# data[].attributes.body
Great presentation.

Introduction:
- You have defined the constructs well. I appreciate this in that so that audience can have clarity about the your research focus.

Methods

“Three teachers” Explaining how these three teachers were selected help us to judge if the sampling was done in a rigorous manner.

Putting in labels to the “1, 2, 3, 4” in the bar graphs will help us to understand what these numbers represent

Results

Foresee the possibility that there might be “pushbacks” from the teachers when it is concluded that teachers do not think “sadness” is important. There is a limitation in how you had collected these data (e.g., only three teachers) that might not lend strength to the conclusion you made about this. Re-Phrase the point to make it more tentative - rather than being to certain about the conclusion. We do not want to lose our audience.

# data[].attributes.body
firstly, would like to share that we admire your courage for taking up this research programme alone! your research is definitely a beneficial area to study and like the professors said, our research could align and possibly add value to one another!

The scope for this research is broad, maybe in the future, due to time limitations, you could try to scope down and focus on a smaller group of people, to further your research and understanding on the target audience!

# data[].attributes.body
hello! thank you for acknowledging that sadness is not associated to being a negative emotion but in fact useful in helping students regulate their coping abilities in facing setbacks. a question we have is that with the knowledge gained, how can we better help provide students with support, especially for those who might invalidate their emotions? At the same time, were the teachers picked based on convenience sampling? How did you pick out teachers to survey?

# data[].attributes.body
Great presentation! I think you have picked a mammoth task to research on: you looked at three systems - instead of picking one - so that your research will be even MORE realistic and relevant. Yet, at the same time, this mean the need to understand the distinct role of each system in the service delivery: could one system be more preventive type of service and another system be functioning a more remedial downstream type of service?

The focus on sec, JC, and IB might be to increase sample participation. Yet, it might increase “noise” into the results since JC students may have different needs and abilities.

# data[].attributes.body
I liked how you have done both qualitative and quantitative data to compare the perspectives between students and teachers. Even though you did not managed to actually do it, I also like how you have planned to contact external professionals to provide an additional viewpoint to enhance your study. Maybe you can explain how you had chosen the teachers to interview to enhance your clarity.

# data[].attributes.body
Your research topic into sadness and academic failure is very interesting! We like how you examined the opinions of both teachers and students, and compared these opinions in your findings. However, we personally feel that it might be better to use a more formal template? Overall, great presentation and great job!

# data[].attributes.body
1. The presentation is well organised and it was easy to follow your argument and key ideas about the various student perceptions of mental health support structures

2. I think what could enhance the significance of the project would be to highlight some reccomendations that schools could implement based on your feedback - especially on the point about how students self-reported that they can't exactly bridge the theory-application gap when it came to caring for their mental wellness.

Enjoyed the presentation very much - thanks!

# data[].attributes.body
Your research is very relevant and can prove beneficial to today’s youth! We liked how you studied and explored the effectiveness of individual support systems in schools today. Our school also has Termly Check-ins and it is interesting to see how effective it really is! A possible improvement for the design of the slides is to bold important points, but your overall presentation was well done :)

# data[].attributes.body
Great presentation! The key strength is the use of TAM model that is also relevant for older persons

Introduction slides

The aesthetics (font size and colors) were very well selected. The bolding of key words help audience to know where to focus their eyes.

Improvement: Include the TAM here? Since the TAM anchors the study?

Methods

The use of Braun framework to guide how you do the analysis shows your group’s keenness and diligence to be rigorous in research methods

You mentioned “we” analyzed, “we ..”: Maybe inform us who is the “We”? Because in qualitative analysis and in interpretation of themes, the “self” of the analyst is crucial to avoid biased or to counter each other’s interpretations. So some clarity on who are the “we”? Did you involve the seniors to also interpret and to check your analysis? Did you get a technology expert? It is fine if you did not.

Analysis

The definition of “use” or the presentation on the actual “usage” could help contextualize the findings. I love that it is data-driven to develop an understanding of “use”.

How would you answer an audience’s question who might push back:  “Why exclude the older adults when these are the persons who may need the help NOW?” Can your argument that “younger seniors” are the future elderly be a good enough reason?

Implications

This slide is very useful! A good wrap up to your study to convey that this study has good value.

# data[].attributes.body
your presentation was very insightful and enriching! really enjoyed the presentation, especially since this is a research area that many do not look into, despite knowing that it is a prevalent issue.

Really like how you specified young seniors! a niche we did not think about!

a question that we have, will be about the usage of phones with simpler functions such as nokia phones:

Simpler phones might lack the functions such as online payment etc. which is considered a limitation to phone usage in today's world. With the rapid improvement in the internet, how else do you think we can help ease the young seniors into it?

# data[].attributes.body
Reviewer Gerard:

Great presentation! The key strength of this study is that it arose from practice needs: these students felt a need in their school and they want to know how to meet those needs by doing research

Introduction slides

The aesthetics (font size and colors) are very well selected

Improvement: use colors to highlight key words

Improvement: Talk about your school environment and current helping services to help us better understand why this study has added value

Method

I like that you gave the reasoning behind the survey questions

This is something I can also learn to do more

The ten minutes interview could be enough because you are focused on one question; yet it also could be too short for you to have wiggle space for further questioning if necessary

Data analysis

The use of quotes are very helpful for us audience to understand the points making it more relevant and informative

The later slides can be improved with key points instead of just a picture. I love that the presenter is sharing more: This is good. A single key point can help anchor the words that the presenter is saying

Create a new section on recommendations and practice implication would bring this presentation home!

# data[].attributes.body
I liked your use of the theoretical framework throughout the presentation to guide your research and also liked how you have provided recommendations based on your results.

# data[].attributes.body
Your research topic is interesting and unique and your findings are great. Perhaps in future you could also try to look for a greater sample size to reduce the bias of the results, and include more points in your conclusion in your slide for greater clarity. Good job!

# data[].attributes.body
You spoke fluently and answered the Q&A questions well! Well done :]

# data[].attributes.body
I think your presentation was very informative and your literature review was very good. I liked how you also managed to have both qualitative and quantitative methods. However, I feel that when you were presenting your data analysis, you could still write down some of your main points to have a little more clarity.

# data[].attributes.body
We feel your research methods, especially the online interviews with the various groups of 2 of students is very interesting. Your findings are also valuable! Good job:)

# data[].attributes.headline
Feedback Guidelines (for Panellist Reference)

# data[].attributes.subject
Feedback Guidelines (for Panellist Reference)

# data[].attributes.body
Thank you for spending time with us this morning to help our young researchers! You may consider giving feedback to projects based on their presentation delivery and on the following points:

1. Mastery of subject knowledge

- Does the project demonstrate extensive knowledge of subject?

- Is there convincing evidence to support ideas and conclusions?

- Are all questions answered with clear elaboration?

2. Organisation of presentation

- Is the organisation of the argument clear and logical?

3. Significance of project

- Is the project relevant or important to the field?

- Will it make a significant contribution?

~ HSSRP 2024 Organising Committee.

# data[].attributes.body
To add a comment to a post, click the space that says: Add comment. Alternatively, you can add a post by pressing the "+" under the project tag heading you are commenting on. When leaving a comment, please begin with your project tag/name.
For example:
Dr Smith: this group has demonstrated extensive knowledge of the subject. However, you can try to make more eye contact with the audience.
XYZP9: the presentation was well organised but the slides were too cluttered and difficult to read. You spoke energetically!