# data[].attributes.body
Pros:  easy to understand .  Simple. Not too many words.
Cons: student may have trouble determining on their own what would be below level and above as well

# data[].attributes.body
Students are all held to the same standards with no real wiggle room. Pro and con

# data[].attributes.body
It’s very vague and jumbled looking

# data[].attributes.body
The rubric is extremely vague.

# data[].attributes.body
The rubric clearly defines expectations of activities, but doesn't give details on what separates the categories for grading.

# data[].attributes.body
Pros: It gives you expectations. Easy to understand.
Cons: Very vague.

# data[].attributes.body
Pros: some criteria are specific (4-6 sentences), and simple

Cons: Unclear what exactly some of the criteria mean (to what degree must they participate in discussion, what does staying on task mean exactly?)

# data[].attributes.body
Pro: criteria is listed Con: very vague

# data[].attributes.body
Pros: Simple to read
Cons: Staying on task could become an issue as students may think they were doing what they were supposed to be doing.. or may not be truthful in their activity level.

# data[].attributes.body
I like that it is easier for students to follow, not as daunting. I also feel like it’s a much better way to measure student achievement, and gives them an attainable goal. Even the rubrics are daunting for me sometimes. Cons are maybe not challenging gifted students as much?

# data[].attributes.body
Pro- it gets to the point of what you expect.

Con- doesn’t convey all information you may way students to know.

# data[].attributes.body
One of the pros of the rubric is that it shows how many points you get for each task. A con is that there isn’t much detail in the criteria.

# data[].attributes.body
Pros: Single column means easy for quick reference.
Only having to explain one set of expectations would be easier for the educator.

# data[].attributes.headline
I believe the pros are easy to understand. Cons are that it is very vague and not specific on criteria. 

# data[].attributes.subject
I believe the pros are easy to understand. Cons are that it is very vague and not specific on criteria. 

# data[].attributes.body
Likes-
* Focuses students on mastery of content more than traditional grading scale.
*Gives the opportunity to give positive feedback along with criticism.
*Is less discouraging in the sense of what scale the student will be graded on, as in they may not be as upset as they would if they received a straight novice.

Dislikes-
*students may get confused on the grading scale if not explained thoroughly.

# data[].attributes.body
I think some pros for this style of rubric is that it gives a pathway for constructive criticism. I also like the idea of pointing to evidence as to why a student is behind or exceeding. Students can get feedback and are all held to the same level. A con could be that it is too simple.

# data[].attributes.headline
Con. Doesnt expand on Developing or exceeding.   

# data[].attributes.subject
Con. Doesnt expand on Developing or exceeding.   

# data[].attributes.body
Pro. It is short and easy for students to follow

# data[].attributes.body
It is more for participation

# data[].attributes.body
Another pro is that it’s simple and easy to use.

# data[].attributes.headline
Pros: simple instructions. Positively framed category for work that is maybe unsatisfactory.                                 Cons: Maybe too simple and a little directionless. Expectations could be more well defined.

# data[].attributes.subject
Pros: simple instructions. Positively framed category for work that is maybe unsatisfactory.                                 Cons: Maybe too simple and a little directionless. Expectations could be more well defined.

# data[].attributes.body
Pros - very simple to follow, easy to understand

Cons - not a lot of detail for grading, very vague and leaves room for questions

# data[].attributes.headline
I like the straight forward expectations. It gives a clear understanding of what they should be doing.  

# data[].attributes.subject
I like the straight forward expectations. It gives a clear understanding of what they should be doing.  

# data[].attributes.body
Cons is it is just a little vague as to in some of the criteria though. But t makes for a good foundation rubric.

# data[].attributes.body
A big con is the vague and lack of explicit direction for how to get the most points. But a big pro is how simple the rubric is.

# data[].attributes.body
Cons: may be too wordy for students to dechipher

# data[].attributes.body
Pro: it’s simple to read and understand. Con: it’s hard to tell what level the student falls in.

# data[].attributes.body
Pros: easy to understand
Cons: criteria spelled incorrectly and vague

# data[].attributes.body
A pro is that it is very straight forward. A con would be that it isn’t very detailed.