# data[].attributes.headline
Value should not only be defined by actors with money but also those without!" 

# data[].attributes.subject
Value should not only be defined by actors with money but also those without!" 

# data[].attributes.body
In SD logic the customer co-creates value with the supplier and defines the value (9). Value is defined as gain relative to costs, and benefits don't have to be monetary (5). What if the customer could be seen as a fish, and by enabling the fish to create value the whole ecosystem will be positively affected?

# data[].attributes.headline
Hydropower plants or a rich, diverse ecosystem - Why not both?

# data[].attributes.subject
Hydropower plants or a rich, diverse ecosystem - Why not both?

# data[].attributes.body
Much of todays discussion is about choosing one of the alternatives. We need to find a meeting point where value is generated for all actors. It doesn´t have to be a dilemma.

# data[].attributes.body
Hydropower generates 45% Sweden´s electricity (10), but has a big negative impact on ecosystems (11).

# data[].attributes.body
Conflict of interest between fisherman, hydropower plants and the fish.

Tragedy of the commons (3)

Ethical behaviour in a system perspective (7)

# data[].attributes.body
There are many actors with different incentives regarding the hydro plant-issue with many factors affecting them. A company can create societal value which will in turn create economic value (5). This is entitled as shared value. To reach a sustainable outcome according to the triple bottom line, monetary sacrifices is required to ensure a better sustainable and societal solution. The hydroplant can't maximize their profit if, at the same time the salmon and eel can live a sustainable life.

# data[].attributes.attachment_caption
A sustainable solution must be sustainable in regards of people, planet and profit (6)

# data[].attributes.body
Safe passageway- Sustainable hydro power plants

Financial problem?

Ecosystem

(1) (2) (4) (8)

# data[].attributes.body
1. Calles, O., Elghagen, J., Nyqvist, D., Harbicht, A.B., and Nilsson, P.A. (2021). Efficient and timely downstream passage solutions for European silver eels at hydropower dams. Ecological Engineering.

2. Fehrer, J. A., & Wieland, H. (2021). A systemic logic for circular business models. Journal of Business Research,125, 609-620.

3. Lynn, J. (8 maj 2013).Dana (Donella) Meadows Lecture: Sustainable Systems (Part 1 of 4) [Video]. You Tube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HMmChiLZZHg.

4. McWilliams, A., & Siegel, D. (2001). Corporate social responsibility: A theory of the firm perspective. Academy of management review, 26(1), 117-127.

5. Porter, M. E., & Kramer, M. R. (2019). Creating shared value. In Managing sustainable business (pp. 323-346). Springer, Dordrecht.

6. Slaper, F. T., & Hall J. T. (2011) The triple bottom line: What is it and how does it work? Indiana Business Review. Volume 86, No. 1.

7. Svensson, G., Wood, G., & Callaghan, M. (2010). A corporate model of sustainable business practices: An ethical perspective. Journal of World Business, ⁴⁵(4), 336-345.

8. Sverigesradio. (2016, 16 maj). Fiskens kamp mot vattenkraften. [Video]. Sverigesradio. https://sverigesradio.se/avsnitt/721694

9. Vargo, S.L. and Lusch, R.F. (2004) ‘From Goods to Service(s): Divergences and Convergences of Logics’, Industrial Marketing Management 37(3): 254–59.

10. Energimyndigheten, 2020. https://www.energimyndigheten.se/nyhetsarkiv/2021/okning-av-fornybar-elproduktion-under-2020/

11. WWF, 2022. https://www.wwf.se/sotvatten/vattenkraft/