# data[].attributes.body
no, Because surrender is like giving up on your country and there is other ways to guarantee peace without having war.

# data[].attributes.body
Yes, we agree with this statement because when you surrender, it automatically means peace for both sides. It means that the affairs against each other are given up on.

# data[].attributes.body
He alludes to all these events to make people think about what if those things had not happened we would not be here and we can let the people that died die in vain.

# data[].attributes.body
Yes this speech was effective because the speech was towards the enemies and telling them that war is not the best way to have peace. The only way to have peace is if they surrender. He also tells the people that they should do something about it and say what if Moses told the children of Israel to live in slavery. They wouldn't be where they are today.

# data[].attributes.body
Yes, As long as we force the enemy to surrender first

# data[].attributes.body
yes!!!!! because to have peace ,we need to be argee and not fight

# data[].attributes.body
It makes it effective because he targets the enemy which is the Soviet Union. He says how the only way to guarantee peace is by surrender. Also, he explains how if we continue to fight, there will only be appeasement after lots of fights.

# data[].attributes.body
Because if this things never happened throughout the past the whole world we live in would be so much different

# data[].attributes.body
He uses a rhetorical question( And what then?) to make the people listening think about what he said. If they keep retreating and retreating they will eventually have to fight them, after that what will they do will they keep running away of will they fight them. He referrers to Moses and Jesus because its something that most people can relate to. They think about what he says and they relate it themselves to the Bible.

# data[].attributes.body
If these things wouldn't have happened it would of been different.He uses theses people so that he can reach out to more people.

# data[].attributes.body
This speech is effective because it shows the agreements of why should they surrender or what they should fight for.

# data[].attributes.body
The speech is effective because it not only goes towards the soviets but it explains why we should surrender and says that people need to do something.

# data[].attributes.body
we did what we had to do, if we didnt do what was right then we would of been in  a whole different world

# data[].attributes.body
Yes it is effective because he is telling the soviet union to surrender to make peace and not to keep on with war.

# data[].attributes.body
He explains how if they were to surrender, that everything will be okay and that they will be honored.

# data[].attributes.headline
He uses parallelism "There is a price we will not pay.There is a point beyond which they must not advance. "To show that the American people will only stand for so much before they will have to take action.

# data[].attributes.subject
He uses parallelism "There is a price we will not pay.There is a point beyond which they must not advance. "To show that the American people will only stand for so much before they will have to take action.

# data[].attributes.body
Logos - but every lesson of history tells us that the greater risk lies in appeasement. This is a good Rhetorical Device because he explains how peace is always the outcome of any war. And also, "If nothing in life is worth dying for, when did this begin -- just in the face of this enemy?" The rhetorical question is a good device because he addresses how we fight because we want something.

# data[].attributes.body
Yes, because if the other side surrenders then both sides can come together on an agreement for peace and see what is fair for both sides.

# data[].attributes.body
Rhetorical Question is being effective in this speech because it is asking what's going to happen if they continue to keep fighting. Parallelism is another rhetorical device that is used by showing that Americans will need to take action for what they stand for.