# data[].attributes.body
Pro- There are many platforms to learn and be able to engage yourself online and may be a more beneficial way of learning. Students can find many ways to learn and there are an unlimited amount of places to find information for your project.

Con- Many don't like books as many students aren't engaged to what they are learning and they don't learn the information for the longterm.

I think more technology is better as there are many more ways of learning online. I although do like a hands on approach to learning things

https://occupytheory.org/list-of-pros-and-cons-of-technology/

# data[].attributes.body
Should tablets replace textbooks in schools?Pros- Lighter, and easier to carry around. You can have things for multiple classes on the tablet versus one textbook per each class.        Studies show that students can learn 30-80% faster when using tablets. E-textbooks on tablets on average cost 50-60% less the printed textbooks. Students can be more prepared for the growing world of technology.     Cons- Hand held tablets have been known for causing health problems. Tablets are more expensive then textbooks. You would have to buy new tablets for the incoming class every year whereas you can use the same textbook for multiple years. Tablets could cause a lot of distractions.

http://tablets-textbooks.procon.org/

# data[].attributes.headline
Should the government block websites deemed inappropriate? 

# data[].attributes.subject
Should the government block websites deemed inappropriate? 

# data[].attributes.body
My debate topic is, should the government block websites deemed inappropriate.

People on the affirmative side of this topic say that children or those easily influenced should be censored from certain content that may contaminate their underdeveloped brains. People who affirm this topic also state that it is important to uphold the laws of a country on and offline, so if something is put on the internet that is illegal, it should be censored.

People on the negative side of this topic say that the internet should be a place that people can express their ideas and opinions freely. It is also expressed that everyone should have the same opportunity to access to those opinions and ideas. There are also those on the negative side that say the government could attempt to be deceitful if they censor the internet.

After considering multiple views regarding both sides of the topic, I believe that there are some instances where the government should be allowed to censor the internet. I also would negate this resolution because people should have access to everyone's opinions, at any time.

http://www.debate.org/opinions/should-the-government-be-able-to-censor-the-internet

http://sks.sirs.com/webapp/leading-issue?type=sub&keyno=013718

# data[].attributes.body
Pros: Stem cells can be used to treat and some day cure diseases like Parkinson’s disease, Alzheimer’s disease, heart diseases, stroke , diabetes, birth Defects, spinal cord injuries, replace or repair damaged organs, reduced risk of transplantation (You could possibly get a copy of your own heart in a heart-transplantation in the future, and stem cells will play a major role in curing  cancer.

Cons: Anti choice arguments.

I think stem cell research and use should be a legal medical and scientific practice, because of the potential it holds to eradicate or mitigate the negative effects of many of the diseases and disorders we see today.

# data[].attributes.body
Pros- Using IPads, kids don't have to run to there locker to pick up there books or paper. It would be much lighter than carrying books.

Cons- A lot of kids could distracted with them and get them off topic of what there teachers are teaching. Some kids wouldn't be responsible enough and crack the screen or always forget to charge them. Also IPads can be unhealthy for your eyes and for kids who are always starring at screens, it can be dangerous.

I lean to having IPads in school because I think kids need to embrace technology and not turn away from it. It would be easier for the kids going from class to class not carrying around so many books. I believe that most kids will be responsible for the task and handle it well.

http://www.debate.org/polls/ipads-in-schools

# data[].attributes.body
Which is better, Android or iPhone.

Pros of iPhones- FaceTime is a huge plus for families to communicate long distance. You can respond to a notification without opening the app. There is a button to set your phone to vibrate. Siri, talk to phone question/answer, has a fun personality and understands natural language better than Android.

Pros of Androids- Voice Assistant works offline. Contacts are easier to navigate and use large photos for their contacts. Goggle Photos gives you unlimited free storage. Swipe gestures and punctuation on the same screen as letters.

Cons for iPhones- iCloud is a disaster. It's been known for losing photos. Switch keyboards from letters to numbers to punctuation. Doesn't have a great list of free music and you have to use your iTunes. Siri can't use Goggle Maps.

Cons for Androids- Goggle Search doesn't search as much as Apples Spotlight. The "Smart Lock" tool is not a secure option for unlocking your screen, this feature is similar to iPhones Touch ID. You have to log onto your phone in order to adjust/set the volume.

My opinion- Both have some great features however I prefer iPhones because of the notification vantage and I like the volume button.

http://money.cnn.com/interactive/technology/iphone-android-comparison/

# data[].attributes.body
Pros- Having DVD recorders can be a useful thing. You can record things for a lifetime. You can have them on discs which are inexpensive. They have good quality and can be used over and over again.
Cons- Having movies on disc cause more people to watch them because they are always there. They are easily lost. They have limited space.
I myself agree with the pro side because
I like having the use of DVD players. You can watch movies that are not always online. Yes they may cost some money but its better for to own it than to rent a movie and waste money on it if you are wanting to keep watching it over and over.
https://www.lifewire.com/dvd-recorder-vcr-dvr-3276198

# data[].attributes.body
Should children be able to have cellphones, or as much of the technology as we have? On one side it is good for children to have phones so they can contact their parents, but then they get all social media which a lot of bullying happens, and creates a spike in depression. Also children stay up all nigh on their phones and don't do the necessary things they need to. Once something si posted online, there is no way to get rid of it. Ever. So a child may post something, and delete it and if they go in for a job interview or something, and can have that certain post or picture brought back up, so kids should be careful what they post or they should have parental restrictions on young children's posts, and be able to monitor what they are doing.

# data[].attributes.body
Does the internet do more good than harm?
The affirmative side states that the internet is nothing but a playground for heinous and illegal acts to be committed. A person's privacy is greatly wounded when they use the internet. Sites and apps like "Snapchat" or "Instagram" store data and locations for anyone to find. Once a person posts something online, it is nearly impossible to erase it, and the law cannot protect your rights in this area. When a person is online they can choose to be whomever and whatever they want to be. Sometimes it's child predators and sometimes it's just bullies, who start to make nasty remarks to someone. Because of cyberbullying, 4,400 teens and counting take their lives each year, 14% of high school students thought about suicide and 7% actually attempted to. The internet is an unsafe, harmful place.
The opposing side states that the internet is our place for freedom. For people to speak their minds freely. The internet brings users information that they otherwise wouldn't have had without it. There are ways to avoid having your information shared worldwide: simply don't share it, don't fill out anything that you aren't comfortable with a random stranger seeing. With the internet comes independency, and meeting people from around the world with similar interests as you. It gives people a chance to broaden their horizons and express themselves
My Opinion- I agree with the opposing side, there are ways to prevent cyberbullying, like shutting the computer off.  I agree that the internet offers freedom to express ourselves freely, and meet new people.
http://debatewise.org/debates/3033-internet-brings-more-harm-than-good/#yes6

# data[].attributes.body
Are Cell Phones Safe?

Pros-  Cell phones are very helpful in many ways they increase personal safety by providing an easy means of contacting others during an emergency. Also by having constant communication between parents and children. Many studies have shown that radio frequency from cell phones is not powerful enough to cause cancer.

Cons- They can become a distraction, such as studying doing homework, and driving. Children have increased health risks from cell phones. When cell phones are used by children the radio frequency energy is two times higher in the brain and ten times higher in the bone marrow of the skull than for adults. Anybody could get addicted to their cell phones and that has many side effects such as you can develop a brain tumor with association with a cell phone. Cell phones emit radio frequency (RF) radiation and RF radiation has been shown to damage DNA and also cause cancer in laboratory animals.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

My opinion- After considering both the positive and negative effects from cell phones, I agree with both but I lean more on the negative side.  The reason why is because the long term health risks have not been determined yet because cell phones have only been popular for the past 10-15 years.
http://cellphones.procon.org/
http://greengarageblog.org/18-essential-pros-and-cons-of-cell-phones

# data[].attributes.body
The affirmative side states that yes, cell phones are safe. Radiofrequency radiation from cell phones is non-ionizing and is not powerful enough to cause cancer.Cell phone radiation, like radio, TV, and visible light radiation, is non-ionizing and lacks sufficient energy to add or remove electrons from molecules, and therefore it cannot ionize and cause cancer. Cell phone radiation levels are tested and certified to remain within levels deemed safe by the Federal Communications Commission.  If cell phones were causing cancer we could expect a significant rise in the rate of brain and other related cancers.

The negative side states that cell phones have more un-healthy traits than what we thought. Cell phones emit radiofrequency (RF) radiation, and RF radiation has been shown to damage DNA and cause cancer in laboratory animals. According to American Academy of Pediatrics President Dr. Robert Block, when cell phones are used by children, "the average RF energy deposition is two times higher in the brain and 10 times higher in the bone marrow of the skull," than for adults.  A July 2008 reviewed study shows that children under the age of eight absorb twice the amount of radiation into their brain tissue as adults due to their lower skull thickness.

My opinion- I think on the "healthy" side of the use of cell phones is, that I would agree with the affirmative side. Yes, we use cellphones everyday for everyday things like jobs, but we are also using computers and other technological things that are just as damaging as a cellphone.

# data[].attributes.body
Is the use of computers in schools as early as elementary a good thing?

The affirmative side states that yes, the use of computers is a tool, just like a calculator or ruler. Students should known how to use these tools just like the use of computers. The use of computers can benefit the learning of students and give them more of a desire to learn. It is a different way of learning that gives them a chance to be creative and explore.

The negative side states that the use of computers at a young age seem to be used more for activities, not educational purposes in the classroom. Almost like a reward for accomplishing something. This takes away the educational time for learning. Students should not sit in front of screens all day, especially at a young age.

I personally am all for different ways of learning. I believe that the use of computers for educational purposes that will help the children learn is a great idea, but not at the expense of other learning techniques.

http://www.educationworld.com/a_tech/tech/tech056.shtml

# data[].attributes.body
My debate is about Kurieg brand coffee machines, harmful or helpful?

The affirmative side states that that they are easy to use and clean. They also save water. These top of the line machines make it so easy anyone can make a simple macchiato by putting in a simple small cup.

But those Opposed say that the small cups are one of the main reasons why there is more plastic ending up in landfills and are a lot
more wasteful than regular coffee machines. As well as how high in price these "pods" are for the most part turns most customers away.

I myself agree with both sides but lean more towards the opposed. When shopping for the pods I try to lean towards the pods that say biodegradable on the packaging or the netted pods. Both are better choices for the environment than the latter.

# data[].attributes.headline
Do violent video games contribute to youth violence?

# data[].attributes.subject
Do violent video games contribute to youth violence?

# data[].attributes.body
The affirmative side states  that playing violent video games causes more aggression, bullying, and fighting. 60% of middle school boys and 40% of middle school girls who played at least one Mature-rated game hit or beat up someone, compared with 39% of boys and 14% of girls who did not play Mature-rated games. And by pretending to be violent characters in video games, children are more likely to imitate the behaviors of those characters and have difficulty distinguishing reality from fantasy.

The negative side states that nearly all young men play video games, so the fact that some people who commit violent acts also played games should not be surprising, nor does it imply a casual relationship. Also Studies claiming a casual link between video game violence and real life violence are flawed. Many studies failed to control for factors that contribute to children becoming violent, such as family history and mental health, plus most studies do not follow children over long periods of time.

I am in favor of the affirmative side. I feel that violent video games does have some influence on teenagers being more aggressive and more likely to fight. Even though not everyone who plays video games becomes violent, there is a higher possibility that they will be influenced by the violence they see. Studies have shown that the more violent the video games are the higher chance the players may become violent.

http://videogames.procon.org/

# data[].attributes.body
My debate topic is: Should young kids be able to have cell phones?

People on the affirmative side say that it giving younger kids cell phones help them get better with technology in the future. It opens their mind to the technology world at a younger age since its a given that technology is improving on a day to day basis and will more than likely be in our future.

The negative side says that giving younger kids cell phones can make them lazy and affect their health. They will get so caught up in technology that they will not be as active. People also say that it will cause more kids to text and drive as they get older or not pay as much attention to their surrounding.

I am on the negative side because I have seen how little kids act when given a phone to play a game on. They don't take their eyes off the screen for hours. This is very bad for their eyes and it makes them less active.

https://articles.niche.com/pros-and-cons-of-cell-phones-for-kids/

# data[].attributes.body
My debate topic is should teens be on social media as much as we are?
The affirmative side states social media can cheer us up just by getting in touch with our friends over texting or certain apps. Social media can actually boost our self- esteem too, it is easy to share or post pictures. By watching YouTube videos or googling a question, we can be educated easily. We can go to social media for advice to almost anything we need.
The negative side states that sometimes all social media does is hurt our self- esteem. Cyber-bulling is a very common thing that destroys people, and all the negativity can never go away on social media. It ruins our ability to think independently, or ruins real- life conversations. Another is online shopping makes a spend too much money.
I agree to both sides. I do almost everything on social media but I also have never had a problem with cyber-bullying or online shopping. I believe I have learned a lot from the internet and I can always get an answer when I need too. Social media is the way I communicate with my friends which is very important to me.

http://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/2015/01/16/10-reasons-why-social-media-is-great-for-teenagers_n_7317716.html
http://www.rd.com/health/wellness/negative-effects-of-social-media/

# data[].attributes.body
Cell phones, harmful or helpful?

Helpful -  Cells phones are helpful in many ways. They're used to communicate with others, we use them to express ourselves by posting updates and sharing our experiences. We also use them to keep track of our daily lives, this includes work, assignments, and planning events.

Harmful - Cell phones do a lot to help but they can also be harmful. It's not only screen time that can be harmful, but cells phones can also cause deaths while driving. Many will argue that it's the persons choice to look at their phones, but what some don't know is that the brain can become addicted to social media and other things such as texting. It is scientifically proven that the brain can become addicted you not only cell phones, but technology in general. Cell phones can also be harmful in conversations. When you communicate though texting words can be misunderstood or changed around. Cell phones not only promote social media but they can also be harmful towards it.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

In my opinion, I agree with both sides. The negative affects of cell phones are clearly enough to cause one to debate if they are worth having. Although there are negatives, cell phones are one of the many advances we've made in technology, and they are useful in peoples every day lives.

# data[].attributes.body
Do the positives of speed cameras outweigh the negatives?

The affirmative side states that drivers are more cautious with cameras watching them. Once a driver is aware that a camera is watching them, and they will recieve a fine if the law is not followed, they tend to start following the speed limit. The cameras mess with the drivers brain, as they will begin questioning whether or not cameras are everywhere they drive.  Thus causing the driver to slow down and be aware of their surroundings.

The negative side states that the cameras are more of a hazard than helpful as they are a false justice system. There is no proof that cameras reduce accidents, in fact accidents are caused when drivers become too cautious and slow down way below the speed limit causing a pile up. Most drivers are knowledgeable of the cameras and do not speed in those areas, while in other areas they do not apply the same mindset. The constitution states that a person has a right to confront their accuser, but in this case, the accuser is a camera that is not always accurate with the rating. Leaving the person with a ticket he/she may not have deserved.

I am in favor of the affirmative as traffic cameras allow justice systems to track criminals when they go past, using facial recognition. I would much rather have a cautious driver than someone who is not aware of their surroundings.

http://drivingschool.net/the-pros-and-cons-of-speed-cameras-driver-safety/

# data[].attributes.headline
Is social media a positive or negative  component in peoples' lives?

# data[].attributes.subject
Is social media a positive or negative  component in peoples' lives?

# data[].attributes.body
The affirmative sides states that people who use social media can connect and communicate with old and new friends, as well of family members. People can also put themselves out there, showing people their accomplishments within their lifetime.
The negative sides states that using social media can make people become depressed and/or become more self conscious by others cyberbullying. Another negative downfall of social media is if people don't make their accounts private, Pedehiles, Murders, and many other types of people  can stalk and get information about a person.
I am in favor of the affirmative side, because social media can connect and keep myself, along with many others, in contact with people I don't see on a day to day basis. Also, there may be downfalls, but there are ways you can prevent them.
https://sites.google.com/site/bhsdigicitizenship/social-media/pros-cons-of-technology

# data[].attributes.body
Should tablets replace textbooks in k-12 schools?

The affirmative side states that by using tablets in the school system, kids have the ability to learn at a faster pace. The time that it takes to complete a learning objective or target could potentially reduce by as much as 30-80%! 77% of the teachers using tablets in the classroom, have seen an increase in the student's motivation to learn with the use of tablets.

The negative side states that it takes much more time and money to use tablets rather than textbooks in the classroom. They also say, "Print textbooks cannot crash, freeze, or get hacked." Plus, the batteries don't last all day, so they feel that the school's would all have to have more outlets, more wifi, etc.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

After considering multiple views and aspects of this topic, I still am on the negative side. There are others, like me, that don't learn as well with tablets. I think it would cost so much more money than normal textbooks. The school would need to buy the tablets, more wifi, the books online, etc. I learn better with normal textbooks, and feel others do as well.

http://tablets-textbooks.procon.org/

# data[].attributes.body
Artificial Intelligence. Should we make them or stop while we can?

The affirmative side states that If we were to advance our Artificial Intelligence (AI) that we could have them do the jobs of humans and learn to correct themselves on their flaws. They say that a robot that is able to learn like a human would benefit the advancements of the human race.
The Negative side say that if we were to keep advancing the AI we have today eventually they say they are scared that they will loose their jobs and that if a robot that can learn like humans is here what is to stop them from revolting agents the humans and cause what some people call an AI invasion or Apocalypse.

I am not 100% sure on what side I would like to be for this technology but I would say I lean more to the affirmative side because they could take the dangerous jobs out of the humans hands and that they could even have their own ideas to push the human race farther into the future with more advanced tec.

http://www.datamation.com/applications/pros-and-cons-of-artificial-intelligence.html

# data[].attributes.headline
Should Cell Phones be used during the school day??

# data[].attributes.subject
Should Cell Phones be used during the school day??

# data[].attributes.body
Student should be allowed to use cell phones during a school setting.
Affirmative side say that yes if we aren't doing anything and are done working we should be able to go on our phones. Pros talking to people communicating  with each other making plans playing games having fun like kids should.

Cons about Cell Phones at school...
Cons about the phones at school are kids using them in the wrong way and the wrong time. People think that the phones weakens your learning but it can help you.
I believe that we should be able to have cell phones because they can be used as an alternative for a computer, you can also do the same types of things on them.
http://cellphones.procon.org/

# data[].attributes.body
My topic is on Online shopping
Pros- Point 1: NO need to travel. With online shopping you never have to leave your house to get what you want or need. From clothes, shoes to even food. Which could be a benefit if you had a disability. Because its a little hard to leave your home if your disabled.

Point 2- You  could save money. You wouldn't have to spend on gas or waste your time collecting coupons and you could find more discounts for items online.

Cons- Point 1- You could spend more money than what you own. Because with shopping online you use a plastic card instead of cash. Because you would be caught up in the new things out.

Point 2- People could sell you fake stuff or spam you so they can take your money. The product that you bought  may not always be what is in the photo and people could steal your information and take everything you have.

# data[].attributes.body
Should tablets replace textbooks in schools?
Pros- Lighter, and easier to carry around. You can have things for multiple classes on the tablet versus one textbook per each class.        Studies show that students can learn 30-80% faster when using tablets. E-textbooks on tablets on average cost 50-60% less the printed textbooks. Students can be more prepared for the growing world of technology.
Cons- Hand held tablets have been known for causing health problems. Tablets are more expensive then textbooks. You would have to buy new tablets for the incoming class every year whereas you can use the same textbook for multiple years. Tablets could cause a lot of distractions.

# data[].attributes.body
Should animals be used as test subjects for experiments?
~People on the affirmative side say they have contributed to many life-saving cures and treatments. People also think they are similar to human in many different ways, making them excellent test subjects for drugs later to be used on humans. They also think since animals have no rights like humans it is okay to put them through scientific experiments.
~People on the negative side say animal testing is cruel and inhumane. Since their are other ways to test experiments now, they don't see the point in having animals suffer through them. The drugs used on animals are not always safe, causing the animals more harm then good. Animals are not always treated fairly because not all of them are protected by the Animal Welfare Act.
~I am in favor of the negative side. I fell animals are not treated properly in the experiments they go through. People say they are very similar to humans, but their bodies are very different and unique compared to humans'. I would not exactly trust a drug that works excellent on a mouse because I human does not have all the parts an animal has, making the drug less effective.

http://animal-testing.procon.org/

# data[].attributes.headline
My debate topic is -Tablets should replace textbooks in k-12?

# data[].attributes.subject
My debate topic is -Tablets should replace textbooks in k-12?

# data[].attributes.body
People on the affirmative side say---
Pro 1-Technology-based instruction can reduce the time students take to reach a learning objective by 30-80%, according to the US Department of Education.
Pro 2-Tablets can hold hundreds of textbooks on one device, plus homework, quizzes, and other files, eliminating the need for physical storage of books and classroom materials.

People on the negative side say  --- Con 1- A broken tablet requires an experienced technician to fix, which can be costly and time-consuming. Where textbooks can usually be repaired with basic supplies such as glue or tape.
Con 2- Print textbooks cannot crash, freeze, or get hacked. Unlike tablets, there is no chance of getting malware, spyware, or having personal information stolen from a print textbook.
Con 3- Tablets constantly need charging, increasing electricity demands on schools and the need for new electrical outlets.

I am in favor of the affirmative side ----, because I believe unlike paper books, online textbooks are regularly updated. So outdated textbooks wouldn't be a problem.

http://tablets-textbooks.procon.org

# data[].attributes.body
Affirmative : Many people are saying yes, technology is making humans lazier. From people using remotes to control everything in the house rather than walking around to change objects, have small robots cleaning our houses, fast food/delivery/frozen meals instead people going out together or cooking. Most people now interact over screens, rather than getting together and actually hanging or talking, they text and snap. Any technology with a light emitting screen impacts sleep, which leads to people becoming more tired during the day, being sluggish and not wanting to do much.  People don't have to just walk or bike places because of busses, cabs, trains, subways, cars, ubers, etc.

Negate : Although there are drawbacks to technology, there are major benefits that help people. Devices exist for the should purpose of helping people, and to help those from becoming obesity; like the Fitbit, apple watches, there are plans out there if people need help eating properly. Those who are against this say that people are not interacting, or getting delivery rather making food or getting it themselves. Even the mere fact that we have transportation. However, those help many. More often than not people have jobs to get to that they cant get to if they would have to walk or bike. People like nurses after working a shift a very tired, we don't want them driving around so they can give there body necessary nutrients, that increases the likeliness of an accident. Do I even have to mention all the medical benefits?
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
I personally believe that technology is truly there to help us. People will make the decision themselves, we can only hope that will use it to benefit them, and become a greater person who looks out for there mind, body, and health. I think the majority of people are using technology to there benifit. There will always be lazy people. I don't think technology is to blame for making anyone "more lazy"

http://www.debate.org/opinions/has-technology-made-humans-more-lazy
http://www.debate.org/opinions/has-technology-made-humans-more-lazy

# data[].attributes.body
My debate topic is are cell phones safe?
People on the affirmative side say  that the radiation emitted from phones is not powerful enough to cause cancer and the radiation levels are tested to remain within safe limits. Also studies have discovered that usage of your cell phone is not connected to the risk of brain tumors.
People on the negative side say  that studies have shown a connection between cell phone use and development of brain tumors and radiofrequency radiation is emitted from cell phones, which has been shown to damage DNA in animals. An increased risk of health problems in children is a problem from the cell phone radiation.
I am in favor of the affirmative side, because I don't think cell phone radiation is too powerful to cause any life-changing problem to someone.

http://cellphones.procon.org/

# data[].attributes.body
pro- deliveries would be faster so the buyer would more than likely  be home to retreive it
also drones and packages would have tracking becones so the costomer could track it.
con- a delivery could be damaged, stolen or missplaced.
dilivery to apartments could cause probems.
drones could also be hacked and have the destination changed.
I dont think that the drone delivery is capable of keeping packages safe, as of now.

# data[].attributes.headline
SaFire- Alternative Energy vs. Fossil Fuels(Windmills, Solar Power, & Hydroelectric energy)

# data[].attributes.subject
SaFire- Alternative Energy vs. Fossil Fuels(Windmills, Solar Power, & Hydroelectric energy)

# data[].attributes.body
People on affirmative- Alternative energy gives everyone the ability to cut down the cost of their electricity bills and it also will cut down on global warming with all the pollution and earth quakes happening because of oil and sand.
People against- Most of the people against it are business companies who make millions off of the oil companies and other fuels we get that are ruining the Earth.
I choose to stand with the affirmative side, because we have the ability to use technology to produce energy, but instead are choosing to destroy the Earth just for money and power.

# data[].attributes.headline
Do Violent Video Games Contribute to Youth Violence?

# data[].attributes.subject
Do Violent Video Games Contribute to Youth Violence?

# data[].attributes.body
PRO/Yes only because moron parents let there 5 year old son play games like G.T.A.5 the game has a nudest camp in it for crying out loud and it is just guys some of them aren't even waring ANYTHING.
CON/ ...

# data[].attributes.body
Pro- They are not association with brain tumors.
Con-  The international agency research cancer have classified cell phone radiation as a possible carcinogen.
Pro- There is no rise in the rate of brain cancer from cell phones.
Con- Children may have an increased rick of adverse health effects.
I am in favor of  the affirmative, because  It can keep us organized.

# data[].attributes.body
My debate topic is about tablets vs textbooks.
Pros- Tablets are a lot lighter then books. Tablets help students learn there materials a lot more faster. Using tablets you can hold multiple textbooks on the tablet this will help your back and learning skills.
Cons- Text books are a lot more cheaper then tablets. Tablets can cause a lot of distractions in the classroom. If a tablet breaks it is very costly to repair them.
I am in favor of the affirmative that tablets are better in the classrooms because students learn the materials a lot faster.
http://tablets-textbooks.procon.org/

# data[].attributes.body
Pros-lighter then textbooks
It improve standardized test scores
digital textbooks are cheaper than printed textbooks.
Cons-Too distracting for students Easy to break
Costly and time consuming to fix.
I think tablets should replace textbooks.
Source
http://tablets-textbooks.procon.org/

# data[].attributes.headline
Will robots replace humans in the work place

# data[].attributes.subject
Will robots replace humans in the work place

# data[].attributes.body
Pros- Robots do the work that humans can't or don't want to do and possibly do them better than the humans. robots could do more work faster than humans can and employers don't have to pay robots
Cons- Robots could take away jobs from humans thus leading the unemployment rate way up. with no humans if something goes wrong with the robots than it affects the entire line and is harder to fix
My side- robots can be used for some jobs just not all of them humans need jobs and could do some better than robots
http://www.mckinsey.com/business-functions/digital-mckinsey/our-insights/where-machines-could-replace-humans-and-where-they-cant-yet

# data[].attributes.body
My debate topic pertains to technology making humans lazier.
Pros- People on the affirmative side of this topic state that technology has made humans physically lazy and inactive. With the production of new video games and new tv shows, people forget and lose focus on how important physical exercise is. Those who believe technology is making humans lazier also say that soon jobs will be taken by robots, and some jobs already have. Due to people being lazy and obese, the production of robots will increase and improve.
Cons- People on the opposite side of this topic state that technology has actually helped us by creating exercise equipment. Exercising equipment like treadmills, exercise bikes and ellipticals keep people up with physical exercise. Technology also makes activities a lot easier to accomplish.

My opinion- Although I do appreciate what technology has given us, I do believe that it is making people lazier. Some would rather watch tv and play games rather than go on a walk, however, technology has made exercising a lot more fun. In the end, I would have to say I am on the affirmative side and believe that technology has made humans lazier.

Sources-http://www.debate.org/opinions/has-technology-made-humans-more-lazy

http://www.slyck.com/story2247_Is_Technology_Making_Us_Lazy

# data[].attributes.body
Pros- people on the affirmative side of this have decided that cells phones do not have a association with increase of brain tumors.
Cons- People have found that cell phones are associated with the development of brain tumors.
I believe that phones are a good thing and that if you don't over abuse it that you will not have any health affects.

Pros#2- Studies have shown that talking on cell phone and driving are less then 1% of motor accidents. Other factors that have more of a percentage of accidents are messing with the radio, CD, and talking with passengers.
Cons#2- The NHTSA estimates that driving with the use of cellphones causes 25% of accidents.

I believe that phones should not be used during travel at all. The driver should not be able to look at their phone at all while they're driving.

# data[].attributes.headline
My debate topic is should animals be used for scientific or commercial testing?

# data[].attributes.subject
My debate topic is should animals be used for scientific or commercial testing?

# data[].attributes.body
People on the affirmative side of this topic say animal testing has contributed to many life-saving cures and treatments.

# data[].attributes.body
My debate topic is does being on your phone before you go to bed disrupt your sleep?
People that say it dose affect you say that staring at the phone screen before trying to sleep makes it harder for you to rest.
People that say being on your phone at night dose not matter say the light is not bright enough to disrupt your eyes.
I don't think that being on your phone before you go to sleep disrupts your sleep. I don't think the light is bright enough to bother your eyes.
https://www.slumberbump.com/blogs/news/put-the-phone-down-if-you-want-to-go-to-sleep

# data[].attributes.body
My debate topic is are cellphones safe?
Pros- Many studies have shows that cellphones do not increase the risk of brain tumors.
-The radio frequency radiation from cell phones is not powerful enough to causes cancer.
-Cell phones help with safety and an easy why to contact someone in an emergency.

Cons- Children have an increased risk of health effects from cell phones.
-Radiation from cell phone can damage sperm.
-Cell phones disrupt with the function of pacemakers.

My Opinion- I feel that that cellphones could not cause extreme harm to your heath that could damage your life. I feel that a lot of things we hear bad about cellphones would be coming from the con side of things.

http://cellphones.procon.org

# data[].attributes.body
My debate topic is are self-driving cars a beneficial possibility for the future of mobility?
Pros:
People say that self-driving cars will increase the availability of transportation for the handicapped. They say Google Maps will tell you exactly where you are and you only have to program it ahead of time. Many people think self-driving cars will decrease the amount of car accidents.
Cons:
People that are against them say that they already have multiple problems with Google Maps as it is, so risking your life by letting Google Maps drive you places is extremely dangerous. Many think it won't work or that there will be a technological bug and the car will crash.
Opinion:
I think that self-driving cars are really dangerous and I don't trust technology enough to actually have it drive a car. I think that self-driving cars will cause more accidents rather than less. I think it's just too risky.
http://www.debate.org/opinions/do-you-believe-that-self-driving-cars-are-a-beneficial-possibility-for-the-future-of-mobility

# data[].attributes.body
My debate topic is are social networking sites good for our society?
People on the affirmative side of this topic say social networking sites help students do better in school, and social media is good for the economy (created many jobs).
People on the negative side of this topic say social media posts cannot be completely deleted and all information posted can have unintended consequences, and social media websites make bullying possible.
After considering both pros and cons, I am in favor of affirmative. Because social networking/media has created thousands of jobs for many people. Social networking and social media also helps teens and adults make new friends. It's also a convenient way to look up current news.
http://socialnetworking.procon.org/

# data[].attributes.body
Are social networking sites good for our society?
Pro:
1. Social networking sites spread information faster than any other media. Over 50% of people learn of breaking news on social media. 65% of media reporters use sites like Facebook for research, and 52% use Twitter.
2. Social networking sites help students do better in school. 59% of students with access to the Internet said that they use social media sites to talk about educational topics. After a middle school in Portland introduced a social media program to engage students, grades went up by 50%.
Con:
1. Social media enables the spread of false information. An example is on September 5, 2012 false rumors of fires, shootouts, and caravans of gunmen in a Mexico City suburb spread on Twitter and Facebook and caused panic, flooded the local police department with over 3,000 phone calls, and temporarily closed schools.
2. Social networking sites lack privacy and exposes users to government and corporate intrusions. 13 million users said they had not set or did not know about Facebook's privacy settings and 28% shared all or nearly all of their posts publicly. The US Justice Department intercepted 1,661 pieces of information from social networking sites and e-mails in 2011.

I am with the pro side because it is faster to find out current events. We are able to know what is going on in the world and it is easier for news reporters to gain information. It is also very beneficial to students. They are able to discuss school related topics with each other and can find out more information on those topics.
http://socialnetworking.procon.org/

# data[].attributes.body
My debate topic is: Are people becoming lazier because of technology?

Pro:
Not only does it make us lazier physically but mentally also. Technology has let humans cut down on the amount of work they have to do.

Con:
Just because there is an easier way doesn't make it the lazier way.
Technology is not making us lazy we are choosing to be lazy because of technology.

My opinion: I do agree that technology has made so people lazier but not everyone.

http://www.debate.org/opinions/is-technology-making-us-lazy

# data[].attributes.body
Is social media good for teens?
Pro:
Social media has allowed teens to socialize over the web when they are unable to in person. They can share memories they are proud of with the world or just a close group of friends. Sometimes you can even earn fame from a social media site. They can also make money off of selling items they own online. Overall, social media is a major convenience for teens allowing them more opportunities.
Con:
Cyberbullying has become a much larger threat to teens now that social media has evolved in many new ways allowing some teens to post anonymously so that no one knows it is them saying hurtful things. Predators could also take advantage of teens posing as someone of interest when in reality they could be a criminal. Others can hack into others accounts and pose as them and say negative things. Overall it is unsafe for teens to use social media if they are unaware of the dangers and damage they can do.
Opinion:
I am on the affirmative side. Social media has many pros and the cons can easily be avoided with smart choices. The cons are basically only possible through user error.
http://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/2015/01/16/10-reasons-why-social-media-is-great-for-teenagers_n_7317716.html

# data[].attributes.body
- Using tablets in school vs. Textbooks
-PRO- Tablets help students learn more material faster and makes learning more interesting to younger children.
-CON- Using tablets is more expensive than using print textbooks and Handheld technological devices which include tablets are associated with a range of health issues.
-Opinion- I prefer to use an Online textbooks at home so I don't have to drag a heavy book home but at school a textbook is nice to have because you have it right in your hands and it doesn't need internet.
Source- http://tablets-textbooks.procon.org/

# data[].attributes.body
Effects of technology on human communication

Pros- You can connect with people who are far away very easily. It makes it easier to get a message to many people at one time.

Cons- Decrease in face-to-face communication. People are becoming less active due to the ability to talk to someone on a device or the amount of things to do online. Decrease in social skills.

I believe both sides are beneficial, but I am on the negative side. I feel like people, especially young kids, are too attached to their devices. There is a large disconnect between people and face-to-face interaction.

"Negative Effects of Technology on Communication."
Techwalla. N.p., n.d. Web. 23 Jan. 2017.

# data[].attributes.body
Is technology good for kids?
Pros: Technology exists everywhere and it's used everyday. Kids who start with technology early on can end up learning more because they experience more with technology and make it interesting so it sticks in their head longer. Cognitive are widely improved because technology helps in faster and better development of cognitive skills. Allows kids to be more interactive in learning.
Cons: Kids could tend to be less sociable, relying on a screen for communication rather than face to face. Technology is also pretty expensive. Want electronics that cost a couple hundred dollars.
I choose the affirmative side on this topic because technology is everywhere. Younger kids tend to catch on and learn faster. It makes it easier for them to navigate the electronic world.
http://healthresearchfunding.org/11-pros-and-cons-of-children-using-technology/

# data[].attributes.body
Living in the Era of Technology.

Pros- Our cars and cell phones have navigation systems to ensure us that we don't get lost. We can pay bills right there on the internet with a touch of a button. We can communicate with anyone, anywhere, at any given time. Not only by telephone, but by video, instant messenger, and email. For family emergencies they can track each other on their phones to make sure they are where they are suppose to be.
Cons- Even though it all sounds great, there are still plenty of downfalls to technology. People have their credit card numbers stolen and businesses have their information hacked or computer systems disabled. Criminals take advantage of technology committing cyber crimes. Dangerous people can get ahold of others numbers and say who they are not.
I think that technology is a great thing and helps make our lives easier. It saves time, helps share information, and is quick. Many people say technology is bad but without it they probably wouldn't be half of where they are at today.
http://inspirationfeed.com/articles/technology-articles/pros-cons-of-living-in-the-era-of-technology/

# data[].attributes.body
Should technology replace human labor?
~People on the affirmative side say that replacing human labor with technology is a great option and will save time so people can do other things with their life. People that agree with this also think that technology will do better work than humans.
~People on the negative side of this topic say that if technology were to take over many people will become unemployed which will effect the economy and they say that many people will become lazy.
~I think that technology should assist humans in their jobs because it makes doing a lot of jobs easier, but it should not completely take over because too many people will become unemployed.

http://www.debate.org/opinions/should-technology-replace-human-labor

# data[].attributes.body
Do violent video games contribute to youth violence?

The affirmative side states that kids playing these game can cause more aggression and fighting. In fact, 90% of pediatricians agree that these video games make children more violent. The gun violence and combat that they experience in the game, can cause real life behavior changes. Children are likely to imitate the doings of the people on the games, causing the erratic behavior.

The negative side states that the sales of these video games have gone up while the juvenile arrest rates have gone down 37%. Also, juvenile murder rates have gone down 76% over the past 20 years. Studies claiming that video games influence violence are said to be flawed, and they aren't taking into the consideration the background of some children. They claim that by playing these games it helps to relieve stress and anger.

I choose the affirmative side because even though it is just a game some people can start to confuse, the game with their reality. Also, there are many other ways to relieve stress and anger rather than killing people on a video game. I think doctors are pretty smart and the fact that 90% of pediatricians believe that these games have an impact on children makes it more accurate to me.

http://videogames.procon.org/

# data[].attributes.body
(1 pt.) My debate topic is the benefits of online banking outweighs the harms.

(2 pts.) People on the affirmative side of this topic say they enjoy the mobile capacity to be able to check their accounts at their convenience and paying bills online (automatic withdrawals help them to make sure they pay bills on time).

(2 pts.) People on the negative side of this topic say impulse spending increases because you’re not using real cash and the risk of identity theft increases because security and passwordscan be more easily hacked than before.

(2 pts.) After considering multiple views regarding both sides of the topic, I am in favor of the affirmative BECAUSE I can check my account regularly and change my password regularly to make sure my account is not hacked and it’s more important to me personally that I have the convenience of accessing my account anytime I want. I work a day job…. During “banking” hours, so I need to pay my bills and balance my account after business hours.

(2 pts.) Source(s) cited   http://www.nasdaq.com/article/the-pros-and-cons-of-online-banking-cm386361