# data[].attributes.body
Welp the video was restricted so i couldn't watch it but i'm pretty sure he was saying that abortion should be legal and its a women's right.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Dr. Willie Parker On Abortion: 'You Can't Answer Religious Questions With Scientific Answers' | TIME

# data[].attributes.body
Its not the governments place to dictate whether a woman can have an abortion or not.

# data[].attributes.headline
Extra video that is just wholesome, Thank you Bill Nye, very cool!!

# data[].attributes.subject
Extra video that is just wholesome, Thank you Bill Nye, very cool!!

# data[].attributes.body
There are two sides to abortion, you are either Pro-choice or Pro-life. Pro-choice is for abortion, and Pro-life is against abortion.

# data[].attributes.body
If a woman wants to have an abortion, she should be able to. It is her decision to want to carry a baby for 9 months or not.

# data[].attributes.body
Abortion is a very controversial subject all over the world. There has been laws banning/restricting abortion since the 1800's. There are about 3 or 4 different ways to have an abortion, all are easiest and less riskful during the first trimester of pregnancy. People are for or against abortion for many reasons, and some people are in between. But at the end of the day, abortion should be legal and accessible to women who need one.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
The election of President Trump, combined with the Republicans securing majorities in both houses of Congress, has been credited for inspiring state legislatures to enact or propose more stringent abortion restrictions in Indiana, Kentucky, Ohio, and Mississippi. Civil liberties and women's rights organizations have launched legal challenges to the new laws.

# data[].attributes.body
Some people think destroying an innocent human life undermines all human rights. There has been multiple bills trying to be passed to permanently ban federal funding for abortion. Catholic moral says you can't have the right to vote, think or speak freely, or worship unless we live long enough to exercise them, which is basically what you are trying to take away from an innocent life by having an abortion. What really undermines all human rights is taking one away from all women. Abortion is nobody's choice but their own.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Catholics Should View Abortion as a Moral Evil

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
The Catholic Church, edited by Michael Ruth, Greenhaven Press, 2016. Opposing Viewpoints. Opposing Viewpoints in Context, http%3A%2F%2Flink.galegroup.com%2Fapps%2Fdoc%2FEJ3010384277%2FOVIC%3Fu%3Dpl2683%26sid%3DOVIC%26xid%3D6608240c. Accessed 5 Mar. 2019. Originally published as "Upholding a Right not to Kill," Life Issues Forum, 29 Apr. 2014.

# data[].attributes.body
Abortion is a serious topic, and people are having to protest to keep a basic right.

# data[].attributes.body
Abortion should be your own personal choice, and no laws should be able to prevent a choice like that.

# data[].attributes.body
Early abortions are associated with a lower risk of medical complications. Restrictions on abortion access contribute to women delaying abortions, making the abortion process harder and putting the women's health at risk. Because of how common violence is against abortion providers, some doctors may not want to get on the drug distributors list, making access to pill abortions even harder. Laws against abortions make it harder for victims of rape and incest to have abortions, forcing them to have a baby they can't raise. Which is just going to hurt the parent and child in the long run even more.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Overregulation Forces Women To Have Late-Term Abortions

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Opposing Viewpoints Online Collection, Gale, 2019. Opposing Viewpoints in Context, http%3A%2F%2Flink.galegroup.com%2Fapps%2Fdoc%2FXUQBCE286976015%2FOVIC%3Fu%3Dpl2683%26sid%3DOVIC%26xid%3De2d1d179. Accessed 6 Mar. 2019. Originally published as "Overregulation Is Forcing Women to Have Late-Term Abortions," Los Angeles Times, 28 Feb. 2017.

# data[].attributes.body
The people who pass abortion laws are men, who will never have to carry a child, therefore having no right to ban it.

# data[].attributes.body
The two sides of the debate aren't completely in direct opposition. A lot of pro-lifers have their opinions based on religion, which shouldn't influence the laws in the state. And not all pro-choicers are pro-abortion either. People should practice safe sex to prevent unwanted pregnancies. But under some circumstances it is better for a baby not to be born than hated

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
Each person has a unique reason to be pro-choice. Here are some of ours.

I am pro-choice because I don't think there is any reason why a woman should have to face all the consequences from something she did not do alone. If a guy can get a woman pregnant and then run away, there is no reason why she should be the one responsible for everything. Having more options puts a woman on more equal footing with men, instead of being someone of whom they can take advantage. In addition, I believe that it is best for a child to not be born at all than to be born hated, to a mother who is forced to have him because she has no choice, and not because she wants the child.
Undergraduate Student in Chemistry

The single most important factor for women's advancement in society is our ability to control our fertility. Without that, we are trapped by the realities of pregnancy, childbirth and childrearing; rather than a privilege and a gift, these aspects of being female become an unbearable burden. Attempts to limit women's reproductive freedom are no more than a gambit to keep women "in their place"-- a gambit in the guise of religious moralism. True, the guise can run deep, and many so-called "pro-lifers" genuinely believe that killing a fetus is equivalent to killing a human being. But such religious feeling has no place in the public policies of a country that claims to separate church and state. In the words of supreme court justices O'Connor, Kennedy and Souter: "At the heart of liberty is the right to define one's own concept of existence, of meaning, of the universe, and of the mystery of human life." No one wants to plan an abortion. But the best way to prevent abortions is to prevent unwanted pregnancies: through sex education, improved distribution of birth control, and general empowerment of women to shape our own individual lives.
Graduate Student in Biology

I think one of the biggest problems with the abortion debate is that the two sides aren't in direct opposition. The pro-life movement seeks to force their moral beliefs on others - grounded in their own religion or personal philosophy. The pro-choice movement doesn't make claims on the morality of abortion - we leave that as an individual choice for every woman faced with an unwanted pregnancy. If they feel abortion is wrong and they want to give their child up for adoption, or keep it, we will support their decision. Pro-life people say "Abortion is wrong;" we only say "Abortion is." Making abortion illegal won't stop abortions from happening, it will only stop them from being safe. 43% of abortions worldwide are illegal. Changing laws doesn't solve the problem, making contraception available and affordable does. If we are to maintain the separation of church and state so central to our nation's identity, we cannot have some people forcing their beliefs on us all.
Undergraduate Student in Linguistics and Philosophy

I believe strongly in taking responsibilities for one's actions. I believe that people should practice safe sex or abstinence. And I believe that the consequences of an unwanted pregnancy can be worse than the "benefits" of having irresponsible sex. However, in some cases, I believe that abortion IS taking responsibility. Bringing an unwanted child into the world is irresponsible. I am not pro-abortion. I am pro-choice. I believe that every woman should decide what to do with her own body without restrictions placed on her by a strongly religious government that ironically preaches the 200 year old doctrine of the separation of church and state. On that note, I think religious freedom and education are also a constitutional right of every citizen, but they do not belong in the hospital room. Reproductive freedom is just as sacred and constitutional as religious freedom. And I am not the opposite of "pro-life." I love life and I love babies, but an unwanted life can be worse than no life at all. I think safe sex and abstinence education is needed. Like many pro-choice believers, I want the number of abortions to be limited, or at least I want to limit the overwhelming need for abortions.
Graduate Student in Materials Science and Engineering

I'm pro-choice because it's the only option that isn't poisoned with misogyny. I believe that we are responsible for justifying our beliefs, and just as one cannot claim that a given race is inferior to another because "it's what I believe", I don't think one can argue that old white men can assert control over a woman's uterus -- and future -- because they claim to believe that a fetus is comparable to a human life. That belief is so clearly a result of the fact that only women can get pregnant and only women would ever have to carry an unwanted fetus to term that I find it laughable that anyone claims being anti-choice has anything to do with concern for potential life. Can anyone really believe that abortion would even be an issue if men had to face the possibility of giving birth to and raising a child because of one night of failed contraception?
I think Florynce Kennedy said it best: "If men could get pregnant, abortion would be a sacrament."
Undergraduate Student in Mathematics

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Each person has a unique reason to be pro-choice. Here are some of ours. I am pro-choice because I don't think there is any reason why a woman should have to face all the consequences from something she did not do alone.

# data[].attributes.body
Women have every right to do what they please with their bodies. Nobody else but them will have to carry something in their stomach for 9 months. If a woman cannot handle that, they shouldn't have a baby. Having a child is a big responsibility, and some women wouldn't be able to work and live to their fullest potential if they have a baby they were not ready for. Women should always raise a child in a safe environment rather than one that won't benefit them.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
This article sets out the women's rights arguments that, in certain circumstances, favour abortion.

# data[].attributes.body
Abortion should always be an option for many reasons. Some women will seek illegal abortions if they are denied access, which is way more riskful. A lot of women who seek abortions don't get pregnant by choice. Many are raped or victims of incest and cannot raise a child. On the other hand, abortion can have a harmful mental and physical impact on some women.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Pro-Life vs Pro-Choice: Should Abortion be Legal?

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Whether or not abortion should be legal and accessible continues to be a controversial subject, split between those who believe women should have the right to...