# data[].attributes.body
The black panther party was so influential because

# data[].attributes.body
I agree with MLK Jr. ideology more, even though both him and Malcom X had the same goal, I believed that fighting for what is right the peaceful way was more powerful and safe for both races. Malcom approach was more violent and Kings approach was more peaceful and safe.

# data[].attributes.body
1.buses were segregated and ruled unconstitutionally
2. this event gave MLK the push that he needed.

# data[].attributes.body
I think it was not right to let black teachers go and not encourage them.

# data[].attributes.body
how people refuse to believe the truth about racism.

# data[].attributes.body
I believe the black panther party was so influential because it was soon after the death of MLK. Since he was gone, the black community needed something to help them stand up against injustices. The solution was the black panther party. They were most likely seen as threatening because of their belief to defend themselves. Defense can often be seen as resistant, and in the case of the black panther party.. threatening. i personally agree with how the organization operated, I mean they helped poor individuals, and they stood for what's right. Not to mention the mother of the greatest rapper to live was a member of the party.

# data[].attributes.body
The Black Panther Party was influential due to their ability to provide support for their communities, such as their free medical clinics or their program to feed children breakfast. They may have been seen as threatening due to them patrolling their neighborhoods with weapons and their belief in self defense.

# data[].attributes.body
the black panther party was such an influential and monumental time period because they made history, something that is in books everywhere. they were seen as threatening because of the impact white people realized they had and obviously because they were black.

# data[].attributes.body
The black panther party was so influential because of how they stood up for African Americans. They were seen as threatening because of the government. I do agree with how the organization was ran but at the same time i disagree. There was violence used but it also seems that people don’t listen unless there is violence.

# data[].attributes.body
The black panthers were influential because they used their voice for change and stood up for something they believe in.people were threatened by them because they had lots of power and that was scary to white people at the time.It also influenced other groups to voice change.I don’t agree with all the violence that went on in the group;I think protests are a better solution

# data[].attributes.body
The Black Panther Party became very influential because it asserted "black power," and allowed black people to voice their opinions and fight for what they want. However, the government saw the Black Panther Party as threatening because it was taking away from the power/control of the government; the government suppressed and villainized the Black Panther Party out of fear. By using the media and other resources/platforms, the government forced a negative connation to the Black Panther Party name, so that people would associate them with danger/threatening. I agree with how the Black Panther Party ran their organization, for they supported self-defense rather than blatant violence; they were reasonable but did not stand still. Additionally, they gave back to the black community, such as providing free healthcare services and food.

# data[].attributes.body
the black panther party were a very influential and powerful group that stood up for what’s right and were often misinterpreted because of how the government portrayed them

# data[].attributes.body
they was so influential because The Panthers campaign for African American equality had a lasting impact on black empowerment, and its influence continues to be felt in such current social movements as Black Lives Matter. yes I do agree how they ran there organization because they It emphasized racial pride, economic empowerment, and the creation of political and cultural institutions which are still problems in today society which is why I agree with them.

# data[].attributes.body
The Black Panther Party is so influential because they were leaders who stood for African Americans, helped communities, and black power. I believe they were seen as threatening because whenever black people are making a stand they always get targeted as enemies. I agree with how they ran their organization, when helping people of color, but I definitely think when it comes to violence it wasn't the best approach. That made the Black Panther Party a bigger target for the FBI and etc. It gave them more of a reason to want to end this party.

# data[].attributes.body
i feel like they were seen as often threatening because of the government portrayed them & the government was Afraid of how strong & how powerful they Were &  The Black panthers were Basically standing up for African American Culture & people  i Agree on how they ran they're Organization Because it seems people only listen when it's Violence But when they try to Approach the situation nobody listens .

# data[].attributes.body
The Black Panther Party was so influential because not only did they focus on helping black people with police brutality but also conditions that were hard for the black community including healthcare, food, school, and etc. They were often seen as threatening because they had a lot of power and strength, which scared and annoyed people. I do agree how they ran their organization because they went a racist anti-white group. Instead they tried to work with all types of races.

# data[].attributes.body
bc they were there to make the voice for african americans and i do agree how they went about themselves how they got there point across about any subject .

# data[].attributes.body
They were influential because the showed white people that they could make a change and do better for themselves. They analyzed black issues and the causes of them so they could fix them and better the community as a whole. i do agree with the way they ran their organization, especially the violence part. They didn't feel the need to be violence and kill for no apparent reason. It was always for a reason

# data[].attributes.body
The Black Panther Party was influential because they inspired other African Americans to stand up for themselves against injustice. They were seen as threatening due to the fact that they weren't willing to let the government and the white man walk all over them. I agree with how they ran their organization because they had self-defense policy, not brute force and violence.

# data[].attributes.body
the black panther party was so influential because that instead of peacefully protesting and not causing any harm it made an emphasis on self defense and it's seen as threatening because it's a punch back at white people who believe in jim crow laws and discrimination. I think that the organization needed to be made because that people have been finding ways to move around peaceful protests and movements and something that they sort of find threatening was maybe what they needed

# data[].attributes.body
The Black Panther Party was so influential because of all the help they gave to the black community such as access to food for breakfast for kids and providing free health services to blacks in need. I believe they were seen as threatening because of the progress they made towards supporting their own community without being solely reliant on other communities and essentially the communities who do not support them and maybe racist. I agree with how they ran their organization because of how persistent and efficient they were. Making use of the donations from markets and such to provide breakfast for those in need was not only very smart but successful; their actions were cautious and non violent. It all came down to protecting themselves and their means of living.

# data[].attributes.body
The Black Panther Party is so influential because white people were lying about the acts that the people in the party were doing. It can be really threatening to them because the little power they have can be easily be taken away from them. Yes I agree with how they ran their organization because they were peaceful but got their point across.

# data[].attributes.body
They were seen as influential because they stood up for African Americans. They were sometimes seen as threatening because of how they were portrayed by the government. I mostly agree with how they ran the organization because they helped African Americans in many ways.

# data[].attributes.body
I think they were so influential because they truly emulate power, knowing you have it and using it how ever they pleased. But that exact power was seem threatening because the white men in power have never seen black people act in a way were they are equal to them. But I do agree how it was ran because they stayed true to them movement while acting within all their right given by the government, people needed to know they meant business. So they did exactly that.

# data[].attributes.body
The black panthers were so influential and powerful because they were a group of black people wanting to make change- theres power in numbers and with many different chapters, they were able to leave quite the impact. The controversy over them was also very impactful. I do agree with how they ran their movement, they only excerised their same rights as many people who disagree with them did. They also helped black people in different ways that were often overlooked such as the disproportionate poverty and hunger they often faced.

# data[].attributes.body
The Black Panther Party seems threatening because of the way they were involved with the police brutality and the way they would come at the police violently. I sort of disagree with how they ran the organization because at times I think the violence was a bit drastic and not helping the situation. At the same time I commend them for having the courage because they knew what the outcome would be.

# data[].attributes.body
ee with mlk bc he was more about the peace between everyone so the children of the world didn't have to grow up learning to hate the oppisite race

# data[].attributes.body
I think MLK's ideologies would have gotten the most done and would be the most effective compared to Malcolm X. MLK was all about peace where as Malcolm X wasn't irrational, MLK's ideologies would get the attention of the people who were in government at the time- possibly even the reason we are taught more about him than Malcolm X. Though Malcolm X's reason for being angry and wanting to act more violently is justified considering all the horrors black people endured- MLK's peace would have been the best for the time.

# data[].attributes.body
I agree with Martin Luther Kings ideologies the most because he wanted African Americans to peacefully the change he wanted. Although I agree with Malcolm X that African Americans should stand up and fight for their freedom but that doesn't mean it has to be in a violent way like he wanted. I feel that if African Americans came off to the world as violent every time we marched for our rights, the world would be so much different in a negative way.

# data[].attributes.body
I agree with MLK’s ideology more because I don’t think that violence is the best way to solve things and if we are peaceful then change can happen more effectively in my opinion. MLK used peaceful protests to spread his message which I like.

# data[].attributes.body
MLK

# data[].attributes.body
I side with MLK Jr.'s idea more because I it was more peaceful, no antagonization, fighting, just marches and speeches.

# data[].attributes.body
i agree with MLK's ideology because i feel like with Malcolm X it was more of taking what's yours and at that kind of time it was like you could get killed for that and i feel like peacefully protesting is a much safer idea.

# data[].attributes.body
I agree with MLK's ideologies because of his emphasis on the peaceful approach to get the change they seek. While a bolder approach gets the attention of many (which Malcom X ideologies paralleled with violence), I believe that violence only makes people more mad and leads to chaos. MLK's held very organized peaceful protests which did in result lead to law change and used different means (like the media) to spread the bigger message to others across the country. I am also not very fond of the idea that blacks should be at the "top of the social order", it should just be those who are most competent and have nothing to do with race; we should all be somewhat equal.

# data[].attributes.body
I agree with MLK because of his peaceful methods. Fighting back without violence showed that we were civilized and not "savages" or "animals." I can also see X's point because MLK's method still got him killed, despite being peaceful.

# data[].attributes.body
he had a

# data[].attributes.body
i agree with MLK’s ideologies because he wants to get a message out to the public without any violence

# data[].attributes.body
Though both ideologies created a huge impact I agree a little more with MLK Jr. I agree with his views a little more because the peaceful approach should that African Americans wanted a change and that violence isn't necessary. The African American back then showed the world they are going to make their voices heard and not give up until. For example the Montgomery bus boycott, which African peacefully boycotted segregated buses for almost a whole year. While Malcom X's ways did have effects, it also was very violent. His ways showed people that the African Americans as "animals" that would prove the white people's points.

# data[].attributes.body
I agree with MLK because I think that his ideology was imppactful on a global scale so was Malcom X to but I agree

# data[].attributes.body
While MLK is more of a peaceful protester. In quote "Use non-violent means to promote the change he wanted". Malcom was more willing to do anything to get equality. Even if it was violent. While  I can understand Malcolms side, I agree with MLKs cause it's more safe for everyone.

# data[].attributes.body
because I like that he took a more non violent route when it came to protests. When he would be involved in protests he didnt cause a problem or a fight. He was more peaceful with it and i think thats a better approach.

# data[].attributes.body
I Agree with MLK Because he Wanted Equal Rights and opportunities and he led a movement of non-violent, peaceful protests to fight racial injustice. & He helped African Americans By doing the protests.

# data[].attributes.body
I agree with MLK's ideologies because he was for equality but was set on only getting it through peace which I admire and show how his peaceful way has come a long way in the future.

# data[].attributes.body
I agree with MLK the most because he was nonviolent. I think this is better because less people will get hurt that way. For example, MLK's protests helped black people.

# data[].attributes.body
I think I most agree with is Malcolm X is because how did not go against the idea of protecting yourself against white aggression as they would. I donʻt think that we should just go around hurting people but being armed as white people would at that time as they want African Americans deserve the same right to do so.

# data[].attributes.body
I agree more with MLK's ideology because of his peaceful and non-violent approach. Equality cannot be reached if both sides are fighting with violence, and MLK set the example of how to reach equality/equal rights without the need for violence. For example, MLK organized the Montgomery Bus Boycott, which was a nonviolent protest to end segregated buses. This protest was successful, as the Supreme Court ruled against segregation on buses, no physical harm was done to anyone, and this act inspired others throughout the country. Although I do agree that Malcolm X was a passionate and influential figure/activist, his approach to racial equality would not work in reality. He fiercely advocated for black power and self-defense (which I agree with), but in the eyes of society, his antagonization of white people made him seem like a threat; equality can not be reached this way. MLK's non-violent approach would be best to reach equality, overall.

# data[].attributes.body
Honestly I can't decide because the both of them made really good points but if I truly have to pick one of them, I'd have to go with Malcolm X. I know you shouldn't fight fire with fire but it seems that white people only really listen to violence. Think back to the civil war.. It took the deaths of many soldiers to get them to partially abolish slavery. Also, Malcolm X said there's really only a reason to be violent if they're violent with us first and I agree with that one hundred percent.

# data[].attributes.body
1. Segregation of buses were ruled unconstitutional.
2. It helped MLK progress as an activist.

# data[].attributes.body
The Montgomery bus boycott introduced Martin Luther King Jr. who was one of the leader of the civil rights movement. Also, it should people across the United States what non violent protests can really do, opposed to violent ones that led to many deaths.

# data[].attributes.body
1.)It desegregated busses/public transportation
2.) It gave Mlk the push he needed

# data[].attributes.body
1. Buses segregation was declared unconstitutional after over a year boycott on Montgomery Buses

2. The boycott and peaceful protests resulted in hope for the civil rights movement and that change can be done through determination and persistence (over a year is a long time)

# data[].attributes.body
Black cab owners had to pay a fee
Rosa Parks was the key piece in getting equality

# data[].attributes.body
it made it more notice able that blacks could make it without the help of the other races communitys

# data[].attributes.body
1. The bus system almost went broke
2. It was ruled unconstitutional to segregate public transport

# data[].attributes.body
1. Buses were desegregated (persons of any race could sit in whatever section of the bus they would like)

2. Martin Luther King Jr. became a well-known figure and this boosted his career as an activist

# data[].attributes.body
1. Segregation on the buses were no more
2. During the boycott bus drivers started losing passenger

# data[].attributes.body
Helped segregate transportation and helped other protests become non violent.

# data[].attributes.body
busses were desegregated

# data[].attributes.body
1. It encouraged and inspired other African Americans.
2. Helped desegregation.

# data[].attributes.body
1. It got america closer to integration, with the Supreme Court ruling segregation on public buses unconstitutional
2. It helped making transport less stressful for black passengers

# data[].attributes.body
Bus companies were losing money because Africans Americans didn't want to ride them during the civil rights movement. Also later African Americans were able to be equal when traveling on public transportation.

# data[].attributes.body
Two major effects the bus boycott had on the civil rights movement was the fact that it introduced Martin Luther King to the movement and he would turn out to be one of the faces of the movement. It also stopped the segregation of local transportation

# data[].attributes.body
2 effects that the Montgomery Bus Boycott had on the civil rights movement was that the supreme court ruled that segregation on public buses violates the equal rights protection act making it unconstitutional . Also, it took down the economy by a lot

# data[].attributes.body
The Montgomery Bus boycott showed people just how powerful protests can be. It was one of the first biggest feats for the civil rights movement. It also gave MLK jr. a platform to start bringing change to the U.S

# data[].attributes.body
It gave MLK jr. momentum to be a prominent figure to the civil rights movement inspiring other to work with him. It also showed how important African- Americans are to the strength economy and how much power they truly hold to influence.

# data[].attributes.body
1. Segregated bus companies were almost bankrupted
2. Buses were desegregated.

# data[].attributes.body
I think its definitely weird behavior how black teachers were let go and instead not encouraged and praised.

# data[].attributes.body
I think it is really ridiculous that after brown v board of education lots of black teachers were fired and I agree that black students can connect more with black teachers

# data[].attributes.body
I didn't realize this case was 65 years ago, but now looking back i've only had 4 black teachers my entire life and for the teachers back then to lose their jobs like that it pretty messed up. Also, i think having a black teacher is more beneficial for black students to have a black teacher because they have more things to relate to.

# data[].attributes.body
1. I was not aware that only 27% of black teachers worked in suburban schools, while 70% worked in high-poverty schools. It's crazy to see the challenges black teachers face, despite Brown v. Board of Education being 65 years ago.

2. I have the same question as the title. Throughout my entire school experience, I've only had, roughly, 3-4 black teachers.

# data[].attributes.body
I found it interesting but not surprising that black students benefit from having a black teacher academically and socially. I also found interesting that black teachers are more likely to quit their job than white teachers.

# data[].attributes.body
Even after the Brown case that happened 65 years ago that the effect is still showing through. Also, since we all looked at the fact that schools were being desegregated, no one really focused on how it would effect others. Many black teachers and principles suffered from this and were ignored.

# data[].attributes.body
even though there was still discrimination up north it was better for African Americans because they had more and better opportunities

# data[].attributes.body
It pointed out the fact that black students were less likely to be suspended, given detention, and be expelled if their teacher was black because they have higher expectations than white people do for their students. Black kids are also more likely to be put into gifted education programs by black teachers.

# data[].attributes.body
I didn't realize that the Brown vs. Board case that happened 65 years ago could still impact how our schools work. It's crazy to see how far we've come but also disappointing to see all that is still not just. We definitely need more representation in the classroom and outside the classroom as well.

# data[].attributes.body
it's sad that majority of people in Topeka will not want to employ Negro teachers next year for white children . and it's crazy how it was 11 certified black teachers but they only picked one .

# data[].attributes.body
Only 1 percent of black teachers work in predominantly white schools while a great percentage of 70 percent of black teachers work in high-poverty schools                         While there is a great amount of people who did not experience having a black teacher, the correlation in areas still exist where my pre-k teacher was black and alot of the staff living in pg county but moving to anne arundel the ratio flipped

# data[].attributes.body
One takeaway from the reading is that when the decision was made black educators like teachers and principal lost their jobs. Another takeaway was how there is still a lack of black teachers in school today.

# data[].attributes.body
One takeaway was that even though schools became educated, many black educators lost their jobs, since they didn't want black educators in position of authority over white educators/students. Another takeaway was the fact that segregation still has lasting effects to this day.

# data[].attributes.body
I learned that black educators always wanted the best for their students and used what power they had to stand up for them even if that resulted in job loss or violence. Also that black students benefited from having a black teacher because they have a deeper understanding and they have higher expectations.

# data[].attributes.body
I learned that the black educators who lost their jobs were more qualified than the white educators who replaced them because they had experience in integrated education and higher degrees. I also learned that we still don't have a percentage of black educators that's higher than the percentage of black educators before the ruling.

# data[].attributes.body
1. I learned that currently only 7% of teachers are black- Looking back, I realize that I have only had around 2-3 black teachers out of so many classes/years

2. I learned that black students are most likely to succeed if they have black teachers- Representation and diversity are important, so measures should be taken in order for all students to have their best opportunity for success

# data[].attributes.body
It was crazy how it took until the 70's to fully be integrated. It was also crazy to me how teachers tried to sue the school district for being fired over their race but the school district declined it.

# data[].attributes.body
I didn't get my first black teacher until the 6th grade and only had 3 since then. But really didn't think much of then. I was surprised that even though black educators were more educated with better credentials were lost from southern schools once integration started.

# data[].attributes.body
i believe that moving to the north was not best but beneficial to african americans at that time because it provided them with more opportunities

# data[].attributes.body
I feel like moving to the North was beneficial because of the vast opportunites given there for us African Americans  after the war and even though we still faced many hardships and inequality from those who see my race as inferior, many people like me  have made a living and that is what I seek

# data[].attributes.body
Moving up north was very beneficial for blacks because they got all sorts of opportunity up north. The Harlem renaissance was also something that would've never taken place, if not for the great migration.

# data[].attributes.body
yes because during the great migration african american population was decreasing and the best solution for them was to migrate to the north/west areas.

# data[].attributes.body
Although discrimination and racism still took place in the North, I believe migrating to the North was more beneficial to African Americans. They were given more opportunities and weren’t treated as badly as they were in the South.

# data[].attributes.body
Naomi G
Moving to the south was a beneficial thing that happened for them because the conditions in the south were horrible and in the North African Americans had way more job opportunities and could make a living. However there were racial issues there too but they were overcome

# data[].attributes.body
I feel like moving to the north/West is beneficial because it's not bad like the south and it's more opportunities than what the south had and u wouldn't get in that much trouble like u were where u lived before .

# data[].attributes.body
Moving was everything that I expected i got more economic opportunities but the racism still followed. It may not be as bad here in New York than Alabama but when will I start to reap the benefits of living in the North that I deserve as a human being.

# data[].attributes.body
i would take the approach of protesting because it got through to people when nothing was going right, we are here for equality not from charity we need everyone to be safe and, black parents praying that their kids are okay walking out the house with the police brutality going on towards us. abolitionist where the ones to get the point across to the people watching across the world to let them know that they where serious.

# data[].attributes.body
The great migration was beneficia because it helped with getting better jobs to provide for the famiy. It also helped create the harlem renaissance and expanding the cuture

# data[].attributes.body
I feel like migrating to the North/West was beneficial because African Americans had more opportunities for jobs and to make a better lifestyle for themselves. I personally think migrating all kept African Americans off of plantations because in the south most freed African Americans were sharecroppers which is similar to still being a slave.

# data[].attributes.body
I think moving to the North/West was a great idea because there were less casualties for African Americans than the South. A better life would be provided too.

# data[].attributes.body
We thought moving to the north to the north would be a good thing for our family, it was all right until the war ended. When the family moved up north we got jobs since most of the white men were gone. But, as they started coming back, more torment came. Thinking that the war was going to bring us together was wrong, people started burning down more of our churches and fighting more. My husband was part of a union to stop this, he was killed a few days ago. I fear the officers will come after me next.