# data[].attributes.body
Generating Ideas: Developing
Ideas are already in the market

Evaluating Ideas: Developing

Observation:(Infer that) Forced-connections is used for 3 idea. Some form of evaluation matrix is used.

# data[].attributes.body
Novice

Ideas are generally targeting one of the perceived problems which is that the containers are not compact.

The solutions are largely simialr and can be found in the market

# data[].attributes.body
Novice
Target audience is not specific enough. There is not much innovation as these are already existing in the market. These could be stemmed from weak problem statement.

# data[].attributes.body
Novice - Low developing

The research done is insufficient and shows general knowledge content.

The why why why is at surface level and does not really go into the root causes.

# data[].attributes.body
Exploring Data: Developing
Some background information, though not up-to-date

Framing Problems: Developing

Observation: Tools were not used

# data[].attributes.body
Generating Ideas
-Novice
-Suggestion to conudct surveys to make it more application
- quality of solutions are not diverse , it's quite repetitive (just to compact)

# data[].attributes.body
Understanding the challenge
-Developing as he understands the pros and cons (outdated info 2015)
-He can improve on his research has been done.

# data[].attributes.body
Novice

Some ideas are already present in the market and are non-novel (non-unique)

Appears that students already have an end product in mind before generating ideas

Ideas 1 and 2 are similar, and not unique; can expand more ideas (more than 3) before converging (rather conservative, can be wilder)

Evidence of divergent ideation is not present; students did not showcase what is the idea that they have in mind

suggestion for students:

Consider using HMW statements as starting ideas to generate more potential solutions

Consider using Wouldn't it be great if ... as another alternative starting statement so that students can identity the key features of their innovation

# data[].attributes.body
Novice and developing
Some research done, however data is outdated. More could be done in the background research. Problem statement already has the solution. The background info seems like reverse engineering from an idea. The students could dig deeper and maybe do interviews, research particularly on SG, research on public instead of industrial plastic waste.

# data[].attributes.body
Novice for Generating ideas,

because solution 1 and 3 are very similar, and while 2 is an innovative solution (to us), the group decided to rate foldable container as the best even though it is already an existing solution

also, no explanation or rationalising of how they rate each solution to criteria. Criterium are also not aligned to the problem statement.

# data[].attributes.body
Developing

Because they identified some criteria they wanted to use to solve the problem. All solutions are already existing. Not much thought put into the solution, e.g. structural integrity.

# data[].attributes.body
Understanding the Challenge
-Developing
-Info collated were substantial

Generating Ideas
-Novice
-Ideas not innovative/creative
-evidence of use of SCAMPER and forced connection
-evidence of use of evaluation matrix

# data[].attributes.body
Between novice and developing

Because research not very well done, why why why not fully complete. Generic research. Did not look into what is the problem with plastic containers, ideas are convergent. More research could be done.

# data[].attributes.body
Developing as:
1.  some data is provided
2. data is outdated (2015)
3. Unclear on whether students understood the problem
4. May not be solving the problem; rather just making an alternative type of container

Usage of IvP tools:

Students did not gather data from intended users of their products and only took general data from the internet

# data[].attributes.body
Developing for Understanding the challenge

While KWL, root cause and whywhywhy laddering seems to be created with much consideration, the research does not support the problem statement created.

# data[].attributes.body
1.  Access the Project:
[IvP Coordinators' Meeting] Teacher activity

2. Score this project for the stages: Understanding the Challenge and Generating Ideas
(E.g. Is it Novice or Developing or Expert?)

3. Explain why. (E.g., Have the IvP tools been used effectively?)

4. In your post, type your Room Number as the subject.
Eg.
Room 3
Novice
Because ...