# data[].attributes.headline
the contingency being doesn't make sense to me

# data[].attributes.subject
the contingency being doesn't make sense to me

# data[].attributes.body
The proof that made the most sense was the first one because if you think about it everything does have to come from something. Things were not created just for fun, but because they truly do something.

# data[].attributes.headline
The proof that made the most sense to me is 

# data[].attributes.subject
The proof that made the most sense to me is 

# data[].attributes.headline
the proof that makes the least sense to me is contingency because i do not understand the difference between this and causality

# data[].attributes.subject
the proof that makes the least sense to me is contingency because i do not understand the difference between this and causality

# data[].attributes.headline
the proof that makes the most sense to me is causality because it makes sense that everything has to come from something and the person who started it all is God 

# data[].attributes.subject
the proof that makes the most sense to me is causality because it makes sense that everything has to come from something and the person who started it all is God 

# data[].attributes.headline
the proof that doesn't make as much sense in the contingency being

# data[].attributes.subject
the proof that doesn't make as much sense in the contingency being

# data[].attributes.body
The proof that made the least sense was the intelligent being because how is the world said to be in remarkable order

# data[].attributes.headline
The 2nd one makes the most sense to me because It was sense that one thing can cause another and create a chain, God creating the first cause.

# data[].attributes.subject
The 2nd one makes the most sense to me because It was sense that one thing can cause another and create a chain, God creating the first cause.

# data[].attributes.body
the proof that makes the least amount of sense is the intelligent being

# data[].attributes.body
the one that doesn't make sense is the 4th one because i had trouble understanding it

# data[].attributes.headline
The one that makes the least sense to me is the last proof.

# data[].attributes.subject
The one that makes the least sense to me is the last proof.

# data[].attributes.body
The that makes the least sense is the final proof.

# data[].attributes.body
God is the most perfect being makes sense and so we have someone to try and follow and be like

# data[].attributes.headline
the proof that makes the least sense is the 4th one which is perfection 

# data[].attributes.subject
the proof that makes the least sense is the 4th one which is perfection 

# data[].attributes.body
Every other "proof" has little to no logic to support the conclusion.

# data[].attributes.body
The proof I don't understand is contingency because it is confusing.

# data[].attributes.body
the proof that makes the least sense to me is the unmoved mover because it said that nothing could move by itself

# data[].attributes.body
The one that doesnt make sense to me is the fourth one. Its more complicated to understand.

# data[].attributes.headline
the reason that makes the most sense is the perfection one because we do need something to compare all things to and that one thing is God because God is completely perfect.

# data[].attributes.subject
the reason that makes the most sense is the perfection one because we do need something to compare all things to and that one thing is God because God is completely perfect.

# data[].attributes.headline
The first one is the most understandable but I only partially agree with it. It seems more logical to think that God himself didn't set everything in motion, but he created the things that created everything. I don't think he just flat out created the earth, but I believe he created science and space, where with those the universe was created.

# data[].attributes.subject
The first one is the most understandable but I only partially agree with it. It seems more logical to think that God himself didn't set everything in motion, but he created the things that created everything. I don't think he just flat out created the earth, but I believe he created science and space, where with those the universe was created.

# data[].attributes.headline
the first one makes the most sense because yo need to know where the things that you use daily are coming from.

# data[].attributes.subject
the first one makes the most sense because yo need to know where the things that you use daily are coming from.

# data[].attributes.body
The proof I did not understand was the final proof from the video. All the other proofs I could comprehend easily, but the final one was a little more difficult for me.

# data[].attributes.body
the proof that makes the most sense is the first one because we already know everything had to come or start from something.

# data[].attributes.headline
The first proof makes the most sense to me because everything has to come from something and that makes sense to me.

# data[].attributes.subject
The first proof makes the most sense to me because everything has to come from something and that makes sense to me.

# data[].attributes.headline
the one that makes the most sense to me is the first one because everything is created for a reason 

# data[].attributes.subject
the one that makes the most sense to me is the first one because everything is created for a reason 

# data[].attributes.body
proof I understand
The proof that I understand the most is Causality because everything has a cause.

# data[].attributes.body
The one that made the most sense to me was the one that something has to make the start of motion, and that god had the first touch on earth to keep it moving in motion.

# data[].attributes.body
The first proof makes the most sense to me. This is because we know that everything HAS to come from something. And I believe that something is God in creating the universe.

# data[].attributes.headline
The last one made the least sense to me.

# data[].attributes.subject
The last one made the least sense to me.

# data[].attributes.body
The third proof: necessary  being makes the least sense because it said that "Our world finds necessity in his existence."

# data[].attributes.body
The 1st proof of god makes sense to me because its a easy understanding definition.

# data[].attributes.body
the proof that makes the most sense is the causality because I understand how everything has to have a cause.

# data[].attributes.body
The proof that makes the least sense to me is the fourth proof of perfection. This is because although it makes sense to me, I think that the other ones are more applicable and are able to explain the existence of God much better.

# data[].attributes.body
The proof that makes the most sense to me is the 4th proof in perfection because everyone is always aiming to be perfect even if they and the only person in the universe who is perfect is God.

# data[].attributes.body
The proof that God set the world in motion makes the most sense to me.

# data[].attributes.body
The first one makes sense because people know things must have a cause to happen. I may not agree with the results of calling God the "first mover", but it makes some semblance of sense. Meanwhile, the other ones don't have as much or anything logical about them with conclusions that have no logic.

# data[].attributes.headline
the proof that makes the least sense to me is the first mover because it is saying that everything needed something to make it move, but then doesn't say how God moved without anything moving him.

# data[].attributes.subject
the proof that makes the least sense to me is the first mover because it is saying that everything needed something to make it move, but then doesn't say how God moved without anything moving him.

# data[].attributes.headline
The first one makes the most sense to me because everything has to come from something.

# data[].attributes.subject
The first one makes the most sense to me because everything has to come from something.

# data[].attributes.body
The first cause makes the most sense because everything has a cause. We know that  everything wouldn't have been created if it weren't for God

# data[].attributes.body
The proof of God that makes the most sense to me is the one that talks about God as the most Perfect being and all other comparisons of good and evil being based on His perfection. This makes sense because how would we be able to describe something if there wasn't first something to compare it to?

# data[].attributes.body
Out of the 5 Proofs for God, the one that makes the least sense to me is the last one they went over in the video. It just didn't make as much sense to me as the other 4 proofs

# data[].attributes.body
The Proof that makes the most sense to me is the third proof of contingency.  This is because everything must be caused by something else and the world could not have been created by itself, so it must have been created by God.

# data[].attributes.body
Of the Five Proofs for God, which do you think makes the MOST sense? Why?

# data[].attributes.body
Of the Five Proofs for God, which do you think makes the LEAST sense? Why?