# data[].attributes.body
-On December 18, 1944 the Supreme court made its decision.
-The 5th amendment was what was connected. Japanese Americans were ordered to go out of their homes and go to relocation camps even though they did not get convicted of a crime.
-The interpretation stayed the same because if it is for the safety of the country they believe that it is ok to do certain things.
-Rights, opportunity and equality. Rights because it is a basic condition to be able to live your life and its part of the Bill of Rights. Equality because they were sent to the camps based on their race so they were not equal to everyone else. Opportunity because they did not have the opportunity to a fair trial and to live their lives.

# data[].attributes.body
-On June 19, 1961 the Supreme court made its decision.
-The 4th amendment was what was argued. The police officers did not have a warrant and when they entered they took stuff not related to why they entered.
-The interpretation stayed the same because they ruled in favor of Mapp saying they unlawfully seized items without a search warrant like it was stated before for higher courts. But it changed the interpretation because in state courts it used to be allowed to use those items but they changed it and stated you cant use those items in any court.
-This relates to the founding ideal Rights. It relates because you have the right to not get things taken without a reason to take them.

# data[].attributes.body
-On June 13, 1966 the Supreme court made its decision.
-The 5th amendment was what was connected. The police officers did not remind him of the right to an attorney and the right to remain silent.
-The interpretation changed because police officers became required to tell people their rights, before they were not required to tell them they have the right to an attorney or to stay silent.
-Rights because people should be allowed to know how to keep themselves out of trouble.

# data[].attributes.body
-On February 24, 1969 the Supreme court made its decision.
-The First amendment was what was argued because of the freedom of speech/expression. Since it was done peacefully and was not distracting anyone
-The interpretation stayed the same because everyone was still allowed to speak their mind anywhere as long as its not hurting anyone but changed because students used to not have that right.
-Liberty and Rights because they ruled that they can show the way the feel/think about what is happening. They cant have restrictions placed on them for an unnecessary reason. They were/are not hurting anyone by showing how they feel.

# data[].attributes.body
-On June 30, 1971 the Supreme court made its decision.
-The 1st amendment was what was connected. The Nixon Administration tried not allowing them to post information about Vietnam.
-The interpretation stayed the same because the president cant block or not allow them to post information to citizens. People have the right to know what is happening.
-Liberty and Rights because people get to think about what is happening and the government cant stop the people from knowing what's happening.

# data[].attributes.body
-On June 29, 1972 the supreme court made its final decision.
-The 8th amendment is what is argued because of it being a cruel/unusual punishment.
-The interpretation changed because they realized the current ways it was interpreted was unconstitutional and not ok.
-Rights because based on the constitution people should not die if they made an accident.

# data[].attributes.body
-On July 2, 1976 the Supreme court made its decision.
-The 8th amendment is what is argued because of it being a cruel/unusual punishment.
-It did change the interpretation of the eighth amendment because with Furman v. Georgia they decided the death penalty was not ok, in this case they decided if you murder someone you lose those rights.
-Rights because they had to decide if certain rights still were guaranteed to a person who broke the law.

# data[].attributes.body
-On April 19, 1977 the supreme court made its final decision
-The 8th amendment is what is argued because of it being a cruel/unusual punishment.
-It did not change the interpretation because throughout time students would be punished for doing something bad and they said that it was ok to do that.
-Rights because it has to do with the Bill of Rights and what they believe is the correct thing guaranteed to students.

# data[].attributes.body
-On January 15, 1985 they made the decision on the case.
-The Amendment connected is the 4th amendment because they searched the students belongings causing her to feel like they violated the unreasonable search and seizure.
-The interpretation stayed the same because they kept the standard that if it was reasonable they could search your belongings.
-Rights because the student felt like her rights guaranteed by the Bill of Rights was violated.

# data[].attributes.body
-On July 7, 1986 the supreme court made its decision.
-The first amendment is whats argued because a student got in trouble when he said bad things at a school assembly.
-Interpretation stayed the same because the speech could be interpreted as not kind and interrupting the peace. They kept it the same as you can't not be peaceful and schools have the right to stop that then.
-Rights and liberty. Rights because of it being part of the Bill of Rights and liberty because the student felt like the limitations on their thoughts were unnecessary.

# data[].attributes.body
-On January 13, 1988 the Supreme Court made its decision.
-The first amendment is what's in question because they were not allowed to share some of the articles they wrote to the school.
-The interpretation stayed the same because like they stated with Bethel School District v. Fraser if the restraint is ok/necessary it is alright to do so.
-Rights and liberty. Rights because of it being part of the Bill of Rights and liberty because the students felt like the limitations on their thoughts were unnecessary.

# data[].attributes.body
-On June 21, 1989 the Supreme court made its final decision.
-The First Amendment is what's connected because of the freedom of speech.
-The interpretation stayed the same because they were not harming anyone and they were just stating their political beliefs.
-Liberty, Rights and Democracy. Liberty because the guy was thinking about how he felt, Rights because he has the right to do what he wants and Democracy because he was saying his political belief as a citizen and he was trying to convince others that his ways are better which is allowed.

# data[].attributes.body
-On June 26, 1995 the decision was made.
-The 4th amendment is what is in question because of them searching students for drugs.
-It changed the Interpretation of the 4th amendment because the supreme court made the decision that they needed probable cause in the New Jersey v. TLO but they decided here that if safety was at stake it was ok to search people without a probable cause.
-Rights and opportunity are all part of this case. Opportunity because the student was not aloud to play football like everyone else because his parents would not consent to the testing. Rights because you have the right to not be searched because of the Bill of Rights.

# data[].attributes.body
-On June 28, 2010 the final decision was made.
-The second amendment is what's in question because of the right to bear arms being controversial.
-The interpretation stayed the same because they believe that it is ok to have weapons as a self defense tool just like before.
-Rights because they decided people should have the right to protect themselves.

# data[].attributes.body
-On June 23, 2021 the Supreme Court made its decision.
-The First amendment is what is in question because of the school stopping speech outside of school.
-The interpretation of the Amendment has changed because they used to say you could stop speech at school but now that social media is involved they had to decide about how it can affect people with the ability speak outside of school.
-Rights and liberty. Rights because it involves the Bill of Rights, liberty because she was thinking and saying how she felt.