# data[].attributes.attachment_caption
CIM: Plan for Results Targeted Monitoring

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
CIM: Plan for Results Targeted Monitoring

# data[].attributes.headline
Resource: Generic Example of Targeted CIM Plan

# data[].attributes.subject
Resource: Generic Example of Targeted CIM Plan

# data[].attributes.headline
Resource: Utilizing High Leverage Practices Guidance

# data[].attributes.subject
Resource: Utilizing High Leverage Practices Guidance

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
CDE Guidance for SIL's Utilizing High Leverage Practices Optional Resource

# data[].attributes.headline
Resource: Utilizing High Leverage Practices

# data[].attributes.subject
Resource: Utilizing High Leverage Practices

# data[].attributes.attachment_caption
CIM: Root Cause Analysis Targeted Monitoring

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
CIM: Root Cause Analysis Targeted Monitoring

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
CIM Step 2_ Root Cause Analysis Guidance

# data[].attributes.headline
Overview: Policies and Procedures Review

# data[].attributes.subject
Overview: Policies and Procedures Review

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Overview of Policies and Procedures Review 

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Overview of Infrastructure Analysis Tool

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
CIM: Progress Reports Targeted Monitoring

# data[].attributes.headline
FAQs: Consolidation and End of CIM Step 1

# data[].attributes.subject
FAQs: Consolidation and End of CIM Step 1

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
FINAL Intensive and Targeted INTEGRATED 2023 CIM Progress Reports.1.12.24

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Student Record Review Items for Stepwell

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
FAQs CIM Progress Reports updated 6.2.23

# data[].attributes.headline
Resource: Policies and Procedures Protocol

# data[].attributes.subject
Resource: Policies and Procedures Protocol

# data[].attributes.body
State Performance Plan Indicators (SPPI) 9, 10, Placement & Discipline

# data[].attributes.headline
Resource: CIM Format for Targeted Level 3

# data[].attributes.subject
Resource: CIM Format for Targeted Level 3

# data[].attributes.headline
Optional Tool: CIM Format for Targeted Levels 1 and 2

# data[].attributes.subject
Optional Tool: CIM Format for Targeted Levels 1 and 2

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
CIM Form for Targeted Levels 1 and 2 FINAL

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
6.14.23 updated Progress Report Training

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
CIM: Policies and Procedures Review Targeted Monitoring

# data[].attributes.headline
Required: Policy and Procedure Review Protocol

# data[].attributes.subject
Required: Policy and Procedure Review Protocol

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
FAQs-Stepwell SRR and CIM Targeted Level 3

# data[].attributes.headline
Resource: Data Drill Down Self-Guided Tool

# data[].attributes.subject
Resource: Data Drill Down Self-Guided Tool

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Targeted Data Drill Down-Self Guided Tool

# data[].attributes.headline
Optional: Improvement Collective Driver Diagram

# data[].attributes.subject
Optional: Improvement Collective Driver Diagram

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
The Driver Diagram is a tool used by improvement practitioners to develop and document a shared theory of improvement, to communicate visually the team's work to external stakeholders, and to act as a knowledge management tool. It is frequently used throughout the entire improvement journey.

See also: Driver diagram serves as tool for building and testing theories for improvement, by Brandon Bennett and Lloyd Provost

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
The Driver Diagram is a tool used by improvement practitioners to develop and document a shared theory of improvement, to communicate visually the team's work to external stakeholders, and to act as a knowledge management tool. It is frequently used throughout the entire improvement journey.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Theory of Action_ Driver Diagram Template

# data[].attributes.headline
Resource: What Data is Needed for the Data Drilldown Reports?

# data[].attributes.subject
Resource: What Data is Needed for the Data Drilldown Reports?

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
What data is needed for the IDC Data Drilldown Reports (70)

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
How to locate the data tools 2023_04_04_23

# data[].attributes.headline
Resource: How to Interpret Student List Reports

# data[].attributes.subject
Resource: How to Interpret Student List Reports

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
How to Interpret Student List Report 2023_4_20_23

# data[].attributes.headline
Resource: How to Interpret Annual Performance Report (APR)

# data[].attributes.subject
Resource: How to Interpret Annual Performance Report (APR)

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
How to Interpret Annual Performance Report 2023_04_20

# data[].attributes.headline
Resource: How to Access User Profile, Authorization & Data Management

# data[].attributes.subject
Resource: How to Access User Profile, Authorization & Data Management

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
How to access user profile authorization and data management 2023_4_3_23

# data[].attributes.headline
Resource: How to Access Annual Performance Reports (APR)

# data[].attributes.subject
Resource: How to Access Annual Performance Reports (APR)

# data[].attributes.headline
CIM Data Center Data Tools Training Opportunities

# data[].attributes.subject
CIM Data Center Data Tools Training Opportunities

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
CIM Data Center Data Tools Training Opportunities

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
CIM: Team Development Targeted Monitoring

# data[].attributes.headline
Webinar: 2023 Targeted Monitoring Orientation

# data[].attributes.subject
Webinar: 2023 Targeted Monitoring Orientation

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Targeted Orientation FAQs March 2023 final

# data[].attributes.headline
Resource: State Performance Plan Indicator Guide

# data[].attributes.subject
Resource: State Performance Plan Indicator Guide

# data[].attributes.headline
PPT: 2023 Targeted Monitoring Orientation

# data[].attributes.subject
PPT: 2023 Targeted Monitoring Orientation

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
2023 Targeted Monitoring Orientation 4.5.23

# data[].attributes.headline
Resource: Priority Matrix Training Video

# data[].attributes.subject
Resource: Priority Matrix Training Video

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
How automation saves Calendly's team 10+ hours a week

How Fellow onboards wholesale customers 4x faster

Create your first Zap with ease

There's never enough time to do everything you want to do. It's a universal problem. And we all accept that fact and live with its reality until the worst-case scenario rears its ugly head: there's not enough time to do everything you have to do.

When everything on your to-do list feels like it's of crucial importance (or when someone you answer to feels that way), use one or more of these prioritization techniques to help you identify your most important task and get work done.

What is a prioritization technique?

A prioritization technique helps you make informed decisions about the order you should complete your tasks based on different factors like their importance and due dates. With a list of prioritized tasks in hand, you have a shield to respectfully push back against unnecessary meeting invites and last-minute requests.

Get productivity tips in your inbox

For example, when stakeholders would approach my teammates with "urgent" requests, we would show them our prioritized task list and ask, "What should we cut in order to accommodate this request?" After seeing the importance of the other things on the list, urgent requests often suddenly became much less urgent.

But prioritization techniques aren't limited to regaining control over workplace tasks. They're also useful for managing competing priorities from your family, friends, and even that part of your brain that's always on the lookout for side projects.

How to prioritize tasks: 10 prioritization techniques

Much like identifying your working style, finding the right prioritization technique is personal. If there's a specific method you're interested in learning about, feel free to jump ahead. Otherwise, keep scrolling to explore the different options and choose the ones that feel right for you.

1. Priority matrix

The priority matrix technique consists of distributing your tasks across a four-quadrant matrix like the one shown below. The x-axis represents one value, and the y-axis represents another. Each quadrant, then, represents priority based on the defined values.

There are infinite ways you could organize your priority matrix. Here are popular priority matrix examples to get you started.

Eisenhower matrix

With the Eisenhower matrix, the x-axis represents urgency while the y-axis represents importance, leaving you with the following categories (from the top-left going clockwise):

Important but not urgent tasks are lower priorities that you should add to your to-do list for later.

Important and urgent tasks are your top priorities.

Urgent but not important tasks are ones that must get done but can be delegated to someone else.

Not urgent or important tasks are probably unnecessary distractions.

To use it, evaluate each task based on its urgency and importance, and then place the task in the corresponding quadrant.

By placing each task on your list into a quadrant on the Eisenhower Matrix, you can determine what needs to be done now, what you can save for later, what's worth delegating, and what you can scratch out altogether.

Impact effort matrix

In the impact-effort matrix, the x-axis represents impact,and the y-axis represents effort. So you'll have a matrix with the following quadrants (from top-left going clockwise):

To distribute your tasks accordingly, evaluate how much effort each one will take and the impact completing it will have. Any tasks in your Low effort, high impact quadrant are your top priorities, followed by ones in your High effort, high impact quadrants.

If you have a lot of tasks in these two quadrants, consider working on one or two from your Low effort, high impact quadrant. The sense of accomplishment from checking off these quick wins might give you that much-needed boost to tackle the rest.

Cost value matrix

In the cost-value matrix, the x-axis represents cost, and the y-axis represents value, leaving you with the following groupings (from top-left going clockwise):

Evaluate how much your task will cost (in terms of time) and the value it'll provide. Tasks in your High value, low cost quadrant are your quick wins, while ones in your Low value, high cost are tasks you should probably avoid.

With any of the matrix models above, you can sketch them out on paper or in a spreadsheet. Or you can use an app that has built-in features for building priority matrices, like TickTick.

2. MoSCoW prioritization method

The MoSCoW method is a simple prioritization technique where you assign every task on your to-do list to one of four categories:

M - Must do: M tasks are things you absolutely have to do.

S - Should do: S tasks are things you should do, but they're a lower priority than M tasks.

C - Could do: C tasks are nice-to-dos. You'd like to do them, but if you don't, it's probably not a big deal.

W - Won't do: W tasks are things that just aren't worth doing.

Note: If you have a lot of tasks that need delegation, the MoSCow method isn't for you. Jump to the ABCDE method for a better-suited alternative technique.

After you've assigned each task to a category, delete your W tasks. Breathe a sigh of relief at how much shorter your task list is now. Then get to work. Focus first on M tasks, followed by S tasks, and if you have time, C tasks.

By working on your list from the top down, you can ensure that you're always working on your highest-priority tasks.

For a seamless way to visualize and organize your tasks, try using a Kanban app like Trello or KanbanFlow. Create a list of unsorted tasks, and then drag each task into the appropriate category. You can also drag and drop tasks up and down within lists to specify the order in which you want to work on them.

But for the MoSCoW method to really work, you have to make sure all your tasks actually get added to your board, so you can categorize them. With Zapier, you can automate this process by connecting your Kanban app with your task sources, like Slack or your email inbox. Learn more about how to automate your Kanban board, or get started with one of these workflows.

To get started with a Zap template-what we call our pre-made workflows-just click on the button. It only takes a few minutes to set up. You can read more about setting up Zaps here.

3. ABCDE method

The ABCDE method comes from Eat That Frog by Brian Tracy. Similar to the MoSCoW prioritization technique, the ABCDE method gets you to assign each task on your list into a category:

The ABCDE method expands on the MoSCoW method by helping you prioritize the tasks you need to do and identifying the ones that can be done by someone else.

Kanban apps also work really well for this technique. You'll have one source list for all your tasks followed by additional lists to contain A, B, C, D, and E tasks. Drag and drop tasks from the source list into the appropriate category, then get started on your A tasks.

4. Scrum prioritization

Scrum prioritization (also referred to as Agile prioritization) is a prioritization method that relies on ordering your tasks based on both priority and sequence. This technique works particularly well when you have to take sequence into account.

For example, say your highest priority task is to re-tile your bathroom floor. However, you know that you also need to have plumbers run new pipes in your bathroom, and they'll have to cut into the floor to do so. Getting new pipes run may be a lower priority, but since it will impact your highest-priority task of re-tiling the floor, it needs to be completed first.

In Scrum prioritization, you evaluate each task on your list using three criteria:

1. How important is this task?

2. How important is it compared to the other tasks on this list?

3. Is any other task dependent on this task?

Then, using the answers to those questions, you assign each a unique number from one to n (where n is the total number of tasks on your list).

Scrum prioritization works well on its own, but it also pairs really well with other techniques like the MoSCoW or ABCDE method. After categorizing your tasks by priority (as M, C, and W or A, B, and C), you can begin sequencing the tasks in order of how you plan to complete them, keeping in mind any task dependencies that might impact that order.

Any to-do list app that allows for drag-and-drop ordering works well for Scrum prioritization. But if you're organizing tasks with a lot of dependencies, project management apps like Jira and Asana provide a better way to visualize your sequenced tasks.

5. Bubble sort method

The Bubble sort method is an effective way to answer the question, "How important is this task compared to other tasks on this list?" It's especially useful if you're suffering from the everything-is-urgent problem.

Start with a horizontal grid and assign each task to a cell.

Then, take the first two tasks and evaluate them against each other by asking, "Which task is more important?"

Whichever task from the previous step is most important gets moved to the left. In the example below, Task 2 is more important than Task 1, so the two tasks switch places.

Then compare the next two tasks. Which is more important? The more important task gets moved one cell to the left.

Continue this process until you get to the end of the list. Then repeat the process from the beginning. Continue repeating the exercise until every task is to the left of a less-important task. Your priorities are now listed from left to right.

There's no specific tool designed for the Bubble sort method, but you can easily use a Kanban, to-do list, or project management app for this. The only difference is that your sets of tasks will run from top-to-bottom instead of left-to-right.

6. Most Important Task (MIT) method

Most Important Task (MIT) is an exceptionally simple prioritization method popularized by Leo Babauta. Instead of trying to prioritize your entire to-do list, start every morning by picking one to three MITs-things that you must do that day.

Pick at least one MIT each day that's related to your goals. This way, you're doing something daily to help you reach your goals. And while you'll most likely complete more in a day than only your MITs, selecting your MITs in the morning and setting a deadline ensures you're dedicating time every day to working on important, high-priority tasks.

The nice thing about MIT is that you don't technically even need a to-do list to use the technique. But if you want to keep your MIT top of mind, try the free Chrome extension Momentum. It prompts you to choose a focus for the day the first time you open Chrome, and then it shows you that focus each time you open a new browser tab.

7. The Ivy Lee method

The Ivy Lee Method is simple (and similar to the MIT method):

At the end of every workday, choose the six most important tasks on your list to work on tomorrow.

Then, order those six tasks in terms of priority.

When you get to work the next day, work on task number one until it's complete.

Tackle the rest of your list in the same way.

Continue until all six tasks are complete, and repeat the process every single day.

Any to-do list, Kanban, or project management app works well for the Ivy Lee method. But if you find that you're struggling to complete your prioritized tasks because of meetings and other distractions, consider building your to-do list in a time-blocking app. This way, you can schedule time for that work directly in your calendar, making you unavailable for meetings that probably could've been an email.

8. 1-3-9 prioritization technique

The 1-3-9 prioritization technique encourages you to focus on important tasks, but it also gives you a way to prioritize the less important tasks you'll inevitably need to work on. It's like a blend of the MoSCoW, MIT, and Ivy Lee methods.

Every day, you plan to complete 13 tasks:

one critical task (like an M task from MoSCoW)

three important tasks (like S from MoSCoW)

nine nice-to-do tasks (like C from MoSCoW)

You could even combine the 1-3-9 technique with an Eisenhower matrix, leaving you with one task in the Important and urgent quadrant, three in the Important but not urgent quadrant, and nine in the Urgent but not important quadrant.

Order your lists of three and nine tasks in terms of priority. Then work on and complete your one task, followed by your three tasks in order, and finally, your nine tasks in order.

In an ideal world, you'd be able to work only on your highest-priority, high-value tasks-but things rarely work out that way. The 1-3-9 method addresses that reality by giving you a way to make sure you're at least working on the most important of your less important tasks.

Any priority matrix app or Kanban app works well with the 1-3-9 prioritization technique.

9. Two lists technique

Warren Buffett's Two lists technique is another really simple approach to prioritization.

First, you write down a list of 25 things you want to accomplish. When the list is complete, circle the five most important items on that list.

When you're finished, compile the results into two lists:

Focus your attention on completing all the tasks on your first list. Only then can you begin working on your second list.

The Two Lists technique is designed to be done on paper, but you can accomplish the same thing with any to-do list app that lets you move tasks from one list to another. Or, if you want to get really creative, turn your 25 goals into a doodle.

10. Pareto principle (80/20 rule)

The Pareto principle, also known as the 80/20 rule, states that 80%of consequences tend to come from 20%. For example, 80% of your impact at work comes from 20% of the tasks you do.

Put another way, if you prioritize a small percentage of the right tasks, they can yield outsized effects.

To put the 80/20 rule into practice, identify your 20% work and make those tasks your priority. There's no hard-and-fast rule baked into the Pareto principle for how to determine your 20% work, but you can draw on other strategies. For example, M tasks from the MoSCoW method or Low effort, high impact tasks from the effort-impact priority matrix.

Bonus: How to prioritize tasks for teams

Many of the prioritization methods listed above are useful for prioritizing your daily tasks. But what if you're working on a larger scale? For example, a product team debating which features to roll out next, or a marketing team deciding how to divide their advertising budget across different campaigns. In those cases, here are a few prioritization methods to help your team identify and sequence those tasks:

How to pick the right prioritization technique

Every technique on this list helps you achieve the same thing: ensuring that you're always working on your most important tasks. So, in the end, it doesn't matter which technique you use. It doesn't matter if you use multiple techniques. And it doesn't matter if you blend parts of the different techniques to make your own custom method.

What matters is that you pick something that makes sense and feels natural, and get to work.
Related reading: This article was originally published in July 2019. The most recent update was in September 2023 with contributions from Jessica Lau.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
How to prioritize tasks when everything feels important | Zapier

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Overwhelmed by your to-do list? Here are 10 prioritization techniques to help you identify your most important tasks and get work done.

# data[].attributes.headline
Resource: Root Cause Analysis Summarizing Protocol

# data[].attributes.subject
Resource: Root Cause Analysis Summarizing Protocol

# data[].attributes.headline
Resource: Root Cause Analysis Inquiry Guide

# data[].attributes.subject
Resource: Root Cause Analysis Inquiry Guide

# data[].attributes.headline
Resource: “Launching your RCA Investigation” Training Video

# data[].attributes.subject
Resource: “Launching your RCA Investigation” Training Video

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
SIL Mini Module: Launching your Root Cause Analysis Investigation

# data[].attributes.headline
Resource: "What is Root Cause Analysis" Training Video

# data[].attributes.subject
Resource: "What is Root Cause Analysis" Training Video

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
SIL Mini Module: What is Root Cause Analysis?

# data[].attributes.headline
Resource: Seeds of Partnership Parent Survey

# data[].attributes.subject
Resource: Seeds of Partnership Parent Survey

# data[].attributes.headline
Resource: Parent Input Data Reflection Analysis

# data[].attributes.subject
Resource: Parent Input Data Reflection Analysis

# data[].attributes.headline
Resource: Seeds of Partnership Reports Video

# data[].attributes.subject
Resource: Seeds of Partnership Reports Video

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
CDE SED Monitoring Parent Input Information System–Reports

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
CDE SED Monitoring Parent Input Information System– Parent Input-Getting Started

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
CDE SED Monitoring Parent Input Information System Overview

# data[].attributes.headline
Webpage: Seeds of Partnership Parent Survey

# data[].attributes.subject
Webpage: Seeds of Partnership Parent Survey

# data[].attributes.body
Link for LEAs to request access to the Parent Survey.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
The Seeds of Partnership team is pleased to partner with California Department of Education to provide technical assistance support to those LEAs identified for monitoring.

To begin, enter the login name and password for your program or organization. If you do not yet have access to this system, please complete this Request for Access Form and a member of the Seeds of Partnership team will reach out shortly to coordinate access and provide information and instruction.

Questions, please contact Robin Ryan at rryan@scoe.net.
Forgot Password? Go to Seeds of Partnership website
10474 Mather Boulevard | P.O. Box 269003 | Sacramento, CA 95826 | 916-228-2388 | Fax: 916-228-2311 | rryan@scoe.net
Funded by the California Department of Education, Special Education Division

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Monitoring Review Administrative Site - Login

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
The Seeds of Partnership team is pleased to partner with California Department of Education to provide technical assistance support to those LEAs identified for monitoring. To begin, enter the login name and password for your program or organization.

# data[].attributes.headline
Webpage: CDE's TA Provider, Seeds of Partnership

# data[].attributes.subject
Webpage: CDE's TA Provider, Seeds of Partnership

# data[].attributes.body
Link to CDE's TA Provider, Seeds of Partnership site. LEAs may obtain the Request for Access form here.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
Parent Input

The California Department of Education, Special Education Division (CDE-SED) annually reviews Local Educational Agency (LEA) performance and compliance data related to implementation of Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) requirements in accordance with the IDEA Section 616(e) and Title 34, Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) sections 300.600-604, and 34 CFR sections 300.646-300.647. The purpose is to ensure that the LEAs, including charter schools, County Offices of Education (COE), and Special Education Local Plan Areas (SELPAs), are providing appropriate supervision and monitoring for special education programs and services.

An LEA is selected for Intensive or Targeted Monitoring if the LEA does not meet established targets for performance and compliance indicators under the IDEA and the California Special Education Part B State Performance Plan (SPP) and Annual Performance Reports (APR). You can explore information about local school districts by using the California School Dashboard. This resource provides parents and educators with meaningful information on school and district progress.

There are many monitoring activities within a review based on the need of the LEA, one required component of the review is considering parent input. Through the Seeds of Partnership, CDE-SED utilizes a parent survey to gather input from parents of students with an Individualized Education Program (IEP) in LEAs selected for an Intensive or Targeted Review. LEAs will have access to parent survey response data for their review as part of the Compliance and Improvement Monitoring (CIM) Process.

Parent Survey

The parent survey is designed to provide LEAs and the CDE with information on parents' experience of their child receiving special education services over the past year and how well schools are supporting parents' involvement in this process. Information gathered will be helpful in identifying areas of strength and areas that may need improvement within the school district. The survey is intended for parents or guardians of students from California school districts, involved in the current year monitoring activities. The survey window is open April-May.

We encourage you to complete only one survey per student, per school year. Responses are anonymous, please do not share confidential information in the comments sections.

The information you share is subject to a Public Records Act request, accessible to your local school district, and will not be handled or filed as a formal complaint. To file a formal complaint with CDE, please visit the CDE SED Complaint Process web page or call the Procedural Safeguards and Referral Services toll-free Help Line at 800-926-0648.

At this time, there are no active Intensive or Targeted Reviews currently collecting parent surveys. This means the survey time period has not yet started or has just concluded for this school year or review cycle.
Encuestas para padres/tutores en español
Districts/LEAs

Districts/LEAs participating in a CDE SED Intensive Review may access the Monitoring Parent Input Information System Log In.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Seeds of Partnership - Monitoring Parent Survey

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
The California Department of Education, Special Education Division (CDE-SED) annually reviews Local Educational Agency (LEA) performance and compliance data related to implementation of Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) requirements in accordance with the IDEA Section 616(e) and Tit…

# data[].attributes.headline
Optional: BASIC Infrastructure Assessment Tool

# data[].attributes.subject
Optional: BASIC Infrastructure Assessment Tool

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
Many LEAs have already been working hard to improve their special education systems. In California, the number of LEAs identified for differentiated assistance based on the performance of their students with disabilities decreased from 243 in 2018 to 187 in 2019, a drop of 23 percent. 1 Although such progress is encouraging, the 187 schools identified in 2019 based specifically on how they served students with disabilities accounted for more than half of all California schools identified for differentiated assistance that year for any reason. Improving outcomes for students with disabilities remains a statewide priority - and a challenge.

Developed through a partnership between the California Department of Education (CDE), the California Collaborative for Educational Excellence (CCEE), and WestEd

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Basic Components of Special Education Infrastructure

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Many LEAs have already been working hard to improve their special education systems. In California, the number of LEAs identified for differentiated assistance based on the performance of their students with disabilities decreased from 243 in 2018 to 187 in 2019, a drop of 23 percent.

# data[].attributes.headline
Optional: Assessment of Infrastructure Tool

# data[].attributes.subject
Optional: Assessment of Infrastructure Tool