# data[].attributes.body
Cons:

His 15 million trees in the San Joaquin Valley consume more than 400,000 acre-feet of water a year

nearly 100,000 acres planted in permanent crops, is completely reliant on the government’s supply of mountain water

In a valley of dead rivers, each one killed on behalf of agriculture

The water is being taken from unsuspecting farmers in an irrigation district in Tulare County

Pros:

Resnick’s billions rely on his ability to master water, sun, soil, and even bees

water sent to Kern County — 1.4 million acre-feet a year — has doubled the cropland

their crops aren’t crops but heart-healthy snacks and life-extending elixirs. Stewart refers to the occasional trek between Lost Hills and Beverly Hills

These are trees and vines raised in nurseries and put into the ground at a cost of $10,000 an acre to satisfy the world’s growing appetite for nuts and fruits

# data[].attributes.body
The State Water Project that allowed western Kern County to grow into a farming behemoth has given no water or very little water over the past three years amid the worst drought in California history. If this were any other part of Kern, the farmers would be reaching into the earth to make up the difference.Today, most everything in this desolate reach of Kern County, save for the oil wells, belongs to Paramount Farming, which belongs to the Resnicks.

# data[].attributes.body
Here, private water jumps from Tulare County to Kern County, but government jurisdictions don’t count. On one side of the road and the other, for miles in both directions, the dirt belongs to Wonderful. I stand over the pipes and give them a hard slap. They slap back with the cold vibration of water.

# data[].attributes.body
This is the domain of Stewart Resnick, the richest farmer in the country. Resnick’s billions rely on his ability to master water, sun, soil, and even bees. The dispute over the “no fly zone” was finally resolved by the invention of a netting that Resnick sheathes around his mandarins each spring. The control Resnick exercises inside his $4.5 billion privately held company does relinquish to one person: his wife, Lynda, vice chairman and co-owner, the “Pomegranate Queen,” as she calls herself. pull over into the dirt of a pomegranate orchard, the ancient fruit that the Resnicks have turned into POMWonderful, the sweet purple juice inside a swell-upon-swell bottle

# data[].attributes.body
It pertains to the broader context of water rights and allocation issues in the Central Valley. The drought exacerbates existing tensions over water usage and distribution, bringing to light the vulnerabilities and complexities of californias water management system discussed throughout the artical. teh drought may also serve as a catalyst for increased scrutiny and debate surrounding water policies and practices, futher underscroing the relevance of Articals One's exploration.

# data[].attributes.body
One likly explores the cnsolidation of water rights and resources by powerful entites, such as The Resnick family, in CA central Valley. The resnicks ability to acquire significant water resources may reflect the themes disccues throught teh article regarding concentration of water rights in teh hands of a few influential individuals or corporations Also the expansion into the wine industry coudl influence the region's water allocations practices and potentially exacerbate existing tensions over water usage betweeen agricultural, industrial, and residential sectors

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
The Wonderful Company, the corporate arm of Beverly Hills billionaires Stewart and Lynda Resnick, promotes itself incessantly as an exemplar of social responsibility and a guardian of sustainable agriculture. "As an agricultural company, we are deeply committed to protecting and conserving our natural resources," it says right there on its website.

Don't tell that to the company's neighbors in Paso Robles, the heart of California's Central Coast wine country. They're infuriated by the clear-cutting of an oak forest on land managed by Justin Vineyards, a Wonderful subsidiary, to make room for new grape plantings for its Justin Wines brand. Wonderful acquired the winery from founder Justin Baldwin in 2010.

They&#8217;ll suck our wells dry, and then we&#8217;ll have to move somewhere else. We weren&#8217;t planning on doing that.

The action, which appeared to start in early June and was halted by San Luis Obispo County soon after its discovery, has left hillsides bare and gray, denuded of vegetation and vulnerable to storm-fed erosion. Neighbors of the property, which is located just west of Paso Robles, say they're also concerned that a large reservoir excavated on the property will enable the company to drain groundwater they depend on.

"The only thing that allows us to live on this land is this underground aquifer," says Neil Heaton, 66, a fourth-generation resident and farmer who does environmentally sustainable dry-farming of grapes and walnuts on his property abutting the Wonderful parcel. "They'll suck our wells dry, and then we'll have to move somewhere else. We weren't planning on doing that."

(See the video below, from the San Luis Obispo Tribune.)

The reaction has extended to the Paso Robles and San Luis Obispo restaurant community, where some restaurants are boycotting Justin wines. "What they did is an injustice, and we can't support that," says Debbie Thomas, owner of Thomas Hill Organics, a Paso Robles farm-to-table restaurant that has taken Justin off its wine list.

" This just has me sad," Greg Holt, owner of the Big Sky Cafe in San Luis Obispo, wrote on his business's Facebook page last week. "You just don't do that to the Earth. I get private property rights, but it just ain't right to remove all those trees. As such, we are going to remove Justin wines from our list. They grow great grapes, and make GREAT wine, but I have to follow my heart here. Some things are just more important."

The extent to which the company's actions violated local law is unclear. The basis for the county's stop-work order is a county ordinance requiring a permit for grading at more than a 30% slope. But tradition, rather than ordinance, protected the oaks themselves.

Members of the community say that until now, it didn't seem necessary to put the principle in writing. "If you're a resident of Paso, you know you don't cut down the oaks without a permit," Thomas says. The very name of the town, she observes, derives from the Spanish for "Pass of the Oaks." In the wake of the Justin controversy, the county board of supervisors will be taking up a deforestation ordinance on an urgent calendar sometime in the next few weeks.
RELATED: The "science" behind Lynda Resnick's Pom Wonderful juice " RELATED: Something's not right about this California water deal "
In a statement issued from Wonderful's Los Angeles headquarters, a spokesman for Justin referred to its "long-standing commitment to... responsible environmental stewardship." He said the company has "made every effort to comply with local ordinances for this project" and is "actively cooperating with officials to address their concerns." The statement said that "among other efforts, we will plant 5,000 oak trees across our properties."

No one is sure how many oaks were bulldozed. Local estimates range from several hundred to as many as 8,000. The entire parcel is more than 300 acres, but the work was done on only a portion of unplanted land. Local residents say the grading wasn't immediately apparent because it took place at locations that aren't visible from the highway, and debris burning was done at night, when the source of smoke wasn't easily determined.

"The first tip was when we saw truck after truck of oak logs going by," says Justin Smith, whose Saxum Vineyards is located about a mile from the site.

Devin Best, executive director of the Upper Salinas Las Tablas Resource Conservation District, says the company received a permit for the reservoir, but didn't submit the tree-removal or grading for review. "Their impression is they were exempt," he says. But proper conservation practice should have stayed the bulldozers' march, he says, since the bare hillsides are vulnerable to erosion.

"The big concern is if there's a storm event, how will that change the environment," he says. A certain amount of vegetation clearing is permissible, he says, "but clear-cutting is a very different practice. That's native vegetation and a habitat for wildlife. Practices like this on a slope this steep is the far end of the spectrum."

You just don't do that to the Earth.... As such, we are going to remove Justin wines from our list.

Vineyard owners have been at war with oak trees for decades, since vineyards tend to encroach on stands of old trees. In the most controversial episode before now, Kendall-Jackson winery destroyed more than 849 old oaks in 1996 to make room for a vineyard expansion in Santa Barbara County. That provoked a local campaign for an oak-preservation ordinance, which failed in a 1999 initiative vote but was enacted by the county in 2003.

The Justin affair brings the Resnicks, whose other brands include Fiji Water and POM Wonderful pomegranate juice, under what may be an unwelcome spotlight. Wonderful has been at odds with water users in central California, and with federal regulators who were unhappy with its promotion of pomegranate juice with what the Federal Trade Commission called "misleading and inadequately supported" health claims. The FTC challenged those claims in 2010 and emerged largely victorious from a drawn-out legal battle with the company. The Resnicks, who claim to be the biggest growers of pistachios and almonds in the world, tend to prevail in battles over rights to the water needed to feed those trees, however.

With the clearing of the Paso Robles hillsides a fait accompli, local officials are pondering what can be done to mitigate the damage. "We're not sure we can make them regrade," says County Supervisor Frank Mecham, whose district covers Paso Robles and the Wonderful property.

Locals will be eying the heavens nervously as wet weather approaches late this year. "We're trying to get some sense of how to head off the erosion certain to come this winter," Heaton says. "One good storm, and a good portion of that silt covering all those hills will be heading right for our income property." At the very least, he says, "they need to put some sort of retaining wall to keep that silt on their side, not here."
Keep up to date with Michael Hiltzik. Follow @hiltzikm on Twitter, see his Facebook page, or email michael.hiltzik@latimes.com. Return to Michael Hiltzik's blog.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Column: Billionaire Resnicks' Justin Vineyards bulldozes forest of old oaks, sparking uproar

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
The Wonderful Company, the corporate arm of Beverly Hills billionaires Stewart and Lynda Resnick, promotes itself incessantly as an exemplar of social responsibility and a guardian of sustainable agriculture.

# data[].attributes.body
In the article one deals with water rights and water allocation in California Central Valley. The issue surrounding water storage and water are directly related to article One because they highlight the contentious debates and conflict over water usage, distribution and access in the region. The struggles over water storage such as the construction of dams, reservoirs, and water infrastructure, often intrsect with the broader theme explored in Articles One, uncluding agriculture intrests, environmental concerns and political power dynamics.

# data[].attributes.body
Water storage and allocations are often issues of federalism due to the distribution of powers and responsibilities between the federal government and state governments. Overall the divison f responsibilities between federal, state, and local governments creates a complex landscape for water storage and managment, with issues often requiring collaberation and negotiatio among mulitple levels of government