# data[].attributes.body
purple - basis

yellow - things to consider

green - local studies

blue - foreign studies

# data[].attributes.headline
sample for introduction (presenting research gap and objective)

# data[].attributes.subject
sample for introduction (presenting research gap and objective)

# data[].attributes.body
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/375120892_Error_Analysis_of_Academic_Essays_of_Senior_High_School_Students

# data[].attributes.body
*number of errors for red a / red b / yellow

Kangangi, B. M., Ndung'u, C. W., Mwangi, K. P. (2024). Error Analysis of English Narrative Essays of Secondary School Learners in Kirinyaga Central Sub-County, Kenya. International Journal of Education and Literacy Studies, 12(2)

https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1426282.pdf

# data[].attributes.body
Gruta, R., & Astillero, S. (2024). Exploring Grade 7 Students’ Second Language Difficulties: Implications for Teaching and Learning. European Journal of Education Studies 11(7), 129–148.

https://oapub.org/edu/index.php/ejes/article/view/5403

# data[].attributes.body
Gruta, R., & Astillero, S. (2024). Exploring Grade 7 Students’ Second Language Difficulties: Implications for Teaching and Learning. European Journal of Education Studies 11(7), 129–148.

https://oapub.org/edu/index.php/ejes/article/view/5403

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
EXPLORING GRADE 7 STUDENTS’ SECOND LANGUAGE DIFFICULTIES: IMPLICATIONS FOR TEACHING AND LEARNING | Gruta | European Journal of Education Studies

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
EXPLORING GRADE 7 STUDENTS’ SECOND LANGUAGE DIFFICULTIES: IMPLICATIONS FOR TEACHING AND LEARNING

# data[].attributes.body
Rivera, R. R. S., (2022). WRITING COMPETENCE AND GRAMMATICAL ERRORS OF THE WRITTEN DISCOURSES OF HUMSS 11 STUDENTS. PSYCHOLOGY AND EDUCATION: A MULTIDISCIPLINARY JOURNAL 1(2), 84-92. https://ejournals.ph/article.php?id=20267

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.authors[].name
Writing Competence and Grammatical Errors of the Written Discourses of HUMSS 11 Students | KITE E-Learning Solutions, Inc.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Writing Competence and Grammatical Errors of the Written Discourses of HUMSS 11 Students

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Writing is one of the macro- skills that needed to be mastered by the students because it is an avenue for them to express their
feelings. Some believed that there are students who are good at writing, but they are not good speakers. In the Senior High
School Curriculum, the Humanities and Social Sciences need to write effectively because there are writing subjects that would
enhance their skills such as Reading and Writing in the core subject, Creative Writing, and Creative Non-Fiction in their
specialized subjects. In spite of the good intention of the HUMSS curriculum, there are students who could not write
effectively. This paper can be instrumental as it sought to determine how competent are the HUMSS students with regards to
writing. It could also help the teachers to identify the necessary steps in order to improve the writing competency of the
HUMSS student. The study used the descriptive- correlational design was used to determine grammatical errors and writing
competence of the HUMSS 11 students. Sixty (60) eulogies that serve as the written discourses were analyzed in the study. It
found out that the respondents have a mean score of 2.37 (Fair to Poor) in their level of writing competence. The respondents
committed grammatical errors on their written discourses wherein their inconsistent use of verb tenses was their common error.
There is no significant relationship between gender and level of writing competence as gender is not a significant factor that
affects the writing competence of the students. There is a significant difference between the scores of the respondents as
female students tend to perform better than males.

# data[].attributes.body
Espernaza, M. E. B., Espinosa J.S. F., Gambalosa, F. M., Opalsa, C. M., Tumbagahan, C. M. & Pomentil, R. A. G. (2024). Common informative writing errors among junior high school students: input to lesson exemplars.

https://ijsra.net/sites/default/files/IJSRA-2024-0466.pdf?fbclid=IwZXh0bgNhZW0CMTEAAR2SLO220a_Xmky3xsgzQacOoWsejFoC2crq0bnNEUKNQDG3JlJwVaOsoKg_aem_GmDH0UYr_HLhIU71mcOpLg

# data[].attributes.body
Munder, D. (2024). Writing Errors of English as Second Language (ESL) Learners in the 21st Philippine Context. Randwick International of Education and Linguistics Science Journal, 5(2), 276-292.

# data[].attributes.body
Coronado, R. (2024). The most common spelling errors among learners of English of San Juan elementary school: Management of causes and remedies. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ADVANCED MULTIDISCIPLINARY STUDIES. https://www.ijams-bbp.net/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/5-IJAMS-MAY-2024-521-533.pdf\

# data[].attributes.body
Dalman, J. L. Z. (2022). English Composition Writing Skill Of Grade Vi Pupils: Basis For Teacher-Intensive Training. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ADVANCED MULTIDISCIPLINARY STUDIES. 11(11), 162-176

# data[].attributes.body
Urbano, C. M., Gumangan, M. A., Gustilo, L., & Capacete, M. P. A. (2021). Reading and writing needs of senior high school students: The case of Filipino students in the Philippines. Modern Journal of Studies in English Language Teaching and Literature, 3(1), 140-166.

https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Leah-Gustilo/publication/361931076_Reading_and_Writing_Needs_of_Senior_High_School_Students_The_Case_of_Filipino_Students_in_the_Philippines/links/62ea16677782323cf1966198/Reading-and-Writing-Needs-of-Senior-High-School-Students-The-Case-of-Filipino-Students-in-the-Philippines.pdf?origin=journalDetail&_tp=eyJwYWdlIjoiam91cm5hbERldGFpbCJ9

# data[].attributes.body
Masruddin, M. & Nasriandi, N. (2022). Lexical and Syntactical Errors Performed by Junior High School Student in Writing Descriptive Text. Journal of Language Teaching and Learning, Linguistics and Literature. 10(1), 1094-1100. https://ejournal.iainpalopo.ac.id/index.php/ideas/article/view/3024/1872

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Lexical and Syntactical Errors Performed by Junior High School Student in Writing Descriptive Text | IDEAS: Journal on English Language Teaching and Learning, Linguistics and Literature

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
This study analysis the junior high school studentâ€™s lexical and syntactical errors in writing descriptive. This research applied qualitative research method. The source of data taken from the students writing. Those descriptive text were analyzed by classifying the error from two types of errors namely Lexical errors and syntactical errors. From this study, the researcher found lexical errors such as wrong spelling, false friend, the use of Indonesian word (code switching). While the syntactical errors namely error in pronoun, plurals, the use verb tense.

# data[].attributes.body
Gildore, P. J., Uka, A. H., & Yting, J. (2023). Error analysis of academic essays of senior high school students. Journal Corner of Education, Linguistics, and Literature, 3(2), 141-156.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
View of Error Analysis of Academic Essays of Senior High School Students

# data[].attributes.body
Roxas, M. J. D. (2020). Exploring senior high school students’ academic writing difficulties: Towards an academic writing model. IOER International multidisciplinary research journal, 2(1).

# data[].attributes.body
Pardosi, J. D., Br. Karo, R. E. V., Sijabat, O. A. S., Pasaribu, H., Tarigan, N. W. P. (2019). AN ERROR ANALYSIS OF STUDENTS

IN WRITING NARRATIVE TEXT. Linguistic, English Education and Art (LEEA)

Journal. 3(1), 159-172. https://journal.ipm2kpe.or.id/index.php/LEEA/article/view/983/618

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
View of An Error Analysis of Students in Writing Narrative Text

# data[].attributes.body
Pasaribu, A. N. (2021). A COMMON

ERROR ANALYSIS IN STUDENTS’ ENGLISH

NARRATIVE WRITING. Linguistic, English Education and Art (LEEA). 4(2). 436-445. https://journal.ipm2kpe.or.id/index.php/LEEA/article/view/2338/1475

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
View of A Common Error Analysis in Studentsâ€™ English Narrative Writing

# data[].attributes.body
Daing, C. A., & Sahagun, M. L. T. (2020). Common errors committed by grade 11 st

udents in writing english essays: Basis for the development of strategic intervention material.

# data[].attributes.body
Özkayran, A. , Yılmaz, E. (2020). Analysis of Higher Education Students’ Errors in English Writing Tasks. Advances in Language and Literary Studies. 11(2), 48-5. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1267155

The data for this study were obtained from exam papers of students. As stated above, students need enough time to produce grammatically correct sentences. As the students wrote the paragraphs in an exam, the time allocated to writing part of the exam may not have been adequate for students. This may have increased the number of errors they made. So, students should be given enough time to write whatever they are assigned to observe their real performance.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
ERIC - EJ1267155 - Analysis of Higher Education Students’ Errors in English Writing Tasks, Advances in Language and Literary Studies, 2020-Apr

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
The aim of this study is to analyse the errors of higher education students in English writing tasks. In the study, the paragraphs in the exam papers of 57 preparatory class students, studying at a state university in Turkey in 2017-2018 academic year, were analysed. The study was conducted using qualitative research method. Case study was used in the research. Document analysis was used to collect data. The collected data were analysed in line with Surface Strategy Taxonomy and errors were identified and classified. As a result of the error analysis process, it was observed that the students made a total of 381 errors on 57 exam papers; 192 of them were misformation errors, 113 were omission errors, 65 were addition errors and only 11 were misordering errors. Misformation was the most frequent error among the students with a percentage of 50.39. In addition, the percentage of omission errors was 29.66%, that of addition errors was 17.06% and misordering errors was 2.89%. The

# data[].attributes.body
Fitria, T. N. (2020). SPELLING ERROR ANALYSIS IN STUDENTS’ WRITING ENGLISH COMPOSITION. Journal GEEJ. 7(2). 240-254.

https://ejournal.bbg.ac.id/geej/article/view/988/1071

Gap: The researcher suggests the next researchers who are interested in doing the same topic about spelling error but doing research on the different focuses.

# data[].attributes.body
Khatter, S. (2019). An Analysis of the Most Common Essay Writing Errors among EFL Saudi Female Learners (Majmaah University). Arab World English Journal (AWEJ). 10(3),364-381.

https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1271716.pdf

Gap: future studies on error analysis are recommended since exploring errors is believed to provide invaluable information that could be used to develop better FL learning and teaching.

# data[].attributes.body
Ratnaningsih, S., & Azizah, A. (2019). Error Analysis in the Descriptive Text Writing of Vocational High School Students. Dinamika Ilmu, 19(1), 175-186. https://doi.org/10.21093/di.v19i1.1364

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
View of Error Analysis in the Descriptive Text Writing of Vocational High School Students

# data[].attributes.body
Sarasua, R. J. G. (2021) ERROR ANALYSIS ON STUDENTS’ ESSAY COMPOSITION: REFERENCE FOR CORRECTIVE FEEDBACKING MECHANISM. International Journal of Arts, Sciences and Education, 2(1), 51–60. https://ijase.org/index.php/ijase/article/view/53

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
Abstract

Error analysis can help teachers discover and analyze language learners' mistakes, allowing for opportunities for growth and optimization of their language learning. Hence, this descriptive-qualitative study analyzed learners' errors in their essay composition. Corder's stages in error analysis was employed analyzing the errors committed by the fifteen participants from Special Program for Journalism. The results showed that the participants committed twenty types of errors which can be categorized into sentential level and word level errors. Incorrect subject-verb agreement, erroneous verb tense, flawed use of preposition were among the frequently erred grammar concepts in the participants' essay composition, while inappropriate pronoun usage was the least error type committed among the participants. The errors committed by the participants are linked to their first language, carelessness, and lack of mastery in the target language. This scenario necessitates language teachers to rethink, restructure and recalibrate their strategies, and teaching methods towards mastery of these grammar concepts. The findings of this study imply that language teachers and curriculum designers can utilize them to create an intervention or a corrective feedback mechanism to address these grammatical learning gaps and assist students grasp the subject.
Key Words: Error Analysis, Corrective Mechanism, Corder's EA Stages, Sentential and Word Level Errors

How to Cite

Sarasua, R. J. (2021). ERROR ANALYSIS ON STUDENTS' ESSAY COMPOSITION: REFERENCE FOR CORRECTIVE FEEDBACKING MECHANISM. International Journal of Arts, Sciences and Education, 2(1), 51-60. Retrieved from https://ijase.org/index.php/ijase/article/view/53

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
ERROR ANALYSIS ON STUDENTS’ ESSAY COMPOSITION: REFERENCE FOR CORRECTIVE FEEDBACKING MECHANISM | International Journal of Arts, Sciences and Education

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Error analysis can help teachers discover and analyze language learners’ mistakes, allowing for opportunities for growth and optimization of their language learning. Hence, this descriptive-qualitative study analyzed learners’ errors in their essay composition. Corder’s stages in error analysis was employed analyzing the errors committed by the fifteen participants from Special Program for Journalism. The results showed that the participants committed twenty types of errors which can be categorized into sentential level and word level errors. Incorrect subject-verb agreement, erroneous verb tense, flawed use of preposition were among the frequently erred grammar concepts in the participants’ essay composition, while inappropriate pronoun usage was the least error type committed among the participants. The errors committed by the participants are linked to their first language, carelessness, and lack of mastery in the target language. This scenario necessitates language teachers to rethink, restructure and recalibrate their strategies, and teaching methods towards mastery of these grammar concepts. The findings of this study imply that language teachers and curriculum designers can utilize them to create an intervention or a corrective feedback mechanism to address these grammatical learning gaps and assist students grasp the subject.
Key Words: Error Analysis, Corrective Mechanism, Corder’s EA Stages, Sentential and Word Level Errors

# data[].attributes.body
Neupane, R. N.(2023). ERROR ANALYSIS OF WRITTEN ENGLISH COMPOSITION: A CASE OF BASIC LEVEL STUDENTS. 1(1)

https://www.nepjol.info/index.php/tribj/article/view/53517/40077

Gap: an interested researcher can conduct a qualitative research in the same territory using interview tool with few teachers in order to identify their views and strategies to error analysis.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
View of Error Analysis of Written English Composition: A Case of Basic Level Students

# data[].attributes.body
Ulit, J. (2018). Writing Errors of Grade Nine Students: Basis for Sentence Writing Module. Asian Society of Teachers for Research, Inc., 2.

GAP: Future researchers may consider conducting similar studies along with the present study;

# data[].attributes.body
Setiyorini, T. J., Dewi, P. & Masykuri E. S. (2020). The Grammatical Error Analysis Found in Students’ Composition. Lensa: Kajian Kebahasaan, Kesusastraan, dan Budaya. 10(2), 218-233.

https://jurnal.unimus.ac.id/index.php/lensa/article/view/6451

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
Afdaleni. (2018). Students' Interest Level in Learning English Grammar. Asian EFL Journal, 20(4), 61-65.

Anjayani, P., & Suprapto. (2016). Error Analysis on the Use of Prepositions in Students' Writing (A Case Study of the Eleventh Grade Students of SMA Negeri 9 Semarang in the Academic Year of 2014/2015). ELT Forum:Journal of English Language Teaching, 5(2), 1-6.

Batu, P. N. F. L., Barasa, L. P. L., & Sitepu, V. T. (2018). Grammatical Errors in Students Speaking English: An Error Analysis on Indonesian Maritime Students. Asian EFL Journal, 20(7), 88-93.

Calanoga, M. C. M. (2019). Mechanics and Grammar Error Analysis in Students' Write-Ups: Basis for Incidental Teaching in the Classroom. Asian EFL Journal, 23(3.3), 104-125.

Calanoga, M. C. M., & Arellano - Tamayo, R. (2019). Error Analysis of Student Interns' Reflective Journals: Basis for a Grammar Remediation Class. Asian EFL Journal, 23(3.2), 220-236.

Cam, L., & Tran, T. M. T. (2017). An Evaluation of using Games in Teaching English Grammar for First Year English-Majored Students at Dong Nai Technology University. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 16(7), 55-71.

Catabay, M. Q. (2019). Error Analysis in Sentence Writing of Second Language Learners. Asian EFL Journal, 24(4.2), 64-79.

Fontiveros - Malana, M., & Calanoga, M. C. M. (2019). Students' Strategies and Competence in Writing Compositions. Asian EFL Journal, 22(1), 178-200.

Hamilton, C. E. (2015). The Contribution of Systemic Functional Grammar to the Error Analysis Framework. TESOL International Journal, 10(1). http://www.tesol-international-journal.com

Heigham, J., & Croker, R. A. (2009). Qualitative Research in Applied Linguistics: A Practical Introduction (First). PALGRAVE MACMILLAN.

Heydari, P., & Bagheri, M. S. (2012). Error Analysis: Sources of L2 Learners' Errors. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 2(8), 1583-1589. https://doi.org/10.4304/tpls.2.8.1583-1589

Ilyas, Moh. (2019). Developing Descriptive Writing through Process Approach to Indonesian Primary School Students. Asian EFL Journal, 26(6.2), 205-224.

Keshavarz, M. H. (2012). Contrastive Analysis and Error Analysis. Rahnama Press.

Khansir, A. A. (2012). Error Analysis and Second Language Acquisition. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 2(5), 1027-1032. https://doi.org/10.4304/tpls.2.5.1027-1032

Kusumawardhani, P. (2017). THE ANALYSIS OF ERRORS OF OMISSION IN ENGLISH NARRATIVE COMPOSITION MADE BY EFL STUDENTS. Journal of English Language and Education, 3(2), 84-96.

Manuel, J. B. (2019). Sentence Errors Committed in the Paragraph Writing among Senior High School Students. Asian EFL Journal, 23(3.4), 334-351.

Marashi, H. (2014). Using Inductive and Deductive Consciousness Raising Tasks to Improve Field-Dependent and Field-Independent EFL Learners' Grammar. The Iranian EFL Journal, 10(3), 60-74.

Mendoza, P. J. L. (2016). Analysis of in-class Writing Errors of College Freshmen Students. Asian EFL Journal, 17, 2-26.

Oktaviana, F. (2018). Comparison of Translation Result from Google-Translator and Bing-Translator (Error Analysis of Translation Result from Indonesian Text into English Text). The Asian ESP Journal, 14(5), 17-29.

Oshima, A., & Hogue, A. (1998). Writing Academic English (Third). Addison Wesley Longman.

Pamittan, F. A. (2019). Investigating ESL Freshmen Students' Writing Proficiency. Asian EFL Journal, 22(1), 226-240.

Patoc, L. A. F., & Lasaten, R. C. S. (2019). Grammatical Errors Reflected in the Narrative Compositions of Grade 7 Students: Bases in the Development of a Learning Support Material in English Grammar. Asian EFL Journal, 21(2.4), 57-87.

Qamariah, H., & Wahyuni, S. (2020). AN ANALYSIS OF STUDENTS' GRAMMATICAL ERRORS IN WRITING ENGLISH TEXT IN THE SECOND GRADE STUDENTS OF SMK-SMTI BANDA ACEH. Getsempena English Education Journal, 7(1), 58-71.

R, M., Yusri, & Jufri. (2018). The Development of Grammar Teaching Material Using Error and Contrastive Analysis (A Linguistic Approach in Foreign Language Teaching). TESOL International Journal, 13(3), 2-13.

Ramos, I. D. D. (2015). Error, Register, Grammatical-Rhetorical, and Genre Analyses on Nursing Students' Case Studies and Thesis Proposals. The Asian ESP Journal, 11(2), 62-97.

Ratnah. (2018). Improving Writing Skills by Using Authentic Materials in Indonesian Vocational School. Asian EFL Journal, 20(7), 124-129.

Rusyaidi, A. M. (2018). The Effective Use of Error Categorization Matrix in Improving Students Writing Skill. Asian EFL Journal, 20(4), 116-121.

Shariq, M. (2020). Difficulties Facing Saudi EFL Learners with Translation: Contrastive and Error Analysis. Asian EFL Journal, 27(3.3), 13-27.

Sidupa, C., & Rahyono. (2019). Lexical Quality of English Language Writing of Undergraduate Students in Indonesia. Asian EFL Journal, 26(6.2), 5-21.

Siew Eng, L., Luyue, C., & Kuan Lim, C. (2020). A Comparison of the English Grammatical Errors of Chinese Undergraduates from China and Malaysia. International Journal of Instruction, 13(1). www.e-iji.net

Simbolon, M. (2015). An Analysis of Grammatical Errors on Speaking Activities. Journal on English as a Foreign Language, 5(2), 71-86.

Sioco, E. C., & Vera, Dr. P. V. D. (2018). Grammatical Competence of Junior High School Students. TESOL International Journal, 13(2), 82-94.

Susanto, Soengkono, N., & Assalma, O. H. (2019). The Effect of Peer Feedback on Students' Writing Anxiety and Students' Writing Ability. Asian EFL Journal, 26(6.2), 63-82.

Swasti, S. B. (2016). AN ERROR ANALYSIS ON THE USE OF ENGLISH ARTICLES IN STUDENTS' WRITTEN DESCRIPTIVE TEXTS A Case of Class X MIA 1 of SMA N 1 Binangun, Cilacap in the Academic Year 2014/2015. ELT Forum:Journal of English Language Teaching, 5(1), 1-10.

Talosa, A. D., & Maguddayao, R. N. (2018). Evaluation of Second Language Learners' Syntactic Errors in ESL Writing. TESOL International Journal, 13(4), 172-181.

Zheng, C., & Park, T. J. (2013). Zheng, C., & Park, T. J. (2013). An analysis of errors in English writing made by Chinese and Korean University Students. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 3(8), 1342-1351. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 3(8), 1342-1351.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
The Grammatical Error Analysis Found in Students' Composition | Setiyorini | Lensa: Kajian Kebahasaan, Kesusastraan, dan Budaya

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
The Grammatical Error Analysis Found in Students' Composition

# data[].attributes.body
Padilla, J. E. & Padilla, C. A.(2021). Morpho-Syntactic Error Analysis in Written Compositions of MTB-MLE Policy Students. International Journal of Social Sciences & Educational Studies. 8(2), 39-52.

https://www.proquest.com/openview/3f5c561f758139b91c214722199dbed0/1?pq-origsite=gscholar&cbl=4672073

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Morpho-Syntactic Error Analysis in Written Compositions of MTB-MLE Policy Students - ProQuest

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Explore millions of resources from scholarly journals, books, newspapers, videos and more, on the ProQuest Platform.

# data[].attributes.body
High School Students’ Common Errors in Writing Essays

Ho, P. V. P., & Trinh, D. T. P. (2019). High school students’ common errors in writing essays. International Journal of English Linguistics, 9(6), 309. https://doi.org/10.5539/ijel.v9n6p309

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
High School Students' Common Errors in Writing Essays | Ho | International Journal of English Linguistics | CCSE

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
High School Students' Common Errors in Writing Essays

# data[].attributes.body
Isma, A., Rasmin, L. O., & Samsudin. (2023). Decoding the Challenges: A Study of English Writing Errors Among EFL Students. GLENS: Global English Insights Journal, 1(1), 1-9. https://doi.org/10.61220/glens.v1i1.2023a1

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
View of Decoding the Challenges: A Study of English Writing Errors Among EFL Students

# data[].attributes.body
Suraprajit, P.(2021). An Analysis of Errors in English Essays Written by Thai Non-English Major Students.Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 11(1). 12-19.

https://tpls.academypublication.com/index.php/tpls/article/view/803

Gap: For further study, the researchers should also conduct the qualitative method by interviewing the participants in order to get genuine data on the errors that they exactly did.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.authors[].name
Authors Prathomwat Suraprajit Kasetsart University Sriracha Campus

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
An Analysis of Errors in English Essays Written by Thai Non-English Major Students | Theory and Practice in Language Studies

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Writing is one of the vital skills for EFL learners. However, they still face some difficulties while processing a task. The present study aimed to analyze the errors that occurred on sixty English essays made by Thai University non-English major students who enrolled in the fundamental English course. The Surface Strategy Taxonomy (Dulay, Burt, & Krashen, 1982) was adopted to explore the errors of omission, addition, misformation, and misordering together with those that were excluded in the taxonomy. According to the framework of Surface Strategy Taxonomy, the findings revealed the most common errors involving omission of articles, followed by the addition of the preposition, the omission of the preposition, the omission of the subject, and misformation of subject pronoun, respectively. Then, according to the errors which were out of the stated taxonomy, the errors in subject-verb agreement were the highest detected error, followed by tense errors, ambiguous sentences, a direct translation from L1 to L2, misformation of object pronoun, misformation of using an adjective as the main verb, the addition of verb to be, and addition of conjunction, respectively. By investigating the errors in foreign language writing, the results would trigger foreign language learners to aware of the error of English writing that might occur. And the benefit also goes to the pedagogy in developing the teaching materials together with teaching strategies.

# data[].attributes.body
Yasto, A. A. A. (2022). SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL STUDENTS’ COMMON ERRORS
IN PRACTICAL RESEARCH 1 IN THE
SCHOOLS DIVISION OF LAGUNA.
EPRA International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research (IJMR), 8(11). https://eprajournals.com/IJMR/article/9718/abstract

GAP: Future researchers may do the identification of common errors per school, per district, or per cluster

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL STUDENTS’ COMMON ERRORS IN PRACTICAL RESEARCH 1 IN THE SCHOOLS DIVISION OF LAGUNA | EPRA International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research (IJMR)

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL STUDENTS’ COMMON ERRORS IN PRACTICAL RESEARCH 1 IN THE SCHOOLS DIVISION OF LAGUNA | EPRA International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research (IJMR)

# data[].attributes.headline
PUNCTUATION ERRORS in WRITING in ENGLISH

# data[].attributes.subject
PUNCTUATION ERRORS in WRITING in ENGLISH

# data[].attributes.body
Gezmisi, Nejla. (2023). Punctuation errors in writing in English. 13(2), 421-432.

https://dergipark.org.tr/en/download/article-file/2932572

688 total of punctuation errors

589 comma errors

# data[].attributes.headline
High School Students’ Common Errors in Writing Essays

# data[].attributes.subject
High School Students’ Common Errors in Writing Essays

# data[].attributes.body
Ho, P. V. P., & Trinh, D. T. P. (2019). High school students’ common errors in writing essays. International Journal of English Linguistics, 9(6), 309. https://doi.org/10.5539/ijel.v9n6p309

Tenses were found to be the most common error (M = 6.1, SD = 4.6) in students’ writing essays.

369 verb tense

247 verb form

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
High School Students' Common Errors in Writing Essays | Ho | International Journal of English Linguistics | CCSE

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
High School Students' Common Errors in Writing Essays

# data[].attributes.body
Example 1. My experiences during the pandemic weren't quite well in general.* Corrected form: My experiences during the pandemic were not quite well in general.

Example 2. For starters, my dad do home services as a hairdresser.*

Corrected form: For starters, my dad does home services as a hairdresser.

Example 3. His clients callshim to make a schedule for them.*

Corrected form: His clients callhim to make a schedule for them

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
View of ERROR ANALYSIS ON STUDENTS' ESSAY COMPOSITION: REFERENCE FOR CORRECTIVE FEEDBACKING MECHANISM

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Return to Article Details ERROR ANALYSIS ON STUDENTS' ESSAY COMPOSITION: REFERENCE FOR CORRECTIVE FEEDBACKING MECHANISM