# data[].attributes.headline
Their Eyes Were Watching God By Zora Neale Hurston

# data[].attributes.subject
Their Eyes Were Watching God By Zora Neale Hurston

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Get access to files anywhere through secure cloud storage and file backup for your photos, videos, files and more with Google Drive.

# data[].attributes.body
Hi Thalia,
Your presentation shows a good understanding of the text, and there was an interesting connection between some of the symbolism of the text and the conflict between Othello's Christian and pagan self.  However, at 3:30, it wasn't long enough to show sufficient knowledge, and the timer cut you off at what may have been the strongest analysis, Act 5.  There was some analysis of the other quotes, but it wasn't very specific to the language of the text.  "Arise, black vengeance!" is not much to support Othello's inner conflict - he's gearing up to murder his wife, but there isn't much in the language to support the pagan/Christian dichotomy.  The presentation was clear, but a little too casual.

# data[].attributes.body
Hi Thalia,
Your essay is tackling a big body of work - the podcast - and some big concepts in it. There is some good understanding of what is happening in the podcasts here, but it is coming out in a vague way, which is holding you back. I have a few suggestions to fix this:
1. Revise the introduction so that it is not talking about podcasts in general, but this podcast in particular. Name the episodes you'll be analyzing and give a brief (1-sentence) summary of them in the intro so that when you analyze the authorial choices, your reader will better understand why this is important.
2. Your body paragraphs need to have more evidence. While the evidence for a podcast might be more broad than a direct quote, it should be specific. Get into a little detail when describing the structure and talk specifically about what the podcast is saying. That way, you can connect it more readily to the structure. If the podcast is saying _____, why did they structure it like _____? Those details will go a long way to making your point more clear.

# data[].attributes.body
Hi Thalia,
Your presentation shows some knowledge of both texts in the context of the GI. There is some analysis of the authorial choices, but there is room for tighter connections between the text/evidence and the GI. The conclusion is almost 2:00, so shortening that and spending more time analyzing each text would pay off. Delivery is clear, but a little informal.