# data[].attributes.body
1.we should evaluate essays of them fairly and strictly.
2.No, I have not,
3.It is more quickly and concrete to find your drawbacks.

# data[].attributes.body
1. Making comments.
2. No.
3.Getting some more straightforward comments that are not that appropriate for teachers to make.

# data[].attributes.body
1, we will try to find out the deficit of our peer, and learn the advantage from them/
2. Yes, we can find out the deficit much faster than do by our own.
3. the sentence structure, logical of article, analysis of them, and can realize some deficit.

# data[].attributes.body
1. read your friend's article and give him/her some feedback on how to improve
2. no
3. getting different ideas
figuring out mistakes

# data[].attributes.body
1. To review a peer's work, point out the strengths and weaknesses of the work, and offer useful advice for  improvement.
2. No.
3. It can help your peer polish his/her work, and help the reviewer better work on his /her own work.

# data[].attributes.body
1) During the peer review, you make a pair or group and each read different essays written by another person and comment on it.
2) I have done peer review before and it was a good opportunity to hear what other students think about my writing.
3) You can get feedbacks and comments from other writers.

# data[].attributes.body
1. Peer review is giving suggestions to your classmate's article.
2. I had peer review experience before. I like it because reading other people's article is great as there is always funny mistakes.
3. You can learn from other people's article.

# data[].attributes.body
1. We evaluate and give suggestions to  peer's essay.
2. No.
3. Peers have different perspectives than instructors when giving advice.

# data[].attributes.body
1. evaluate their essay, give suggestions
2. No
3. The suggestion from others may inspire the author for writing a better essay.

# data[].attributes.body
1.Try to find the mistakes and evaluate this essay structure.
2.No.
3.We can learn something by evaluating other's work.

# data[].attributes.body
We should evaluate classmates' work and make comments on it. Point out possible perfection of their work
no
help to improve

# data[].attributes.body
1. Write down comments,evaluation, and point out mistakes.
2. Yes. I found out it was helpful.
3. It enables students to learn from each other.

# data[].attributes.body
1.to give advice/evaluations on other's essay. which part is good or which part can still be improved.
2.no
3.to get different opinions and perspectives, make the essay better ans more subjective

# data[].attributes.body
1. We should evaluate it with perspective from the completeness of the analysis and the properness of the whole structure.
2. Yes, it was good to have conversations about each others' documents. Even if people might have arguments, people who are thinking and organizing well gets improved.
3. People could argue about contents more freely

students get benefits from verbal discussions.

# data[].attributes.body
Answer the following questions.
1. What do we do when we do peer review/Peer Feedback? Or what is peer feedback?

2. Have you ever had peer review experience? If yes, how did you like it?

3. (Even if you said no) What are the advantages of doing peer reviews?