# data[].attributes.body
VIDHI SAHA

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Sign in to your OneDrive cloud storage and Office Online.

# data[].attributes.headline
Use of Scientific-Sounding Language That Is Meaningless

# data[].attributes.subject
Use of Scientific-Sounding Language That Is Meaningless

# data[].attributes.body
Definition: This refers to jargon that sounds scientific but lacks a clear basis in real science.

Connection: Terms like "quantum energy" misuse legitimate scientific terms to create false credibility. This violates the scientific method and calls for critical thinking to evaluate evidence.

Object: www.cbc.ca/documentarychannel/blog/why-scientific-jargon-often-hides-bogus-claims

# data[].attributes.headline
 Results Can’t Be Reproduced or Verified

# data[].attributes.subject
 Results Can’t Be Reproduced or Verified

# data[].attributes.body
Definition: Claims that fail reproducibility tests under controlled conditions.

Connection: Practices like homeopathy rely on anecdotal evidence instead of verifiable results, challenging demonstrable validity.

Object: Link to a video explaining why homeopathy doesn’t work.

# data[].attributes.body
Definition: Pseudoscience fails to evolve despite new evidence or methods, unlike real science, which adapts.

Connection: Astrology remains unchanged for centuries, ignoring advances in astronomy, which shows a lack of critical thinking and a distorted view of truth.

Object: Link to an article discussing astrology’s flaws.

# data[].attributes.body
Definition: The assumption that "natural" is inherently better or safer.

Connection: Products labeled "natural" (e.g., herbal remedies) often avoid rigorous testing, challenging demonstrable validity.

Object: Article on the natural fallacy.

# data[].attributes.body
Definition: The belief that old practices are superior solely because of their age.

Connection: Practices like traditional Chinese medicine may lack scientific validation, appealing instead to group-think.

Object: Link to an article debunking ancient wisdom myths.

# data[].attributes.body
Definition: Relying on the opinion of an authority figure instead of evidence.

Connection: Celebrity endorsements of health products exploit this fallacy, bypassing critical thinking processes like evaluating evidence.

Object: www.psychologytoday.com

# data[].attributes.body
Definition: Claims of invisible, unmeasurable energy affecting well-being.

Connection: Pseudosciences like Reiki promote mystical energy, ignoring the need for demonstrable validity and a reputable source.

Object: Article exposing Reiki myths.

# data[].attributes.body
Definition: Overwhelming people with long, complex arguments to mask weak evidence.

Connection: This tactic confuses audiences and bypasses steps in the critical thinking process, like evaluating evidence.

Object: www.skepticalraptor.com

# data[].attributes.body
Definition: Seeing intentional patterns or agents in random events.

Connection: Superstitions often arise from agenticity, like believing black cats bring bad luck, instead of evaluating evidence.

Object: Article on agenticity and superstitions.

# data[].attributes.body
Definition: Finding patterns in random data.

Connection: Conspiracy theories thrive on patternicity, ignoring critical thinking and skepticism.

Object: www.theatlantic.com

# data[].attributes.body
Definition: Preference for simple explanations over complex ones.

Connection: Flat Earth theories appeal to simplicity but lack demonstrable validity and credible evidence.

Object: www.livescience.com

# data[].attributes.body
Definition: Believing something because it feels right or resonates emotionally.

Connection: Anti-vaccine movements exploit emotional stories, ignoring scientific evidence and reputable sources.

Object: www.nytimes.com