# data[].attributes.body
The term personal budget appears only once in the consultation document, and not in any proposal, but an explanation of the existing system. I'm concerned this vital post of the system has been overlooked, and may be lost

# data[].attributes.body
Q9. Do you agree or disagree that local authorities should be responsible for quality assuring non-school alternative provision delivering special educational provision EOTAS for children of compulsory school age?

In plain English: If there are new quality standards, who should be checking providers meet them — the local authority, or someone else?

PROMPTS

These are to help you think of answers. Please do not feel limited to these, or to answer these at all.

Who has monitored the quality of your child’s provision, and how effective has this been?

How do you feel about local authorities taking on this role under the proposals?

What would give you confidence that provision is being properly checked?

# data[].attributes.body
Q1. How can we best support the needs of children and young people who are not eligible for a Specialist Provision Package but are unable to continue their education in a formal setting?

In plain English: What should happen for children who don't meet the new, narrower eligibility bar for EOTAS, but still genuinely can't be in a school or college setting?

PROMPTS

These are to help you think of answers. Please do not feel limited to these, or to answer these at all.

Based on your experience, what has happened when your child could not attend school but did not fit existing criteria?

How well do you think the proposed eligibility approach would have worked for your child’s situation?

What changes would make this proposal better reflect the realities families face?

# data[].attributes.body
Subsequent to the the government's main SEND reform White Paper, 'Every Child Achieving and Thriving', published in February 2026, the Department of Education is now asking for our views on how the government can better support children and young people whose education, health and care plan (EHCP) has set out that they should be educated outside a school or college setting.

This consultation covers:

Education Other Than In School or College (EOTAS, under s.61 of the Children and Families Act 2013)

support for children who cannot attend school because of health needs (such as under s.19 of the Education Act 1996)

how schools and local authorities use accredited online education providers for alternative provision

The questions are split into 4 chapters:

1. Chapter 1: Reforming education otherwise than at school

This chapter covers how EOTAS should work for children entering the new SEND system from 2029/30 - eligibility, who's in charge, appeals, and quality assurance. EOTAS here refers to those with EOTAS through their EHCP under s.61 of the Children and Families Act.

2. Chapter 2: Children and young people on existing EOTAS arrangements

This chapter is about what happens to children already on EOTAS when any new system starts (expected 2029/30) — particularly the proposed reassessment for primary-age children. EOTAS here refers to those with EOTAS through their EHCP under s.61 of the Children and Families Act.

3. Chapter 3: Children who can't attend school due to health needs

This chapter covers children who need alternative provision because of physical or mental health needs — a related but legally distinct group from EOTAS.

This covers non-EOTAS access to alternative provisions, including under Section 19 of the Education Act 1996.

4. Chapter 4: Children in accredited online education

This chapter covers the small number of children receiving alternative provision through accredited online-only education providers.

# data[].attributes.body
Q13. If a needs assessment takes place, what should be the next step for those who are not eligible for an EHCP?

In plain English: If a reassessed child is found not to qualify for an EHCP any more, what should happen to them — should they be moved towards a school placement, kept on EOTAS with reviews, or handled case by case?

PROMPTS

These are to help you think of answers. Please do not feel limited to these, or to answer these at all.

Have you experienced reductions or changes in support, and what impact did this have?

How well does the proposal address what happens next for children in this situation?

What would help ensure children continue to receive suitable education and support?

# data[].attributes.body
Q2. Which approach to commissioning and overseeing EOTAS arrangements do you think would work best?

In plain English: This is the central question about who should be in control of your child's EOTAS arrangements — the council, the school, or a shared model between them.

PROMPTS

These are to help you think of answers. Please do not feel limited to these, or to answer these at all.

In your experience, who has been most responsible for decisions about your child’s education, and how well has this worked?

How would your preferred option improve (or change) that experience in practice?

What would need to happen to ensure your chosen model works effectively for families like yours?

# data[].attributes.body
Q10. For young people aged 16–25, should quality assurance and oversight arrangements of EOTAS provision align with the approach proposed for children of compulsory school age?

In plain English: Should older teenagers and young adults on EOTAS be quality-assured in the same way as younger children, or does this age group need a different approach?

PROMPTS

These are to help you think of answers. Please do not feel limited to these, or to answer these at all.

If relevant, how has support changed as your child has moved into post-16 education?

How well do the proposals reflect the different needs, independence, and outcomes for this age group?

What would need to be adapted to make quality assurance meaningful and appropriate for young people?

# data[].attributes.body
Q8. Do you agree or disagree that non-school alternative provision delivering EOTAS special educational provision to children of compulsory school age should be required to comply with new national regulatory standards?

In plain English: Should all EOTAS providers (tutors, therapists, non-school settings, etc.) have to meet a new national safeguarding and quality standard?

PROMPTS

These are to help you think of answers. Please do not feel limited to these, or to answer these at all.

What has been your experience of the quality of alternative or EOTAS provision?

How would national standards work in light of your existing package? Do you have providers in your EOTAS package that aren't specialist/specifically alternatively provision, such as PE or art classes?

What would you want national standards to include based on your experience?

# data[].attributes.headline
🛈 What is the difference between s.19 and s.61 EOTAS?

# data[].attributes.subject
🛈 What is the difference between s.19 and s.61 EOTAS?

# data[].attributes.body
A SPP is a standardised, evidence-based package of specialist support for children and young people with the most complex SEND - those whose needs can't be met within the "Universal," "Targeted," or "Targeted Plus" tiers of the reformed SEND system. It's built around groups of children with similar characteristics and support needs, rather than around a specific diagnosis - a child doesn't need a formal diagnosis to qualify for one. SPPs are proposed to be developed by an independent panel of experts and tested with parents, and would be delivered through a named school or further education setting (often one the child hasn't attended before).

# data[].attributes.headline
EOTAS Government Information on the EOTAS Reform Consultation

# data[].attributes.subject
EOTAS Government Information on the EOTAS Reform Consultation

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
SEND reform: education otherwise than at school – what parents and carers of children and young people need to know

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
One in 3 children are identified as having special educational needs (SEN) at some point in their education, but many of these children and young people are not getting the support they need to achieve and thrive.

# data[].attributes.body
Q18. What approach, if any, should be taken to the duration of placements for children receiving alternative provision through Online Education Accredited Providers?

In plain English: Should there be a time limit on how long a child can be educated through an accredited online provider, or should this stay flexible and case by case?

PROMPTS

These are to help you think of answers. Please do not feel limited to these, or to answer these at all.

If your child has used online provision, how long was it needed and why?

How well does the proposal reflect the need for flexibility based on individual circumstances?

What approach to duration would better reflect real experiences?

# data[].attributes.body
Q6. What safeguards are needed to ensure reintegration planning best supports progress and the CYP's long-term outcomes?

In plain English: What protections should be built in so that reintegration isn't rushed or pushed through when it isn't right for the child or young person?

PROMPTS

These are to help you think of answers. Please do not feel limited to these, or to answer these at all.

Have you experienced pressure to return your child to school before they were ready?

How well do the proposals protect against this happening?

What would help ensure reintegration decisions are made appropriately for each child?

# data[].attributes.body
Q5. What factors are important for effective reintegration planning for children and young people receiving EOTAS provision?

In plain English: If a plan is made to move a child from EOTAS back into a school or college, what needs to be in place for that plan to actually work?

PROMPTS

These are to help you think of answers. Please do not feel limited to these, or to answer these at all.

If reintegration has been discussed or attempted, what worked well and what didn’t?

How realistic do the proposals feel based on your child’s readiness and needs?

What would need to be in place for reintegration to succeed for your child?

# data[].attributes.body
Q4. What safeguards should be in place to support consistent, needs-led decisions about when EOTAS is the most appropriate way to meet a child or young person's needs, including where suitable school or further education provision may be limited or unavailable?

In plain English: How should decisions about who qualifies for EOTAS be kept fair and consistent, especially in areas where there simply isn't enough suitable school provision available?

PROMPTS

These are to help you think of answers. Please do not feel limited to these, or to answer these at all.

Have decisions about your child’s provision felt consistent and needs-led? Why or why not?

How likely is the proposed system to improve consistency based on your experience?

What additional safeguards would help ensure fair decisions for families?

# data[].attributes.body
Q.3 What support, capacity or safeguards would enable the school or FE setting and/or LA to undertake their roles effectively?

In plain English: If a school is going to be given this new responsibility, what training, funding, or checks should it be required to have first?

PROMPTS

These are to help you think of answers. Please do not feel limited to these, or to answer these at all.

From your experience, what knowledge or support did education professional have or lack when making decisions about your child?

How well do the proposals address gaps in capacity or expertise?

What specific support or safeguards would have improved your experience?

# data[].attributes.body
Why?

This padlet is provided by Worcestershire Parent Carer Forum to gather feedback from Worcestershire parent carers to help us represent your views at regional and national discussions. The information will also be used to help us submit a response to the EOTAS Reform consultation.

The padlet also shares where you can find more information and provides the details of how you can submit your own response.

Please only add posts and reactions to this padlet if you are a parent carer (someone caring for a child with additional needs aged 0-25) who lives in Worcestershire.

If you do not live in Worcestershire please contact your local parent carer forum to provide feedback.

# data[].attributes.body
The consultation outlines a series of measures intended to reform the SEND system - some of these measures have already been finalised, and this is clearly indicated within the document.

# data[].attributes.headline
Link to EOTAS Consultation Response Survey

# data[].attributes.subject
Link to EOTAS Consultation Response Survey

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
SEND reform: education otherwise than at school - Department for Education - Citizen Space

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Find and participate in consultations run by the Department for Education

# data[].attributes.headline
Consultation Questions - A complete list

# data[].attributes.subject
Consultation Questions - A complete list

# data[].attributes.body
Finding your way around:

Swipe / scroll down ↓ to read the responses in each section and swipe / scroll right → to read more information.

The Questions

We have taken the questions from the consultation document.

You might find it helpful to read the consultation document to further understand the question (this is included on this padlet in the Useful Information section (swipe / scroll right → ) - where you see this symbol 🛈 we have provided a pinned post that explains more detail.

Some of the consultation questions are too long to write in full so we have summarised them.

When we write 'they' on this padlet it says 'we' in the consultation meaning the Department for Education / the government.

Add a post (your thought / comment / link):
Tap / click the “+” icon under the question to add a post with your feedback.

⭐You don't need to answer every question⭐

Scroll / swipe across and find the ones that are most important to you. We have also added some polls for the questions that are a yes / no answer to help you give a quick response.

Rate posts:
Tap the post to give a thumbs up 👍 or thumbs down 👎 to agree or disagree.

🔐 No account needed — just post as a guest. We have hidden the contributors names to posts and comments so everything you post will be anonymous however if you are signed in we might be able to see this information when we download the data from the padlet - please sign out to stay anonymous.

# data[].attributes.body
We've included all the links to the EOTAS Reform Consultation at the end of this padlet.

Swipe swipe / scroll right → to the end to find it 🙂

# data[].attributes.body
The consultation closes on 18th September - we will stop accepting responses to this padlet on Friday 11th September to give us time to write and submit our response.

# data[].attributes.body
Q7. What arrangements are needed to provide parents with a clear route to resolve disputes if decisions are made: about whether new EOTAS provision should be put in place; or to change or cease EOTAS provision that has already been put in place?

In plain English: Given the proposal to remove the specific SEND Tribunal appeal route for EOTAS decisions, what should replace it so families still have a genuine way to challenge a decision? This is one of the most significant questions in the whole consultation.

PROMPTS

These are to help you think of answers. Please do not feel limited to these, or to answer these at all.

What has been your experience of resolving disagreements with schools or local authorities?

How confident would you feel in the proposed alternative to the current system?

What would make a dispute process feel fair, independent, and effective for your family?

# data[].attributes.body
Q11. When should assessment take place, if at all, for children and young people on existing EOTAS arrangements?

In plain English: Should children already on EOTAS be reassessed at all — and if so, should that apply to every age group, or only to younger children moving from primary to secondary?

PROMPTS

These are to help you think of answers. Please do not feel limited to these, or to answer these at all.

How important has stability in your child’s current provision been, and why?

How do you think reassessment would affect your child based on your experience?

What would make any reassessment process feel proportionate, safe, and fair?

# data[].attributes.body
Q12. If a needs assessment takes place and a child of primary age is assessed as eligible for an EHCP, do you agree that they should move onto a Specialist Provision Package, with any EOTAS arrangements managed in line with the proposals set out in Chapter 1?

In plain English: If your primary-age child is reassessed and still qualifies for support, do you agree they should move into the new Specialist Provision Package system, with a named school taking over management of their EOTAS arrangements?

PROMPTS

These are to help you think of answers. Please do not feel limited to these, or to answer these at all.

What has your experience been of working with a named school (if applicable)?

How do you think this proposal would change how your child’s provision is managed?

What would need to be in place for this approach to work effectively in practice?

How do you think the Specialist Provision Package system would work for EOTAS?

Do you have/have you used provisions that are not on the LA's list in order to meet the needs of your child? If so, why?

# data[].attributes.body
Q14. Which factors best support stable transitions and progression for children receiving EOTAS, including return to education where appropriate?

In plain English: What actually makes a transition (whether reassessment, or a move back into school) go well, rather than badly, for a child on EOTAS?

PROMPTS

These are to help you think of answers. Please do not feel limited to these, or to answer these at all.

What has your experience been of transitions between settings or stages?

How well do the proposals reflect what actually helps transitions go smoothly?

What additional planning or support would improve stability for children like yours?

# data[].attributes.body
Q15. How effective is the current system in enabling schools to put in place early support for children whose health needs affect their participation in education, before requiring the local authority to arrange alternative provision?

In plain English: In your experience, do schools currently step in early enough when a child's health is affecting their attendance, before things escalate to the local authority?

PROMPTS

These are to help you think of answers. Please do not feel limited to these, or to answer these at all.

How did your child’s school respond when attendance first became difficult?

How well do the proposals reflect your experience of early intervention?

What changes would have made support more timely or effective?

# data[].attributes.body
Q16. How could roles and responsibilities between schools, local authorities and health services be clarified to support more timely and effective support for children who are unable to attend school due to health reasons and require alternative provision?

In plain English: Who should be responsible for what, and how could schools, councils and health services work together better and faster for these children?

PROMPTS

These are to help you think of answers. Please do not feel limited to these, or to answer these at all.

How have different services worked together in your experience?

How clearly do the proposals reflect who is responsible for what?

What would improve coordination, communication, or accountability?

# data[].attributes.body
Q.17 Where an alternative provision placement is required to meet health needs, how can the child or young person be better supported to transition back into a school?

In plain English: What would help a child return to school successfully after a period of health-related alternative provision?

PROMPTS

These are to help you think of answers. Please do not feel limited to these, or to answer these at all.

If your child has returned (or attempted to return) to school, what helped or hindered this?

How realistic do the proposals feel based on your experience?

What support would be needed to make transitions sustainable?

# data[].attributes.body
Q.19 Should CYP receiving AP through Online Education Accredited Providers remain on the admission register of a school?

In plain English: Should a child or young person being educated fully online still be formally 'on the books' at a physical school, even if they never attend in person?

PROMPTS

These are to help you think of answers. Please do not feel limited to these, or to answer these at all.

Has your child remained on a school roll during alternative provision, and what impact did this have?

How well does the proposal reflect your experience of being on or off roll?

What approach would best support accountability and access to support?

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
SEND reform: education otherwise than at school consultation (BSL)

# data[].attributes.headline
** Worcs. SEND EOTAS & AP Reform - Plain English Guide **

# data[].attributes.subject
** Worcs. SEND EOTAS & AP Reform - Plain English Guide **

# data[].attributes.body
A WPCF plain English guide to the proposed reforms of EOTAS and alternative provision.

# data[].attributes.body
Do add your comments too!

# data[].attributes.wish_content.attachment_props.question
Do you agree or disagree that non-school alternative provision delivering EOTAS special educational provision to children of compulsory school age should be required to comply with new national regulatory standards?

# data[].attributes.body
Do add your comments too!

# data[].attributes.wish_content.attachment_props.question
Q10. For young people aged 16–25, should quality assurance and oversight arrangements of EOTAS provision align with the approach proposed for children of compulsory school age? 

# data[].attributes.wish_content.attachment_props.poll_choices[].choice_text
Arrangements should be different (please specify)

# data[].attributes.body
Do add your comments!

# data[].attributes.wish_content.attachment_props.question
Q11. When should assessment take place, if at all, for children and young people on existing EOTAS arrangements? 

# data[].attributes.wish_content.attachment_props.poll_choices[].choice_text
Assessment at transition points for all children

# data[].attributes.wish_content.attachment_props.poll_choices[].choice_text
Assessment at transition points for younger children only

# data[].attributes.body
Do add your comments too!

# data[].attributes.wish_content.attachment_props.question
Q12. If a needs assessment takes place and a child of primary age is assessed as eligible for an EHCP, do you agree that they should move onto a Specialist Provision Package, with any EOTAS arrangements managed in line with the proposals set out in Chapter 1? 

# data[].attributes.body
Do add your comments too!

# data[].attributes.wish_content.attachment_props.question
Which approach to commissioning and overseeing EOTAS arrangements do you think would work best?

# data[].attributes.wish_content.attachment_props.poll_choices[].choice_text
The local Authority decides if EOTAS is needed, the named school manages it day-to-day;

# data[].attributes.wish_content.attachment_props.poll_choices[].choice_text
The named school decides and manages everything

# data[].attributes.body
Do leave any comments, even if just "don't know"!

# data[].attributes.wish_content.attachment_props.question
If a needs assessment takes place, what should be the next step for those who are not eligible for an EHCP?

# data[].attributes.wish_content.attachment_props.poll_choices[].choice_text
Structured transition plan via a school/ AP school/ FE setting

# data[].attributes.attachment_caption
Please do specify whether "highly" or "somewhat" effective/ineffective in comments

# data[].attributes.body
Do add any comments you have

# data[].attributes.wish_content.attachment_props.question
Q15. How effective is the current system in enabling schools to put in place early support for children whose health needs affect their participation in education, before requiring the local authority to arrange alternative provision? 

# data[].attributes.wish_content.attachment_props.poll_choices[].choice_text
Highly effective/ Somewhat effective (please specify which in comments)

# data[].attributes.wish_content.attachment_props.poll_choices[].choice_text
Somewhat effective/ highly ineffective (please specify which in comments)

# data[].attributes.body
Do provide any comments!

# data[].attributes.wish_content.attachment_props.question
What approach, if any, should be taken to the duration of placements for children receiving alternative provision through Online Education Accredited Providers?

# data[].attributes.wish_content.attachment_props.poll_choices[].choice_text
should depend on individual circumstances

# data[].attributes.body
Do leave any comments!

# data[].attributes.wish_content.attachment_props.question
Q19. Should children receiving alternative provision through Online Education Accredited Providers remain on the admission register of a school? 

# data[].attributes.wish_content.attachment_props.poll_choices[].choice_text
should depend on individual circumstances

# data[].attributes.body
Do add your comments too! Even if just "don't know"

# data[].attributes.wish_content.attachment_props.question
Q9. Do you agree or disagree that local authorities should be responsible for quality assuring non-school alternative provision delivering special educational provision EOTAS for children of compulsory school age? 

# data[].attributes.wish_content.attachment_props.poll_choices[].choice_text
Agree with quality assuring but not by the LA

# data[].attributes.body
Our Aim

Worcestershire Parent Carer Forum is a collective of parent carers of children with a wide range of special educational needs and disabilities. Our aim is to make sure that parents’ voices are heard when it comes to planning and decision making about services for our SEND children and young people in Worcestershire.

We are part of the National Network of Parent Carer Forums. Parent Carer Forums are representative local groups of parents and carers of children and young people with disabilities who work alongside local authorities, education, health and other service providers to ensure the services they plan, commission, deliver and monitor meet the needs of children and families.

Our Forum uses parental voice to influence change through events, discussion groups and working groups. We gather the views of local families and work with the council, educational settings, health providers and other agencies to highlight where local services are working well, or challenge when changes or improvements need to be made.

Find out more about our work:

www.facebook.com/WorcestershirePCF

Become a member and get involved!:

https://worcspcf.org/get-involved/

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Being a member of WPCF has lots of benefits: you can meet other parent carers, have access to information and events and use your experiences to really make a difference to children’s lives in Worcestershire. You can be involved as little or as much as you like, and membership is free!

# data[].attributes.body
This chapter covers the small number of children receiving alternative provision through accredited online-only education providers.

# data[].attributes.body
This chapter covers how EOTAS should work for children entering the new SEND system from 2029/30 - eligibility, who's in charge, appeals, and quality assurance. EOTAS here refers to those with EOTAS through their EHCP under s.61 of the Children and Families Act.

# data[].attributes.body
This chapter is about what happens to children already on EOTAS when any new system starts (expected 2029/30) — particularly the proposed reassessment for primary-age children.

EOTAS here refers to those with EOTAS through their EHCP under s.61 of the Children and Families Act.

# data[].attributes.body
This chapter covers children who need alternative provision because of physical or mental health needs — a related but legally distinct group from EOTAS.

This covers non-EOTAS access to alternative provisions, including under Section 19 of the Education Act 1996.