# data[].attributes.body
Process + implementation current survey results

Renewed survey --> directors

# data[].attributes.headline
Keeping the network updated - exchange of information

# data[].attributes.subject
Keeping the network updated - exchange of information

# data[].attributes.body
Sharing and updating the information that we get through different channels

What would be the best form for them? Dedicated platform? Repository?

GOAL: to have the same set of key messages that we can represent

Coordinating communication is crucial

Provide a unified voice

We can give signals, messages, lobby – to be able to pass the same overarching key messages e.g. towards our own National Authorities

Assign responsible persons for agenda items - For everyone to know who to address in connection with a specific topic

Importance of making the agenda accessible for everyone

written and accessible for everyone

the agenda should be flexible - to be able to include items that come up along the way

# data[].attributes.body
After network meetings a summary could be made and sent towards the Commission

Setting up a more structured way of reporting back to the network, and also when collecting topics e.g. for the formal NA Directors' meeting

# data[].attributes.body
Question: should it be held on a yearly basis or e.g. every 2nd year?

Italy will host the NA staff meeting in 2026

# data[].attributes.body
An opportunity to map the strengths of NAs in certain topics, and by that, creating a pool of expertise (sharing knowledge or best practices)

Having some kind of mentoring system in place for new NA directors

Peer support, job shadowing visits

If we can’t have NA staff meeting each year, it would be great to have staff trainings in-between

# data[].attributes.headline
Common reaction to the first draft of the new program

# data[].attributes.subject
Common reaction to the first draft of the new program

# data[].attributes.body
Give insight into the facts and figures, about the implications and consequences of certain changes planned by the Commission

have some kind of lobby activity – especially in case of the

Provide a unified voice, while keeping in mind that we can give signals, messages, lobby – but of course we are not policymakers

Examples of crucial topics:

Accreditation system

Share of schools that have accreditation differs from country to country

How should we proceed

Burning but difficult issue

National co-funding for operational costs

sensitive topic

could be an important input towards the Commission (when they plan the budget) for them to know the amount needed to carry out our tasks

ALL tasks should be taken into consideration

Financial framework of the programme

# data[].attributes.body
How often and in what way we should renew the coordinating members?

Introduction of a rotation system which does not replace all coordinating members at once could ensure both renewal and continuity

A small set of rules must be set up

Suggestion to set up a permanent secretariat for the network

Sometimes we get great ideas during these meetings and then we return home and become preoccupied with our daily tasks

The secretariat could take care of the follow-up of network activities

Is it possible in the form of an LTA?

# data[].attributes.body
Is the length of the meetings appropriate?

in case any of network meeting in person is planned longer than usual - if it is announced in due time, everyone can plan accordingly

In addition to the face-to-face meetings occurring twice a year, shorter, regular online meetings could be introduced.

# data[].attributes.headline
Possible involvement of Youth directors?

# data[].attributes.subject
Possible involvement of Youth directors?

# data[].attributes.body
Joint informal meetings – supported by E&T directors

Maybe a joint network in the long run?

NAs dealing with both E&T and Youth could have a key role in this matter

# data[].attributes.headline
Importance of making the agenda accessible for everyone

# data[].attributes.subject
Importance of making the agenda accessible for everyone

# data[].attributes.body
written and accessible for everyone

the agenda should be flexible - to be able to include items that come up along the way

# data[].attributes.body
What kind of role the network should have when it comes to TCAs? Should it have a coordinating role in the planning of TCAs/LTAs above the level of the individual NAs?

If it is a strategic tool, there should be some kind of coordination – reviewing plans

Are there any areas that are missing in the existing TCAs and LTAs? Are there overlapping topics?