# data[].attributes.body
"What do you think might be some of the problems for international students with the transition to studying abroad at a university? ​

​

How can these problems be addressed?"

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Extra review of seminar functional phrases (STUDENT COPY) 

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
S2 Week 8 - Session D - SEMINAR - Peer performance checklist

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
S2 Week 8 - Session D- CW 3 Checklist and Feedback Form (For Tutorials)

# data[].attributes.body
Ahmad - Good job from ahmed addresed problems and solutions, (70/80)
.I give him 70/80Khalid he did well but I think he could talk more
M Alsagri

# data[].attributes.body
Abdullah- He did pretty well. He scored atleast 75/80
M. Mubarak - completing peer checklist for Abdullah: addressing good points, He did some research, and engaged in the topic, bringing up solutions related to the topic. 75/80
Hitang - (disappeared) 0

# data[].attributes.body
Yahia
Hongge feedback for Peijing?
Peijing - a bit difficult to follow, but you did choose a good timing to participate into the discussion. You also ended up inviting other people to join, but maybe try another way to invite next time.

# data[].attributes.body
Xinsen
Hareb feedback for Xinsen?
Yi Ye

# data[].attributes.body
Abdullah:
- grammar: "many students abroad struggles" >
- pronunciation: "prioritise"
- Dominated discussion for 2 minutes! Nominate - ask questions.
- Nominated - good! ;)

Ahmad:
- one idea given - good.
- "Now Xinsen will continue!"

Peijing:
- hesitation can make it hard to follow.

(Where the Hell is Rubayea??!)

Group issue:
- speeches / individual = should be interactive and organised.
- no one is responding to previous points.

# data[].attributes.body
The group performed a great job in addressing ideas and included some sort of evidence. However, there is minimal interaction with group members.
Tips  :
Try to ask questions between peers .
Evaluate on other points ( Try to be the devil and create a tension ;) )

# data[].attributes.body
Hareb:
- started by giving points: would be nice to section each discussion.
- Adding a lot of problems
- Nominated: thank God!

M. Mubarak:
- good continuation of ideas for problems: cultural issues.
- solutions also given with problems even though Hareb didn't go into solutions.

Khalid:
- You added problems and solutions.

Hongge:
- Research mentioned with name and year. FIRST TIME a citation is mentioned!

Group didn't start with organising the discussion. There were some students doing problems and solutions while Hareb only did problems.
What do you think Khalid?
What do you think Hongge?
what do you think Mohammad?
I agree!
I agree!
I agree!
I totally agree with you! totally???? 100%???
I disagree ;) - Brother Khalid.

Try and organise challenges and solutions by areas - educational, social, financial, mental challenges/solutions.

# data[].attributes.body
Great interaction between members and ideas. However, there was domination and jumping back and forth in ideas going through loops.
Try to include some evidence, evaluate the evidence's results, and relate it to the main topic.

Conclude and summarize the main points of the seminar

# data[].attributes.body
Yahia:
- gave one problem with an example
- solution 1: what problem is this addressing?

M Alsagri:
- politely interrupted.
- Grammar: "we faces many problem"?
- another problem? What do you think hitang?
- PROBLEM???

Hitang:
- no sound.
= 0%

Yi Ye:
- Some lack of clarity: -tion? make the words clear.
- citation given = Susan? is that a first name?

Group issues:
- Organised well: thanks Yahia.
- what do you think? what do you think?

# data[].attributes.body
The interaction between group members needs improvement. Moreover, using non-seminar language during an academic discussion.