# data[].attributes.body
So I decided to take this 3 times to see if the results would fall along the same lines. Mostly the significant ranges are between avoider and problem solver, as compromiser always comes out 90% and above. I know that my "avoidance" side can come out when I am really emotionally attached to the situation and deeply entrenched in the outcomes. I have had to work very hard in my professional life to keep that side in check. Ironically, I am working in a professional context that is highly charged with conflict, and one of my colleagues is avoiding dealing with it. I can see the impact to his health and the rest of the team which has pushed me to take on the conflict head on...something in the past, I have avoided! In an online environment, I could see myself gravitating toward setting up a virtual f2f conversation to work through conflict if it escalated as I feel those conversations can often help clarify misunderstandings rather than texting or emailing (but that might not be the same for everyone!). Curious how different I will feel about this after we complete this module :-)

# data[].attributes.body
Results:
82% Problem Solver
73% Compromiser
57% Accomodator
42% Avoider

As with all survey/assessments I  tend to feel it is a hit and miss with the results.  For example with this conflict style assessment I scored 42% as being an avoider  to conflicts which I am not in agreement with. I am of the opinion 70% of time I try to avoid conflicts if I forsee what is going to transpire. However, I do agree in many situations whether professional or personal I always try to make a compromise when conflicts arise. The result of problem solver was not a surprise, as my line of work (customer service) I have to find techniques to resolve and diffuse conflicts or problem quickly and amicably, making all parties happy.
What I appreciated about this assessment was the break down of the pros/cons of each result .In that sometimes I do find myself overthinking or accessing the problem on how I am going resolve or approach it, which can be a bit stressful at times.

In an online setting I find conflicts are easily resolved because in many cases all parties are working towards meeting a goal and most times I tend to listen to all involved and come to a compromise to resolve whatever problem it is.
Sometimes it takes several conversations to resolve these conflicts .

What I have observed sometimes when conflicts are resolved in an online setting there tends to be a tension still lurking among parties involved. Have anyone ever experienced such?
Cheers,
Phyz

# data[].attributes.body
While taking this survey, like many times before, I get frustrated that the questions are trying to peg me into a box. Well and like many of those surveys, they are right! I am mostly a “problem solver” when it comes to conflict from the results and I would say that I am one that likes to hear all sides of the stories. I work with incredible colleagues and constantly feel that I can learn from them. I sense this could be a quality of an effective general manager as you give everyone a voice and see all sides. I do, however, find that this approach is time consuming as the test suggested. I also have observed that I have always been part of a team and enjoyed the comfort in numbers. Perhaps this plays into my conflict resolution skills?

In an online context, I think that I would have to change my tactics to solve problems? I think I will learn about this in our readings this week!

# data[].attributes.headline
Dino - Avoider and Problem-solver at the same time?

# data[].attributes.subject
Dino - Avoider and Problem-solver at the same time?

# data[].attributes.body
Results:
67% Avoider
64% Problem solver
57% Accommodator
55% Compromiser
8% Competer

While completing the questionnaire I felt that I wanted to choose neither or both options at times, while at the end I was more certain on the answer I was selecting. As for the result, It was interesting to see scores around the same range with the exception of "competer". What I concur from the results and the explanations provided, and knowing myself on how I deal with conflict or heated situations, I think the result made sense.  When I'm confronted with a situation that requires to be dealt with, I initially pause to reflect how to deal with it rather than acting on the heat of the moment (avoider). However, because I know the situation needs to be dealt with, I analyze it and then discuss it trying to find a win-win situation but not walking a way without making sure there is an outcome (problem-solver). If I see that the person involved in the conflict feels very strongly about their position, then I express my feelings and rationale and I usually get my way around things using logic (compromiser). Then I take into consideration that being diplomatic is more important when there is a risk of jeopardizing the (good) relationship so I take a "one step back, two forward" approach (accommodator). I do agree with the weakness presented that as a result, I sometimes keep my feelings bottled up and feel that my own needs aren't met, which can result in frustration buildup.

# data[].attributes.body
As I normally find when filling out these types of personality assessments; I found being authentic challenging. I had to constantly think about what I actually do as opposed to what I perceive to be the “right answer”. Although, my result was compromiser, and I try to compromise in most situations; it's not always the resolution style that comes the most naturally to me. I can see elements of other styles in how I act in different situations. In situations where I’m passionate or frustrated, I start trying to convince others that I’m right. In addition, when someone starts getting upset, I have a hard time not backing down to avoid conflict.

# data[].attributes.body
64% Problem Solver

Very interesting way to get to how you prefer to manage conflict.  Many times I found myself having to make a choice between the lesser of two unwanted choices which really helped to drill down to how I prefer to handle conflict.

I don't know that I would have identified myself as much as a Compromiser as I would a Problem Solver, however I do tend to look for the win - win in every conflict which can be described as compromise.

I was not surprised to see that I scored least in the competer category. I have found more success looking for ways for others to gain in a conflict situation as this tends to reduce conflict in the future. I am competitive in game play and sports for sure but I have found that compromise works best for me in conflict situations.

# data[].attributes.headline
91% COMPROMISER       73% PROBLEM SOLVER 

# data[].attributes.subject
91% COMPROMISER       73% PROBLEM SOLVER 

# data[].attributes.body
Interesting online quiz and on several occasions the same statement presented itself against a new statement to see if you would select that again or if the other was more favorable.

When reading the comments noted in the results it suggests that a 91% Compromiser approach - maintain relationship and a meaningful outcome. It goes on to say there is a tendency to think about what I'd be willing to give up and what I am willing to hold on to.  It's a great way to perhaps strike a nice balance and end up with a 'win-win' situation versus lose-win or win-lose.  It also suggests it's a great way to promote cooperation and a sense of fairness through engaging those who are impacted.  I do resonate with this a great deal especially as I've matured and evolved in my own self-awareness around my tendencies.  I am typically one that would want it 'my way' and over time have learned to exercise the skills around win-win, differences of opinions and perspectives are essential to find a better and overall solution, as well as trust and relationships need to have open-dialogue, respect and trust and finally DIFFICULT CONVERSATIONS are actually healthy and welcomed as it fosters innovation and good tension at times.

The second runner up was a strong tendency in conflict and controversy to be 73% Problem Solver - tend to look for the best of everything, strongly invested in the issue, outcome and relationship.

Problem Solvers tend to want to discuss all the details of a problem and work through it together so that everyone gets what he or she wants and is happy in the end. Their strengths are that they tend to welcome differences, build high-levels of trust and mutual understanding in relationships. There is also the potential to learn from creative problem solving.

Here is a GREAT VIDEO on the conflict styles explained.

# data[].attributes.body
100% compromiser and 73% problem solver.
This is not a surprise to me at all.  I have completed a similar quiz a few years ago and got similar results.  I do find that sometimes I let my ideas go in the interest of getting things done.  I think it depends on how invested I am in the outcome of whatever the issue to be solved is.  Most of my job both as a chef and a teacher involves problem solving, so this is also something I am very comfortable with.  If I look at these traits with an eye on previous courses I would think that this is 100% accurate.  In on-line courses I am happy to compromise, as everyone brings a valuable opinion to the table, and I am usually happy to hear others opinions.  I learn as much from my peers as I do from a facilitator.
I am a 0% competer.  Also not a surprise.  I have never been overly competitive and feel like it is detrimental in many situations.

# data[].attributes.headline
Equally compromiser and problem solver with solid competer and accomodator vein ...

# data[].attributes.subject
Equally compromiser and problem solver with solid competer and accomodator vein ...

# data[].attributes.body
I followed Amanda's and Jeff's suit and took the quiz three times in a day with different background things in my mind to check how much my mood and the current state interferes with my general approach.

I think myself as a problem-solver in my daily life, and as problem-solver helping to compromise in my teaching role. I am also an "avid" competer in certain situations, probably bringing it from my corporate career. All of these were surfacing in my different takes on the quiz. I ended up having results with slightly different shares, but in a similar order.
I am the least conflict avoider according to the quiz. I do not look for conflict but face it if I have to. My Competer and Accommodator numbers are at the same level in the mid-range. Problem solver and compromiser are also on the same level in the high range.

My manager and leadership style changed and evolved a lot since my twenties. Now, I have more in my toolbox and can switch from different tactics and strategies based on the other side, trying to ensure we all are happy at the end. In my mind, it does not mean compromising, but creatively solving problems based on priorities, listening to all the sides and using empathy. I believe different situations call for different approaches, and there is a time and a place to use each of the conflict styles; we just have to have the right toolbox and balance.
Thoughts?

# data[].attributes.headline
Compromiser with  sprinkling of Accommodating Problem Solver.

# data[].attributes.subject
Compromiser with  sprinkling of Accommodating Problem Solver.

# data[].attributes.body
Interesting mix, with 82% compromising, and 64% accommodating/problem-solving.

# data[].attributes.body
I chose audio for my post. It's an interesting fit with the two solutions I got.

# data[].attributes.body
This activity really solidified what I understand about myself especially when it comes to situations of conflict. Yes, I did get Accommodator as my first style. The result of the assessment was 86% Accommodator, 67% Avoider and 45% for both Compromiser and Problem Solver, and 0% Competer. On the most part, I do accommodate others to ensure that a situation doesn’t escalate. Most of my colleagues and friends describe me as the peace keeper, diplomat, and problem solver while my close family describe me as the problem solver and avoider of conflict to ensure that nothing disturbs the peace in the family – I hate confrontations!

When thinking about my style in an online environment, I believe that this will assist me in group work where we all need to respect each other and hear each other’s perspectives; however, if a conflict does arise, I may stay quiet and not voice my view to appease others.

Did anyone else get a similar result as I?

# data[].attributes.body
I found this to be interesting. I ended up taking this quiz a few times, to see if my mood or current stress level would change my responses much. At the end of the day, I ended up getting accommodator the most. However, the difference between #1 and #2 wass never larger than 10% Sometimes problem solver was near the top, and other times it was replaced with competitor. So it was clear that my mood had a drastic impact on how I would handle conflict. I do agree that I often spend to much time and energy making sure others needs at met, and end up neglecting myself.

In an online environment I can see this being a positive and a negative. I could cause me to be more passive while working in a group. It could also mean that I work well in trying to make sure everyone's voice is heard and included.

Did anyone else get accommodator as their first style?