# data[].attributes.body
-I think that the discussion was satisfactory becasue there would be pauses in between when people were talking and others would not reallly help each other for forming ideas, but they did discuss all the questions
-Their spoken contributioon and verbal behavior was satisfactory becuase everoyne did participate, but the way that they verbally behaved wasnt well developed.
-The one one thing that suprised me was that most people did not think that this punishment was acceptable and that their books were ot appropraite for the readings
-I wish I could resond to the questions that were beiing asked about weather the book they are reading is accepable or not.
-I would reccomend more participation for certian people ad follow up questions

# data[].attributes.body
-Students helped each other when they struggled to verbalize ideas.
-Students started sentences with meaningful conversation starters (i.e. "I agree because...")
-Spoke with maturity about tough topics (i.e. Sunny and Holden's experiences with her); no giggling or foolishness.
-Asked clarifying questions throughout (i.e. "I wonder...)
-Made frequent reference to the text and paraphrased big ideas and scenes.
-A couple of suggestions I would make to these students would be that everyone should have their materials out and perhaps have notes prepared to speak from/refer to.

# data[].attributes.body
1) The person speaking would sometimes  stutter a lot due to the lack of quick thinking skills
2)People respect each others thoughts and will disagree or agree or add on.
3)Explain confusion concepts to each other
4)referred back to the text
5) Would add on different ideas

# data[].attributes.body
Productive behavior
1. They build off each others ideas
2.  They don´t speak over each other
3. No side conversations or giggling
4. References to the book to build on ideas
Recommend
1. They could make eye contact more
2. Some kids didn't have materials out

# data[].attributes.body
Productive Behaviors
-only one person was talking at a time
-Agreeing/ disagreeing respectfully
-if someone is confused, the others explain the confused topics to each other
-they are making eye contact
build off others ideas
Recommended
-using evidence from the text

# data[].attributes.body
1) Everyone talking and contributing to the discussion. They went off what other people were saying so that everyone got to share what they were thinking.
2) Maybe they can use the book and refer to the text and gather up information to talk about in the discussion so that they are prepared.

# data[].attributes.body
1) People are actively listening and sharing their opinions. Started off by saying "I agree with..." .  Everyone supported their thinking with evidence from the book.
2) They could've used exact page numbers to cite their thinking instead of vaguely describing where it was in the book. There could have been more questions being asked to clarify what people thought.

# data[].attributes.body
1) The students help each other when one gets stuck. Also they build off one persons idea to create a better understanding of the text. Also they agree and disagree with each other to see different reactions to the text.
2)They can be better by creating more questions about the text. Also they should not interrupt each other.

# data[].attributes.body
- The students followed up on each others ideas, they were able to openly talk about their ideas/topics, they explained confusing topics to each other, they were respectful when disagreeing, most of them started their sentence with "I agree" or "I disagree"
- Only one student should be speaking at once and they shouldn't be talking over each other

# data[].attributes.body
-They help each other is someone is stuck
-They responded to what other people said instead of starting a new topic
-They say if they agree or disagree with something
-They ask questions
-Only recommendation would be to stay on topic instead of talking about how he got the kids at the end

# data[].attributes.body
-The students added on to each others comments, and agreed and added more evidence/information.
-The conversation flowed easily from person to person, and nobody interrupted one another's thoughts. -They showed why they personally believe why someone did something, in their own opinion. ------They also always support their thoughts with reasoning, often using words like "because". Students stayed on task and were well focused.
-It did not look like most of them had any notes written down, which would make the conversation more successful.
-I think they were able to talk maturely and take it seriously
-they respected their peers
- I also recommend that they challenge their thinking more and make more diverse statements, you don't always have to agree.

# data[].attributes.body
1) Students help each other out if the speaker is stuck with what they're trying to say.
2) People build off of each other in their conversation.
3) People agree respectfully or disagree respectfully with evidence.
4) Each student analyzes the text and explains in their own words about what was going on in the text.
5) Each contribution the students gave in the seminar were provided with pieces of evidence.
6) Students reply back to questions asked earlier on in the seminar after the specific conversation seemed to come to an end.

Rating-Non-Verbal: Good, many of the students are making eye contact, nobody is looking directly at the teacher for the entirety of the comment.
Rating-Verbal: Very good-students build off of each other's ideas, used examples from the text. They provide their own examples and explain with their reasons on why they think their books are/aren't helpful for these teens. They don't often refer to the article, but they do build off of each other often.

# data[].attributes.body
1)
- students build off of others ideas
- use "I agree"/"I disagree"
- students speak loudly and clearly
- students are mature
- students correct each other politely
2)
- students should talk one at a time
- all students should participate
- should use more text evidence

# data[].attributes.body
- students wait for their classmates to finish talking to start talking
- they openly discuss about whats going on
-help each other understand the story.
-I recommend that they make more connections to what their other classmates are saying
talking about why the part in the book matters rather than just re stating what happened.

# data[].attributes.body
1.  Classmates are polite to each other and respect each other.
Helped each other get their ideas across to everyone.
They talked clearly and loudly.
Built off of what someone else said and elaborated more.

2. I recommend that the students maybe try to talk over each other less and let the other students voice  their opinions one at a time.

# data[].attributes.body
-they share their opinions openly and support them by examples from the text
-they respond to each other by agreeing or disagreeing and then adding on.
-they are able to talk about mature topics
-they help each other by explaining something that some one else is confused about.
-they go back to a topic or question that they discussed previously.

-one thing that they could improve on is not talking over each other and waiting for someone to stop talking before saying what they wanted to say
-even though they refer to the text, they could use text evidence

# data[].attributes.body
Going off each others thoughts and adding to the discussion
One person talking at a time
Helping each other

They could have referred back to the book

# data[].attributes.body
-Only one person was talking at a time, but they built off of each others ideas.
-the students helped each other talk about the ideas they were trying to reach.
-They talked about the main problems and ideas from  the story they were talking about.
-In the future maybe they can use more text evidence.

# data[].attributes.body
Everyone was looking at who was talking
They agreed or disagreed
They listened and added on to people's thoughts
They were interested and enthusiastic about the topic
They made connections
They helped their peers
They identified the author's writing style and figurative language

They should not have one person dominate the conversation
Don't cut each other off
Think out your idea before voicing your opinion

# data[].attributes.body
-  When the one guy didn't know what to say, the girl helped him
- They talk loud and clear
- They start off with I agree or I disagree
-  Everyone is contributing
- One person talks at a time
- Not say like as much or um
- Some people stutter or take long pauses before going on
- Everyone looks at the person who's talking and listens
- Used examples from the text

# data[].attributes.body
- In the Socratic seminar no one talked over each other. In addition, they had meaningful conversations without being called on. They started their sentences with phrases like "I agree..." and variations of "And to add on..." They also continued to use higher level thinking in the conversation and used hypothetical Level 3 questions. When people ask these questions, others respectfully answer them and do not get off topic.
- Towards the middle and through till the end, they reached a point of being slightly informal and cutting off others.

# data[].attributes.body
-Others helping out their partners when they cant fins a certain word to say
-Maybe having something written down so that they know what they can say if a certain question is asked, or they can also say if they agree or disagree with their peers, or even ask some questions to their peers

# data[].attributes.body
-the one kid said "Like" about 260 times
-they agree/disagree with the person before them
-they don't say a specific name when talking
- they got off topic
- restate the question
- referenced the text

# data[].attributes.body
They speak without interrupting one another, and the also try to build off the thoughts and ideas that were presented by other people in the group by using "I agree". When a student has a opinion that differes from one of their peers, they are very respectful and don't scream or just straight up deny it. They instead give their opinion on the topic and why they believe about the topic at hand. Help out peers that have a misunderstanding, or don't completely understand a part. They go more indepth as the time continue on.  Something they could have improved upon is by trying to encourage some of the other students that were not talking as much, there looked as if there was one or two very dominant students in the discussion which then made some of the stundents, that may be  a little bit more timid due to the fact they may have some confusion on a certain section of the book, and it limits their ability to talk. All of the students furthermore, were also very well prepared and it felt like they truly know what the book is about and etc.

# data[].attributes.body
1) Uses specific details from the book and uses transitions words to make it flow better. Also, there is things like I agree or I disagree, to continue the conversation from one person to another. Additionally, they  also talk about topics very maturely and don't do anything inappropriate when others are speak. They also use deeper thinking and wait for others to finish speaking before they talk. They give background context if new ideas are being introduced. Also, they are respectfully explaining ideas which may be confusing or interpreted in different ways.
2)Although they did a good job not speaking over each other at the beginning, they stopped doing it after a while. So, they should be continue not speaking over others. Also, they could have used specific quotes from the book instead of paraphrasing details from the book. They should do this because it would make their opinions stronger and more detailed.

# data[].attributes.body
1)
- helped finish each other's thoughts
- used "Socratic Seminar " phrases
- polite while others talk
- able to talk about mature topics
- used details from the book
- the students are keeping the conversation going, there is no help from the teacher
2)
- eye contact while you're speaking
- ask more questions, instead of just summarizing the book
- finish your thought in your head before saying it out loud (let your brain catch up to your mouth)
- use more textual evidence (instead of just mentioning details mention a page number so people who are confused can see what you're talking about
- add leveled questions into the discussion (especially level 3 questions)

# data[].attributes.body
1) they referred back to the text when bringing up a point. They also bounced off of each others ideas to keep the flow of the conversation. They also used background information to help prove points, and give a stronger statement. Everyone also talks and has a part contributing to the conversation.

2) They should not only ask more questions, but when they ask questions make sure its not just something straight from the text. They should also try to make some inforences and predict what might happen in the future based on the chapters actions. They should also try to refer back to the txt more, in the video they do refer back to he text but not as much as they should of.

# data[].attributes.body
After watching the video of the Socratic Seminar, answer the following:

-What productive behaviors or quality contributions did you notice during the seminar?
-What recommend to the seminar participants to help them have even more successful academic conversations in the future?

*Be sure to put your name at the top of your post.
*You do not need to restate the questions; you may simply bullet your responses.