# data[].attributes.headline
Healt warning, water pollution, global food security and so on

# data[].attributes.subject
Healt warning, water pollution, global food security and so on

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
Russia's indiscriminate use of heavy weapons in urban areas is increasing the risks from damaged energy, industrial and commercial sites.

On 3 March, the IAEA that Ukraine no longer had regulatory control over the site, and that its staff faced "psychological pressure and moral exhaustion". By 5 March, there were more worrying signs of the toll that the occupation was having on staff at the site, with the local mayor that:

"We can't replace people, they have been working their shift for 10 days. They split into two groups, taking turns, but they were tired morally and physically, emotionally. People eat a limited diet, they have a limited amount of medicine and it is very difficult for them."

Although we were one of several voices highlighting the risks that fighting in proximity to the Zaporizhzhia Nuclear Power Plant could pose, it was nevertheless shocking to see these fears realised. The overnight at the plant followed a tense afternoon, with surrounding the town of Enerhodar next to the plant, and its people forming a human in an effort to prevent Russian troops from accessing the site.

While much of the coverage on the plant's six reactors, there was little attention on the large volumes of radioactive waste stored in the open air at the site. Warnings had been since at least 2015, with Friends of the Earth commenting at the time that: "With a war around the corner, it is shocking that the spent fuel rod containers are standing under the open sky, with just a metal gate and some security guards waltzing up and down for protection." As it was, the was focused on a training building at the site. of the site's control room staff pleading with the Russians to stop firing was released to the New York Times.

The largely unprecedented nuclear dimension to this conflict has brought the role of the IAEA into sharp focus. Its members adopted a resolution deploring Russia's actions, while its Director General Rafael Mariano Grossi has been in touch with both sides, and has been holding daily press conferences, even offering to visit Ukraine in person. But the agency's ability to influence the situation remains more technical than political, for example when asked if it could enforce a 30km exclusion zone around Ukrainian nuclear facilities the agency said that was not within its mandate. Social media memes began demanding that the nuclear plant risks be a justification for the imposition of a NATO no-fly zone.

Demand that your politicians close the sky over Ukraine. Ukraine has 15 nuclear units. This is a huge danger for the whole of Europe.
If Russia blows up one power, it will be a catastrophe for the whole of Europe#stoprussia pic.twitter.com/9v9iWpiv2x

- Stratcom Centre UA (@StratcomCentre) March 5, 2022

So far, the South Ukraine Nuclear Power Plant north of Mykolaiv has been spared the fighting, but this may change shortly. As of March 5 its official was offline. And the situation remains that it is not just the highly visible nuclear plants that pose radiological risks, two low level waste storage facilities were by artillery and missile fire, one of which was in Kyiv.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Environmental trends in the Ukraine conflict, 10 days in - CEOBS

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Russia's indiscriminate use of heavy weapons in urban areas is increasing the risks from damaged energy, industrial and commercial sites. On 3 March, the IAEA that Ukraine no longer had regulatory control over the site, and that its staff faced "psychological pressure and moral exhaustion".

# data[].attributes.headline
Conseguenze ambientali della guerra in Ucraina: overview

# data[].attributes.subject
Conseguenze ambientali della guerra in Ucraina: overview

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Ukraine invasion: rapid overview of environmental issues - CEOBS

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Nuclear facilities and radiation risks As the first day of the invasion drew to a close, elevated levels of gamma radiation in the Chernobyl Exclusion Zone were reported, according to three sensors of the automated radiation monitoring . The radiation dose reported was equivalent to approximately 28 times the annual limit.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
The reinvasion of Ukraine threatens global food supplies

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
People and countries least able to cope will be hit hardest Reliable access to adequate nutrition is essential for physical and mental health. Vladimir Putin’s illegal reinvasion of Ukraine reminds us that we take our food supply for granted.1 The consequences will be felt far beyond Ukraine’s bord…

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Why Russia’s invasion of Ukraine is a direct threat to the environment

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Ecocide is being committed in Ukraine and it may ‘take decades’ for the environment to recover.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
La guerra in Ucraina e l’impatto sull’ambiente: quanto costerà al Pianeta l’inquinamento causato dal conflitto

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Di fronte alle immagini di morte, disperazione, profughi in fila alla ricerca di un riparo che ci arrivano dall’Ucraina, ovviamente il nostro pensiero va