# data[].attributes.body
I would use some simulations or individual lessons, but I would want to make sure the whole PLC is on the same page before doing much more with it.

# data[].attributes.body
Yes, but I think that it has to be fully implemented. We can not pull from it!

# data[].attributes.body
thumbs up emoji - I like the "story telling" style of teaching and I could adopt it

# data[].attributes.body
I don't want to be tied to too rigid of a curriculum

# data[].attributes.body
5th grade is still waiting with for their stuff.

# data[].attributes.body
I think I would rather pick and choose what pieces I liked rather than going all-in no a the full curriculum they offer

# data[].attributes.body
I like how we make our curriculum now and would not want a canned program

# data[].attributes.body
I can see it taking a lot of time and collaboration to be able to adapt some of the resources to fit with the materials we already use, but it could definitely be done, just not for next year.

# data[].attributes.body
Challenges: Can be daunting to have to sort/sift through pages and pages of resources. Unit lengths seem very long and would likely have to be adapted to fit our scope and sequence. 

# data[].attributes.body
I like access to the video clips/demos. Also nice to have access to tons of activity/lesson plans pre-made

# data[].attributes.body
Because it works best for spiraled curriculum, we would have to seriously consider and agree on whether or not we are going to spiral as a department

# data[].attributes.body
At this time I can not, not having any of the materials they use. We already use similar things, and even exact copies. Some of their simulations I saw were not as strong as PhETs we use.

# data[].attributes.body
I am unsure how each lesson works. Would definitely need more work on this before I embraced it.

# data[].attributes.body
I can envision implementing OpenSciEd in my classroom as long as I don't have to follow it to the t. I would like the ability to be able to make the call on what will work best for my class and edit as needed. You know, cut a lesson or add a lesson as needed, turn a hands on lab into a demo, that kind of thing.

# data[].attributes.body
I think that using pieces of it as it fits with curriculum we already have

# data[].attributes.body
Timeline is optimistic

# data[].attributes.body
Some lessons I've seen used before in other districts were on there that I think could definitely be incorporated into our curriculum.

The simulations are great.

The idea of using an anchoring phenomenon for a unit is great and we could build off it by making the examples more localized & relevant to our students and their interests.

The unit outlines give newer teachers to the district a good layout of how student understanding is expected to unfold throughout the unit.

# data[].attributes.body
worth picking and choosing resources to include in our existing units, not sure about implementing an entire unit (month +)

# data[].attributes.body
Need training

# data[].attributes.body
The best part of OpenSciEd is that the units are put together in a way that hits several standards and intertwines cross cutting skills/concepts

# data[].attributes.body
If I had a science class, yes, and would love to support if trying it out.

# data[].attributes.body
Potentially unrealistic timing for some of the lessons

# data[].attributes.body
Interesting questions.

Activities that can be currently incorporated into our curriculum.

# data[].attributes.body
many individual lessons are great, it matches plenty of simulations to topics we cover

# data[].attributes.body
I generally don't like prescribed curriculum. We already have great science curriculum.

# data[].attributes.body
I like some of the activities but I would hesitate to use them unless one lesson can stand alone.

# data[].attributes.body
Some of the topics designed for different grades that we have

# data[].attributes.body
Yes, I can see trying out a few!

# data[].attributes.body
Just a question about what students seem, how they access.

# data[].attributes.body
The units are very long.

There aren't many opportunities to practice science text reading.

To work the most effectively it needs to be taught in the order they suggest.

# data[].attributes.body
Some of the units were ridiculously long (Ex. 30 days).

# data[].attributes.body
I loved the storylines, simulations, and video playlists for students.

# data[].attributes.body
I can imagine using some parts of these units. There are some projects that I think have been valuable and match the age level we work with a little better at times but I think some smaller lessons could be beneficial.

# data[].attributes.body
I like to cherry pick from different sources and would be unsure of using a source that is designed for multiple weeks

# data[].attributes.body
There are relevant resources (sims, videos, labs) that we could use in our existing units

# data[].attributes.body
Not really, except the obvious that there's not much for 5th grade.

# data[].attributes.body
Yes, I plan to pick out a few of the resources that go along with our units

# data[].attributes.body
I like that it's free so we can see everything before making a decision.

I like that they develop a model throughout the unit.

The anchoring phenomenon are great, I think that's the way we should be teaching.

It spirals!!!

# data[].attributes.body
I would like some of the phenomena to be a little more localized.

# data[].attributes.body
I liked that it appeared well organized.

# data[].attributes.body
Love that it is passed on an authentic relatable to kids phenomenon.

# data[].attributes.body
Seeing the simulations was cool! I think students would really enjoy those.

Also, this is helpful for me to visualize the concepts

# data[].attributes.body
I like that the worksheets are made for you.

I like that there is an editable version as needed.

I like that there is a phenomena given for each, you don't have to think of your own.