# data[].attributes.body
I believe that deep ecology is present due to the fact that Carl is making new plants by grafting them together/ to himself. This really shows that he’s using nature as a resource to humanity

# data[].attributes.body
The story sort of contrasted this idea of nature as a resource and as something to fit our needs. Carl desired this flower, but definitely did not 'need' it and it most definitely acted to his detriment in the end. That power of the lily to corrupt Carl should rather be respected, not taken advantage of.

# data[].attributes.body
The plant is a supernatural organism that feeds off Carl. It’s a frightening thought to be attached to someone’s body and feed off of them.

# data[].attributes.body
Eco feminism was prevalent once analyzing the flower symbolism. The flower and feminist became linked, additionally I thought it was interesting that the flower sprouted a mouth of all things. To me mouths are more associated with femininity. And the flower/female was stared at like she was in a zoo, and ended up dying.

Old world wilderness because the nature did kill him in the end which is threatening behavior.

# data[].attributes.body
the lily is portrayed as threatening because it takes over the scientist’s body. the story explains how observers at the exhibitions are afraid of the lily

# data[].attributes.body
He saw nature as a resource he could use to try to make new plants etc… through his grafting. It was his resource as a scientist to do whatever he wanted to it. So I think deep ecology would be a RESPONSE to his actions

# data[].attributes.body
I saw deep ecology in this story because Carl is using this plant as a means for human scientific discovery. He is using it as a resource and nothing more to advance his own agenda and to receive critical acclaim over his new creation, even if he is obsessed and has a deep respect with the plant.

# data[].attributes.body
I think that it kinda portrays nature as this scary place. Ie: Brazil wilderness has plants that can graft to you and drink your blood.

# data[].attributes.body
Ecofeminism analyzes the connection between the domination of women and the domination of nature, usually by men. It draws parallels between women and nature, which is often seen as feminine, fertile and the property of men.

Ecofeminism also includes other aspects of environmental justice, such as racial environmental justice. There are two branches of ecofeminism:

The first branch of ecofeminism embraces the idea that women are inherently closer to nature than men on a biological, spiritual, and emotional level. This branch is often called radical ecofeminism because it reverses the domination of men over women and nature.

The second branch of ecofeminism contradicts the first, arguing that neither women nor men are more likely to connect with nature

# data[].attributes.body
We must first address our social inequalities before remedying the environment. The first wave of ecocriticism was froth with deep ecologist, while the second concentrated on social concerns.

# data[].attributes.body
Deep ecology challenges the anthropocentrism at the heart of modern society and the ecological standpoints that see the natural world as merely a resource for humanity and that presuppose that human needs and demands override

other considerations. In other words, deep ecologists believe that taking care of our environmental problems first will in-turn solve our society problems.

# data[].attributes.body
Found primarily in British and American literature, pastoral focuses on the dichotomy between urban and rural life, often idealizing nature and rural life and demonizing urban life. There are three branches of pastoral ecocriticism:

Classical is characterized by nostalgia and nature as a place for human relaxation and reflection.

Romantic is characterized by portraying rural independence as desirable.

American emphasizes agrarianism and represents land as a resource to be cultivated.

# data[].attributes.body
Wilderness examines the ways in which the wilderness is constructed, valued and engaged with. There are two branches of wilderness ecocriticism:

Old World portrays the wilderness as a scary, threatening place beyond the borders of civilization and as a place of exile.

New World portrays the wilderness as a place of sanctuary where one can find relaxation and reflection, similar to classical pastoral ecocriticism.

# data[].attributes.body
Examines the way that the poorest and most oppressed members of a population fall victim to the most adverse effects of climate change and environmental degradation.