# data[].attributes.headline
1968: The Bilingual Education Act (Title Vll of the ESEA)

# data[].attributes.subject
1968: The Bilingual Education Act (Title Vll of the ESEA)

# data[].attributes.body
Summary:

The Bilingual Education Act of 1968 (also known as Title VII) was the first federal legislation to recognize the needs of students with limited English proficiency. It provided funding for programs to help these students develop English skills while maintaining their native language. The act reflected the civil rights movements of the 1960s and represented an effort to create equal educational opportunities for all students, regardless of language background.

Why it’s important today:

This law marked the beginning of bilingual education in the U.S. and set the foundation for language equity in schools. It reminds educators that language diversity should be supported, not seen as a deficit. The spirit of this act continues to influence dual-language and English learner programs across the country.

# data[].attributes.headline
1974: Lau v. Nichols Supreme Court Decision

# data[].attributes.subject
1974: Lau v. Nichols Supreme Court Decision

# data[].attributes.body
Summary:

In 1974, the Supreme Court ruled in Lau v. Nichols that providing the same education to all students does not mean providing equal education if students cannot understand English. The case was brought by Chinese American students in San Francisco who were not given language assistance. The Court decided that schools must take action to ensure students can meaningfully participate in education.

Why it’s important today:

This case established that English learners have the right to support services under the Civil Rights Act. It reinforced that schools must provide instruction that helps students overcome language barriers. Lau v. Nichols continues to guide policies that protect the rights of English learners.

# data[].attributes.wish_content.attachment_props.alternative_text
1974: Lau v. Nichols Supreme Court Decision

# data[].attributes.body
Summary:

The No Child Left Behind Act of 2001 replaced the Bilingual Education Act with Title III, called “Language Instruction for Limited English Proficient and Immigrant Students.” It focused on accountability, standardized testing, and English proficiency rather than bilingualism. Many bilingual programs were reduced or eliminated, and English-only instruction became common in public schools.

Why it’s important today:

NCLB shows how policies can shift the focus away from valuing multiple languages. Understanding its effects helps educators see how testing and accountability can impact bilingual programs. It also reminds us that language diversity should be viewed as a strength, not a challenge.

# data[].attributes.body
Summary:

In 2015, President Obama signed the Every Student Succeeds Act to replace NCLB. ESSA continued to emphasize English language development but gave states more flexibility to design accountability systems. It recognized bilingualism as an asset and supported dual-language and multilingual programs.

Why it’s important today:

ESSA brought back a more balanced approach to bilingual education. It values bilingualism and cultural diversity, encouraging schools to develop programs that celebrate multiple languages rather than eliminate them.

# data[].attributes.body
Summary:

California voters approved Proposition 58 in 2017, repealing Proposition 227 from 1998. This law removed restrictions on bilingual education and allowed schools to bring back dual-language and multilingual programs. It reflected a major change in public opinion toward bilingual education.

Why it’s important today:

Proposition 58 shows the growing recognition of bilingualism as an advantage. It demonstrates how communities value multilingual learning and want to provide students with opportunities to maintain and develop more than one language.