# data[].attributes.body
thhey cool

# data[].attributes.body
They had an amazing opening, you could tell they put a lot of time into it. Even though I do think the Pro team had a better rebuttal, I think the closing and the opening were better on the con team. They put a lot of effort and unlike the pro team they had a bunch of different reasons. I still think both did good.

# data[].attributes.body
This one was really really really close but I believe that con had the better argument because they had a  stronger intro and closing but they did lack in their rebuttals but con has more descriptive and reasonable intro and closing ,and you can tell that they put more time into their project

# data[].attributes.body
i think con one because they had the best opening and closing. also they looked more prepaired

# data[].attributes.body
I think pro should win because i thought that the rebuttal's were awesome.i also liked how they worked as a group to do the rebuttals.

# data[].attributes.body
they had a really good beginning and end. They had a good rebuttal and also they had so many facts. They were proud and stood up.

# data[].attributes.body
I think the pro won but they both have a Great start the pro rebuttal was way better. The pros listed many bad things that could happen. While the cons really only said we can do anything that is legal. Also the rebuttal for con had every mis leading topics and they also listed facts that even proved the pros should win. Also their was a lot of miss information.

# data[].attributes.body
I think pro had the better argument because they had a good starting and they had good information.

# data[].attributes.body
The con won because they had better opener and closer but the rebuttal was bad on both team but con had better for the other two that is why con should win this debate

# data[].attributes.body
i think that they had better rebuttals and closing. and their facts were better and i think they but more thought into what they were saying.

# data[].attributes.body
The pro side gave more information and it was all true, while the other side gave some false information

# data[].attributes.body
They had a better ending and also I think that the con side did not have a good rebuttle.

# data[].attributes.body
i say pro because they started and ended strong and had really good rebutals and answered everthing right. they also said we do sky diving and stuff like that all the time and that can kill people who sky dives on a regular bases. the con side could not rebutal

# data[].attributes.body
I believe that the pro side was better because there rebuttals was better. Con was still good but they kept stating the same thing.

# data[].attributes.body
They had a good closing and leading also they had great rebuttals

# data[].attributes.body
They both had a good beginning but the pro had a really good rebuttal and also stopped the con from even able to rebuttal their rebuttal.

# data[].attributes.body
i said pro because they started and ended strong they also had really a good rebuttle the beginning started really strong for the con side but then they fell off when the rebuttle came on it was really close but pro won