# data[].attributes.body
Ultimately, professional development is not just about acquiring new knowledge—it’s about refining how we teach, creating engaging learning experiences, and nurturing a lifelong love of learning in ourselves and our students.

# data[].attributes.headline
Tang JiaJun-The Importance of Immersive Environments in Israel Education

# data[].attributes.subject
Tang JiaJun-The Importance of Immersive Environments in Israel Education

# data[].attributes.body
One of the most critical aspects of the Israel education model is the immersive environment. Immersion transforms learning from a passive experience into an active, lived reality, enabling students to engage deeply with knowledge, emotions, and identity formation. This approach is widely applied in Israel trips, Jewish summer camps, and intensive experiential learning programs, all of which aim to create a holistic, integrative learning experience.

1. The Integrative and Comprehensive Nature of Immersion

Immersive environments in education are multifaceted. They integrate:

• Physical setting

• Time commitment

• Educational components

• Identity-building practices

By removing students from their familiar surroundings and placing them in an all-encompassing learning environment, immersion enables cognitive, emotional, and behavioral engagement on a deeper level. For example, in a Jewish summer camp, students do not just learn about Israel academically; they live in a space designed to simulate aspects of Israeli society, interact with Israeli counselors, and participate in cultural traditions such as flag-raising ceremonies, Israel Day events, and Hebrew immersion activities.

This holistic integration maximizes the cumulative impact of different learning experiences. Instead of a fragmented approach where learning happens in isolated moments, immersive education creates a continuous and reinforcing environment where students think, feel, and act within a specific framework.

2. My Personal Experience: A Military Training Camp

During high school, I participated in a seven-day military training program. The training took place in a remote mountain-based military camp, completely removing us from our usual school environment.

• New Identity Formation: We were divided into battalions, not based on our usual school classes. We lived in large dormitories that resembled military barracks, ate together in an orderly, command-driven cafeteria, and followed a strict, disciplined routine.

• Total Immersion in Routine: The military-style training extended beyond physical drills; it shaped our daily schedule, communication style, and group dynamics. For instance, mealtime was conducted in silence—we could only eat after every member of the battalion was seated, and no casual conversations were allowed.

One of the most striking immersive activities was a simulation exercise called “Rescue from the Fire”, where we had to save as many people as possible in a staged fire disaster. The atmosphere was intentionally heightened: dramatic music, loud motivational speeches, and emotional storytelling were used to stir deep emotional responses. Many of my classmates were moved to tears, fully immersed in the scenario. However, I found myself disconnected from the activity, questioning its necessity and impact.

This experience highlights a major drawback of immersive education:

• If a participant does not resonate with the core values or message of the experience, the immersion may feel artificial or even counterproductive.

• The depth of immersion does not automatically translate into meaningful engagement. While some of my classmates were deeply moved by the simulation, I found it unconvincing and emotionally manipulative, leading me to reject the intended lesson rather than embrace it.

3. Implications for Israel Education

My personal experience in military training offers important insights into the strengths and weaknesses of immersive education in Israel programs:

Strengths of Immersion:

• When students buy into the immersive experience, it can be transformative—fostering identity development, emotional attachment, and deep engagement.

• In Israel education, immersive travel experiences, mifgashim (encounters with Israelis), and role-playing historical narratives create memorable and impactful learning moments.

Potential Pitfalls:

• Lack of connection to the experience’s values can undermine engagement—students must feel authentically invested in the learning process.

• Overly scripted emotional experiences may backfire, leading students to question or reject the message instead of embracing it.

• Immersion without follow-up reflection risks creating intense but fleeting experiences that do not translate into long-term growth.

# data[].attributes.body
In terms of vehicles for Israel education, it seems as though we can’t judge whether a vehicle is uniformly superior.  Rather, each vehicle may produce results depending on specific educational goals.  Immersive environments like summer camp produce incredible results in religious education and Israel education.  Students often connect to tefillah in a deeper way than they can at school or at the synagogue.  Being surrounded by Israeli staff members and educators makes students feel connected to Israel on an emotional level.  This success seems more bounded by affective educational goals, as Alex Sinclair noted in his article.

When it comes to cognitive goals, the environment of the classroom may be more suited to having grounded text study, debate and intellectual exchange.  In an ideal world, every Jewish child would receive a day school education, a Jewish summer camp experience, youth Israel experience, and have a robust Jewish practice at home.  Unfortunately, we know that for many students this is not possible, and we fill in the gaps as best as we can.

# data[].attributes.body
One key aspect of the model that stands out is the role of immersive environments in Israel education. Immersive educational settings are described in the course material as transformative, offering learners the opportunity to engage with content in a comprehensive, uninterrupted manner. These environments can range from summer camps to school programs and trips to Israel, where participants are fully immersed in the experience.

Immersive environments are powerful because they engage learners cognitively, emotionally, and behaviorally. Unlike one-off educational activities, such as reading a book or attending a single lecture, immersive environments create a holistic experience. This approach often leads to deeper understanding and stronger emotional connections to the subject matter.

From my own experience as a teacher, I witnessed the impact of an immersive environment during a week-long educational retreat for students. This program allowed learners to live, eat, and study together while engaging in cultural and historical activities. The absence of competing distractions fostered a sense of community and a shared purpose, amplifying the educational impact.

An example from the course material is the mifgashim (encounters) between Israeli staff and young campers at North American summer camps. These interactions provide campers with a direct, personal connection to Israel, which cannot be achieved in a classroom setting. Similarly, trips to Israel, which encapsulate total immersion from the moment participants board the plane, offer unparalleled opportunities for engagement and learning.

In conclusion, the immersive aspect of the model is critical because it fosters a deep and lasting connection to the material. It encourages learners to fully integrate knowledge and emotions, creating meaningful and transformative educational experiences.

# data[].attributes.headline
Coordinators and their Challenges of Collaborating with an Established School Culture

# data[].attributes.subject
Coordinators and their Challenges of Collaborating with an Established School Culture

# data[].attributes.headline
Daniel Rosen -- thoughts on one aspect of the Melton model

# data[].attributes.subject
Daniel Rosen -- thoughts on one aspect of the Melton model

# data[].attributes.body
It seems to me as if the most important / influential aspect of the melton model is the first aspect: the fixed immutable factors relevant to a school, program, camp, or synagogue. Without nailing these down first, any program design will inevitably fail.

Denomination: Arguably the most important, any program designed for an institution should fit within the ideology / philosophy of the institution, which in Jewish terms, means denomination. Designing an orthodox program that includes separation of men and women, inclusion of traditional texts from the Talmud and other sources, strict rules of kashrut and halakha, and other orthodox things, won't be successful with a Reform institution. And the reverse is true: designing a Reform program for an Orthodox institution will be a failure. Knowing your audience, and the types of things they respond positively and negatively to, is hugely important.

School / program history: Knowing the history of anything, including schools / institutions, helps with designing for the present. Has this institution ever engaged in a robust program of Israel education before? How did it go? Where were successes, and where were failures? Knowing the history of participants and institutions allows you to try something new when necessary, and to draw on the successes of the past, if any are present.

Age of participants: In designing content and curriculum, it must be age appropriate. If designing for younger children, perhaps a deep dive into the geopolitical history of the middle east is not the best idea. But, for high schoolers, college aged students, or adults, a more nuanced, open, and detailed conversation about the history of the Arab-Israeli conflict could be appropriate. Age may factor in in areas that would be unexpected as well. For example -- if you are designing a multi-day overnight program, that would include picking meals. Perhaps for older children, the food that is served can be an opportunity for education about the food and culture of Israel, but for younger children with pickier tastes, serving labneh, tabouleh, koobeh, and falafel might not be successful.

Size of school / program: This is highly important for many reasons. How many participants will there be within the program? The size of an institution, generally, directly correlates to how much funding is available -- bigger institutions usually have more money available. Does this apply to the institution that you are designing for?

When designing a building, an architect must first understand the makeup of the land that is being built on. A building that is sitting on sand or dirt must be built differently than a building that is sitting on top of granite. They analyze the material, and design a foundation suited to that material, and the rest of the building comes next. Any educational program must be thought of in the same way, particularly something that has potential to be highly emotional, such as Israel education. Understanding the ground that the institution rests on is the critical first step in creating a successful program.

# data[].attributes.body
Ariel: thoughts on melton model

One aspect of the model that resonates most with me because of its importance would be the first aspect, conditions. Conditions include the denomination, size, age, and reputation of the school. From my experience as a teacher, the conditions largely affect many aspects of the student’s education, as well as a teacher’s mode of teaching. First, we have the denomination of the school. Different denominations have different customs and rituals. Reform synagogues include a lot more singing in prayers, no dress code, and maybe more lenient on the education with a focus more on fun. I have worked at two different Sunday Synagaoge schools and both were reformed and the same in that aspect. Before I taught, I was only exposed to Orthodox synagogues like Chabad which is what I attended with my family. There, we did not learn prayers with a melody, had a strict dress code, and it was not really fun most of the time. The size of the school greatly matters as well. The first school I worked at was a lot smaller, and the one I am currently at is three times as big. This means there is less individuality between teachers as well as student teacher relationships. At the old school, I knew every single teacher and most students in all of the grades. At my school now, I only know a handful of teachers and my students only. It feels a lot less personal, and I prefer a smaller school. I am also working with a different age this year, which shows me insight to one of the conditions in the Melton Model. At my last school I was working with 5th graders who are about 10 or 11 years old, and now I am working with ages three - seven. This makes a difference in the content I teach and the way I teach it as well. Many subjects I have covered in the past I can not cover now.

# data[].attributes.body
Looking at the Melton Center Model, the Intensifiers shape a framework for Israel Education with an upfront mission vision, visionary leadership, and a coordinator as the executive branch. Each part of this framework is important, and no part can be left out. However, I find the coordinator—the person who carries out the school policy related to Israel Education—to be the most important and challenged administrator.  This person has the time and the resources to put together a curriculum using a spiral structure to address properly the level of age of the students, he/she has the budget, the power, and the staff needed.

In most of the Jewish schools in Atlanta Georgia Israel Education is not an integrated subject to be taught, In the community Jewish school and some in the Solomon Shechter elementary-middle school there are a few elements of the model carried out, such as Shlichim, Shinshinim, Ivrit classes, 8th-grade trip to Israel. Most of the schools pick and choose the elements that can make a difference for their community.

Examining the situation in the Orthodox Jewish schools (3) in Atlanta GA, I find that Israel is not a part of the mission of the school. There are no activities related to Israel, there is no flag of Israel, a map of Israel. The school is not celebrating Yom Haatzmaut.

In these schools, there is no coordinator for this subject, and the “expert” is the Ivrit teacher. Most of the time these are teachers who are busy preparing, teaching, and mentoring students in Hebrew, the school does not create time into their schedule to devote to Israel Education.

I would like to share my experience at the Orthodox High School for Girls.

1.       Yom Haatzmaut celebration. In 2018 when Israel celebrated 70 years, I was able to put together a program (4 hours long) about Israel's innovations. For the students who do not have access to news, especially not about technology, it was a great opportunity to learn about innovations in science, technology, and space.

2.       In the first days of October 7 (Charavot Barzel) the administration consulted the Rabbis in the community and decided to read during Shacharit and Minchah Pirkeh Teehilim (Psalms). The students started to ask questions about the situation in Israel, after hearing that some of their relatives were fighting in Azah. The administration had to change its policy and bring the news. The Hebrew teachers were the ones who put together a project about Ottef Azah. Each student was responsible for one settlement and presenting the site, pointing out the history, geography, demography, agriculture and more aspects.  I would like to clarify that we were not allowed to discuss the war or political issues.

Since the project, the students were much more open to the situation in Israel and ready to raise money for the soldiers.

These are 2 small examples of bringing Israel Education into a Charedi school. I am convinced that a coordinator who has time to design the project was doing a better job than me. For me, it is a success.

# data[].attributes.headline
Limor's One Aspect of the Melton Model - מפגשים 

# data[].attributes.subject
Limor's One Aspect of the Melton Model - מפגשים 

# data[].attributes.body
An essential part of the model for Israel education is mifgashim, or encounters, particularly between diaspora Jews and Israeli peers. These personal interactions bridge cultural, linguistic, and geographical divides, allowing participants to form meaningful relationships. Mifgashim is a vital component of the model because it humanizes the concept of Israel and makes abstract ideas about Jewish identity and connection tangible and personal.

Why Mifgashim Are Important

Mifgashim are crucial because they provide a human face to the Israel-diaspora relationship. For many learners, Israel can feel distant or abstract—a concept discussed in textbooks or during lessons. Meeting Israeli peers, hearing their stories, and engaging in dialogue brings Israel to life in a way that no lecture or video can replicate. These encounters enable participants to ask questions, challenge assumptions, and discover shared values and experiences.

Another key strength of mifgashim is their role in fostering mutual understanding. Through structured or informal interactions, participants can explore the diversity of Jewish identities and gain a more nuanced understanding of Israel’s complexities. For instance, Israeli participants may share stories about their military service or their family histories, offering diaspora Jews a unique perspective on life in Israel. At the same time, diaspora Jews can share their own experiences of maintaining Jewish identity in a different cultural context, enriching the understanding on both sides.

Finally, mifgashim are an effective way to build lasting relationships. The friendships formed during these encounters often extend beyond the experience, creating networks connecting diaspora Jews with their Israeli counterparts. These relationships deepen learners’ emotional connections to Israel and reinforce their sense of belonging to a global Jewish community.

Personal Reflection

As a parent, I’ve seen the transformative power of mifgashim through the experiences of my twin boys. During a school exchange program, they participated in a mifgash with an Israeli school that hosted ten students from their school. First, the Israeli students came to the U.S., and later, my boys traveled to Israel. They loved the connections they made, and even today, they remain in touch with some of the Israeli students. These friendships have provided them invaluable insights into life in Israel, fostering a deeper understanding of the culture and creating lasting bonds.

Beyond the formal program, my boys have also had mifgashim with the children of my friends in Israel who are their age. These interactions allowed them to learn about Israeli culture and the daily lives of Israeli teens. Now in their 20s, they continue to chat with their Israeli friends in Hebrew and even plan their mifgashim without my involvement when they visit Israel. Watching these connections evolve has been incredibly rewarding, as it demonstrates how personal relationships can make Israel feel like a distant homeland and a living, breathing community they are part of.

Mifgashim are a vital aspect of the model because they transform the learning experience into a deeply personal and relational one. By fostering human connections, they bring the concept of Israel closer to learners and provide a richer understanding of Jewish identity. These encounters create opportunities for dialogue, challenge stereotypes, and build lasting bonds that reinforce a global sense of Jewish peoplehood. Incorporating mifgashim into educational programs ensures that learners engage with Israel not just as a place but as a living, breathing community.

# data[].attributes.body
Kfirah HaLevi- The Melton Model

# data[].attributes.body
The intensifiers are an important element of the Melton Model because it is a non-stagnant defined component of the model. The intensifiers are what directly influence the practice of Israel education. The visionary leadership and mission are essential for understanding the nature of the institution and deriving its goals for Israel education through mission statements. Even if the visions and mission statements are inaccurate to the day to day practices of Israel education, we can learn a lot about what the institution cares about and how it is organized administratively. I work for Hillel International, as I have discussed a few times. The mission and vision are very relevant today, I’m sure for all of us in our work, and it is no different for myself—post October 7 and into a new climate of Israel discourse. Hillel International has always prided itself on its pluralistic nature—a cornerstone of its mission statement and vision across Hillel communities on college campuses around the world. Today, upholding [religious] pluralism, let alone political pluralism is like skating on thin ice. This debacle illuminates everything we are discussing in this course: reconciling the complexity of Israel education leading into the Melton Model [intensifiers]. First, as Hillel professionals, we are reevaluating what prioritizing pluralism means, and how it relates to Hillel’s commitment to Israel. I worked for Hillel before October 7, and as an educator, we didn’t really delve into what pluralism means and what its confines are. After October 7, it is all we think about. How do we cater the best we can to our diverse Jewish audiences when we are now under scrutiny: we are suddenly too outwardly liberal for the more conservative Zionists in our community, but we are at the same time too Zionist for the left leaning Jewish community (who is struggling with their relationship to Israel; See: distancing debate). All in all, the mission and vision intensifier within the model is important and heavily controversial today. Because these elements are not necessarily set in stone, it is highly provocative to see how institutions and their senior visionary leadership stay dedicated to their mission under political turmoil. As we know, institutions rarely shift their missions due to their history and other factors. When it really matters, can these Jewish institutions uphold their self proclaimed stances on Israel or do they struggle to defend their mission due to fear of turning away sectors of their community?