# data[].attributes.headline
7: i totally support this idea because they both made an impact in history. even if harriet is a women that shouldnt matter and it would be nice to have the first women on a bill. 

# data[].attributes.subject
7: i totally support this idea because they both made an impact in history. even if harriet is a women that shouldnt matter and it would be nice to have the first women on a bill. 

# data[].attributes.headline
7.  He is viewed differently because today doing something like that is seen as cruel and unjust but back then it was okay and I think that needs to be thought about also.

# data[].attributes.subject
7.  He is viewed differently because today doing something like that is seen as cruel and unjust but back then it was okay and I think that needs to be thought about also.

# data[].attributes.body
I think they look at him differently because there is so much more diversity now than there was back then.

# data[].attributes.body
President jackson is not someone that should be represented on the 20$ bill because of his actions when he was president

# data[].attributes.body
I agree with this idea. I think at the time he was liked but
views now are very different.

# data[].attributes.body
Because now Jackson is viewed as the cause of what could be considered a genocide of the Indians due to the rough conditions of the trail of tears this brings Jackson into a light that does not favor him.

# data[].attributes.body
He is viewed now in a different way because the thoughts of Americans have changed. During Jackson's time, the people wanted to kick the Indians out and they treated them like savages and inferior. Now; however, people are starting to realize that this was wrong and unjust and people want to fix the past mistakes.

# data[].attributes.body
I agree with changing the $20 bill to Harriett Tubman is a great idea. She helped women gain rights whereas Jackson stripped the rights of people.

# data[].attributes.body
I would love to see Harriet Tubman on the $20 bill instead of Andrew Jackson. Back then it might have been okay, but looking back at it now, once the U.S. has changed and evolved so much, I don't believe Jackson should be represented on the bill.

# data[].attributes.body
Replacing Andrew Jackson's face with Harriet Tubman is a great idea

# data[].attributes.body
it would not effect me either way but would be cool to see another face on a bill

# data[].attributes.body
I think he is looked at differently now because we live in such an age of equality where we no longer support people who were discriminative or who had to do with those situatuions as it no longer reflects well on the country

# data[].attributes.body
I think it would be better to have Harriett Tubman would make for a better person to be on the $20 bill. Harriett did so many more and better things then Jackson did.

# data[].attributes.body
I LOVE this!

# data[].attributes.body
I LOVE this! He was not a very good president, and he did terrible things. But, I mostly like the idea of having a woman on a bill! Finally, we need a girl!! She represents so many rights for women, and it would be wonderful to have her on a bill :0

# data[].attributes.body
I think that It is a great idea because we shouldn't be glorifying his cruelty and injustice against the native tribes.

# data[].attributes.body
I think that replacing President Jackson on the $20 with Harriet Tubman is a great idea because this would be the first woman and first Black person on U.S currency. I also feel that people might think she made a more positive impact on this country than he did.

# data[].attributes.body
YES. He totally betrayed the Cherokee which was super mean. He was ignorant and very rude to people who weren't white. Harriet Tubman was a remarkable lady who IMPROVED people's lives. She didn't attack people's rights.

# data[].attributes.body
I liked the idea even before I knew how awful President Jackson was to the Cherokee. Harriet Tubman should 10/10 be on the $20 bill.

# data[].attributes.body
I think Jackson isn't looked at the same way because of how men are looked at with more equality more today. I think Harriet Tubman deserves to be on the $20 bill.

# data[].attributes.body
it contradicted the constitution because the constitution believed that all men are created equal

# data[].attributes.body
The values of the US have drastically evolved to include more equality and diversity, so it makes sense that they would suggest Harriet Tubman, who is a great representative of moral goodness. Andrew Jackson, while he accomplished many things, he could technically be accused of genocide. I think Harriet is a better showcase for our country

# data[].attributes.body
It contradicted the principles. The rights of the Indians were being stripped away from them. They could not do anything to help save themselves from this situation.

# data[].attributes.body
It contradicts the democratic principles on which the U.S. was founded. The constitution states that all men are created equal and have the right to freedom, but they're not treating the Cherokee this way.

# data[].attributes.body
It contradicted because it was not for the same things as the government would of been supportive of if it were them.

# data[].attributes.body
It completely contradicts because the  US was founded on freedom but the cherokees were completely stripped of that basic principle from the beginning of the settlement of this country.

# data[].attributes.body
It contradicts the democratic principles on which the U.S. was founded because the treaty doesn't give them the amount of freedom they wanted and everyone is suppose to be free in the U.S.

# data[].attributes.headline
6.  It contradicted the constitution by approving a treaty that a whole nation of people did not agree to.  It was taking the rights away for  some of the same reasons they went to war with the British over.

# data[].attributes.subject
6.  It contradicted the constitution by approving a treaty that a whole nation of people did not agree to.  It was taking the rights away for  some of the same reasons they went to war with the British over.

# data[].attributes.body
It contradicted the whole constitution on which the U.S. was founded. The Indians were not represented in congress or any part of the government at all, just like in colonial times with "No taxation without representation." Now there are similar issues that America had with England inside America its self.

# data[].attributes.body
They wouldn't move and opposed the treaty that was made. But another group did move west and wanted to avoid bloodshed.

# data[].attributes.headline
5. The fraction helped them because they were able to pay some of these Indians that wanted to leave to go ahead and sign the treaty without the permission of the others.

# data[].attributes.subject
5. The fraction helped them because they were able to pay some of these Indians that wanted to leave to go ahead and sign the treaty without the permission of the others.

# data[].attributes.body
Although more than 3/4th of the tribe signed in protest of the treaty, the governor of Georgia declared that" 19/20th of the the cherokees are too ignorant and depraved to entitle their opinion to any weight or consideration in such matters"

# data[].attributes.body
Because back then he wanted to be liked, he would follow the likings of the people.

# data[].attributes.body
the fraction wanted to get out of the tribe and move to escape war

# data[].attributes.body
He believes that the native americans are all savages.

# data[].attributes.body
His stance is that the Cherokee are very uncivilized people. He looks down on them as uneducated and unsociable people. His view was definitely common. If his view wasn't common, then the Indian removal would have been way more controversial in America than it was.

# data[].attributes.body
He signed the Indian Removal Act, but because he wanted all of them to move westward. Most whites wanted Indians out of their way.

# data[].attributes.body
Because a small group of Indians were bribed into and wanted to move so they signed the treaty as false representatives and when the Indians said that the group that signed had no right to sign the U.S. did not listen to them though.

# data[].attributes.headline
4.  Jackson represents a portion of the white population, but there is another portion that believes that the Indians are like them but that their difference are in their cultures.

# data[].attributes.subject
4.  Jackson represents a portion of the white population, but there is another portion that believes that the Indians are like them but that their difference are in their cultures.

# data[].attributes.body
he thinks all Indians are savages  and northerners are very opposed as well as women.

# data[].attributes.body
He believes all native americans are savages. The northerners were strongly opposed and many women signed petitions against the mistreatment of Indians

# data[].attributes.headline
3. Whitefield is saying that they must obey the president and that he believes that the Indians needs are less important then what the whites want.

# data[].attributes.subject
3. Whitefield is saying that they must obey the president and that he believes that the Indians needs are less important then what the whites want.

# data[].attributes.body
Scott speaks as if he is trying to stop bloodshed between Indians and Americans

# data[].attributes.body
He says that he wants the citizens and Indians to be at "peace" with each other, but he also addresses the treaty to the Indians, stating that they need to obey and stop resisting against the white men.

# data[].attributes.body
Wanted all the Cherokees to move with the others, his militia are the Indians friends. I don't believe his intentions because if the Government wants the Indians to move they will be moved by the militia, so the militia isn't really their friends.The militia will be forceful if they don't comply.

# data[].attributes.body
It's a good idea. Everything is based in equality now.

# data[].attributes.headline
2.   John Ross is asking congress to repeal the treaty he justifies this by saying that the men that helped make this treaty had no control in their government and that the Indians did not agree to it.

# data[].attributes.subject
2.   John Ross is asking congress to repeal the treaty he justifies this by saying that the men that helped make this treaty had no control in their government and that the Indians did not agree to it.

# data[].attributes.body
Ross does not like the treaty and the Cherokee think that the treaty is very one sided

# data[].attributes.body
Ross is asking congress to stop the enactment of the "treaty." He says that the Indians are not represented in the U.S. government, and everything is being taken away from them without their consent.

# data[].attributes.body
More rights for the Indians (Cherokee) so he wants them to make an arrangement that the Indians and the U.S. Government can agree on one decision.

# data[].attributes.body
Ross is asking congress to reconsider the treaty of new echota because the cherokee tribe was not properally represented

# data[].attributes.body
The Cherokee people kind of rebelled against this thought, and Jackson pushed at Congress to remove the Indians from the land.

# data[].attributes.body
A speedy removal would be important to the united states and the indians themselves.

# data[].attributes.body
Scott is saying he doesn't agree but has no power to go against the President he asks the Indians no to fight because he has seen a lot of blood shed and wants them to spare him of having to kill them. I think he is just imploring them to do as their told so it's less work for him.

# data[].attributes.body
I think it would be really cool to have a woman on the 20 dollar bill because it would represent women's rights and the importance of women in history

# data[].attributes.body
His message is that is was successful in a way that it would help both sides and it would help the Indians live longer.

# data[].attributes.body
I believe our country now realizes that the discrimination against Indians was wrong, so people are starting to see Andrew Jackson in a darker light even if he represented the people of the time well. Harriet Tubman was someone that actually helped stop discrimination, so I think it would be much better to have her on the $20 bill.

# data[].attributes.body
President Jackson's message to Congress states that the Indians must move westward and will be better off because of it.

# data[].attributes.body
I dont think they should change it. Now days they have to make everything equal for men , women, gays, blacks, and anybody. when in realaity the world isn't fair. why try to make it fair when in truth nobody can be prefectly fair in the world.

# data[].attributes.body
Jackson had a desire to save what remained of the Indian culture and move them west to a permanent area beyond the Mississippi

# data[].attributes.body
Summarize with one sentence President Jackson's message  to Congress on Indian Removal.

# data[].attributes.body
What is John Ross asking Congress to do?  How is he justifying his request?

# data[].attributes.body
What is the underlying message of General Winfield Scott to the Cherokee? Do you believe his intentions?

# data[].attributes.body
What was President Jackson's stance on the Cherokees? Did he accurately reflect white attitudes toward and assumptions about the Indians?

# data[].attributes.body
How did the fraction within the Cherokee nation help the state of Georgia and the federal government to carry out their policy of Indian removal?

# data[].attributes.body
In what ways and why did the 1835 Cherokee Treaty contradict and/or affirm the democratic principles on which the U.S. was founded?

# data[].attributes.body
Recently there was a proposal of replacing Andrew Jackson with Harriet Tubman on the $20 bill.  What do you think of this idea?