and eliminate pathogen invasions. Upon pathogen clearance, the brain responds by activating the HPA axis and releasing anti-inflammatory molecules, glucocorticoids, from the adrenal cortex. The release of this final product of the HPA axis sends a signal to the immune system to terminate the inflammatory responses, completing the hormonal negative-feedback loop. Glucocorticoids also negatively regulate the HPA axis itself, restoring host homeostasis, including CNS and cardiovascular system, as well as metabolic balances. The interplay between the nervous system and the immune system plays a critical role in forming a cohesive and integrated early host response for pathogen clearance through an optimized innate inflammatory response. Impairment of the HPA axis by various substances of abuse could render the host highly susceptible to inflammation and even increased mortality from septic shock from exposure to infectious and proinflammatory triggers, including COVID-19. Inappropriate and excessive CNS responses could predispose the host to extreme inflammation, including cytokine storm that has been observed clinically in influenza [ 68, 76], SARS [ 77], and COVID-19 [ 59]. Excessive activation of the HPA axis and the release of glucocorticoids by several substances of abuse will suppress the activities of various immune cells, including macrophages, dendritic cells, and T cells, and will inhibit activities of NK cells, B cells, and T cells ( Figure 3) [ 74]. The immunosuppression reduces antibody production, cytotoxicity, and T cell-mediated immune responses, and is linked to higher incidences of pathogen infections, slowed recovery, and severe disease progression in COVID-19.

4. Effects of Commonly Abused Substances on COVID-19

For individuals with SUDs, both the infection of vascular endothelial cells and the proinflammatory immune responses of COVID-19 could pose severe risks. It has been well studied that substances of abuse can cause irreversible BBB damage [ 78] and impair the HPA axis and immune responses [ 75]. To understand the vulnerabilities of SUDs in COVID-19 infection at the molecular level, we will examine the brain-immune interactions and the HPA axis attenuation, neuroinflammation, immunosuppression, and BBB impairment induced by most commonly abused substances in the comorbidity of COVID-19.

4.1. Nicotine

Nicotine is available in the form of tobacco, which also contains many other types of chemicals. Tobacco smoking is associated with arterial thrombosis and atherosclerosis in the heart, abdomen, and neck [ 79], and is associated with increased risk of stroke, pulmonary disease, and emphysema [ 80]. As nicotine damages the lung directly, smoking is one of the leading causes of COPD. Smokers and COPD patients are of high risk in developing severe disease and have a higher mortality rate in COVID-19 [ 13]. Smoking can significantly worsen COVID-19 progression, with more critical conditions and higher fatality [ 81]. Cigarette smoking increases the number of alveolar macrophages (AMs), the innate immune cells in the lung by several fold. These cells secrete lysosomal enzyme, elastase, which can damage connective tissue and parenchymal cells of the lung, one of the contributors to the COPD pathogenesis [ 82].

Nicotine is also an important immune modulator. It significantly reduces antibody responses and T-cell proliferation [ 83]. The immune suppression by nicotine, particularly the decrease in CD8+ T-cells that facilitate the rapid resolution of acute viral infections, increases the susceptibility of smokers for viral infections [ 84]. Analysis of clinical data has indicated that smokers are twice as much as non-smokers to contract the virus, have a more severe disease progression, and have higher mortality rates [ 85].

Nicotine induces BBB leakage and increases BBB permeability by diminishing the expression of tight junction proteins, including occludin, claudin-3, ZO-1, and JAMs [ 86, 87, 88, 89]. Nicotine alters actin cytoskeleton arrangement in the BMVEC, which also greatly increases BBB permeability, resulting in a surge of bacterial invasion to the brain [ 90]. Nicotine induces oxidative stress, which can progressively compromise the BBB integrity [ 91]. Nicotine increases gene expression of proinflammatory cytokines, TNFα, IL-1β, and IL-18, and chemokines, CCL2, CCL8, and CXC3CL1, and suppresses anti-inflammatory factors, Bcl6, IL-10, and CCL25 in the brain microvessels [ 92]. Nicotine's detrimental effects on the BBB and induced neuroinflammation are serious concerns for COVID-19.

4.2. Alcohol

The history of fermentation production and the use of alcohol can be dated back to 10,000 BC. Although light-to-moderate consumption may arguably have positive health benefits, particularly in lowering cardiovascular risks [ 93, 94], high dose alcohol can have severe neurotoxic effects and cause dementia [ 95]. Alcohol has been linked to liver damage, inflammation of the pancreas and stomach, and neurodegenerative disorders. High alcohol consumption changes gene expression of immune response genes in the brain region frontal cortex [ 96]. Proinflammatory signaling is also connected to high alcohol intake [ 97]. Binge alcohol (blood alcohol content B.A.C ≥ 0.08%) elevates expression of proinflammatory cytokines, IL-1β and IL-6, and chemokine CCL-2 (MCP-1) [ 98]. Binge alcohol can also damage various organs, including the gut, liver, and brain [ 99], and lead to spleen atrophy in a hippocampus-mediated fashion [ 100]. As suggested in a comparative risk assessment using the margin of exposure (MOE) benchmark, alcohol is considered to have the highest risk of mortality [ 101]. The alcohol-induced inflammatory cytokine release could expose COVID-19 patients to excessive inflammatory responses. The spleen damage by alcohol could weaken the immune response in COVID-19 by reducing the production of antibodies and lymphocytes against the virus [ 102].

Alcohol can induce BBB disruption by decreasing the expression of tight junction proteins and increasing mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) activities [ 103]. Alcohol may also stimulate inositol 1,4,5-triphosphate receptor (IP3R)-operated intracellular Ca ²⁺ release, activating myosin light chain kinase (MLCK). The heightened kinase activities lead to the phosphorylation of cytoskeletal and tight junction proteins, compromising the BBB integrity [ 104]. Alcohol-mediated oxidative stress in BMVEC can also activate MLCK that alters cytoskeleton and tight junction protein structures, causing BBB leakage [ 105]. Disruption of the BBB associated with chronic alcohol use could increase the possibilities of invading pathogens, including SARS-CoV-2, to infiltrate the brain.

4.3. Marijuana

Marijuana, also known as cannabis, is the most frequently used illicit substance of abuse in the U.S. Currently, 11 states and the District of Columbia have legalized the recreational use of marijuana, and 16 states have decriminalized marijuana use and possession. The use of marijuana for medical purposes is legal in 33 states. It is, however, illegal under federal law to use and possess marijuana. It is classified as a Schedule I substance by the US Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA), indicating a high potential for abuse and no accepted medical use, despite the fact that medical marijuana has been well established [ 106, 107]. Two cannabinoids, ∆ ⁹-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) and cannabidiol (CBD), are the main active ingredients in marijuana. Cannabinoids act on the endocannabinoid system (ECS), which is composed of two cannabinoid receptors, CB1, expressed in most neuronal cells, and CB2, expressed predominantly in immune cells [ 108]. THC is the component that produces psychotropic effects through stimulating the CB1 receptor and mediating the inhibition of neurotransmitter release [ 109]. CBD is considered to regulate immune response, such as cytokine release, and blood pressure, with little to no psychotropic side effects, as CBD only binds to CB2 but not to CB1 receptors [ 109]. THC can also activate CB1 receptor in the cardiovascular system, which has been associated with adverse cardiovascular events, including myocardial infarction, cardiomyopathy, arrhythmias, stroke, and cardiac arrest [ 110].

4.4. Opioids

Opioids, including illegal drug heroin, synthetic drug fentanyl, prescription pain-killing drugs oxycodone (OxyContin ®), hydrocodone (Vicodin ®), codeine, and morphine, are effectors on the endocrine system [ 116]. They act as immune suppressors that impair the function of macrophages, natural killer (NK) cells, and T-cells, and are associated with higher risks of infectious diseases, such as pneumonia [ 117]. The endogenous opioid system (EOS), comprising three naturally occurring opioid peptides (β-endorphins, dynorphins, and enkephalins) and three classes of opioid receptors, µ (MOR), δ (DOR), and ĸ (KOR), are tightly linked to substance abuse and the development of addiction, and are responsible for systemic infection [ 118]. Activation of opioid receptors in the brain stem could lead to respiratory depression and overdose fatality [ 119]. Respiratory depression is a leading factor to hypoxemia in COVID-19 complications. Morphine desensitizes the HPA axis and inhibits the release of anti-inflammatory glucocorticoids through potentiating proinflammatory cytokine, IL-1β [ 120]. Inhibition of endogenous glucocorticoid and activation of IL-1β by opioids could significantly increase the severity and inflammatory response of COVID-19 in patients with OUD. It has been shown that individuals with OUD are more susceptible to opportunistic infections [ 121], disposing these individuals at a higher chance of contracting the virus in COVID-19.

4.5. Cocaine

Cocaine is a potent stimulant, and is the second most abused illicit drug after marijuana. Cocaine can be abused in several forms, such as chewing the leaves of Erythroxylum coca tree, injecting the water-soluble hydrochloride salt form, and smoking or snorting pure, freebase form, called "crack". One of the most significant pathophysiological effects of cocaine is its cardiotoxicity, which has been well documented and extensively reviewed [ 122, 123, 124, 125, 126]. Cardiac arrhythmias and acute myocardial ischemia or infarction (MI) are the leading causes of cocaine-induced sudden cardiac death. Other cardiovascular diseases associated with cocaine include heart failure, cardiomyopathies, aortic dissection, and endocarditis. Cocaine blocks voltage-dependent Na⁺ and K⁺ channels in the sinoatrial node and the myocardium, depressing cardiovascular contractility [ 127]. Due to its function as an ion channel blocker, cocaine has been effectively used as a local anesthetic [ 128]. Cocaine can also induce binding and opening of L-type Ca ²⁺ channels, causing the influx of Ca ²⁺ in cardiomyocytes and elevation of intracellular Ca ²⁺ concentration. This second messenger pathway may also lead to cardiac arrhythmia [ 129]. Clinically, cocaine increases myocardial oxygen demand by increasing heart rate and hypertension, while it decreases the oxygen supply due to coronary vasoconstriction [ 130, 131, 132]. Cocaine impairs endothelial functions [ 133], sensitizes constrictor effects of catecholamines [ 134], and causes microvascular diseases and thrombosis [ 135, 136]. The cocaine-mediated oxygen imbalance can be particularly detrimental in COVID-19, in which the coronavirus can cause hypoxemia because of the diminishing of lung capacity.

Cocaine exerts its effect through binding to three monoamine transporters on nerve terminals: the serotonin transporter (SERT), the dopamine transporter (DAT), and the norepinephrine transporter (NET), with K i of 0.14, 0.64, and 1.6 µM, respectively [ 137]. Upon binding to these transporters, cocaine inhibits the reuptake of the neurotransmitters from the synaptic cleft, leading to prolonged synapses and activation of postsynaptic receptors. Cocaine also binds directly to two classes of neurotransmitter receptors, muscarinic acetylcholine and sigma receptors [ 138, 139, 140]. The interactions with the transporters and the receptors form the molecular basis for cocaine neurotoxicity. Cocaine stimulates the HPA axis, increasing the secretion of neuronal peptide CRH, which leads to subsequent releasing of β-endorphin and ACTH. Through general circulation, ACTH reaches the adrenal glands and promotes the biosynthesis of glucocorticoids [ 141]. Cocaine-induced stimulation of the HPA axis and immune suppression can alter antibody formation, lymphocyte subset profile, and lymphocyte proliferation. Cocaine suppresses responses to the proinflammatory cytokine, IL-6, and dampens cytotoxic activation of macrophages, natural killer cells, and cytotoxic T lymphocytes [ 142]. Due to compromised immune responses, cocaine abusers have considerably high incidences of viral infections, including human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), influenza, and potentially SARS-CoV-2.

Cocaine can induce BBB dysfunction, disrupt neurovascular capillaries and basement membrane [ 143], and increase BBB permeability [ 144, 145, 146]. The detrimental effects of cocaine on the BBB are partially attributed to the loss of tight junction protein complexes, including ZO-1 and JAM-2 [ 146, 147, 148, 149]. Cocaine also increases the expression of matrix metallopeptidase (MMP)-1, which contributes to the rearrangement of the cytoskeleton structure of the basement membrane [ 147, 148]. The adverse effects of decreased tight junction protein complexes and remodeling of the basement membrane fibers cause the BBB leakage and make it open to peripheral toxins and viruses, including SARS-CoV-2. An increase in proinflammatory cytokine, TNFα, has also been reported in BMVECs exposed to cocaine [ 150], which could be a concern for endothelial health in COVID-19.

4.6. Amphetamine, Methamphetamine (METH), and 3,4-Methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA, Ecstasy)

d-Amphetamine and its synthetic derivatives, METH and MDMA, are addictive psychostimulants associated with neuropsychiatric complications, including deficits in attention, memory, and executive functioning [ 151, 152]. Amphetamines mediate neurodegenerative changes in the brain, including persistent loss of dopamine (DA) transporters [ 153, 154, 155, 156, 157] and receptors [ 158], loss of serotonin (5-HT) transporters [ 159], and decrease in dopamine and serotonin level and its metabolites [ 160, 161, 162]. METH has been linked to various cardiac pathologies, including hypertension, tachycardia, and congestive heart failure or cardiomyopathy [ 16]. Clinically, METH abusers commonly showed dilated and poorly contracting left ventricles (LV) and substantially lowered left ventricular ejection fractions (LVEF) in comparison to non-users [ 163]. METH-associated cardiac pathologies are a major cause of pulmonary edema. The reduced lung capacity due to the fluid collection in the lungs and constriction of blood vessels can severely complicate COVID-19 symptoms and negative prognosis.

Amphetamine-like psychostimulants can trigger inflammatory processes, compromise neurogenesis in the brain, and damage the BBB integrity [ 170]. METH, for example, is strongly associated with ischemic stroke and hypoxia [ 171, 172]. Binge use of METH causes a sustained reduction in global and cerebral blood flow [ 173, 174]. METH is also known to damage the central nervous system (CNS) by compromising the integrity of the blood-brain barrier (BBB) [ 175, 176, 177]. METH and MDMA can decrease the expression of tight junction proteins, including ZO-1, occludin, and claudin-5. These drugs activate microglia and astrocyte to secrete proinflammatory cytokines and chemokines, as well as vasoactive factors, and elevate expression of peptidases, such as MMP-1 and MMP-9, to degrade tight junction proteins and modify BBB basement membrane structure [ 178, 179]. METH abuse has been shown to increase brain infection of peripheral bacteria and viruses [ 180, 181, 182]. Similarly, MDMA has been shown to cause BBB dysfunction with increased BBB permeability [ 183], and to excessively activate astrocytes and microglia [ 184]. It may lead to edema [ 183]. With BBB dysfunction, it is almost certain that the risks of SARS-CoV-2 invasion into the brain will be immensely heightened among individuals using or abusing these psychostimulants, and complications in these patients are vastly expected.

4.7. Summary of Roles of Substances of Abuse in COVID-19

Substances of abuse may lead to COVID-19 complication and severity in several ways. Smoking tobacco and marijuana could cause direct damage to the respiratory system, such as COPD. Other substances mostly work through modulating brain and immune functions, including the promotion of proinflammatory factors, suppression of immune responses, and impairment of the BBB. Neuroinflammation induced by several substances of abuse and inflammatory activities caused by COVID-19 in the peripheral tissues may mutually intensify the adverse effects of one another, leading to negative progression of the disease. With impaired HPA axis and immune imbalance, the patients are highly susceptible to SARS-CoV-2 infections. Compromised BBB may pose a high risk of viral infection in the brain tissue. Figure 4 sketches the possible pathological effects of commonly abused substances on various tissues and systems and their connection to COVID-19 complications. These adverse effects of these substances on the respiratory system, cardiovascular system, the immune system, and the CNS, as well as their relations to the severity and negative prognosis of COVID-19, are summarized in Table 3.

5. Strategies of Treatment and Prevention for Individuals with SUDs

5.1. General Approaches for Treatments and Vaccines

The therapeutic strategies for COVID-19 have been focused on repurposing existing drugs against this novel coronavirus [ 190, 191, 192]. Among these repurposed drugs, the antimalaria drugs chloroquine and hydroxychloroquine [ 193, 194] are extremely controversial, including a retracted study [ 195] and a terminated solidarity clinical trial by the WHO [ 196]. The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) recently revoked its Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) to treat COVID-19 [ 197]. Other drugs include the anti-HIV drugs lopinavir-ritonavir in combination with ribavirin [ 198, 199, 200], tumor chemotherapy drugs, doxorubicin and paclitaxel [ 201], traditional herbal medicines [ 202], broad spectrum antiviral drug niclosamide [ 203], Janus-associated kinase (JAK) 1 and 2 inhibitor, ruxolitinib [ 204], anti-influenza drug favipiravir [ 205], antiviral drug remdesivir [ 206, 207, 208], and most recently, a commonly used steroid, dexamethasone [ 209]. Many of these drugs primarily target the RdRp (NSP12) or the main protease, M pro. A cryo-EM structure of NSP12 in complex with its cofactors NSP7 and NSP8 has been reported [ 210]. Remdesivir, the only proven effective drug against COVID-19 so far, is found to potently inhibit RdRp in MERS-CoV [ 211] and SARS-CoV2 [ 212]. Ribavirin and Favipiravir also function as RdRp inhibitors. The crystal structure of the M pro with its inhibitor has been recently solved and reported [ 213, 214]. Due to its importance in viral production, and the lack of similar proteins in human cells, the M pro is considered an important drug target in treating COVID-19 [ 213, 215, 216]. Niclosamide and the anti-HIV combination drug lopinavir-ritonavir, are inhibitors of the main protease. Structure-based design has led to the development of new inhibitors of the M pro with desirable pharmacokinetic properties and low toxicity [ 217]. The SARS-CoV-2 entry point, ACE2, and the associated protease, TMPRSS2, are also considered potential drug targets [ 28].

Tremendous research efforts have been put into identifying, isolating, and developing neutralizing antibodies against SARS-CoV-2. The S protein, which plays a key role in recognizing and binding to the ACE2 receptor to gain entry into the host cell, is the main focus for developing neutralizing antibodies and vaccines against SARS-CoV-2 [ 24, 25]. Neutralizing monoclonal antibodies isolated from convalescent COVID-19 patients were found to block the RBD surface of the S protein from binding to ACE2, and these antibodies showed effectiveness in reducing viral infection in animal models [ 218, 219, 220]. The crystal structure of the RBD-bound antibody provided a clear picture on inhibition of viral interaction with ACE2 [ 221]. The neutralizing antibodies isolated from SARS-CoV patients seemed to cross-neutralize SARS-CoV-2 [ 222]. The RBD is not the only site that neutralizing antibodies may block. A monoclonal antibody isolated from convalescent COVID-19 patients exhibits high neutralization potency against SARS-CoV-2. This antibody does not bind to the RBD, but it tightly associates with the N-terminal domain of the S protein [ 223]. A recombinant antibody fused with the human ACE2 extracellular domain displayed desired neutralizing properties in vivo and in mice [ 224]. Single-domain camelid antibodies from a llama were found to cross-react and neutralize MERS-CoV, SARS-CoV, and SARS-CoV-2 S pseudotyped viruses [ 225]. Cocktails of antibodies that simultaneously bind to different epitopes of the RBD may provide more potent neutralizing power and significantly reduce virus escaping through mutations [ 226, 227, 228].

5.2. Challenges for Individuals with SUDs

With the race to therapeutics and vaccines towards COVID-19, rarely have the efforts specifically been directed at SUD complications in COVID-19. As we analyzed earlier, SUDs complicate and impair the respiratory system directly, and can intensify the severity of the disease through cardiovascular damage and immune abnormality. There are increasing concerns on capillary endothelial damage or endotheliitis by COVID-19 and SUDs, including the harmful effects on the BBB integrity. If the coronavirus is allowed to migrate across the BBB and to infect the brain, long-term neurological degeneracy is expected, and the treatment will be deemed challenging. SUDs can weaken the immune system, alter and disrupt the HPA axis, and stimulate neuroinflammation with heightened expression of TNFα, IL-1β, and IL-6 in the CNS. Anti-TNFα therapy has been used in severe cases of autoimmune inflammatory disease to control inflammation by downregulating IL-6 and IL-1β [ 235]. Anti-IL-6 antibody may also be beneficial in inflammation control [ 236]. These treatments could be helpful for COVID-19 patients with SUDs.

Current antiviral drugs are designed to interfere with viral replication or viral protein processing. For example, the most effective drug, remdesivir, which can shorten the recovery time by 30% [ 206], inhibits viral RNA replication [ 212]. Neutralizing antibodies bind to RBD of the S protein, so the virus cannot bind to ACE2. However, clearance of the virus is heavily dependent on the individual's immune system, including activating phagocytes and natural killer cells. As discussed earlier, several substances of abuse, such as nicotine, marijuana, cocaine, and amphetamines, have shown to suppress immune and antibody responses. Clinical cases indicated that antibody-secreting cells (ASCs), T follicular helper (T FH) cells, as well as activated CD4+ and CD8+ T-cells, are critical to symptomatic recovery from COVID-19 [ 237]. As a result, SUD-induced reduction of T-cell activation will dampen the ability to efficiently clear the virus from the body. For vaccines to work efficiently, robust immune responses are required. CD4+ and CD8+ T-cell responses are essential in protective antiviral immunity by vaccination [ 238, 239]. Due to the immunosuppression and reduction of T-cell responses, individuals with SUDs may not develop sufficient protective antibodies against the virus. A clinical study suggested that SARS-CoV-2 specific immunoglobin G (IgG) antibodies may last only 2-3 months before a steep decline in both asymptomatic and mildly symptomatic COVID-19 patients [ 240]. Considering their substantially undermined immune systems, the protective antibodies in patients with SUDs are very likely to decline much quicker, making vaccines considerably less effective in these patients. There is a potential risk, although no reported cases yet, that antibodies or vaccines may promote COVID-19 pathogenesis through antibody-dependent enhancement (ADE). While SUDs compromise the immune system, virus-specific antibodies are likely to promote viral entry into various immune cells, including monocytes, macrophages, and B cells [ 241, 242], which may further deteriorate the immune response towards the virus.

COVID-19 pandemic poses tremendous challenges for the treatment of SUDs [ 243]. The regulatory and policy obstacles for patients with SUDs are intensified in the times of crisis, making it more difficult for healthcare providers to address the needs of SUD patients with the availability of medications. Physical and social distancing requirement renders the face-to-face group treatment and mutual support groups inaccessible. These difficulties will disrupt the treatment of patients with SUDs when these patients start to experience withdrawal symptoms. It has been called for relaxing rules and regulations for these patients to receive treatment, and adopting the model of pharmacy-based addiction care by integrating primary-care and pharmacy prescription, dispense, and management [ 243].

It is now widely accepted that COVID-19 may stay with us for some extended periods. People with mild or no symptoms can transmit the pathogen as effectively as those with severe symptoms [ 244, 245]. The complications and compromised immune systems associated with SUDs make drug abusers particularly vulnerable to COVID-19. Therapeutics and vaccines currently under development do not address the specific concerns and risk factors for these individuals. There are even greater challenges for people with SUDs under COVID-19 pandemic, as they will experience a higher infectious rate, limited access to healthcare system and support groups, inadequate food and housing, and increased likelihood of homelessness and incarceration. They may also face excessive discrimination, and have higher chances of relapses and overdose death. The research community should heed to the challenges and difficulties these individuals may experience in the pandemic, uncover scientific evidence to link COVID-19 severity and mortality with substance use, and advance effective treatment and prevention strategies for people with SUDs.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, Y.W.; methodology, Y.W. and R.S.; formal analysis, Y.W. and R.S.; resources, Y.W. and R.S.; data curation, Y.W. and R.S.; writing-original draft preparation, Y.W. and R.S.; writing-review and editing, Y.W. and R.S.; visualization, Y.W. and R.S.; supervision, Y.W.; project administration, Y.W.; funding acquisition, Y.W. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA) of the National Institutes of Health (NIH), grant number R21DA046223.

Acknowledgments

We thank Ammer Abdin, Madellyne Sanchez, and Song Zhang, for collecting and analyzing relevant literatures and intellectual discussions for this article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

1. World Health Organization. WHO Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) Dashboard. Available online: https://covid19.who.int/?gclid=CjwKCAjw_-D3BRBIEiwAjVMy7IzWSCeKBbqAB9-TFuuZjmGDDMEdt6ZvGZjjKeqBgN3kIA6kRl9XEhoCG9kQAvD_BwE (accessed on 28 June 2020).

2. Johns Hopkins University & Medicine. Coronavirus Resource Center. Available online: https://coronavirus.jhu.edu/ (accessed on 28 June 2020).

3. World Health Organization. WHO Director-General's Opening Remarks at the Media Briefing on COVID-19-11 March 2020. Available online: https://www.who.int/dg/speeches/detail/who-director-general-s-opening-remarks-at-the-media-briefing-on-covid-19---11-march-2020 (accessed on 17 March 2020).

4. United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime. World Drug Report 2019. Available online: https://wdr.unodc.org/wdr2019/ (accessed on 25 June 2020).

5. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. Key Substance Use and Mental Health Indicators in the United States: Results from the 2018 National Survey on Drug Use and Health; Center for Behavioral Health Statistics and Quality: Rockville, MD, USA, 2019.

6. Meazza, C.; Pagani, S.; Travaglino, P.; Bozzola, M. Effect of growth hormone (GH) on the immune system. Pediatr. Endocrinol. Rev. 2004, 1 (Suppl. 3), 490-495. [Google Scholar]

7. Pivneva, T.A. Microglia in normal condition and pathology. Fiziol. Zh. 2008, 54, 81-89. [Google Scholar]

8. Geng, Y.; Savage, S.M.; Razani-Boroujerdi, S.; Sopori, M.L. Effects of nicotine on the immune response. II. Chronic nicotine treatment induces T cell anergy. J. Immunol. 1996, 156, 2384-2390. [Google Scholar]

9. Pramanik, P. Cocaine Cardiac Toxicity: Revisited. In Cardiotoxicity; IntechOpen: Rijeka, Croatia, 2018. [Google Scholar]

10. Sharma, H.S.; Muresanu, D.; Sharma, A.; Patnaik, R. Chapter 11-Cocaine-Induced Breakdown of the Blood-Brain Barrier and Neurotoxicity. In International Review of Neurobiology; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2009; Volume 88, pp. 297-334. [Google Scholar]

11. Cadet, J.L.; Krasnova, I.N. Chapter 5-Molecular Bases of Methamphetamine-Induced Neurodegeneration. In International Review of Neurobiology; Hari Shanker, S., Ed.; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2009; Volume 88, pp. 101-119. [Google Scholar]

12. Reiner, B.C.; Keblesh, J.P.; Xiong, H. Methamphetamine abuse, HIV infection, and neurotoxicity. Int. J. Physiol. Pathophysiol. Pharmacol. 2009, 1, 162-179. [Google Scholar]

13. World Health Organization. "Solidarity" Clinical Trial for COVID-19 Treatments. Available online: https://www.who.int/emergencies/diseases/novel-coronavirus-2019/global-research-on-novel-coronavirus-2019-ncov/solidarity-clinical-trial-for-covid-19-treatments (accessed on 29 June 2020).

14. U.S. Food & Drug Administration. Coronavirus (COVID-19) Update: FDA Revokes Emergency Use Authorization for Chloroquine and Hydroxychloroquine. Available online: https://www.fda.gov/news-events/press-announcements/coronavirus-covid-19-update-fda-revokes-emergency-use-authorization-chloroquine-and (accessed on 29 June 2020).

15. World Health Organization. Draft Landscape of COVID-19 Candidate Vaccines. Available online: https://www.who.int/publications/m/item/draft-landscape-of-covid-19-candidate-vaccines (accessed on 19 June 2020).

Figure 1. ( A) Architecture of SARS-CoV-2 genome. The ORF1ab will be translated into two overlapping polyproteins, PP1a, consisting of NSP1-11, and PP1ab, consisting of NSP1-16, with the exception of NSP11, which is part of NSP12 in PP1ab. The rest of the ORFs encode the four structural proteins, S, E, M, and N, and several accessory proteins with unknown functions. ( B) Structure of SARS-CoV-2 virion. The lipid bilayer. embedded with S, E, and M proteins, capsulizes the single-stranded genomic RNA, which is stabilized by the N protein. The S protein is responsible for the recognition of host cell ACE2 receptor to gain cell entry.

Figure 4. Pathological effects of substances of abuse on various tissues and systems and their implied complications in COVID-19. ( A) Respiratory system; ( B) Cardiovascular system; ( C) Vascular endothelium; ( D) HPA axis stimulation and immunosuppression; ( E) Proinflammation and neuroinflammation.

Comorbid Conditions

Case Fatality (%)

Mortality (per 100,000 Population)

Comorbid Conditions

Not Hospitalize N (%)

Hospitalized N (%)

No Critical Illness N (%)

Critical Illness N (%)

Substance

Target System

Pathology

COVID-19

Tobacco (Nicotine)
Respiratory system

Increased severity and mortality [ 13, 81]

Immune system

Immune suppression,
Decreased CD8+ T-cells [ 83, 84]

Higher infection rate [ 85]

Increased inflammatory cytokines (TNFα, IL-1β, IL-18) and chemokines (CCL2, CCL8, and CXC3CL1); decreased anti-inflammatory factors, Bcl6, IL-10, and CCL25 [ 92]

CNS

Alcohol
Immune system

Increased proinflammatory cytokines, IL-1β and IL-6, and chemokine CCL-2 [ 98]

Spleen atrophy [ 100].

Impaired production of antibodies and lymphocytes [ 102]

CNS

Marijuana (THC, CBD)
Respiratory system

Enhanced COPD with tobacco [ 113, 114]

Increased severity and mortality [ 13, 81]

Immune system

Immunosuppression; reduced antibody response and T lymphocyte activities; reduced migration of macrophage [ 111]

Increased infection and reduced viral response and clearance [ 111]

Opioids (heroine, fentanyl, morphine)
Respiratory system

Increased severity and mortality [ 14, 15]

Immune system

Desensitizing HPA axis; inhibiting glucocorticoid release, increased IL-1β; neuroinflammation [ 120]

Cocaine
Cardiovascular system

Cardiac arrhythmias and acute MI; oxygen imbalance; microvascular diseases and thrombosis [ 122, 123, 124, 125, 126, 127, 129, 130, 131, 132]

Immune system

Stimulating HPA axis; immunosuppression; defects in antibody formation, lymphocyte proliferation, macrophage and NK activation [ 141, 142]

High incidence of viral infection [ 142]

CNS

Amphetamine, METH, MDMA
Cardiovascular system

Hypertension, tachycardia, and cardiomyopathy leading to pulmonary edema [ 16, 163];
Ischemic stroke and hypoxia; restricted blood flow [ 171, 172, 173, 174]

Immune system

Increased infection rate, depression, anxiety/despair [ 168, 169]

CNS

BBB damage due to loss of tight junction protein; edema [ 175, 176, 177, 178, 179]

Endotheliitis and CNS infection [ 53, 55, 56, 57, 180, 181, 182]

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Substance Use Disorder in the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Systematic Review of Vulnerabilities and Complications

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
As the world endures the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, the conditions of 35 million vulnerable individuals struggling with substance use disorders (SUDs) worldwide have not received sufficient attention for their special health and medical needs.

# data[].attributes.body
Second Article

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
The COVID-19 pandemic has created disruptions in our lives that can cause feelings of stress and anxiety. These feelings are normal. However, using alcohol, cannabis, or other substances to cope with negative feelings can make you feel worse and increase your risk of developing a substance use disorder.

To avoid harms related to substance use, try other ways to cope with stress and anxiety. The Canadian Centre on Substance Abuse has prepared an infographic summarizing ways to cope with stress, anxiety, and substance use during the COVID-19 pandemic. If you choose to consume alcohol or cannabis, consider monitoring your use and follow low-risk guidelines.

Alcohol

Over 20% of Canadians aged 18-54 report they are drinking more alcohol while at home due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Reasons for increased alcohol consumption include feelings of stress and anxiety, loss of routine, social isolation, and having more alcohol in the home due to stockpiling. If you choose to drink, pay attention to why and how frequently you are doing so.

Increasing your alcohol consumption may affect your health and well-being. Excessive alcohol consumption can weaken your immune system and make it harder for your body to fight infection.

To keep these risks at bay, try to:

The Canadian Centre for Substance Abuse offers a self-help guide called Knowing Your Limits with Alcohol: A Practical Guide to Assessing Your Drinking. This resource can be used independently or with the guidance of a healthcare professionally to track alcohol consumption and set goals to reduce intake to lower-risk levels.

Opioids

Since March, 2020, there has been a spike in overdose related calls in the Belleville area, and at least 2 overdose deaths. Please see below for information on what service providers and people who use drugs can do maintain safer substance use while also implementing COVID-19 social distancing and hygiene practices.

Please also be aware of The Overdose Prevention Line, which is available Monday to Friday from 10 am -10 pm, Saturday and Sunday from 10 am - midnight. Please call 1-888-853-8542 if you are about to use drugs and are located in Ontario.

Cannabis

It is important to know the risks of cannabis use and how they relate to COVID-19, especially if you have noticed your use increasing during this time. Cannabis does not prevent, treat, or alleviate symptoms of COVID-19. Smoking cannabis can also suppress the immune system, and negatively affect lung health. These impacts may worsen the symptoms of COVID-19 or other respiratory illnesses. In addition, vaping cannabis products from the illegal market has been linked to severe lung illnesses.

If you choose to use cannabis, take these steps to reduce risks to your health and prevent the spread of COVID-19

Avoid sharing smoking supplies with others, to prevent the spread of illness

Wash your hands thoroughly before bringing a cannabis product to your mouth

Choose safer, not-smoking ways to use cannabis, that do not directly impact your lungs

Obtain your cannabis from legal sources

Following Canada's Lower-Risk Cannabis Use Guidelines can also help to reduce your risk of harms.

Try to limit your use to once a week or less, if possible

Choose low-strength products, which can reduce your risk of developing dependency or mental health problems

Talk to your health care provider about cannabis use, and how it may interact with other medications

Getting Help

If you are struggling with substance use, do not hesitate to reach out for help through the resources listed on our Mental and Emotional Health during COVID-19 web page, or by visiting the links below:

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Substance use During the COVID-19 Pandemic - Hastings Prince Edward Public Health

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
The COVID-19 pandemic has created disruptions in our lives that can cause feelings of stress and anxiety. These feelings are normal. However, using alcohol, cannabis, or other substances to cope with negative feelings can make you feel worse and increase your risk of developing a substance use disorder.

# data[].attributes.headline
What's It All About?         First Article.  

# data[].attributes.subject
What's It All About?         First Article.  

# data[].attributes.body
The first article is by Yufeng Wei and Rameen Shah from the Department of Chemistry at New Jersey City University. In summary, this article goes into great detail about many substances including alcohol, nicotine, marijuana, cocaine, and opioids. While explaining the risks and bodily impact the substances may cause when used on their own as well as used amidst the COVID-19 pandemic. The article has also included a section to encourage users to seek help and how they can do so. In addition, this article explains in depth the outbreak and components of the virus itself.

# data[].attributes.headline
What's It All About?      Second Article.

# data[].attributes.subject
What's It All About?      Second Article.

# data[].attributes.body
The second article is by Hastings Price Edward Public Health. To summarize, this article shares statistics on substance use since the start of the COVID-19 pandemic and the many ways in which people can avoid abusing such substances. It is also said in this article how abusing substances can affect one's health as well as how someone can get help if ever found in a difficult cycle.

# data[].attributes.body
After comparing both articles, it is clear that they share similarities when it comes to their content and the way they have formatted their information. Personally, I have found that both articles have implemented the use of headings to separate their writings into sections for the reader's ease. Another similarity the two  articles have is the fact that they touch on the same substances (alcohol, opioids, nicotine, etc), which the article claims have had an increased use since the outbreak of COVID-19.  Both articles provide ways that substance abuse can be prevented and if in a situation where an individual is seeking help, how they can go about getting the help they require.

# data[].attributes.body
Among the multiple similarities regarding their content, the articles both hold some differences as well. One difference between the articles that really stood out to me was the length. The first article was packed with information and very long to say the least whereas the second article had similar information but to less of an extent resulting in a much shorter article than the first. Another difference between the articles was that the first one went into a lot of detail about each substance and the actual virus itself whereas the second article limited themselves to briefly explaining the virus while maintaining their focus on the substances use and abuse. Lastly, a difference between the articles had to be that the second article did not provide any references, although the first article provided acknowledgements and a lengthy set of references.

# data[].attributes.body
In my opinion, content from both articles were shared in a factual way. Neither of the articles had seemed biased in any way, they stuck to facts and statistics and did not seem to provide any personal feelings or thoughts which made reading the articles feel like I was not being persuaded to a certain opinion. For example, the second article provided many links to other articles and platforms where help can be found. The second article also stated that "over 20% of Canadians aged 18-54 report they are drinking more alcohol while at home due to the COVID-19 pandemic". The first article provided a countless amount of factual evidence as well as statistics to back up their claims. Overall, I feel both articles shared their information in a professional manner and did not allow any personal opinions overshadow their article.

# data[].attributes.body
Regarding the first article, a strength would be that it is deemed very credible considering the amount of references and information shared. On the contrary, the amount of information shared could be a weakness as well considering the article is very long and touches on many different aspects of the virus and substances, it could be easy for the reader to get lost when reading or not be willing to read an article as great in length. For the second article, a weakness would be that there is a lot more information and references they could have added resulting in a weakness. A strength of the second article would be that the text is bold, big, and spaced out, allowing a smooth flow to the reading, keeping the reader connected.

# data[].attributes.body
One Sociological Theory that can be applied to my chosen topic of Substance Use During a Pandemic is, the Functionalist Theory. The Functionalist Theory believes that each aspect of a society functions on their own to create a fully functioning society from the way each aspect performs their role. Substance Use During a Pandemic relates to the Functionalist Theory because of the rising use of substances during the pandemic, more people can be at risk for addiction and need help. Therefore, in regard to potentially having more people in need of rehab centers and counselling, there is an increased demand for counsellors, nurses, doctors, etc. resulting in a need for these jobs and roles to keep working to help maintain a successful society.

# data[].attributes.body
From comparing these articles, I have learned the difference between a good article and a great one. This will benefit me in my future endeavors because when I am in my other classes I will have more information to provide from my experiences comparing articles and discovering how to conduct an article analysis. In addition, I have learned that although the pandemic has caused great loss, hardships, and substance use, it has also given people the time to spend with family as well as developing new hobbies and skills that perhaps would not have been learned if not given the time. I also learned that the Sociological Theories can be found in anything within society whether we were knowledgeable of that before or not. I can use this as a citizen by paying more attention to what goes on within my community and finding its deeper meaning.