# data[].attributes.headline
Do these editorials seem to support or reject the Supreme Court's decision with in Brown?  What evidence supports your position? 

# data[].attributes.subject
Do these editorials seem to support or reject the Supreme Court's decision with in Brown?  What evidence supports your position? 

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Get access to files anywhere through secure cloud storage and file backup for your photos, videos, files and more with Google Drive.

# data[].attributes.headline
What connection to the Cold War do these events have? 

# data[].attributes.subject
What connection to the Cold War do these events have? 

# data[].attributes.headline
Does the Civil Rights Movement of the 1950s-60s still have relevance today? 

# data[].attributes.subject
Does the Civil Rights Movement of the 1950s-60s still have relevance today? 

# data[].attributes.headline
Jaxson- Supports because, "enjoy not only equal facilities but the same facilities in the same schools"

# data[].attributes.subject
Jaxson- Supports because, "enjoy not only equal facilities but the same facilities in the same schools"

# data[].attributes.body
this article does support with the brown families decision because they use the all men are to be treated equal

# data[].attributes.body
New York Times Supports- They say that all men are equal before the law. If men are equal, children are equal too.
Chicago Supports - Racial segregation violates the spirit and letter of our Constitution.
Washington D.C. Supports - It will bring to an end a painful disparity between American principles and practices.
Mississippi Against - White and Negro children in the same schools will lead to miscegenation.
Atlanta Neutral - It talks about that it does not mean schools will integrate or segregate. It is no time to indulge demagogues on either side nor to listen to those who always are ready to incite violence and hate.
Boston Supports - Constitution is a growing document.
Virginia Against - People of the south are justifited in their bitterness concerning this decision.

# data[].attributes.body
FIRST-Supports-"Gods Chillun"- All people and children are the same, all gods chilren
SECOND-"meaningful"supports
THIRD-Supports, "pride and gratification'
FOURTH-doesnt support-"miscegenation'
FIFTH-supports-'its no time for hasty actions
SIXTH-supports"proves that the consitiution is growing"
SEVENTH-doesnt support,says that people being bitter is okay because its a violation

# data[].attributes.body
¨All God´s Chillun¨-supports

¨The Supreme Court has given us time¨-agianst

# data[].attributes.body
All Gods Chillun - Supports the decision they call the supreme court "the guardian of our national conscience"
Defender - Against "The beginning of the end of... American society."
Post and Times Herald - Supports, everything they write is saying that this will save society
Daily News - Against It was written by a southerner
Herald - Supports, the title is Equality redefined.
Cavalier Daily - Against

# data[].attributes.body
The article supports the Brown Vs Board of Education because they agree with having all children to be given equal opportunities, and not be segregated.
The second article agrees with the Supreme Courts decision because they imply how they made an "unanimous" decision when the decision was made.
The third paragraph supports the Supreme Courts decision because it talks about how this decision will prove how equality id best for The United States.

# data[].attributes.body
thr

# data[].attributes.body
1) The first news article does support the Supreme Court's decision because the title itself shows unity.
The second paragraph is in favor of the Supreme Court's decision because "unanimously" means in agreement to. Therefore, it is in an agreement with the Court's decision.
The third paragraph is in favor of the Court's decision because it claims that, "It will bring to an end a painful disparity...". It also came from Washington D.C.
The fourth section denies the Supreme Court's decision because it claims that there would be blood on the marble steps.
The fifth paragraph remains neutral on the Supreme Court's decision, but in some cases it shows an agreement. This is because it says that people shouldn't be "ill" about the topic.
The sixth section is in agreement with the decision of the Supreme Court because it claims that the Constitution is still a "growing document".
The last paragraph is against the Supreme Court's decision because they feel as though the court may change its mind.
2) Some of the editorials were similar because many showed support for the Court's decision, but in other cases, some disagreed. The reason for the different perspectives is because of how people handled segregation. Some of the articles were for the blacks or to ease in white people towards the change. Other articles stayed with the whites' opinions.

# data[].attributes.body
Supports - because it supports equal facilities
(Chicago) Does not support - thinks that segregation holds society together
(Washington D.C.) Supports - states that it will restore faith in Americans
(Mississippi) Does not support - stating that it will lead to miscegenation
(Boston) Supports - the American government is growing from this situation
(Univ. of Virginia) Does not support - it is stating that it will change how the people in the south think about segregation since its been in place for so long

# data[].attributes.body
Article 1
The New York Times article "God Chillun" shows their support on the Supreme Courts decision on ending segregation as shown in the title of the article, location of the articles organization, and the substance of the Article. The Articles Title is distinctly named "All Gods Chillun" because it shows that everyone black or white are united under Gods care hinting to their opinion on how segregation isn't the answer because its the opposite of unity. The New York Times organization who wrote the article is located in the northern states of America who predominately has the opinion on equal rights for African Americans therefore it is more likely then not that the New York Times has the same opinion. In their article the New York Times states "Declaration did not intend to say that all men are equally intelligent, equally good or equal in height or weight. They meant to say that all men were, and ought to be equal before law." they are referring to our founding fathers creation of the Declaration of Independence that is the outline of our country that states all men are created equally but not in individual characteristics but individual legal rights. The founding fathers created the constitution which the Supreme Court is designed to deem what is constitutional and what is unconstitutional inferring that the New York times agrees with the Supreme Courts decision because they provided the correlation between the Founding Fathers opinion on segregation
Article 2:

# data[].attributes.body
1.supports -the courts decision because it thinks all children are gods children.
2. Doesn't support - thinks its against our constitution
3. supports- states how it will help restore american principles
4. Doesn't support- believes that it will lead to mixed relationship and mixed children

# data[].attributes.body
-The first document supports the courts decision because it is in favor of equal opportunities for African Americans.
-The second document supports the decision because it compares the courts decision to two major American events and states that it was more important.
-The third document supports because it is titled "A Healing Decision"- therefore it was an improvement for America
-"Bloodstains on White Marble Steps" does not support because it will lead to miscegenation.
-"The supreme Court Has Given us Time" does not support, because it does not want white children going to school with African Americans.
-"Equality Redefined" is in favor because it believes the constitution should change with time
-"Violates' our Way of Life" is not in favor, because whites have the right to be mad.

# data[].attributes.headline
1.) this supports it because it is from the north and makes black and white children just  children not with color differences. 

# data[].attributes.subject
1.) this supports it because it is from the north and makes black and white children just  children not with color differences. 

# data[].attributes.body
2.) This supports it because it is from the north and then says how bad it was.
3.)It supports
4.)It doesn't support because it list all the bad things that would happen if they integrate
5.)It doesn't support because it is trying to calm it down and stay the same.
6.)

# data[].attributes.body
Supports because the title of the first article creates a sense of unity that everyone is equal.

# data[].attributes.body
1a. Times supports because the editorial states "If men are equal, children are equal, too".
1b. Defender supports because the editorial states "This means the beginning of the end of the dual society in American life and the. . . segregation which supported it"

# data[].attributes.body
Supports
- NY Times article supports Brown through expressing how important education is for children and how segregation holds them back
- The article "End of Du
Doesn't Support

# data[].attributes.headline
#1 supports, it is coming from a northern city first of all and states "of all men and children"

# data[].attributes.subject
#1 supports, it is coming from a northern city first of all and states "of all men and children"

# data[].attributes.body
All Gods Chillun, supports
End of Duel Society, supports
a 'Healing' Decision

# data[].attributes.body
1) Supports because it says that all the people should be treated equal
2) Supports because it states that segregation violates our constitution
3) Supports compares segregation to a open wound
4) Against because mixing the schools will cause chaos
5)

# data[].attributes.body
1. supports- the title is implying "all God's children" , meaning all as one
2. supports -"segregation violates the spirit and letter of our constitution"
3. Supports- this shows that America is proud of the courts decision and believes it will make America better
4. Does not support- "mixed marriages lead to mongrelization to the human race"
5.

# data[].attributes.body
All Gods Chillun - Supports in line 6 and 7 also 13 and 14 talks about how it meant ALL men including children

End of duel society - Supports mentions the constitution and how segregation violates it

A healing decision - supports states it will end the suffering and heal the wound (segregation)

Bloodstains on white marble steps - disagrees says it will cause miscegenation and cause mixed marriages

The supreme court has given us time - supports? likes how Georgia has time to think about desegregating schools and can think clearly

equally redefined - supports? states the facts and doesn't show dislike for the court taking back segregation

Violates way of life - justifies the segregation and why people still think that way (they were raised up with it)

2) They all say the same facts and have the same feels everyone else has, based on if they are for segregation. Most of them are based emotions

# data[].attributes.headline
1. Supports because it says all men are created equal

# data[].attributes.subject
1. Supports because it says all men are created equal

# data[].attributes.body
2. supports because "segregation violates the spirit and letter of our constitution"
3. supports because it says americans can be proud in the court's decision
4. against because it says the combining of schools will mongrelize the human race
5. against because it tells people who are worrying that things will be fine even though the court made this decision
6. supports because it says the segregation is an abuse of America's democracy
7. against because it supports the feelings of the south

# data[].attributes.body
Supports

# data[].attributes.body
1.Supports
2.Supports because it mentions that segregation violates the constituion
3. Supports because it compares segregation to a open wound
4. Against because it says mixing races will lead to the mongrelization of the human race
5. against because it says the court has given them time before they have to integrate
6. Supports because it says the constitution is a living document
7. Against because it claims that integrating goes against the southern way of life

# data[].attributes.headline
Supports, because they laid the foundation of later laws making every man equal. 

# data[].attributes.subject
Supports, because they laid the foundation of later laws making every man equal. 

# data[].attributes.body
End of Dual Society: supports, "will never be as meaningful as the unanimous decision"
A 'Healing' Decision: supports, "it will serve -- and speedily -- close to an ancient wound too long allowed to fester"
Bloodstains on White Marble Steps: against, "white and Negro children will lead to miscegenation"

# data[].attributes.body
the speech supports because it says everyone should come together instead of segregation and unify and presidents Eisenhower speech is similar because he talks about religion, race and sex and how we should all unify together

# data[].attributes.body
supports, because it's more important than the bombs

# data[].attributes.body
yes , because their civil rights movements today but their is no law enforced that says that they are segregated but peoples thoughts and actions can have their own opinions which results into the starbucks incident

# data[].attributes.body
Times: the article support because all men are equal
defenders: support
post and Times: Support
Daily News: reject
Constition: reject
Herald: reject
Violates way of life: support

# data[].attributes.headline
It connects to the cold war because in both instances the United states military sent men in to protect the rights of a group of people

# data[].attributes.subject
It connects to the cold war because in both instances the United states military sent men in to protect the rights of a group of people

# data[].attributes.body
Yes the civil rights movement still has relevance today because stereotypes or people being biased will always exist in this world.

# data[].attributes.headline
Yes, It is relevant today because it still affects the make up of are society.

# data[].attributes.subject
Yes, It is relevant today because it still affects the make up of are society.

# data[].attributes.headline
Jaxson- 2.) Supports because, "the end of a dual society"

# data[].attributes.subject
Jaxson- 2.) Supports because, "the end of a dual society"

# data[].attributes.body
2: that its the beginning of a new duel society with everyone and anyone

# data[].attributes.body
Equality Redefined supports because of the statement "constitution is still growing" this shows progressiveness

# data[].attributes.body
Supports
- The article end of dual society describes that Brown winning is like the atomic bomb which lead us to our victory
- The article "A Healing Decision" is supporting Brown through explaining how it will heal Americans and bring back their values and faith in their traditions
Against
-The article from Jackson Mississippi show how the South is mad about the court decision

# data[].attributes.headline
Supports because, "A 'Healing' Decision"

# data[].attributes.subject
Supports because, "A 'Healing' Decision"

# data[].attributes.headline
Yes because if not for the civil rights movement modern society would be very different 

# data[].attributes.subject
Yes because if not for the civil rights movement modern society would be very different 

# data[].attributes.headline
defender supports the claim because it references how not even the atomic bomb is as great of a change as this will be

# data[].attributes.subject
defender supports the claim because it references how not even the atomic bomb is as great of a change as this will be

# data[].attributes.body
This connects to the cold war, because for both the Cold war and Little Rock, the US and its military has a goal of protecting equality and human rights. For example, even though a majority of people wanted to murder and harm the black kids that attended the school, the governments job is to defend the constitution no matter what. As Eisenhower says, "without distinction as to race, sex, language or religion". He believed that he should protect the civil rights of all people of different characteristics because we were all part of the United Nations and striving for world peace.

# data[].attributes.body
Yes, the civil rights movement is still relevant because some people still socially discriminate against certain people and races. Without the physical law, people would act against others because of their ethnicity, sex or race, not always physical, but verbally. For example, when fighting for all of their rights, blacks do a sit-in at a lunch place. People spit on them and attack them verbally and physically because it is okay to and there is no legal document to stop them. Even with documentation, people still discriminate in private because verbal discrimination cannot always be proved by government officials and secrecy is dominant in the community. In order to ensure actual rights, they had to be fought for and people had to show the whites who they were and why they deserved the rights as stated by Malcolm X .

# data[].attributes.headline
daily news does not support the claim because this news outlet believes it will only lead to violence and destruction. 

# data[].attributes.subject
daily news does not support the claim because this news outlet believes it will only lead to violence and destruction. 

# data[].attributes.body
The Cold War and Little Rock are connected because both events are about people being equal and army men being involved to prevent the spread of something.

# data[].attributes.body
The Cold War is connected to the Little Rock events because the effect of both was to maintain peace. The purpose of the cold war was to not allow communism to enter the United States and destroy peacefulness. Similarly, during the Little Rock events the purpose of allowing them to go to the school was to be in compliance with the standards of the UN for peace. For example, "there they affirmed 'faith in fundamental human rights'". President Eisenhower allowed for the nine students to enter the school because it's their right, proposed by the UN to maintain peace.

# data[].attributes.body
Yes, the Civil Rights Movement still has relevance today because there is still bias and protests for equality in the United States and around the world.

# data[].attributes.body
It connects because the U.S. won't allow 9 students go to school based on their looks. But at the same time, the U.S. is a part of the United Nations, and is expected to uphold the rights of the world. Also, the U.S. is afraid of change. America doesn't want Communism to spread, nor do most of the white people want integration in schools to spread.

# data[].attributes.body
Yes, because they were fighting to be the same and not discriminated. Even today, while it is better then doing nothing wrong and getting lynched, some are still discriminated against, so the movement is still relevant as it has not entirely achieved its goal.

# data[].attributes.body
There is a connection between the cold war because it shows the government trying to keep the peace between both the world and in there own country.

# data[].attributes.body
It is still relevant because there are still black people fighting for their rights. Some white people are treating black people as though they are different. For example, when white people walk past black people or are in an elevator with them, the white people hold on to their belongs as if they were to get jumped. Also, there are still people that make racist comments. An example of that was when a young boy in Florida wrote a racist promposal saying, "If I were black I'd be picking cotton, but I'm white so I'm picking you". This shows how their is still racism in the U.S. and how some people see it as a joke (similar to the Civil Rights movement).

# data[].attributes.body
Yes because there's still protesting about rights, discrimination is still around in the present world, there's still violence based on ethnicity, sex, and race. Even after the Civil Rights act was passed in 1964, the past is still present and looms in today's world.

# data[].attributes.body
Yes, the civil rights movement of the 50's and 60's is still relevant today. Since then America has made tremendous progress in regards to civil rights. However, today in 2018 discrimination still takes place. In comparison to the sit-ins that African Americans did during the civil rights movements, where no harm was posed to the white people, two black men were recently forced to leave a Starbucks. The sit-ins consisted of African Americans sitting in a restaurant to insist on gaining rights. They did not intend to harm anyone or cause chaos in the restaurant, however white people would result to pouring food and drinks on the protesters. When African Americans were recently kicked out of a Starbucks they hadn't done anything to disturb the business, they were just waiting on someone. In both cases, African Americans were discriminated against on bases of race. We can assume the black men were kicked out for their race because in the same situation a white woman wouldn't have been kicked out.

# data[].attributes.body
Yes the civil rights movement does have relevance today. It may not be as major as not letting schools integrate, but its events like the Starbucks incident still happen. If that was racism is up to the viewers choice. Some may reason that there is no more racism in the workforce or in any aspect of being social, but there still is because people have their own views. Racism is an on going event that people still have to fight against, it isn't as a big thing now but overall equality is important. Equality will be met but it can never be fully accepted because people are allowed to hate.

# data[].attributes.body
Both Little Rock and the Cold War are similar because both protect peoples' human rights and wanting to spread integration and equality.

# data[].attributes.body
It connects to the Cold War because our country was at war with Korea before and they were considered the ¨bad guys¨ for not having equal rights while America didn't have full equal rights themselves.

# data[].attributes.body
It is similar to the cold war because the Cold War fought for Americans freedom & Eisenhower's point is how we should not be forced to make decisions based on race and instead we should not let communism spread and stay together.

# data[].attributes.body
The Cold war is about fighting for Americas's individual freedom, which we believe is being breached in the Soviet Union. Eisenhower's point is how can we fight for freedom and still oppress these people and not follow the law on the home front.

# data[].attributes.body
it connects to the cold war because if the US cant give all of its citizens human rights then how can it expect other countries to do the same.

# data[].attributes.body
The Cold War connects to these events because the United States were fighting to keep human rights and communism, but here the United States was discriminating against African Americans and denying them rights.

# data[].attributes.body
During the Cold War, the US' racial tensions ran high on the issue of civil rights. This tension connected the Civil Rights movement to the Cold War due to the paradox of our involvement of international affairs. We fought in the conflict in Korea for human rights and supported the United Nation's own Charter, where no person would be discriminated against due to "race, sex, language, or religion", but we had violated human rights in our own country.

# data[].attributes.headline
In the presidents speech, he connects the Cold War with this situation by involving our problems with the United Nations. He asks how we can keep peace in other countries  if we cannot do so in our own. 

# data[].attributes.subject
In the presidents speech, he connects the Cold War with this situation by involving our problems with the United Nations. He asks how we can keep peace in other countries  if we cannot do so in our own. 

# data[].attributes.body
The U.S. is emphasizing to sustain human rights around the world, while the U.S. is struggling to give all of their citizens the rights they are supposed to be given. When Eisenhower mentions the U.N. and the other issues with civil rights: "sex, race, language, religion."

# data[].attributes.body
The events in Little Rock relate to the Cold War because in Little Rock and The Cold War The United States main goal was to protect the constitution. The presidents during The Cold War and Little Rock events knew that to protect human rights in their own country they had to do whatever was necessary to do so.

# data[].attributes.body
It connect because the united states cant hold the other countries accountable if we cant even keep simple human right ourselves.

# data[].attributes.headline
It connects to the cold war because they believe in the faith in fundamental human rights and want to keep it dignified and worthy of the human race. Eisenhower is saying that if we can't uphold human rights in our own country, we can't blame others for not doing it in their countries. For example, we cannot blame other countries for their political systems such as communism

# data[].attributes.subject
It connects to the cold war because they believe in the faith in fundamental human rights and want to keep it dignified and worthy of the human race. Eisenhower is saying that if we can't uphold human rights in our own country, we can't blame others for not doing it in their countries. For example, we cannot blame other countries for their political systems such as communism

# data[].attributes.body
The civil rights movement is similar to the cold war because during the cold war some groups were treated as 2nd class citizens. And during the cold war many Americans feared people that were against the government.

# data[].attributes.body
In both instances a large group of people swayed everyone's opinion. During the cold war certain groups were alienated, and now during little rock these kids were being alienated from the school. The U.S. is being indecisive with their decision making, like all countries are. The U.S. population (not all) didn't want to desegregate and President Eisenhower had to physically take action to desegregate schools," He ordered it and U. S. marshals to protect the children and to ensure their right to attend the school".

# data[].attributes.body
they are similar because they involve the suffering of people in there countries. The racism here and unequal rights, compared to starvation and poverty during the cold war.

# data[].attributes.body
yes it is relevant because there are still thoughts of racial discrimination. The thought that someone is better than someone else because of their skin color will never die because it is one's belief and since racism has being going on for a long time, it will take a long time to even consider it being dead.

# data[].attributes.body
This relates to the Cold War because Eisenhower states how we might be taking away a humans basic rights like the USSR did. Since we are doing the same thing as these communist countries, who are we to tell them what to do? If we fix issues like this, Eisenhower believes that the image of America to the rest of the world will be saved.

# data[].attributes.body
I believe this movement still has relevance today because there are still issues in the united states and around the world regarding race. Until everyone is always viewed as equals there will still be relevance to this movement.

# data[].attributes.body
Yes the civil rights movement still has relevance today because even today there is still racism and prejudice in the world today

# data[].attributes.body
Yes the civil rights movement still has relevance today because based on current events such as the Starbucks story, there are still some lingering events of racism. Although it is not as extreme as fighting for the right to school or voting, the overall concept is the same because African Americans are still making progress to reach 100% civil rights equality among the people.

# data[].attributes.body
Make an inference about this events connection to the Cold War. The cold war was a battle between communism (Soviet Union) and capitalism (United States) where which is the better system to abide by. Capitalism won leading to the census have capitalism around the world is the moral and beneficial thing to do for a society to function on. Eisenhower compares our actions to African-Americans to communist countries because communist countries disavow human rights for the sake of societal gain. This is stated in Eisenhower's speech leading to the correlation to the cold war due to it being a battle between communism and capitalism which is a main focus throughout this speech which is to uphold capitalistic values so as a country we can set an example around the world.

# data[].attributes.body
yes, there are still protests going on today.

# data[].attributes.headline
Yes, I believe the Civil Rights movement still has relevance today. Discrimination and racism is still an occurring problem today , for example the Starbucks issue. African Americans are still struggling today to get treated equally to whites. 

# data[].attributes.subject
Yes, I believe the Civil Rights movement still has relevance today. Discrimination and racism is still an occurring problem today , for example the Starbucks issue. African Americans are still struggling today to get treated equally to whites. 

# data[].attributes.body
Yes, the Civil Rights movement still does have relevance today. There are still incidents of racial tension and racism, like Charlottesville and the Starbucks incident a couple of weeks ago. There are still people protesting in our era for equal treatment. Some movements are diverse in thoughts, like parts of the BLM movement, where some are violent and some are not.

# data[].attributes.body
The Civil Rights movement still relates to today because morally some people are not where they should be. Every once and awhile there are some events of racism even though they are no where near the extremeness of things that happened back in the 50's and 60's, but unwritten moral rights are still yet to be followed by some people in the United States.

# data[].attributes.body
I do think that it is prevalent because as we talked about in class today its not about the color its about everyone getting the same civil rights they deserve.

# data[].attributes.body
Yes, it is still relevant today because off how people are still being treated. There are still examples today showing blatant racism. There is a news story that talks about how 2 black boys where just sitting in a Starbucks and had the police get called on them for doing nothing. This is showing how there is still a lot of factors from the 1950's and 60's. While the civil rights movement helped a lot for black rights it will most likely never make racism go away.

# data[].attributes.body
Yes, Because if this is still happening by not being able to use the bathroom in a public place and being taken out of the public place is not right. This is all about human rights and everyone should be able to do what they want under the law because everyone should be treated and gave the same human rights.

# data[].attributes.body
The Civil Rights Movement in the 50s and 60s consisted of both violent and peaceful protests and retaliations from African-Americans. Today, there are still peaceful marches and violent acts occurring from both whites and blacks because of their views on civil rights in America.

# data[].attributes.body
Yes, i agree equality

# data[].attributes.body
The Civil Rights movement is very much still taking part in today's society with incidents like the two black men getting kicked out of Starbucks and the various police shootings of black men nationwide. Events like these show how there is still discrimination and inequality, making the Civil Rights movement relevant today.

# data[].attributes.body
The Cold War and Little Rock are connected because both events are about people being equal and involved to prevent the spread of something.

# data[].attributes.body
Yes , because there is still civil rights movements today, but there is no law enforced that says that they are segregated!

# data[].attributes.body
There is connection from The Cold War to the Little Rock

# data[].attributes.body
yes the civil war still has relevance today because it makes up our society

# data[].attributes.body
No, because racism isn't prevalent in western society today than what it was in the 1950's and 1960's. Everyone no matter what race or gender has an equal opportunity according to the Constitutions and the set of laws enforced in America. Not only laws but as a society we give and treat people on character not race. This is self evident in the Starbucks video where two young black men were loitering in Starbucks and refused to leave when asked. The Starbucks manager who called the police on the loitering black men was ostracized by the media and condemned as being a "racist." We know she isn't a racist because in the 911 call/local police she was very polite referring two the black men as "gentlemen" not even involving race which is expected for a good moral citizen. This can be inferred that she called the police on the accounts of loitering and not based offa ill racist intention.The young black men could've bought a 1 dollar item like a pack a gum and this wouldn't have ever happened especially if they were loitering and wanting to use a bathroom with a key for paying customers. This instance of "racism" was treated with all 8,000 Starbucks being shutdown for a short time for all customers being taught how to handle situations when a customer is colored. (Personally I think that's absurd to differentiate a customer based off race when we should treat any person the same and differentiate off character. The manger was unfortunately fired for handling the situation poorly. This is evidence because racist behaviors like this one were condemned and dealt according by majority of our society leading to the only prevalent racism are minor occurrences which all races have to deal with. The 1950 and 1960 protests were used for a society that was ruled under Jim crow where racism was accept by the majority of society and didn't condemn racist behaviors. The protests should be taught and remembered as history (which it is) and become relevant if an outrage of racism ever occurs again.
911 Call -https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pFRP7QwlIH0&t=141s

# data[].attributes.body
Yes. I believe there is still a separation between races that is still in effect today. There is still peaceful protest going on for white and black people that also happened in the 50's and 60's. many people are still fighting for their rights today.

# data[].attributes.body
The cold war and the Little Rock documents have in common many things. The main thing being that they both want to keep peace. The Cold War was to stop the spread of communism to other countries because that was not the right way to live. Little Rock was to try to integrate black and white students in school. Both of these events had many harsh actions when people were trying to mkae things work