# data[].attributes.headline
Could anything have been done to prevent it?

# data[].attributes.subject
Could anything have been done to prevent it?

# data[].attributes.body
Preventing the impacts discussed in the case might have required a more proactive and comprehensive approach to the development and implementation of technology. Policymakers, industry leaders, and technology developers could have collaborated to establish ethical guidelines and regulations that prioritize human rights. Additionally, a more inclusive and equitable approach to the distribution of benefits and opportunities arising from technological advancements could have mitigated the negative consequences. Human rights organizations playing a more active role in shaping and advocating for responsible technology development could also have contributed to preventing or minimizing adverse effects on marginalized populations. Overall, a more conscious and foresighted approach to the societal implications of technological progress could have helped prevent some of the identified challenges.

# data[].attributes.headline
Development of technology raised questions about their impact on human rights

# data[].attributes.subject
Development of technology raised questions about their impact on human rights

# data[].attributes.body
The rapid development of artificial intelligence, automation, and robotics has led to these concerns. These technologies can automate tasks that were previously done by humans, leading to job losses and decreased wages. Additionally, they can collect vast amounts of data about individuals, which can be used to track their movements, monitor their online activity, and even predict their behavior. This raises concerns about privacy and the potential for discrimination.

# data[].attributes.body
Both group of miners and government are responsible. First, the latter failed to regulate the gold mining activity, leading to an increment of this activity. The group of miners were careless. They did not respect the legal warnings about the weather situation.

What could be done to prevent it:

Create laws to regulate illegal mining.

Create different job opportunities for small miners, to remove them from dangerous environments.

Have a protective unit for highly affected areas as this is not the first time it happens.

Government and business corruption.

# data[].attributes.body
The group of miners defied the order of the government, not waiting for approval for environmental safety. They also lacked tools and materials to operate safely. They did not respect the weather alert of possible landslide. There is also a deeper reason: this country is fourth largest gold producer in Africa, which encourages small group of miners to search gold for themselves. Thus, there are a lot of illegal mines, which the government has not being able to control.

The miners need a way sustain themselves and their families.

# data[].attributes.headline
Starbucks accused of making false claims about the "ethical" sourcing of its tea and coffee

# data[].attributes.subject
Starbucks accused of making false claims about the "ethical" sourcing of its tea and coffee

# data[].attributes.body
The lawsuit against Starbucks alleging false advertising over "ethically" sourced coffee and tea can be attributed to the inherent challenges in managing a complex global supply chain. Issues such as outsourcing to regions with lower labor standards, difficulties in maintaining transparency, shortcomings in certification processes, and potential lapses in corporate accountability contribute to the allegations. The discrepancy between Starbucks' claims and reported human rights abuses highlights the importance of addressing these structural challenges to uphold ethical standards and avoid legal consequences based on false advertising.

# data[].attributes.headline
Starbucks accused of making false claims about the "ethical" sourcing of its tea and coffee

# data[].attributes.subject
Starbucks accused of making false claims about the "ethical" sourcing of its tea and coffee

# data[].attributes.body
The situation at Starbucks, involving deceptive claims about ethical sourcing, implicates various stakeholders in responsibility. Firstly, Starbucks must ensure the accuracy of its claims and closely monitor its supply chain. Suppliers, including farms and cooperatives, share the responsibility to adhere to ethical standards. Governments play a crucial role in setting standards and oversight, but regulatory gaps can limit effectiveness. Consumers, relying on accurate information, also have a role in advocating for ethical practices through their purchasing choices.

To prevent such situations, preventive measures would include rigorous supply chain audits by Starbucks, increased transparency on sourcing practices, adoption of third-party certifications, advocacy for robust regulatory frameworks, and continuous improvement in supply chain management practices. Responsibility is shared among Starbucks, suppliers, governments, and consumers, necessitating collective action to address these issues.

# data[].attributes.headline
Tanzania: 22 miners die following a landslide at an unregulated mine

# data[].attributes.subject
Tanzania: 22 miners die following a landslide at an unregulated mine

# data[].attributes.body
On Saturday, January 13th, 2024, workers, between the age 24 and 38, started mining in an area restricted and due to heavy rains, they ended up being trapped and killed because of a landslide in Nothern Tanzania.

https://www.bbc.com/news/world-africa-67976041

# data[].attributes.headline
USA: Consumer group files false advertising lawsuit against Starbucks over allegations that it sources "ethical" coffee and tea from farms involved in human rights abuses

# data[].attributes.subject
USA: Consumer group files false advertising lawsuit against Starbucks over allegations that it sources "ethical" coffee and tea from farms involved in human rights abuses

# data[].attributes.body
It is completely Starbucks' fault. Indeed, choosing to source their tea and coffee from these countries implies that Starbucks endorses local labor regulations. As a result, it is vital that Starbucks is informed about the working conditions of employees in these companies, and must open its eyes when employees raise concerns about modern-day slavery or sexual assault. Starbucks preferred to turn a blind eye to employees' calls for help.

To avoid such problems, the company should carry out regular audits to monitor the working conditions of its suppliers' employees.

# data[].attributes.headline
Starbucks accused of making false claims about the "ethical" sourcing of its tea and coffee

# data[].attributes.subject
Starbucks accused of making false claims about the "ethical" sourcing of its tea and coffee

# data[].attributes.body
A group of American consumers has filed a lawsuit against Starbucks, accusing the coffee chain of making false claims about the "ethical" sourcing of its tea and coffee. The National Consumers League filed a complaint, stating that Starbucks sources from farms in Kenya, Brazil, and Guatemala where serious human rights violations occur, including child labor, forced labor, and widespread sexual harassment. Starbucks responded by asserting that it takes such allegations seriously and defending against the accusations. The association is seeking a court order to stop Starbucks from allegedly deceptive advertising and is demanding unspecified damages, claiming that the company is in violation of the District of Columbia Consumer Protection Act.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Etats-Unis : Un groupe de consommateurs poursuit Starbucks en justice pour publicité mensongère pour son thé et café ”éthiques” qui proviendraient d’entreprise bafouant les droits de l’homme - Business & Human Rights Resource Centre

# data[].attributes.headline
Japan: Less than 15% of board members are women, lagging far behind international standards

# data[].attributes.subject
Japan: Less than 15% of board members are women, lagging far behind international standards

# data[].attributes.body
3) Whose fault is it? Could anything have been done to prevent it?

It's not really about pointing fingers but more about how our society, companies, and history have all played a part in this.

The lack of women in top jobs is on all of us. To prevent it, we should have all been more proactive – challenging old norms, pushing for diversity, and making workplaces more inclusive. It's a joint effort, both on a personal and a big-picture level.

For examples, we can implement educational programs to challenge gender stereotypes and encourage girls and women to pursue careers in traditionally male-dominated fields. Or, we can also try to ensure transparency in pay structures and conduct regular pay equity audits to identify and rectify any gender pay gaps.

# data[].attributes.body
The case highlights the dual nature of modern technology, particularly focusing on the Internet, new media platforms, and emerging technologies like artificial intelligence. On one hand, these advancements offer significant utility and promise for human rights, broadening access to knowledge, enabling fast organization of communities, and enhancing data quality for policy and healthcare decisions. However, on the other hand, the rapid development of artificial intelligence, automation, and robotics poses potential risks to human rights, particularly in the realms of employment, social inequality, and privacy violations.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
Modern technology presents great utility and promise, including for human rights. The development of the Internet has widened access to knowledge, while new media platforms have given activists fast ways to organise communities and share messages at scale. Emerging technologies, such as artificial intelligence, may significantly expand the availability and quality of data that informs policy and healthcare decisions for the benefit of society. Their proponents argue that these technologies will create new opportunities, increase efficiency, and help maximise human potential.

At the same time, rapid developments in artificial intelligence, automation, and robotics raise questions about their impacts on human rights and the future of work. The use of machines to increase productivity risks resulting in heightened social inequality through downward pressure on wages and the loss of jobs. The growth of the "gig economy," facilitated by new technologies, has contributed to changing the nature of work by increasing the availability of flexible positions that provide opportunities for some while negatively affecting the livelihoods of others. And in the background, mass data collection can lead to violations of the right to privacy and inhibit free and fair societies.

The extent of these impacts remains unknown. Human rights organisations are exploring how to ensure that advances in technology benefit all people and do not exacerbate inequality for marginalised populations.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Modern technology presents great utility and promise, including for human rights. The development of the Internet has widened access to knowledge, while new media platforms have given activists fast ways to organise communities and share messages at scale.

# data[].attributes.headline
USA: Consumer group files false advertising lawsuit against Starbucks over allegations that it sources "ethical" coffee and tea from farms involved in human rights abuses

# data[].attributes.subject
USA: Consumer group files false advertising lawsuit against Starbucks over allegations that it sources "ethical" coffee and tea from farms involved in human rights abuses

# data[].attributes.body
Starbucks is accused of lying about the origin of its coffee. In fact, its coffee and tea are not ethically sourced, but come from farms in Guatemala and Kenya where human rights are not respected. The National Consumers League has filed a complaint. in effect, Starbucks is falsely advertising the fact that it buys from farms that do not respect human and labor rights, and that use child labor, sexual harassment and assault, according to various investigations by journalists and governments.

# data[].attributes.headline
USA: Consumer group files false advertising lawsuit against Starbucks over allegations that it sources "ethical" coffee and tea from farms involved in human rights abuses 

# data[].attributes.subject
USA: Consumer group files false advertising lawsuit against Starbucks over allegations that it sources "ethical" coffee and tea from farms involved in human rights abuses 

# data[].attributes.body
What Happened ?

Starbucks has been sued by the National Consumers League for spreading false claims about their supply.

# data[].attributes.headline
Zimbabwe: Communities call for the immediate stoppage of artisanal mining operations to save lives as 15 trapped miners are rescued

# data[].attributes.subject
Zimbabwe: Communities call for the immediate stoppage of artisanal mining operations to save lives as 15 trapped miners are rescued

# data[].attributes.body
3- Could It Have Been Prevented:

Yes, the incident likely could have been prevented with stricter adherence to mining safety regulations.

The ongoing illegal mining operations, despite safety concerns and regulatory violations, indicate a lack of effective oversight and enforcement by relevant authorities.

Community-based organizations in Manicaland have called for an immediate stoppage of artisanal mining operations and the implementation of accountability measures to prevent future incidents and save lives.

# data[].attributes.headline
Zimbabwe: Communities call for the immediate stoppage of artisanal mining operations to save lives as 15 trapped miners are rescued

# data[].attributes.subject
Zimbabwe: Communities call for the immediate stoppage of artisanal mining operations to save lives as 15 trapped miners are rescued

# data[].attributes.body
2-Why It Happened:

The collapse appears to have been due to unsafe mining practices at Redwing Mine.

The mine, known to attract numerous artisanal miners from across Zimbabwe, is reported to be operating in violation of safety regulations (Statutory Instrument 109 of 1990).

Illegal mining activities at the site, allegedly facilitated by political elites and politically-connected groups, suggest a lack of enforcement of mining safety standards and regulations.

# data[].attributes.headline
Japan: Less than 15% of board members are women, lagging far behind international standards

# data[].attributes.subject
Japan: Less than 15% of board members are women, lagging far behind international standards

# data[].attributes.body
2)Why did it happened?

1. The underrepresentation of women in Japanese corporate boards stems from deep-rooted cultural and systemic issues. Cultural expectations and traditional gender roles often limit opportunities for women to advance into leadership positions. The prevalent belief in a "male breadwinner" model and societal norms may discourage women from pursuing or being considered for high-level roles.

2. Moreover, the way workplaces are set up and the cultures within companies that keep favoring one gender over another play a big part in why there are so few women in top positions. Plus, the fact that there hasn't been much focus on having diverse leadership in the past only makes the problem worse.

# data[].attributes.headline
Zimbabwe: Communities call for the immediate stoppage of artisanal mining operations to save lives as 15 trapped miners are rescued

# data[].attributes.subject
Zimbabwe: Communities call for the immediate stoppage of artisanal mining operations to save lives as 15 trapped miners are rescued

# data[].attributes.body
What Happened:

A group of 15 artisanal miners, including Owen Jaison, were trapped underground for three days at Redwing Mine in Tsapauta, Penhalonga, Manicaland province, Zimbabwe.

The incident occurred when a mine shaft collapsed while they were working inside a tunnel.

Owen Jaison, one of the miners, managed to escape by digging his way out of the mine over a distance of one kilometer.

# data[].attributes.headline
Courts acquits human rights activists in Indonesia 

# data[].attributes.subject
Courts acquits human rights activists in Indonesia 

# data[].attributes.body
Could anything have been done to prevent it ? One possible preventive measure could have been open dialogue between the activists and Luhut to address any concerns or misunderstandings before resorting to legal action. Additionally, fostering an environment that encourages freedom of expression and constructive criticism may contribute to resolving such issues through dialogue rather than legal proceedings. It's essential for all parties involved to engage in communication and understanding to avoid unnecessary conflicts and legal disputes.

# data[].attributes.headline
Court acquits human rights activists in Indonesia 

# data[].attributes.subject
Court acquits human rights activists in Indonesia 

# data[].attributes.body
Why does it happened ? The case originated when Luhut, a former Army general and senior cabinet minister, reported the activists to the police in late 2021. Luhut claimed that he was offended by being referred to as a "lord" and "villain" in the comments made by Haris and Fatia in a YouTube video. Additionally, Luhut insisted that he did not own any business in resource-rich Papua and denied any involvement in the increasing military presence in the province, which is one of the poorest regions in the country.

# data[].attributes.headline
Japan: Less than 15% of board members are women, lagging far behind international standards

# data[].attributes.subject
Japan: Less than 15% of board members are women, lagging far behind international standards

# data[].attributes.body
1)What happened?

The Keidanren survey on gender equality in Japanese corporate leadership revealed a significant disparity, with only 14.1% of board members being women. This stark contrast highlights a substantial underrepresentation of women in senior positions within leading Japanese companies.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
"Keidanren: 14.1% of directors at member firms are women," 3 January 2024

Leading companies in Japan are lagging far behind their foreign rivals in terms of promoting women to senior positions, according to the first survey on gender equality by Keidanren (Japan Business Federation).

Women accounted for 14.1 percent of board members at 751 member companies of Keidanren, Japan's most influential business lobby, according to the survey results released on Dec. 22.

According to a Cabinet Office survey, the percentage of female corporate executives in 2022 was 45.2 percent in France, 40.9 percent in Britain, 37.2 percent in Germany, and 31.3 percent in the United States...

The business lobby conducted the survey because investors are becoming more wary of gender balances on corporate boards.

Some U.S. advisory firms recommend against investing in companies with male-only boards...

Only 12 percent of female board members were promoted from within the companies, compared with 61 percent of male executives...

The government has set a goal of increasing the ratio of women on boards of Prime-listed companies to 30 percent by 2030.

A Cabinet Office survey of all companies listed on the Prime Market in 2023 showed a 13.4-percent ratio of female directors, low by international standards...

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Japan: Less than 15% of board members are women, lagging far behind international standards - Business & Human Rights Resource Centre

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
"Keidanren: 14.1% of directors at member firms are women," 3 January 2024 Leading companies in Japan are lagging far behind their foreign rivals in terms of promoting women to senior positions, according to the first survey on gender equality by Keidanren (Japan Business Federation).

# data[].attributes.headline
Court acquits human rights activists in Indonesia 

# data[].attributes.subject
Court acquits human rights activists in Indonesia 

# data[].attributes.body
What happened ?

Two human rights activists, Haris Azhar and Fatia Maulidiyanti, were acquitted by the East Jakarta District Court on January 8, 2024. They were facing charges of defaming senior cabinet minister Luhut Pandjaitan in a YouTube video. The panel of judges ruled that the comments made by the activists did not constitute criminal defamation.

# data[].attributes.body
3) Whose fault is it? Could anything have been done to prevent it?

# data[].attributes.body
2) Analysing the case, why did it happen? Try to think about the underlying cause, considering the structural contexts.

# data[].attributes.body
1) What happened? Summarize very shortly and paste the link of the story