# data[].attributes.body
I think Great Britain used their power unfairly over the colonists. I think this because they taxed the consist for paper products. Also when the Proclamation of 1763 was made the consisted didn't like it. In the video French and Indian War Hyper-doc it states, "The king ignored these arguments and decided to expand the British army in the colonies." That is definitely not fair because the colonist didn't have a say, they just got ignored. That is prove that the king didn't share his power. Secondly,  Stated on the Stamp act it states "Soon, the pressure on England from struggling British merchants was too great to bear." That is just sad that even though the consist got there way, They ended it not for the colonist. But because the British merchants were struggling. Overall that is how I can infer the power was used unfairly.

# data[].attributes.body
In my opinion i think that great Britain used

# data[].attributes.body
Great Britain did not use there power fairly over the colonies . The first example is the Stamp act i was a tax on all paper documents  such as  proof of owning land, a will to family and marriage documents etc. They used this to fund mone

# data[].attributes.body
In my opinion, Great Britain used it's power unfairly over the Colonists. At the end of the French and Indian War, although Great Britain had won the war, they needed money and quickly!
The King forced the Colonist to allow British Soldiers to stay in their homes without paying for food and shelter...as long as they wanted too!
The Stamp Act was introduced to forced the Colonist to pay for all printed documents. These events made the Colonist upset and they refused to pay...especially without representation.

# data[].attributes.body
Great Britain used it's power unfairly over the colonists. They were unfair because they created the stamp act which was unfair.  The stamp act is when they taxed the colonists by making them pay for stamps for paper products.  This was unfair because they made them pay extra. They did this because the Great Britain needed to make up the money lost in the war.  I don't think they should of taxed them because they should not have to pay for the war with unfair taxes. Since the colonists did not like the stamp act the colonists protested by saying "No taxation without representation" this protest was to try to end the stamp act. They also had this protest because the colonists were mad and they thought they were not able to express their feeling. The colonists also boycotted British companies to stop the stamp act. Also the colonists had a meeting, this meeting was called the stamp act congress. In this meeting they were deciding what to do about the stamp act. Finally, the quartering act was also unfair because they just had to let British troops stay in their homes. This is unfair because the British troops were just able to take or use whatever they needed, even though it could be something important to the people who live there. Overall, the British were unfair to the colonists, from the quartering act and the stamp act. This is unfair because they were taxing the colonists too much and for things that should not have tax on it. Also it was unfair for British troops to just invade peoples homes.

# data[].attributes.body
Great Britain did not use it's power fairly over the colonies. First, the king made people allow troops into their home. The troops would usually were super rude and eat all their food. The colonist had to let the troop stay as long as they needed to. Also the king made a new law called the stamp act to pay for the war Britain had with the French and Indians.  

# data[].attributes.body
Great Britain didn't use its power fairly because  they raised unnecessary taxes and the colonists found it unfair that they had to pay it. So the colonists boycotted it and didn't buy any of Britain's goods  and Britain lost half of their money so they eliminated the law

# data[].attributes.body
Great Britain treated the colonist very unfairly with all the power they had.  Since Great Britain ran out of money during the war I think it did not mean they had to take all of the colonist money. The colonist worked very hard for that money each day and they did not much money so when they bought something they needed they had to pay extra .

# data[].attributes.body
In my opinion i think that great Britain did use its power among the colonist because they are making the  colonist pay taxes on paper,glass, and tea. They are  upset because the colonist responded by dumping the tea in the Boston harbor. But the British responded by sending 1,500 soldiers to New York. secondly, the colonist are going to get upset that they have to move from their homes because they are trying to take over. I would be upset if this happen to me.

# data[].attributes.body
I think that great Britain used it's power unfairly over the colones .  I think this because the colones had no one to say what they wanted and Britain always had it's way like how it said that the stamp act was made and the colonists were mad because they had no one to represent them.  This happened again in the proclamation of 1763. The colonists had no one in a high enough chair to represent them and what they want.  Plus even though they sent letters they were ignored and the king sent more British solders which brings me to my next point, the town-shed act. The King took the peoples homes and made them ins for solder and the people weren't payed to do so, they were forced to. If the king had made it a choice and paid people who did there could have been a better response but since the king constantly ignored his own people his solders and and his laws were forced to leave because of the revolutionary war which could have been avoided if he had been more willing to pay attention to what they wanted.

# data[].attributes.body
Great Britain used it's power unfairly over the colonists. They were unfair because they created the stamp act which was unfair.  The stamp act is when they taxed the colonists by making them pay for stamps for paper products.  This was unfair because they made them pay extra because the Great Britain needed to make up the money lost in the war. I don't think they should of taxed them because

# data[].attributes.body
I think Great Britain used their power unfairly because they kept taxing there Citizens on like every product. Some products they taxed was like all paper products ALL paper products and British goods. And they taxed their Citizens because they won the war. Secondly, the citizens were mad and irritated because they were forced to move from where there living which is not fair! They did absolutely nothing to have to be forced to move. Its just so unfair for all the citizens. I'm also confused on why when they win the war they tax all their citizens ♡♡♡

# data[].attributes.body
Great Britain used its power unfairly. Just because they ran out of money during the war they lost all of their money. I don't think that it is fair that just because they lost their money they can just take it from the hard working colonists they work hard everyday and they now have to pay extra because Great Britain does not know how to save some money so they don't go broke right after the war. They had to make items more expensive just to make up the money that they lost during the war.

# data[].attributes.body
I think Great Britain used their power unfairly over the colonists. I think this because they taxed the consist for paper products. Also when the Proclamation of 1763 was made the consisted didn't like it. In the video French and Indian War Hyper-doc it states, "The king ignored these arguments and decided to expand the British army in the colonies." That is definitely not fair because the colonist didn't have a say, they just got ignored. That is prove that the king didn't share his power. Secondly,  Stated on the Stamp act it states "Soon, the pressure on England from struggling British merchants was too great to bear." That is just sad that even though the consist got there way, They ended it not for the colonist. But because the British merchants were struggling. Overall that is how I can infer the power was used unfairly.

# data[].attributes.body
Great Britain treated it's citizens very unfairly, which they didn't deserve. For example, they taxed  their citizens just on paper goods, but that is not good because it forces them to pay extra money each time they want to buy something, they may be annoyed by that. Secondly, the citizens must have felt irritated because the proclamation forced them to move from they are living. This is bad because they might have trouble finding a new job and settling there. In conclusion Great Britain unfairly treated the citizens because they taxed them extra money and made them move from where they were living, so it is kind of understandable that the citizens are boycotting the British

# data[].attributes.body
Great Britain did not use there power fairly among the colonists because firstly the King created the Stamp Act.  I think the stamp act was unfair to the colonists because  they were forced to pay extra money for simple goods that they needed for there everyday life.  He made a lot of unfair rules.  For example, "The colonists were viewed this as tyranny and said they should have more rights to have a say."  This proves that the colonists were very upset and wanted to have a freedom of speech.  The colonists were angry and irritated.  The text even states that, "The colonists responded by disobeying the act." This shows that the colonists were so frustrated with this law that they didn't even follow it. They completely disobeyed the law because it was unfair to them. To conclude I think that Great Britain used there power unfairly to all of the colonists.

# data[].attributes.body
Great Britain didn't use its power fairly over the colonists because they made taxes for things like paper, playing cards ect. so that made the colonists mad and made them protest on things and boycott.

# data[].attributes.body
I think that Great Britain used its power unfairly over the colonists because Great Britain made the colonists pay taxes just to send important paper goods, they also made the colonists move from were they were living to follow the proclamation. The text stated that the colonists had to pay taxes for every thing that they were sending like paper playing cards and paper documents. I don't think this was fair because that was the only was of communication back when this law was created. I also don't think this law is fair because Great Britain took power over the colonist and if the colonists were not that wealthy they could not spend all of their money communication with their family. The text also said that Great Britain also made the proclamation and this was a law that told all the colonist that the colonists couldn't settle on the other west side of Appalachian Mountains . I don't think this was fair because people had to move from were they were living and have to get new jobs and make a new house witch costed more money. I also think that Great Britain was taking advantage of the colonists because they had to make new houses and make a living when they might not of had a job. That is why I think that Great Britain used its power over the colonists unfairly.

# data[].attributes.body
I think Great Britain used their power unfairly throughout the colonies. They taxed things that are very necessary such as paper to write important documents. If someone bought a house and had to get documents they would mean nothing unless it was on stamped paper to show that had paid taxes. Taxation is important, especially after a way where they lost lots of their money but when they would make these laws, there would be to representatives from the colonies present. This is very unfair to the colonists. In another law they said soldiers would be aloud to stay in their houses no matter what. They could have felt very uncomfortable with a stranger in their house. To conclude, Great Britain has abused there power over the colonies in this situation.

# data[].attributes.body
Great Britain used it's power unfairly over the colonists. They treated the colonists unfairly because they taxed them on paper products. Many colonists sent letters to the King and Queen. The colonists did not get to share their opinion on how they felt about this because the king ignored everything. They did not think it was fair since they were living in the application mountains and they should not be taxed. This was known as the Stamp Act. They also made them pay for the soldiers who were going to be sent to the french.  They had to pay for their housing which was known as the quartering act. They protested by using the words " No taxation without representation!" They felt very angry and very mistreated. Not only did they tax paper products, they taxed glass, lead, paint and tea. They boycotted by not buying the products which ended with Great Britain having to take away the law that they made. Overall, the colonies were not equally treated by Great Britain.

# data[].attributes.body
Great Britain did not use it's power fairly over the colonies. First, the king made The Quartering Act of 1765 when people allow troops into their home. The troops would usually were super rude and eat all their food. The colonist had to let the troop stay as long as they needed to. Also the king made a new law called the Stamp Act in 1765 to pay for the war Britain had with the French and Indians. It was the first direct tax on the colonists. They were taxed on things like wills, newspapers and playing cards. They had to boycott just to get the law removed. So as you see the coloisnts were treated unfairly and did not have a say.

# data[].attributes.body
Great Britain did not use there power fairly over the colonies. Great Britain created the stamp act to tax all colonists on paper products. This made Great Britain more money.  This was not fair because there was no one to represent the colonies in the parliament so Great Britain was able to tax the colonies without getting anyone else's opinion first.  This in turn, hurt Great Britain because now colonists were boycotting British goods and shouting “No taxation without representation!" The Townshend Acts also taxed paper, tea, lead, glass, and paints.  Again, no body was in the parliament to represent the colonies opinion on this new law.  Therefore, the colonists boycotted British goods again because they didn't agree with the new law that taxed all of these items.  Boycotting forced Great Britain to drop these laws. Overall, I think that Great Britain didn't use there power fairly because they didn't let anyone represent the colonies in the parliament and they used the colonies to make more money for Great Britain.

# data[].attributes.body
Great Britain didn't use its power fairly over the colonies because they made life very hard for colonists and just citizens in general. They made new laws every year to make it better but did not work. Such as the stamp act for the tax collectors they were very positive about this law but for colonists they weren't really happy about it. The British only wanted things for themselves. Also the quartering act wasn't a very smart idea because they forced citizens or colonists to care for British solders so the colonists boycotted. They have done so much in the course of 16 years but most of the choices they have made negatively impacted the colonies.

# data[].attributes.body
Great Britain did not use their power fairly and took advantage of the fact that no colonist are part of the parliament. They taxed paper and since it benefited Great Britain and only citizens of Great Britain are in the parliament there was no one to say no or decide the tax price that was actually being affected by it. Also after the king repelled the law he created another tax this would not have happened if there was a colonist or someone representing them there. They would have said no we already said no to the first tax and we don't want this one either.  Also Great Britain made it so colonists would have to support soldiers so they would not have to pay for the soldiers. This was unfair because it is the governments responsibility to care for soldiers and people in Great Britain don't have to care for soldiers.

# data[].attributes.body
Great Britain did not use there power fairly over the colonies . The first example is the Stamp act i was a tax on all paper documents  such as  proof of owning land, a will to family and marriage documents etc. They used this to fund money that was lost in the French and  Indian war also to prove that any any paper document. The second way that Great Britain abused there power is they created the quartering act which made the colonists pay for housing, food and care for soldiers who went to go fight the french the colonists disobeyed the act. These are two  reasons why Great Britain  uses there power unfairly.

# data[].attributes.body
Great Britain did not use it's power fairly over the colonies. First, the King created the Stamp Act on 765, which made the colonists pay tax for any important paper documents, for example marriage documents, will paper, proof of owning land etc. This means that for anything written on paper that is important, the King made the colonists pay more than the cost of the paper itself. The colonists were not happy with this and chanted "No taxation without representation!" Secondly, the Quartering Act made families in the colonies uncomfortable. The Quartering act was created on March 24, 1765, and made it so any British troop was allowed to stay in the colonists home for as long as they want for the 2 years the law was in place. The family that lived in the house had to care for the soldiers, give them food and shelter. Most families did not like this so they disobeyed the law, and then the British realized that the law was hard to enforce, so they ended it. Overall, The Quartering Act and Stamp act was just the King abusing the power he had which he shouldn't have abused as much as he did to make the citizens suffer to make the king more money.

# data[].attributes.body
I think great Britain used it's  power faily over the colonists because tax goes to the goverment and is used for all important reasons. In the doc, The Stamp Act it said that there was only tax on paper products. Now their is tax on everything all they had to pay tax for was paper products. Also their is not much tax on an item, so they do not have to pay much more than they would without tax. The doc, The Stamp Act also says that the olonists were rallying against it, and stoped buying British goods. I think that the colonists should have payed their tax without arguing.

# data[].attributes.body
Double click anywhere on the Padlet to respond to the following statement:

Think about this statement: Great Britain used its’ power fairly over the colonies.

1. Create a claim by providing your opinion in response to that statement:

Great Britain used its’ power fairly over the colonists.
OR
Great Britain used its’ power unfairly over the colonists.

1. Support your claim with at least two pieces of data from the activities above and explain how they support the claim.

Format:

1. Claim

2. Data & Warrant (Explain)

3. Summary Sentence