# data[].attributes.body
Because Academic freedom relies so heavily on the students and faculty to talk to each other freely and challenge ideas, universities could run the extreme risk for becoming a chamber of reflection in the instance of communication.

Identity within the text: "Many investigations and rules are justified ... ensuring that students feel safe. But I’m not at all sure the college classroom should be a place of comfort. It should be a place, rather, where students regularly face the challenge of difficult questions ... "

There has to be some kind of balance between feeling safe have being in a mindset to tackle the challenge. Not ensuring some kind of resistance is challenging the baseline of what school is suppose to achieve.

# data[].attributes.headline
Universities encouraging debate and dissent

# data[].attributes.subject
Universities encouraging debate and dissent

# data[].attributes.body
Encouraging debate would eventually lead to new and powerful conclusions made to help refine a student's critical thinning and to develop independent perspectives.

Identity within the text: "I agree with the philosopher Seana Valentine Shiffrin that when we search for the justifications for free speech, we tend to overlook its value in crafting our own identities, the way that a self can try on ideas like clothes, to discover which fit best. Sometimes the ideas will be beautiful; sometimes they’ll be ugly; sometimes they’ll look better on one person than another."

If you develop your own sense of self identity, it could transform you as a person to become more transformative within different cultures and ideas.

# data[].attributes.body
A lot of speech regulations are very vague when it's on campus, but giving a lot of power to those who take offense can lead to self-censorship within the community and an atmosphere where people are afraid to express certain viewpoints.

Identity within the text: "When large majorities of college students report pressure to self-censor, this is what they’re talking about. Surveys suggest that the principal reason students keep controversial ideas to themselves is to avoid the disdain not of their professors but of their peers."

This avoidance of distain from their peers can effectively push students away from voicing their own opinion and forming the little bit of controversy that causes students to think critically about their opinion and the facts.

# data[].attributes.body
If Universities make sure ideological frameworks are carried out, some type of academic freedom becomes very limited. Teachers and students may feel pressured to conform, when what the university wants is for them to explore unpopular ideas.

Identity within the text: "they give no fair warning of what’s forbidden, leading to such absurdities as stopping a student from passing out copies of the Constitution on Constitution Day; or investigating a professor for the sin of stopping to watch a “Back the Blue” rally..."

If Academic institutions allow this, it will force people not to explore outside of their initial think pattern, leading the institution to become stagnant or even linear within its innovation.

# data[].attributes.headline
Balancing free speech with social responsibility 

# data[].attributes.subject
Balancing free speech with social responsibility 

# data[].attributes.body
Universities must be able to navigate ethical concerns of such free speech. To ensure that academic discourse does not promote any kind of violence or misinformation.

Identity within the text: "Well, maybe; or maybe they were passionate about their cause and, in their passion, went too far. I quite agree that schools should punish those who disrupt the educational process, no matter how noble-sounding their reasons. Interrupting classes, making noise so that others can’t hear speakers,
blocking access, taking over buildings — all of these are less acts of dissent than
assertions of raw power."

These violent acts could potentially block other students from learning and taking their own side. This could be seen as oppressive and the opposite of what learning can and should be.