# data[].attributes.body
Mariculture itself can elevate the economic state of a country through marine market. Since the demand of food security is rising as the population risen through, the existence of mariculture could help by securing the food security. In which, this could also help the country (or those who provide the mariculture) in gaining economic values

# data[].attributes.headline
Cons of Waste management (Fariha Kashif)

# data[].attributes.subject
Cons of Waste management (Fariha Kashif)

# data[].attributes.body
Mariculture operations often face regulatory confusion due to overlapping authorities and rules. This creates gaps in enforcement, making accountability challenging. Clearing up this confusion and getting stakeholders on the same page can lead to a more sustainable and responsible industry.

# data[].attributes.body
•From a farmer's point of view:

*helps in diversifying crops.

*Provides stable employment.

*Also helps in producing more food in less

space.

• From a Local's point of view:

*By producing seafood locally, we reduce the carbon footprint associated with transporting seafood from distant locations.

*Helps in increasing local food security.

*Builds teamwork amongst or between communities

*Helps in diversifying local economy.

# data[].attributes.body
Poor waste management - ranging from non-existing collection systems to ineffective disposal -causes air pollution, water and soil contamination. Open and unsanitary landfills contribute to contamination of drinking water and can cause infection and transmit diseases.

# data[].attributes.body
Limited access to advanced waste management technologies and resources can obstruct the ability of mariculture operations to comply with regulations, complicating enforcement efforts.

# data[].attributes.body
In terms of economic value, first of all, aquaculture needs certain scientific research support, so that the economy of human and material resources paid in the early stage is relatively large. Scientific research has great uncertainty, which cannot guarantee the successful implementation of aquaculture in the laboratory, but whether it is successfully applied in real life is impossible to estimate. Secondly, when aquaculture is used in wetlands, we cannot predict whether it will create economic value for the local people.

# data[].attributes.headline
Cons of Waste management (Fariha Kashif)

# data[].attributes.subject
Cons of Waste management (Fariha Kashif)

# data[].attributes.body
Effective waste management in mariculture requires cooperation among various stakeholders, including governments, industry players, local communities, and NGOs. Coordinating these efforts can be challenging and may lead to conflicts of interest or differing priorities.

# data[].attributes.headline
CONS of Waste Management        ( Fariha Kashif )

# data[].attributes.subject
CONS of Waste Management        ( Fariha Kashif )

# data[].attributes.body
NGOs sometimes face skepticism or pushback from the public or industry stakeholders, who may view their actions as overly critical or uninformed. This can undermine their efforts to promote sustainable waste management practices.

# data[].attributes.body
Fish waste in the sea

Reduced area

# data[].attributes.body
1. Environmental Impact: Mariculture can have negative environmental impacts, such as:
- Habitat destruction or alteration
- Water pollution from waste and chemicals
- Escaped farmed species affecting wild populations
2. Disease and Parasites: Mariculture can increase the risk of disease and parasites, including:
- Spread of disease from farmed to wild species
- Parasites affecting farmed species and potentially impacting human health
- Development of antibiotic-resistant bacteria
3. Feed and Resource Usage: Mariculture often relies on wild-caught fish and resources for feed, which can lead to:
- Overfishing and depletion of wild fish populations
- High carbon footprint and energy usage
- Potential for unsustainable resource extraction

# data[].attributes.body
As a government representative, we have to take into account the environmental impact of biodiversity. To some extent, when we conduct aquaculture on a large scale, we cannot guarantee whether we will destroy the ecological balance that has remained relatively stable in nature. If we do aquaculture blindly or for the sake of economic development, we cannot predict what its consequences will do to our human beings. And for some aquatic organisms after large-scale cultivation of biological resources will be increased, whether we have enough resources to provide aquaculture this is a need to consider the problem.

# data[].attributes.body
1. Environmental Impact: Mariculture can have negative environmental impacts, such as:

- Habitat destruction or alteration

- Water pollution from waste and chemicals

- Escaped farmed species affecting wild populations

2. Disease and Parasites: Mariculture can increase the risk of disease and parasites, including:

- Spread of disease from farmed to wild species

- Parasites affecting farmed species and potentially impacting human health

- Development of antibiotic-resistant bacteria

3. Feed and Resource Usage: Mariculture often relies on wild-caught fish and resources for feed, which can lead to:

- Overfishing and depletion of wild fish populations

- High carbon footprint and energy usage

- Potential for unsustainable resource extraction

# data[].attributes.body
Disagreement as a law enforcer for mariculture :
The environmental impact:
Marine animals will potentially be harmed due to farming
Which can lead to destruction and pollution

1.

Farm animals can escape in wild which will effect the biodiversity

1.

It is important to balance economics with the habitat of marine