# data[].attributes.body
Students will exchange feedback on their projects by completing a peer edit. I will be using a platform called peer grade (www.peergrade.io) for the peer edit.
In period one computer science juniors will be exchanging feedback on video games. At this stage students have learned the fundamentals of video game design and programming. Their final video games after due on February 14th.
In periods four and seven illustrations students will be exchanging feedback on comic book drawings. At this stage students should have five complete comic book pages drawn. Next week they will be inking these pages.

My focus question for the inter-visitation is whether or not this digital tool (peer grade) is helping students exchange feedback in a meaningful way.

Feel free to visit during these periods and use anything you see in your classroom. If you'd like me to share any specific resources with you let me know.

The low inference observation sheet is available below. Let me know if you have any clarifying questions.

# data[].attributes.body
Students will complete a playlist.
Focus Question: Do students seem able to understand content from the video? Are they doing the tasks?

# data[].attributes.body
1. What were your goals for addressing the problem of practice?

2. What goals were met? What goals were not met?

# data[].attributes.body
1. Observers review notes and identify specifics on how the host teacher attempted to address the problem of practice.

2. Observers jot down what they notice (low-inference) and wonder (questions that do not offer solutions but stimulate thinking).

3. Observers should write down two notices and two wonders.

# data[].attributes.body
Respond to what seems most relevant to the problem of practice, extend a wondering, etc.

# data[].attributes.body
1. Each person will describe something he or she has learned during the observation and debrief.

2. What is one thing you will commit to implementing in your classroom in the future?

# data[].attributes.body
1. What were your goals for addressing the problem of practice?

2. What goals were met? What goals were not met?

# data[].attributes.body
1. Observers review notes and identify specifics on how the host teacher attempted to address the problem of practice.

2. Observers jot down what they notice (low-inference) and wonder (questions that do not offer solutions but stimulate thinking).

3. Observers should write down two notices and two wonders.

# data[].attributes.body
Respond to what seems most relevant to the problem of practice, extend a wondering, etc.

# data[].attributes.body
1. Each person will describe something he or she has learned during the observation and debrief.

2. What is one thing you will commit to implementing in your classroom in the future?

# data[].attributes.body
Thursday Feb 27 Period 4 & 7
Context: Students will review and practice digitally editing art in Photoshop using google slides playlist.

Focus Question: Are students truly  implementing the strategies?

# data[].attributes.body
Host Teacher Reflection:

1. What were your goals for addressing the problem of practice?

2. What goals were met? What goals were not met?

Observer Reflection:

1. Observers review notes and identify specifics on how the host teacher attempted to address the problem of practice.

2. Observers jot down what they notice (low-inference) and wonder (questions that do not offer solutions but stimulate thinking).

3. Observers should write down two notices and two wonders.

Host Teacher Responds:
Respond to what seems most relevant to the problem of practice, extend a wondering, etc.