# data[].attributes.body
ToI: Several objectives between one operation. We feel it is a shame that we have to only report one type of intervention per operation

# data[].attributes.body
Can we include the working paper as an annex in the tender?

# data[].attributes.body
We have enough info to draft evaluation plan; will use some of this information as part of tender as well.

# data[].attributes.body
Have the same problem with external evaluators as Estonia; finding external evaluators for fisheries and aquaculture sector

# data[].attributes.body
Still in process of adapting programme, this takes priority. Establishing good criteria for evaluation will be a major challenge. With existing indicators it may be difficult to be concrete on impact without additional indicators, interviews, etc.

# data[].attributes.body
Still finalising programme- that must be done first. One challenge is bringing stakeholders together given new measures in EMFAF. For example, some new EMFAF measures involve multiple stakeholders that must be organised.

# data[].attributes.body
In initial phases of reading, looks good so far

# data[].attributes.body
Time wise, difficult to make evaluations so early. Good that EP is separate from programme.

# data[].attributes.body
Based on previous period, biggest challenge is finding outside evaluator- small market in EE. So many evaluations on a smaller budget may be difficult in EE. Budget for this, compared to number of evaluations, may limit # of evaluations. Evaluators also related to programme implementers, may be difficult to find independent evaluators

# data[].attributes.headline
EE external evaluators available limited and hence high budgets 

# data[].attributes.subject
EE external evaluators available limited and hence high budgets 

# data[].attributes.body
Looks good, began initial reading so far so good

# data[].attributes.body
Time wise, want to ensure timing on conducting evaluations aligns with programming time-frame, not based on strict time lines but progress of implementation

# data[].attributes.body
Good experience from first period; don't see major issues- will use FAMENET Working Paper to draft plan using same structure from previous period.

# data[].attributes.body
Want to continue with internal procedure for EMFF, similar procedure with EMFAF

# data[].attributes.headline
3 Do you have any feedback on the evaluation plan working paper?

# data[].attributes.subject
3 Do you have any feedback on the evaluation plan working paper?

# data[].attributes.headline
2 Defining the technical aspects of evaluation – do you see major challenges?

# data[].attributes.subject
2 Defining the technical aspects of evaluation – do you see major challenges?

# data[].attributes.headline
1 Organizing and coordinating evaluation activities – do you see major challenges?

# data[].attributes.subject
1 Organizing and coordinating evaluation activities – do you see major challenges?