# data[].attributes.headline
Slide 1 - Professional Perspective/ Audience/ Topic

# data[].attributes.subject
Slide 1 - Professional Perspective/ Audience/ Topic

# data[].attributes.body
One of the mindsets of school counselors is that "Every student should graduate from high school prepared for postsecondary opportunities," (American School Counselor Association, 2019 ,p. 2). The first step in this process, is ensuring students have met all requirements necessary for graduation, including assessment requirements. This legal guide will review the assessment requirements for graduation put forth by state and federal agencies.

Summary of Topic: State and federal law have strict guidelines regarding the assessments that schools must give and, based on student performance, their impact on a student’s ability to earn a highschool diploma.

Audience: This legal guide will be utilized for educators, namely school counselors and testing coordinators, to ensure state and federal testing requirements are being met for student graduation.

Ensuring state and federal requirements are being met are important for both campus accountability and student achievement. This legal guide focuses primarily on ensuring students meet all assessment requirements necessary for graduation.

# data[].attributes.body
School counselors are responsible for adhering to all professional standards related to assessment, use assessment results to guide student goal setting and planning, and assist stakeholders in using assessment to guide student goal setting and planning (TEA, 2018). Part of this, is ensuring all students are meeting the minimum assessment requirements for graduation. In order to do this, counselors must make sure all students are participating in the necessary tests. For students who may struggle on these tests, it is the responsibility of the counselor to help the student create a plan for success.

A major issue emerging is that the current tests required for graduation, STAAR End of Course Exams (EOCs), have a pattern and history of low student performance. This is causing districts to dive deeper into the assessment requirement laid out by the state, to come up with contingency plans for those students who may not successfully pass all five EOCs. Campus accountability ratings, and therefore, funding, is being hugely impacted by EOC performance, so much that school districts across the state of Texas have began suing the Texas Education Agency regarding their new accountability system (Boyd, 2023). All this to say, it would be beneficial for counselors and school districts as a whole to follow along as the state investigates, and possible redefines, the assessment process, accountability, and graduation requirements for Texas public high schools.

# data[].attributes.body
Texas Education Agency. (2023). District and campus coordinator resources.  https://txassessmentdocs.atlassian.net/wiki/spaces/ODCCM/overview?homepageId=2793209857

Link to full text: https://txassessmentdocs.atlassian.net/wiki/spaces/ODCCM/overview?homepageId=2793209857

The District and Campus Coordinator Resources (DCCR) is a publication put out by the TEA that goes over all EOC requirements, assessment planning and implementation, special testing scenarios, and additional resources including information regarding assessment requirements for specific student scenarios (TEA, 2023). The DCCR is and excellent tool for testing coordinators but houses a large amount of valuable information for school counselors to share with students, as they work toward planning for graduation. This information includes, assessment requirements, dates/timelines, accommodations, and links and instructions for accessing practice tests. Though the resources is lengthy, it is invaluable to all professionals working with students toward meeting graduation requirements in Texas.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
District and Campus Coordinator Resources - Confluence

# data[].attributes.body
Donaldson, E. (2021, March 25). Will Texas seniors who failed STAAR tests be able to graduate on time during the pandemic? Lawmakers debate options that could allow them to walk. The Dallas Morning News. Retrieved October 2, 2023, from https://www.dallasnews.com/news/education/2021/03/25/will-texas-seniors-who-failed-staar-tests-be-able-to-graduate-on-time-during-the-pandemic-lawmakers-debate-options-that-could-allow-them-to-walk/

Link to full text:
https://www.dallasnews.com/news/education/2021/03/25/will-texas-seniors-who-failed-staar-tests-be-able-to-graduate-on-time-during-the-pandemic-lawmakers-debate-options-that-could-allow-them-to-walk/

Texas investigates alternatives for high school graduates who don't pass their final exams so they can graduate on time.

Students who should have tested in the 19-20 school year had their STAAR test requirements waived if they passed the corresponding class, as the state assumed that passing the class would result in a passing STAAR score

Individual graduation committees might become permanent, and high-stakes exams could be exempt from requirements owing to COVID-19 learning loss.

Bills to extend committee use and temporarily ignore state test results are being discussed by lawmakers.

The committees want to keep students from suffering academically because of the pandemic.

Teachers contend that other metrics besides high-stakes tests can be used to gauge progress.

The majority of the students the committees assist are minority students from low-income families.

Committees were crucial for graduating students during the pandemic.

STAAR tests were not exempted for the 2020–21 academic year, which presented difficulties for pupils.

Seniors from DISD will work with committees to complete remediation tasks and tutorials in order to graduate.

(Donaldson, 2021)

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
Seniors who failed the required end-of-course tests in high school could still graduate on time if the Legislature approves alternative paths for them.

One move could have Texas permanently adopting the individual graduation committee process that's allowed more than 58,000 students to graduate since 2015. Another would be a short-term option waiving the high-stakes test requirements for a few years as students struggle with learning loss because of COVID-19.

Hundreds of Dallas high school seniors fail one or more required state exams each year and rely on an alternate graduation process to obtain a diploma.

About 2,500 DISD students used the individual graduation committee process in the first five years of the program and the last school year, which was upended by the pandemic, brought an uptick of graduates relying on the committees, said Tamara Singleton, one of the district's counseling coordinators.

"I know it definitely has made an impact [for] the students as well as the campus," Singleton said. "Ultimately the goal is for the student to complete this milestone in their life so they can move on to post-secondary ... [and] move on with their life."

Students who failed up to two of five required STAAR exams can still earn a diploma if they prove themselves to a committee of educators who approve the graduation.

In the 2018-19 school year, about 5% of high school seniors used the committees to graduate. The state has not yet released data for the last school year.

The committees could be used even more broadly this school year with learning loss widespread and some students opting to not take required state exams that are only being offered in-person.

Lawmakers have cast special attention on the process -- which has a 2023 expiration date -- this legislative session. A bill by Rep. Dan Huberty, R-Kingwood, would make the committees permanent. The pandemic has shown how critical the committees are for students, Huberty said.

The House Public Education Committee unanimously voted in favor of the bill on Tuesday, forwarding it to the full chamber.

Another bill may prove to be more controversial, however. A proposal from Rep. Diego Bernal, D-San Antonio, would allow graduation committees to disregard results from required state exams through the 2022-23 school year. The bill was left pending in the House committee on Tuesday.

Students shouldn't be penalized because of the exceptional circumstances they are learning in, Bernal said during the bill's hearing. The bill would strip high stakes from the State of Texas Assessments of Academic Readiness, or STAAR, exams for the current school year, he said.

"How long-lasting are the effects of COVID-19 on our students? We don't know the answer to that yet," Bernal said.

Education Commissioner Mike Morath already waived consequences for students who don't pass exams in third through eighth grade, but the commissioner doesn't have the authority to do the same for high school students.

Educators have other ways to measure progress outside of state exams, said Mark Ramirez, DISD's deputy chief of school leadership and a former high school principal. Students would benefit from removing some of the consequences for not performing, he said.

"We can still measure their progress, we can still make sure they are ready for graduation or the workforce even though we don't have this high-stakes exam," Ramirez said.

Huberty, who sits on the Public Education Committee, probed why Bernal's bill should extend beyond the current school year. But sophomores and juniors impacted by the pandemic should be included in the exception, Bernal countered.

The proposal drew support from educators at the Texas Association of School Administrators and the Texas Association of Rural Schools. Eduardo Hernández, the superintendent of Edgewood ISD in San Antonio, emphasized that the committees do not guarantee a diploma.

"IGCs are not an open door to graduation," he said.

Texas requires students to pass five end-of-course STAAR exams throughout their high school career.

The graduation committees were established in 2015 to provide an alternative graduation method for the thousands of students who failed at least one required exam. In 2014-15, more than 6,000 students successfully graduated as a result of the committee. By 2018-19, the most recent year with available data, nearly 17,500 students took advantage of the process.

The committees tend to serve students of color and those from low-income families. About 16% of 2018-19 graduates through the committee were Black and almost 70% were Latino. Roughly 77% of students were considered economically disadvantaged.

More than half of the students who graduated through such committees in 2018-19 had failed just one end-of-course exams.

Several Dallas-area districts used the committees at greater rates than the state. Nearly 7% of Dallas ISD's 2019 seniors graduated through committees.

Many students who are learning English and those who transfer into a Texas high school late in the school year and have a shorter time to take exams often use the process in Dallas ISD, Ramirez said.

Texas officials encouraged districts to use the committees last school year as students finished their high school careers from home and STAAR exams were waived. The state assumed then that students who received passing grades in their classes would also pass their corresponding end-of-course exam.

Data isn't available for how many students graduated by committee in the 2019-20 school year, but educators say anecdotal evidence shows the committees proved themselves as an essential tool.

The state did not waive STAAR for the 2020-21 school year. Students won't get an automatic end-of-course exam credit if they don't take the tests that are only being offered in-person.

DISD seniors will soon begin meeting with their committees, and then they'll start work on remediation projects and tutorials to gain approval to graduate.

Students "have to put the effort in but that good feeling of them completing the process and knowing that they have their high school diploma is, you know, priceless," DISD's Singleton said.
Stay connected to the latest in education by The DMN Education Lab deepens the coverage and conversation about urgent education issues critical to the future of North Texas. The DMN Education Lab is a community-funded journalism initiative, with support from The Beck Group, Bobby and Lottye Lyle, The Communities Foundation of Texas, The Dallas Foundation, Dallas Regional Chamber, Deedie Rose, The Meadows Foundation, Solutions Journalism Network, Southern Methodist University and Todd A. Williams Family Foundation. The Dallas Morning News retains full editorial control of the Education Lab's journalism. signing up for our weekly newsletter.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Will Texas seniors who failed STAAR tests be able to graduate on time during the pandemic? Lawmakers debate options that could allow them to walk

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
One temporary alternate path allowed more than 58,000 Texas students to graduate in recent years.

# data[].attributes.body
Texas Education Agency. (2022, June 16). TEA releases 2022 STAAR End-Of-Course assessment results. Agency News. Retrieved October 2, 2023, from https://tea.texas.gov/about-tea/news-and-multimedia/news-releases/news-2022/tea-releases-2022-staar-end-of-course-assessment-results

Link to full text: https://tea.texas.gov/about-tea/news-and-multimedia/news-releases/news-2022/tea-releases-2022-staar-end-of-course-assessment-results

Results of the 2022 STAAR EOC were announced by the Texas Education Agency (TEA).

While English I and II test results stayed stable, there was improvement in Algebra I, Biology, and US history.

TEA has confidence in educator initiatives and strategies for academic recovery following COVID-19.

Students who failed the EOC assessments will receive remediation through House Bill 4545.

Results from STAAR are essential for assessing student performance and reducing learning loss associated with COVID-19.

There are several ways to fulfill graduation requirements such as receiving a qualifying score on a substitute assessment or meeting the requirements of an Individual Graduation Committee.

There will be no high stakes STAAR results for grades 3 through 8.

STAAR will be revised in 2022–2023 in order to better reflect classroom learning.

(Texas Education Agency, 2022)

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
AUSTIN, Texas - June 16, 2022 - Today, the Texas Education Agency (TEA) released spring 2022 State of Texas Assessments of Academic Readiness (STAAR®) results for end-of-course (EOC) assessments. The results include assessments in Algebra I, English I, English II, Biology, and U.S History.

This year's STAAR EOC assessment results show progress in the three tests that saw a decline during COVID-19. In these three tests, Algebra I, Biology, and U.S. History, Texas student performance in the meets grade level category improved. As the percentage of high school students meeting grade level is moving closer to pre-pandemic levels, these improvements are a welcome sign that Texas students are moving in the right direction in their post-pandemic academic recovery.
Percentage of Students Who Met Grade Level in EOCs
In the two tests that did not show a negative impact from COVID-19, English I and English II, results stayed largely consistent from last school year.

"These results provide encouraging evidence that the academic recovery plans adopted by the Texas Legislature and implemented by our state's 370,000 dedicated teachers are working for our students," said Texas Education Commissioner Mike Morath. "We have made some progress to date, but there is still work to be done to fully recover from the academic effects of the COVID slide. We're confident we'll get there because Texas educators are all-in on helping their students to make the necessary academic gains."

Among the policies to help support academic gains is House Bill 4545 (87R). If students do not meet the passing standard on a STAAR EOC assessment, HB 4545 entitles students either to receive thirty hours of targeted tutoring before, during, or after school for each subject in which they did not pass the corresponding EOC assessment, or to be assigned to a classroom overseen by a certified master, exemplary, or recognized teacher.

Commissioner Morath added, "It is critical we use all available tools, including standardized tests, to measure student performance and help address any possible learning loss from COVID-19-related disruptions. Parents need to have access to clear information on where their students are, compared to previous years, and how much progress was made during the most recent school year. Teachers need reliable input on how students are doing relative to a consistent set of state standards. And school district leaders rely on the results from these assessments to properly lead their school systems in ways that maximize support for student academic growth."

To meet state graduation requirements, students must have either (a) passed STAAR EOC assessments, (b) scored high enough on a substitute assessment (e.g., PSAT, SAT, ACT, AP, TSIA), or (c) met the requirements of an individual graduation committee (IGC).

Results for STAAR grades 3-8 assessments will be made publicly available on June 24, 2022, and will give families and schools across Texas a better understanding of how students are doing. State law has recently changed to remove any high stakes for students associated with STAAR tests in grades 3-8. There is no requirement under state law that students who fail any STAAR grades 3-8 assessment repeat a grade, instead allowing STAAR results solely to serve as information on how best to support students moving forward.

More changes to STAAR are coming in the 2022-23 school year. TEA is implementing changes from House Bill 3906 (86R) that require STAAR to be redesigned to better align with classroom instruction. These changes aim to improve student engagement and eliminate instruction that is solely directed toward test preparation. These changes, which will not alter the test's difficulty, will be fully in effect by the spring 2023 test administration.

To Learn More
Parents are encouraged to log in and learn more about their child's results by going to TexasAssessment.gov.

Parents can view a variety of resources and assessment components, including each STAAR question and answer, along with their child's answer. The website also provides resources designed to help parents prepare their son or daughter as he or she progresses from grade to grade.

Resources include tools to support a student's ability to read and write, as well as tips and questions to help prepare for parent-teacher conferences in the 2022-23 school year.

To review STAAR state-level reports, visit: http://tea.texas.gov/staar/rpt/sum. Summary results are noted here:

###

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
TEA Releases 2022 STAAR End-Of-Course Assessment Results | Texas Education Agency

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
AUSTIN, Texas - June 16, 2022 - Today, the Texas Education Agency (TEA) released spring 2022 State of Texas Assessments of Academic Readiness (STAAR®) results for end-of-course (EOC) assessments. The results include assessments in Algebra I, English I, English II, Biology, and U.S History.

# data[].attributes.body
Source of Law type: Federal - Constitutional Law

Citation: U.S. Const. Amen. X

Link to full text: https://www.archives.gov/founding-docs/constitution-transcript#3-3

Bulleted list describing the law and what it requires related to your topic:

The 10th Amendment reinforces federalism by stating that any powers not specifically granted to the federal government belong to the states or the people.

This suggests that the federal government does not directly determine the graduation requirements for students in public schools in the context of public education.

State governments are generally in charge of setting graduation criteria, including assessment requirements.

States are allowed to set and enforce their own graduation requirements, which might differ greatly from one state to the next.

The 10th Amendment allows each state to customize its educational programs and graduation requirements.

As a result, the graduation standards for public education are set at the state and municipal levels rather than being consistent across the nation.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defence, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.

Article. I.

Section. 1.

All legislative Powers herein granted shall be vested in a Congress of the United States, which shall consist of a Senate and House of Representatives.

Section. 2.

The House of Representatives shall be composed of Members chosen every second Year by the People of the several States, and the Electors in each State shall have the Qualifications requisite for Electors of the most numerous Branch of the State Legislature.

No Person shall be a Representative who shall not have attained to the Age of twenty five Years, and been seven Years a Citizen of the United States, and who shall not, when elected, be an Inhabitant of that State in which he shall be chosen.

Representatives and direct Taxes shall be apportioned among the several States which may be included within this Union, according to their respective Numbers, which shall be determined by adding to the whole Number of free Persons, including those bound to Service for a Term of Years, and excluding Indians not taxed, three fifths of all other Persons. The actual Enumeration shall be made within three Years after the first Meeting of the Congress of the United States, and within every subsequent Term of ten Years, in such Manner as they shall by Law direct. The Number of Representatives shall not exceed one for every thirty Thousand, but each State shall have at Least one Representative; and until such enumeration shall be made, the State of New Hampshire shall be entitled to chuse three, Massachusetts eight, Rhode-Island and Providence Plantations one, Connecticut five, New-York six, New Jersey four, Pennsylvania eight, Delaware one, Maryland six, Virginia ten, North Carolina five, South Carolina five, and Georgia three.

When vacancies happen in the Representation from any State, the Executive Authority thereof shall issue Writs of Election to fill such Vacancies.

The House of Representatives shall chuse their Speaker and other Officers; and shall have the sole Power of Impeachment.

Section. 3.

The Senate of the United States shall be composed of two Senators from each State, chosen by the Legislature thereof, for six Years; and each Senator shall have one Vote.

Immediately after they shall be assembled in Consequence of the first Election, they shall be divided as equally as may be into three Classes. The Seats of the Senators of the first Class shall be vacated at the Expiration of the second Year, of the second Class at the Expiration of the fourth Year, and of the third Class at the Expiration of the sixth Year, so that one third may be chosen every second Year; and if Vacancies happen by Resignation, or otherwise, during the Recess of the Legislature of any State, the Executive thereof may make temporary Appointments until the next Meeting of the Legislature, which shall then fill such Vacancies.

No Person shall be a Senator who shall not have attained to the Age of thirty Years, and been nine Years a Citizen of the United States, and who shall not, when elected, be an Inhabitant of that State for which he shall be chosen.

The Vice President of the United States shall be President of the Senate, but shall have no Vote, unless they be equally divided.

The Senate shall chuse their other Officers, and also a President pro tempore, in the Absence of the Vice President, or when he shall exercise the Office of President of the United States.

The Senate shall have the sole Power to try all Impeachments. When sitting for that Purpose, they shall be on Oath or Affirmation. When the President of the United States is tried, the Chief Justice shall preside: And no Person shall be convicted without the Concurrence of two thirds of the Members present.

Judgment in Cases of Impeachment shall not extend further than to removal from Office, and disqualification to hold and enjoy any Office of honor, Trust or Profit under the United States: but the Party convicted shall nevertheless be liable and subject to Indictment, Trial, Judgment and Punishment, according to Law.

Section. 4.

The Times, Places and Manner of holding Elections for Senators and Representatives, shall be prescribed in each State by the Legislature thereof; but the Congress may at any time by Law make or alter such Regulations, except as to the Places of chusing Senators.

The Congress shall assemble at least once in every Year, and such Meeting shall be on the first Monday in December, unless they shall by Law appoint a different Day.

Section. 5.

Each House shall be the Judge of the Elections, Returns and Qualifications of its own Members, and a Majority of each shall constitute a Quorum to do Business; but a smaller Number may adjourn from day to day, and may be authorized to compel the Attendance of absent Members, in such Manner, and under such Penalties as each House may provide.

Each House may determine the Rules of its Proceedings, punish its Members for disorderly Behaviour, and, with the Concurrence of two thirds, expel a Member.

Each House shall keep a Journal of its Proceedings, and from time to time publish the same, excepting such Parts as may in their Judgment require Secrecy; and the Yeas and Nays of the Members of either House on any question shall, at the Desire of one fifth of those Present, be entered on the Journal.

Neither House, during the Session of Congress, shall, without the Consent of the other, adjourn for more than three days, nor to any other Place than that in which the two Houses shall be sitting.

Section. 6.

The Senators and Representatives shall receive a Compensation for their Services, to be ascertained by Law, and paid out of the Treasury of the United States. They shall in all Cases, except Treason, Felony and Breach of the Peace, be privileged from Arrest during their Attendance at the Session of their respective Houses, and in going to and returning from the same; and for any Speech or Debate in either House, they shall not be questioned in any other Place.

No Senator or Representative shall, during the Time for which he was elected, be appointed to any civil Office under the Authority of the United States, which shall have been created, or the Emoluments whereof shall have been encreased during such time; and no Person holding any Office under the United States, shall be a Member of either House during his Continuance in Office.

Section. 7.

All Bills for raising Revenue shall originate in the House of Representatives; but the Senate may propose or concur with Amendments as on other Bills.

Every Bill which shall have passed the House of Representatives and the Senate, shall, before it become a Law, be presented to the President of the United States; If he approve he shall sign it, but if not he shall return it, with his Objections to that House in which it shall have originated, who shall enter the Objections at large on their Journal, and proceed to reconsider it. If after such Reconsideration two thirds of that House shall agree to pass the Bill, it shall be sent, together with the Objections, to the other House, by which it shall likewise be reconsidered, and if approved by two thirds of that House, it shall become a Law. But in all such Cases the Votes of both Houses shall be determined by yeas and Nays, and the Names of the Persons voting for and against the Bill shall be entered on the Journal of each House respectively. If any Bill shall not be returned by the President within ten Days (Sundays excepted) after it shall have been presented to him, the Same shall be a Law, in like Manner as if he had signed it, unless the Congress by their Adjournment prevent its Return, in which Case it shall not be a Law.

Every Order, Resolution, or Vote to which the Concurrence of the Senate and House of Representatives may be necessary (except on a question of Adjournment) shall be presented to the President of the United States; and before the Same shall take Effect, shall be approved by him, or being disapproved by him, shall be repassed by two thirds of the Senate and House of Representatives, according to the Rules and Limitations prescribed in the Case of a Bill.

Section. 8.

The Congress shall have Power To lay and collect Taxes, Duties, Imposts and Excises, to pay the Debts and provide for the common Defence and general Welfare of the United States; but all Duties, Imposts and Excises shall be uniform throughout the United States;

To borrow Money on the credit of the United States;

To regulate Commerce with foreign Nations, and among the several States, and with the Indian Tribes;

To establish an uniform Rule of Naturalization, and uniform Laws on the subject of Bankruptcies throughout the United States;

To coin Money, regulate the Value thereof, and of foreign Coin, and fix the Standard of Weights and Measures;

To provide for the Punishment of counterfeiting the Securities and current Coin of the United States;

To establish Post Offices and post Roads;

To promote the Progress of Science and useful Arts, by securing for limited Times to Authors and Inventors the exclusive Right to their respective Writings and Discoveries;

To constitute Tribunals inferior to the supreme Court;

To define and punish Piracies and Felonies committed on the high Seas, and Offences against the Law of Nations;

To declare War, grant Letters of Marque and Reprisal, and make Rules concerning Captures on Land and Water;

To raise and support Armies, but no Appropriation of Money to that Use shall be for a longer Term than two Years;

To provide and maintain a Navy;

To make Rules for the Government and Regulation of the land and naval Forces;

To provide for calling forth the Militia to execute the Laws of the Union, suppress Insurrections and repel Invasions;

To provide for organizing, arming, and disciplining, the Militia, and for governing such Part of them as may be employed in the Service of the United States, reserving to the States respectively, the Appointment of the Officers, and the Authority of training the Militia according to the discipline prescribed by Congress;

To exercise exclusive Legislation in all Cases whatsoever, over such District (not exceeding ten Miles square) as may, by Cession of particular States, and the Acceptance of Congress, become the Seat of the Government of the United States, and to exercise like Authority over all Places purchased by the Consent of the Legislature of the State in which the Same shall be, for the Erection of Forts, Magazines, Arsenals, dock-Yards, and other needful Buildings;-And

To make all Laws which shall be necessary and proper for carrying into Execution the foregoing Powers, and all other Powers vested by this Constitution in the Government of the United States, or in any Department or Officer thereof.

Section. 9.

The Migration or Importation of such Persons as any of the States now existing shall think proper to admit, shall not be prohibited by the Congress prior to the Year one thousand eight hundred and eight, but a Tax or duty may be imposed on such Importation, not exceeding ten dollars for each Person.

The Privilege of the Writ of Habeas Corpus shall not be suspended, unless when in Cases of Rebellion or Invasion the public Safety may require it.

No Bill of Attainder or ex post facto Law shall be passed.

No Capitation, or other direct, Tax shall be laid, unless in Proportion to the Census or enumeration herein before directed to be taken.

No Tax or Duty shall be laid on Articles exported from any State.

No Preference shall be given by any Regulation of Commerce or Revenue to the Ports of one State over those of another: nor shall Vessels bound to, or from, one State, be obliged to enter, clear, or pay Duties in another.

No Money shall be drawn from the Treasury, but in Consequence of Appropriations made by Law; and a regular Statement and Account of the Receipts and Expenditures of all public Money shall be published from time to time.

No Title of Nobility shall be granted by the United States: And no Person holding any Office of Profit or Trust under them, shall, without the Consent of the Congress, accept of any present, Emolument, Office, or Title, of any kind whatever, from any King, Prince, or foreign State.

Section. 10.

No State shall enter into any Treaty, Alliance, or Confederation; grant Letters of Marque and Reprisal; coin Money; emit Bills of Credit; make any Thing but gold and silver Coin a Tender in Payment of Debts; pass any Bill of Attainder, ex post facto Law, or Law impairing the Obligation of Contracts, or grant any Title of Nobility.

No State shall, without the Consent of the Congress, lay any Imposts or Duties on Imports or Exports, except what may be absolutely necessary for executing it's inspection Laws: and the net Produce of all Duties and Imposts, laid by any State on Imports or Exports, shall be for the Use of the Treasury of the United States; and all such Laws shall be subject to the Revision and Controul of the Congress.

No State shall, without the Consent of Congress, lay any Duty of Tonnage, keep Troops, or Ships of War in time of Peace, enter into any Agreement or Compact with another State, or with a foreign Power, or engage in War, unless actually invaded, or in such imminent Danger as will not admit of delay.

Article. II.

Section. 1.

The executive Power shall be vested in a President of the United States of America. He shall hold his Office during the Term of four Years, and, together with the Vice President, chosen for the same Term, be elected, as follows

Each State shall appoint, in such Manner as the Legislature thereof may direct, a Number of Electors, equal to the whole Number of Senators and Representatives to which the State may be entitled in the Congress: but no Senator or Representative, or Person holding an Office of Trust or Profit under the United States, shall be appointed an Elector.
The Electors shall meet in their respective States, and vote by Ballot for two Persons, of whom one at least shall not be an Inhabitant of the same State with themselves. And they shall make a List of all the Persons voted for, and of the Number of Votes for each; which List they shall sign and certify, and transmit sealed to the Seat of the Government of the United States, directed to the President of the Senate. The President of the Senate shall, in the Presence of the Senate and House of Representatives, open all the Certificates, and the Votes shall then be counted. The Person having the greatest Number of Votes shall be the President, if such Number be a Majority of the whole Number of Electors appointed; and if there be more than one who have such Majority, and have an equal Number of Votes, then the House of Representatives shall immediately chuse by Ballot one of them for President; and if no Person have a Majority, then from the five highest on the List the said House shall in like Manner chuse the President. But in chusing the President, the Votes shall be taken by States, the Representation from each State having one Vote; A quorum for this Purpose shall consist of a Member or Members from two thirds of the States, and a Majority of all the States shall be necessary to a Choice. In every Case, after the Choice of the President, the Person having the greatest Number of Votes of the Electors shall be the Vice President. But if there should remain two or more who have equal Votes, the Senate shall chuse from them by Ballot the Vice President.
The Congress may determine the Time of chusing the Electors, and the Day on which they shall give their Votes; which Day shall be the same throughout the United States.

No Person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President; neither shall any Person be eligible to that Office who shall not have attained to the Age of thirty five Years, and been fourteen Years a Resident within the United States.
In Case of the Removal of the President from Office, or of his Death, Resignation, or Inability to discharge the Powers and Duties of the said Office, the Same shall devolve on the Vice President, and the Congress may by Law provide for the Case of Removal, Death, Resignation or Inability, both of the President and Vice President, declaring what Officer shall then act as President, and such Officer shall act accordingly, until the Disability be removed, or a President shall be elected.
The President shall, at stated Times, receive for his Services, a Compensation, which shall neither be encreased nor diminished during the Period for which he shall have been elected, and he shall not receive within that Period any other Emolument from the United States, or any of them.

Before he enter on the Execution of his Office, he shall take the following Oath or Affirmation:-"I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will faithfully execute the Office of President of the United States, and will to the best of my Ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States."

Section. 2.

The President shall be Commander in Chief of the Army and Navy of the United States, and of the Militia of the several States, when called into the actual Service of the United States; he may require the Opinion, in writing, of the principal Officer in each of the executive Departments, upon any Subject relating to the Duties of their respective Offices, and he shall have Power to grant Reprieves and Pardons for Offences against the United States, except in Cases of Impeachment.

He shall have Power, by and with the Advice and Consent of the Senate, to make Treaties, provided two thirds of the Senators present concur; and he shall nominate, and by and with the Advice and Consent of the Senate, shall appoint Ambassadors, other public Ministers and Consuls, Judges of the supreme Court, and all other Officers of the United States, whose Appointments are not herein otherwise provided for, and which shall be established by Law: but the Congress may by Law vest the Appointment of such inferior Officers, as they think proper, in the President alone, in the Courts of Law, or in the Heads of Departments.

The President shall have Power to fill up all Vacancies that may happen during the Recess of the Senate, by granting Commissions which shall expire at the End of their next Session.

Section. 3.

He shall from time to time give to the Congress Information of the State of the Union, and recommend to their Consideration such Measures as he shall judge necessary and expedient; he may, on extraordinary Occasions, convene both Houses, or either of them, and in Case of Disagreement between them, with Respect to the Time of Adjournment, he may adjourn them to such Time as he shall think proper; he shall receive Ambassadors and other public Ministers; he shall take Care that the Laws be faithfully executed, and shall Commission all the Officers of the United States.

Section. 4.

The President, Vice President and all civil Officers of the United States, shall be removed from Office on Impeachment for, and Conviction of, Treason, Bribery, or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors.

Article. III.

Section. 1.

The judicial Power of the United States, shall be vested in one supreme Court, and in such inferior Courts as the Congress may from time to time ordain and establish. The Judges, both of the supreme and inferior Courts, shall hold their Offices during good Behaviour, and shall, at stated Times, receive for their Services, a Compensation, which shall not be diminished during their Continuance in Office.

Section. 2.

The judicial Power shall extend to all Cases, in Law and Equity, arising under this Constitution, the Laws of the United States, and Treaties made, or which shall be made, under their Authority;-to all Cases affecting Ambassadors, other public Ministers and Consuls;-to all Cases of admiralty and maritime Jurisdiction;-to Controversies to which the United States shall be a Party;-to Controversies between two or more States;- between a State and Citizens of another State,-between Citizens of different States,-between Citizens of the same State claiming Lands under Grants of different States, and between a State, or the Citizens thereof, and foreign States, Citizens or Subjects.

In all Cases affecting Ambassadors, other public Ministers and Consuls, and those in which a State shall be Party, the supreme Court shall have original Jurisdiction. In all the other Cases before mentioned, the supreme Court shall have appellate Jurisdiction, both as to Law and Fact, with such Exceptions, and under such Regulations as the Congress shall make.

The Trial of all Crimes, except in Cases of Impeachment, shall be by Jury; and such Trial shall be held in the State where the said Crimes shall have been committed; but when not committed within any State, the Trial shall be at such Place or Places as the Congress may by Law have directed.

Section. 3.

Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying War against them, or in adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort. No Person shall be convicted of Treason unless on the Testimony of two Witnesses to the same overt Act, or on Confession in open Court.

The Congress shall have Power to declare the Punishment of Treason, but no Attainder of Treason shall work Corruption of Blood, or Forfeiture except during the Life of the Person attainted.

Article. IV.

Section. 1.

Full Faith and Credit shall be given in each State to the public Acts, Records, and judicial Proceedings of every other State. And the Congress may by general Laws prescribe the Manner in which such Acts, Records and Proceedings shall be proved, and the Effect thereof.

Section. 2.

The Citizens of each State shall be entitled to all Privileges and Immunities of Citizens in the several States.

A Person charged in any State with Treason, Felony, or other Crime, who shall flee from Justice, and be found in another State, shall on Demand of the executive Authority of the State from which he fled, be delivered up, to be removed to the State having Jurisdiction of the Crime.

No Person held to Service or Labour in one State, under the Laws thereof, escaping into another, shall, in Consequence of any Law or Regulation therein, be discharged from such Service or Labour, but shall be delivered up on Claim of the Party to whom such Service or Labour may be due.

Section. 3.

New States may be admitted by the Congress into this Union; but no new State shall be formed or erected within the Jurisdiction of any other State; nor any State be formed by the Junction of two or more States, or Parts of States, without the Consent of the Legislatures of the States concerned as well as of the Congress.

The Congress shall have Power to dispose of and make all needful Rules and Regulations respecting the Territory or other Property belonging to the United States; and nothing in this Constitution shall be so construed as to Prejudice any Claims of the United States, or of any particular State.

Section. 4.

The United States shall guarantee to every State in this Union a Republican Form of Government, and shall protect each of them against Invasion; and on Application of the Legislature, or of the Executive (when the Legislature cannot be convened) against domestic Violence.

Article. V.

The Congress, whenever two thirds of both Houses shall deem it necessary, shall propose Amendments to this Constitution, or, on the Application of the Legislatures of two thirds of the several States, shall call a Convention for proposing Amendments, which, in either Case, shall be valid to all Intents and Purposes, as Part of this Constitution, when ratified by the Legislatures of three fourths of the several States, or by Conventions in three fourths thereof, as the one or the other Mode of Ratification may be proposed by the Congress; Provided that no Amendment which may be made prior to the Year One thousand eight hundred and eight shall in any Manner affect the first and fourth Clauses in the Ninth Section of the first Article; and that no State, without its Consent, shall be deprived of its equal Suffrage in the Senate.

Article. VI.

All Debts contracted and Engagements entered into, before the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be as valid against the United States under this Constitution, as under the Confederation.

This Constitution, and the Laws of the United States which shall be made in Pursuance thereof; and all Treaties made, or which shall be made, under the Authority of the United States, shall be the supreme Law of the Land; and the Judges in every State shall be bound thereby, any Thing in the Constitution or Laws of any State to the Contrary notwithstanding.

The Senators and Representatives before mentioned, and the Members of the several State Legislatures, and all executive and judicial Officers, both of the United States and of the several States, shall be bound by Oath or Affirmation, to support this Constitution; but no religious Test shall ever be required as a Qualification to any Office or public Trust under the United States.

Article. VII.

The Ratification of the Conventions of nine States, shall be sufficient for the Establishment of this Constitution between the States so ratifying the Same.

The Word, "the," being interlined between the seventh and eighth Lines of the first Page, The Word "Thirty" being partly written on an Erazure in the fifteenth Line of the first Page, The Words "is tried" being interlined between the thirty second and thirty third Lines of the first Page and the Word "the" being interlined between the forty third and forty fourth Lines of the second Page.

Attest William Jackson Secretary

done in Convention by the Unanimous Consent of the States present the Seventeenth Day of September in the Year of our Lord one thousand seven hundred and Eighty seven and of the Independance of the United States of America the Twelfth In witness whereof We have hereunto subscribed our Names,

G°. Washington
Presidt and deputy from Virginia

For biographies of the non-signing delegates to the Constitutional Convention, see the Founding Fathers page.
Back to Main Constitution Page

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
The Constitution of the United States: A Transcription

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
get-content name="print-page-left" include-tag="false" /] Note: The following text is a transcription of the Constitution as it was inscribed by Jacob Shallus on parchment (the document on display in the Rotunda at the National Archives Museum.) The spelling and punctuation reflect the original.

# data[].attributes.body
Source of Law type: State - Statutory

Citation: Secondary-Level Performance Required, Tex. Educ. Code § 39.025

Link to full text: https://statutes.capitol.texas.gov/Docs/ED/htm/ED.39.htm

Bulleted list describing the law and what it requires related to your topic:

A student is required to score satisfactorily on each End of Course (EOC) assessment in Algebra 1, Biology, English 1, English 2, Us History

The graduation requirements for special education kids are decided by their ARD committee.

Students may retest if they do not perform satisfactorily without repeating the course, however these students must receive accelerated instruction

Schools may issue alternate assessments, approved by the commissioner, to students who fail to perform on the EOC

A student may not receive a diploma if they have not performed satisfactorily on the EOC or approved alternate assessment(s)

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
EDUCATION CODE



TITLE 2. PUBLIC EDUCATION



SUBTITLE H. PUBLIC SCHOOL SYSTEM ACCOUNTABILITY



CHAPTER 39. PUBLIC SCHOOL SYSTEM ACCOUNTABILITY



SUBCHAPTER A. GENERAL PROVISIONS



Sec. 39.001. RULES. (a) The commissioner shall adopt rules as necessary to administer this chapter.


(b) In adopting a rule under this chapter, the commissioner shall solicit input statewide from persons who would likely be affected by the proposed rule, including school district boards of trustees, administrators and teachers employed by school districts, parents of students enrolled in school districts, and other interested stakeholders.


Added by Acts 2017, 85th Leg., R.S., Ch. 807 (H.B. 22), Sec. 6, eff. June 15, 2017.


Sec. 39.002. ADVISORY COMMITTEE. An advisory committee appointed under this chapter is not subject to Chapter 2110, Government Code.


Added by Acts 2017, 85th Leg., R.S., Ch. 807 (H.B. 22), Sec. 6, eff. June 15, 2017.


SUBCHAPTER B. ASSESSMENT OF ACADEMIC SKILLS



Sec. 39.021. ESSENTIAL SKILLS AND KNOWLEDGE. The State Board of Education by rule shall establish the essential skills and knowledge that all students should learn to achieve the goals provided under Section 4.002.


Added by Acts 1995, 74th Leg., ch. 260, Sec. 1, eff. May 30, 1995.


Sec. 39.022. ASSESSMENT PROGRAM. (a) The State Board of Education by rule shall create and implement a statewide assessment program that is knowledge- and skills-based to ensure school accountability for student achievement that achieves the goals provided under Section 4.002. After adopting rules under this section, the State Board of Education shall consider the importance of maintaining stability in the statewide assessment program when adopting any subsequent modification of the rules.


(b) It is the policy of this state that the statewide assessment program be designed to:


(1) provide assessment instruments that are as short as practicable; and


(2) minimize the disruption to the educational program.


Added by Acts 1995, 74th Leg., ch. 260, Sec. 1, eff. May 30, 1995. Amended by Acts 1999, 76th Leg., ch. 397, Sec. 2, eff. Sept. 1, 1999.


Amended by:


Acts 2019, 86th Leg., R.S., Ch. 1315 (H.B. 3906), Sec. 1, eff. June 14, 2019.



Sec. 39.023. ADOPTION AND ADMINISTRATION OF INSTRUMENTS.



Text of subsection effective until September 01, 2021



(a) The agency shall adopt or develop appropriate criterion-referenced assessment instruments designed to assess essential knowledge and skills in reading, writing, mathematics, social studies, and science. Except as provided by Subsection (a-2), all students, other than students assessed under Subsection (b) or (l) or exempted under Section 39.027, shall be assessed in:


(1) mathematics, annually in grades three through eight;


(2) reading, annually in grades three through eight;


(3) writing, including spelling and grammar, in grades four and seven;


(4) social studies, in grade eight;


(5) science, in grades five and eight; and


(6) any other subject and grade required by federal law.



Text of subsection effective on September 01, 2021



(a) The agency shall adopt or develop appropriate criterion-referenced assessment instruments designed to assess essential knowledge and skills in reading, mathematics, social studies, and science. Except as provided by Subsection (a-2), all students, other than students assessed under Subsection (b) or (l) or exempted under Section 39.027, shall be assessed in:


(1) mathematics, annually in grades three through eight;


(2) reading, annually in grades three through eight;


(3) social studies, in grade eight;


(4) science, in grades five and eight; and


(5) any other subject and grade required by federal law.


(a-1) The agency shall develop assessment instruments required under Subsection (a) in a manner that allows, to the extent practicable:


(1) the score a student receives to provide reliable information relating to a student's satisfactory performance for each performance standard under Section 39.0241; and


(2) an appropriate range of performances to serve as a valid indication of growth in student achievement.


(a-2) Except as required by federal law, a student is not required to be assessed in a subject otherwise assessed at the student's grade level under Subsection (a) if the student:


(1) is enrolled in a course in the subject intended for students above the student's grade level and will be administered an assessment instrument adopted or developed under Subsection (a) that aligns with the curriculum for the course in which the student is enrolled; or


(2) is enrolled in a course in the subject for which the student will receive high school academic credit and will be administered an end-of-course assessment instrument adopted under Subsection (c) for the course.


(a-3) The agency may not adopt or develop a criterion-referenced assessment instrument under this section based on common core state standards as defined by Section 28.002(b-1). This subsection does not prohibit the use of college advanced placement tests or international baccalaureate examinations as those terms are defined by Section 28.051.


(a-4) For purposes of Subsection (a)(1), the State Board of Education by rule may designate sections of a mathematics assessment instrument for a grade level that:


(1) may be completed with the aid of technology; and


(2) must be completed without the aid of technology.


(a-5)-(a-10) Expired.


(a-11) Before an assessment instrument adopted or developed under Subsection (a) may be administered under that subsection, the assessment instrument must, on the basis of empirical evidence, be determined to be valid and reliable by an entity that is independent of the agency and of any other entity that developed the assessment instrument.


(a-12) An assessment instrument adopted or developed under Subsection (a) may not have more than three parts. A part of an assessment instrument must be designed so that:


(1) if administered to students in grades three and four, 85 percent of students will be able to complete that part within 60 minutes; and


(2) if administered to students in grades five through eight, 85 percent of students will be able to complete that part within 75 minutes.


(a-13) The amount of time allowed for administration of an assessment instrument adopted or developed under Subsection (a) may not exceed eight hours, and the administration may occur in multiple parts over more than one day.


(a-14) Subsections (a-12) and (a-13) do not apply to the administration of assessment instruments for a grade level if, as a result of the time restriction imposed, the assessment instrument no longer:


(1) complies with federal law; or


(2) is valid and reliable, based on findings and recommendations made by the advisory committees established under Section 39.02302.


(a-15) Subsections (a-12) and (a-13) do not apply to a classroom portfolio method used to assess writing performance.


(a-16) An assessment instrument under this section may not be administered to a kindergarten student except for the purpose of determining whether the student is entitled to the benefit of the Foundation School Program as provided under this code.


(b) The agency shall develop or adopt appropriate criterion-referenced alternative assessment instruments to be administered to each student in a special education program under Subchapter A, Chapter 29, for whom an assessment instrument adopted under Subsection (a), even with allowable accommodations, would not provide an appropriate measure of student achievement, as determined by the student's admission, review, and dismissal committee, including assessment instruments approved by the commissioner that measure growth. The assessment instruments developed or adopted under this subsection, including the assessment instruments approved by the commissioner, must, to the extent allowed under federal law, provide a district with options for the assessment of students under this subsection. The agency may not adopt a performance standard that indicates that a student's performance on the alternate assessment does not meet standards if the lowest level of the assessment accurately represents the student's developmental level as determined by the student's admission, review, and dismissal committee.


(b-1) The agency, in conjunction with appropriate interested persons, shall redevelop assessment instruments adopted or developed under Subsection (b) for administration to significantly cognitively disabled students in a manner consistent with federal law. An assessment instrument under this subsection may not require a teacher to prepare tasks or materials for a student who will be administered such an assessment instrument. A classroom portfolio method used to assess writing performance may require a teacher to prepare tasks and materials.


(c) The agency shall also adopt end-of-course assessment instruments for secondary-level courses in Algebra I, biology, English I, English II, and United States history. The Algebra I end-of-course assessment instrument must be administered with the aid of technology, but may include one or more parts that prohibit the use of technology. The English I and English II end-of-course assessment instruments must each assess essential knowledge and skills in both reading and writing and must provide a single score. A school district shall comply with State Board of Education rules regarding administration of the assessment instruments listed in this subsection. If a student is in a special education program under Subchapter A, Chapter 29, the student's admission, review, and dismissal committee shall determine whether any allowable modification is necessary in administering to the student an assessment instrument required under this subsection. The State Board of Education shall administer the assessment instruments. An end-of-course assessment instrument may be administered in multiple parts over more than one day. The State Board of Education shall adopt a schedule for the administration of end-of-course assessment instruments that complies with the requirements of Subsection (c-3).


(c-1) The agency shall develop any assessment instrument required under this section in a manner that allows for the measurement of annual improvement in student achievement as required by Sections 39.034(c) and (d).


(c-2) The agency may adopt end-of-course assessment instruments for courses not listed in Subsection (c). A student's performance on an end-of-course assessment instrument adopted under this subsection is not subject to the performance requirements established under Subsection (c) or Section 39.025.


(c-3) Except as provided by Subsection (c-7), in adopting a schedule for the administration of assessment instruments under this section, the State Board of Education shall ensure that assessment instruments administered under Subsection (a) or (c) are not administered on the first instructional day of a week.


(c-4) To the extent practicable and subject to Section 39.024, the agency shall ensure that each end-of-course assessment instrument adopted under Subsection (c) is:


(1) developed in a manner that measures a student's performance under the college readiness standards established under Section 28.008; and


(2) validated by national postsecondary education experts for college readiness content and performance standards.


(c-5) A student's performance on an end-of-course assessment instrument required under Subsection (c) must be included in the student's academic achievement record.


(c-6) In adopting an end-of-course assessment instrument under this section, the agency shall consider the use of an existing assessment instrument that is currently available. The agency may use an existing assessment instrument that is currently available only if the assessment instrument:


(1) is aligned with the essential knowledge and skills of the subject being assessed; and


(2) allows for the measurement of annual improvement in student achievement as provided by Subsection (c-1).


Text of subsection as added by Acts 2019, 86th Leg., R.S., Ch. 1282 (H.B. 1244), Sec. 1



(c-7) The United States history end-of-course assessment instrument adopted under Subsection (c) must include 10 questions randomly selected by the agency from the civics test administered by the United States Citizenship and Immigration Services as part of the naturalization process under the federal Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. Section 1101 et seq.). The agency shall:


(1) ensure that the questions included in the assessment instrument align with the essential knowledge and skills adopted for the United States history course for which the instrument is administered; and


(2) annually issue a report:


(A) providing the questions included in the assessment instrument under this subsection and the answers to those questions; and


(B) detailing student performance on the questions included in the assessment instrument under this subsection, both statewide and disaggregated by school district and campus.


Text of subsection as added by Acts 2019, 86th Leg., R.S., Ch. 1315 (H.B. 3906), Sec. 3



(c-7) Subsection (c-3) does not apply to a classroom portfolio method used to assess writing performance if student performance under that method is less than 50 percent of a student's overall assessed performance in writing.


(c-8) Beginning with the 2022-2023 school year, an assessment instrument developed under Subsection (a) or (c) may not present more than 75 percent of the questions in a multiple choice format.


(d) The commissioner may participate in multistate efforts to develop voluntary standardized end-of-course assessment instruments. The commissioner by rule may require a school district to administer an end-of-course assessment instrument developed through the multistate efforts. The admission, review, and dismissal committee of a student in a special education program under Subchapter A, Chapter 29, shall determine whether any allowable modification is necessary in administering to the student an end-of-course assessment instrument.


(e) Under rules adopted by the State Board of Education, every third year, the agency shall release the questions and answer keys to each assessment instrument administered under Subsection (a), (b), (c), (d), or (l), excluding any assessment instrument administered to a student for the purpose of retaking the assessment instrument, after the last time the instrument is administered for that school year. To ensure a valid bank of questions for use each year, the agency is not required to release a question that is being field-tested and was not used to compute the student's score on the instrument. The agency shall also release, under board rule, each question that is no longer being field-tested and that was not used to compute a student's score. During the 2014-2015 and 2015-2016 school years, the agency shall release the questions and answer keys to assessment instruments as described by this subsection each year.


(e-1) The agency may defer releasing assessment instrument questions and answer keys as required by Subsection (e) to the extent necessary to develop additional assessment instruments.


(f) The assessment instruments shall be designed to include assessment of a student's problem-solving ability and complex-thinking skills using a method of assessing those abilities and skills that is demonstrated to be highly reliable.


(g) The State Board of Education may adopt one appropriate, nationally recognized, norm-referenced assessment instrument in reading and mathematics to be administered to a selected sample of students in the spring. If adopted, a norm-referenced assessment instrument must be a secured test. The state may pay the costs of purchasing and scoring the adopted assessment instrument and of distributing the results of the adopted instrument to the school districts. A district that administers the norm-referenced test adopted under this subsection shall report the results to the agency in a manner prescribed by the commissioner.


(h) The agency shall notify school districts and campuses of the results of assessment instruments administered under this section not later than the 21st day after the date the assessment instrument is administered. The school district shall disclose to each district teacher the results of assessment instruments administered to students taught by the teacher in the subject for the school year in which the assessment instrument is administered.


(i) The provisions of this section, except Subsection (d), are subject to modification by rules adopted under Section 39.022. Each assessment instrument adopted under those rules and each assessment instrument required under Subsection (d) must be reliable and valid and must meet any applicable federal requirements for measurement of student progress.


(j) Repealed by Acts 2007, 80th Leg., R.S., Ch. 1312, Sec. 18, eff. September 1, 2007.


(m) The commissioner by rule shall develop procedures under which the language proficiency assessment committee established under Section 29.063 shall determine which students are exempt from the administration of the assessment instruments under Section 39.027(a)(1) or (2). The rules adopted under this subsection shall ensure that the language proficiency assessment committee provides that the exempted students are administered the assessment instruments under Subsections (a) and (c) at the earliest practical date.


(n) This subsection applies only to a student who is determined to have dyslexia or a related disorder and who is an individual with a disability under 29 U.S.C. Section 705(20) and its subsequent amendments. The agency shall adopt or develop appropriate criterion-referenced assessment instruments designed to assess the ability of and to be administered to each student to whom this subsection applies for whom the assessment instruments adopted under Subsection (a), even with allowable modifications, would not provide an appropriate measure of student achievement, as determined by the committee established by the board of trustees of the district to determine the placement of students with dyslexia or related disorders. The committee shall determine whether any allowable modification is necessary in administering to a student an assessment instrument required under this subsection. The assessment instruments required under this subsection shall be administered on the same schedule as the assessment instruments administered under Subsection (a).


(o) The agency shall adopt or develop optional interim assessment instruments for each subject or course for each grade level subject to assessment under this section. A school district may not be required to administer interim assessment instruments adopted or developed under this subsection. An interim assessment instrument:


(1) must be:


(A) predictive of the assessment instrument for the applicable subject or course for that grade level required under this section; and


(B) administered electronically; and


(2) may not be used for accountability purposes.


(p) On or before September 1 of each year, the commissioner shall make the following information available on the agency's Internet website for each assessment instrument administered under Subsection (a), (c), or (l):


(1) the number of questions on the assessment instrument;


(2) the number of questions that must be answered correctly to achieve satisfactory performance as determined by the commissioner under Section 39.0241(a);


(3) the number of questions that must be answered correctly to achieve satisfactory performance under the college readiness performance standard as provided by Section 39.0241; and


(4) the corresponding scale scores.


Added by Acts 1995, 74th Leg., ch. 260, Sec. 1, eff. May 30, 1995. Amended by Acts 1997, 75th Leg., ch. 767, Sec. 1, eff. Sept. 1, 1997; Acts 1999, 76th Leg., ch. 397, Sec. 3, 8, eff. Sept. 1, 1999; Acts 2001, 77th Leg., ch. 8, Sec. 1, eff. April 11, 2001; Acts 2001, 77th Leg., ch. 834, Sec. 9, eff. Sept. 1, 2001; Acts 2003, 78th Leg., ch. 201, Sec. 25, eff. Sept. 1, 2003; Acts 2003, 78th Leg., ch. 430, Sec. 5, eff. Sept. 1, 2003; Acts 2003, 78th Leg., ch. 433, Sec. 1, eff. June 20, 2003; Acts 2003, 78th Leg., ch. 1212, Sec. 11, eff. June 20, 2003; Acts 2003, 78th Leg., ch. 1275, Sec. 2(20), eff. Sept. 1, 2003.


Amended by:


Acts 2007, 80th Leg., R.S., Ch. 1312 (S.B. 1031), Sec. 8, eff. September 1, 2007.


Acts 2007, 80th Leg., R.S., Ch. 1312 (S.B. 1031), Sec. 18, eff. September 1, 2007.


Acts 2009, 81st Leg., R.S., Ch. 895 (H.B. 3), Sec. 50, eff. June 19, 2009.


Acts 2011, 82nd Leg., R.S., Ch. 307 (H.B. 2135), Sec. 3, eff. June 17, 2011.


Acts 2013, 83rd Leg., R.S., Ch. 211 (H.B. 5), Sec. 31(a), eff. June 10, 2013.


Acts 2013, 83rd Leg., R.S., Ch. 590 (S.B. 906), Sec. 1, eff. June 14, 2013.


Acts 2013, 83rd Leg., R.S., Ch. 861 (H.B. 462), Sec. 2, eff. June 14, 2013.


Acts 2013, 83rd Leg., R.S., Ch. 1267 (H.B. 866), Sec. 1.


Acts 2013, 83rd Leg., R.S., Ch. 1267 (H.B. 866), Sec. 2, eff. September 1, 2017.


Acts 2015, 84th Leg., R.S., Ch. 934 (H.B. 2349), Sec. 2, eff. June 18, 2015.


Acts 2015, 84th Leg., R.S., Ch. 934 (H.B. 2349), Sec. 5(1), eff. June 18, 2015.


Acts 2015, 84th Leg., R.S., Ch. 1006 (H.B. 743), Sec. 1, eff. June 19, 2015.


Acts 2015, 84th Leg., R.S., Ch. 1094 (H.B. 2804), Sec. 13, eff. June 19, 2015.


Acts 2019, 86th Leg., R.S., Ch. 1282 (H.B. 1244), Sec. 1, eff. June 14, 2019.


Acts 2019, 86th Leg., R.S., Ch. 1315 (H.B. 3906), Sec. 2, eff. September 1, 2021.


Acts 2019, 86th Leg., R.S., Ch. 1315 (H.B. 3906), Sec. 3, eff. June 14, 2019.


Sec. 39.02302. ADVISORY COMMITTEES FOR ASSESSMENT INSTRUMENTS. (a) The commissioner shall appoint a technical advisory committee to advise the commissioner and the agency regarding the development of valid and reliable assessment instruments for purposes of this chapter. The members of the committee must be experts on educational assessments and psychometrics.


(b) The commissioner shall appoint an educator advisory committee to advise the commissioner and the agency regarding the development of academically appropriate assessment instruments for purposes of this chapter. The members of the committee must include experts in curriculum and instruction.


(c) The agency may compensate a member of the technical or educator advisory committee or reimburse the member for expenses incurred in the performance of duties related to the member's service on the committee.


(d) The selection of or payment to a member of the technical or educator advisory committee is not subject to Chapter 2110 or 2254, Government Code.


Added by Acts 2019, 86th Leg., R.S., Ch. 1315 (H.B. 3906), Sec. 4, eff. June 14, 2019.


The following section was amended by the 87th Legislature. Pending publication of the current statutes, see H.B. 4545, 87th Legislature, Regular Session, for amendments affecting the following section.



Sec. 39.0231. REPORTING OF RESULTS OF CERTAIN ASSESSMENTS. The agency shall ensure that each assessment instrument administered in accordance with Section 28.0211 is scored and that the results are returned to the appropriate school district not later than 10 days after receipt of the test materials by the agency or its test contractor.


Added by Acts 1999, 76th Leg., ch. 396, Sec. 2.18, eff. Sept. 1, 1999.


Sec. 39.02315. REPORTING RESULTS OF ASSESSMENT INSTRUMENTS FOR OUT-OF-STATE TRANSFER STUDENTS. (a) For assessment instruments required to be administered under Section 39.023, the agency shall adopt procedures to ensure that the results of the assessment instruments administered to students who transfer from a school district in another state to a school district in this state are reported to each school district separately from the results of assessment instruments administered to other students.


(b) The commissioner by rule shall:


(1) ensure that the results of assessment instruments administered to students who transfer from a school district in another state to a school district in this state reported under Subsection (a) are properly identified in agency systems that report and track academic performance of students; and


(2) adopt procedures for reporting and tracking data relating to students who transfer from a school district in another state to a school district in this state.


Added by Acts 2015, 84th Leg., R.S., Ch. 934 (H.B. 2349), Sec. 3, eff. June 18, 2015.


Sec. 39.0232. USE OF END-OF-COURSE ASSESSMENT INSTRUMENT AS PLACEMENT INSTRUMENT; CERTAIN USES PROHIBITED. (a) To the extent practicable, the agency shall ensure that any high school end-of-course assessment instrument developed by the agency is developed in such a manner that the assessment instrument may be used to determine the appropriate placement of a student in a course of the same subject matter at an institution of higher education.


(b) A student's performance on an end-of-course assessment instrument may not be used:


(1) in determining the student's class ranking for any purpose, including entitlement to automatic college admission under Section 51.803 or 51.804; or


(2) as a sole criterion in the determination of whether to admit the student to a general academic teaching institution in this state.


(c) Subsection (b)(2) does not prohibit a general academic teaching institution from implementing an admission policy that takes into consideration a student's performance on an end-of-course assessment instrument in addition to other criteria.


(d) In this section, "general academic teaching institution" has the meaning assigned by Section 61.003.


Added by Acts 2006, 79th Leg., 3rd C.S., Ch. 5 (H.B. 1), Sec. 5.05, eff. May 31, 2006.


Amended by:


Acts 2013, 83rd Leg., R.S., Ch. 211 (H.B. 5), Sec. 32(a), eff. June 10, 2013.


Sec. 39.0233. SPECIAL-PURPOSE QUESTIONS INCLUDED IN END-OF-COURSE ASSESSMENT INSTRUMENTS. (a) The agency, in coordination with the Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board, shall adopt a series of questions to be included in an end-of-course assessment instrument administered under Section 39.023(c) to be used for purposes of Subchapter F-1, Chapter 51. The questions adopted under this subsection must be developed in a manner consistent with any college readiness standards adopted under Subchapter F-1, Chapter 51.


(b) In addition to the questions adopted under Subsection (a), the agency shall adopt a series of questions to be included in an end-of-course assessment instrument administered under Section 39.023(c) to be used for purposes of identifying students who are likely to succeed in an advanced high school course. A school district shall notify a student who performs at a high level on the questions adopted under this subsection and the student's parent or guardian of the student's performance and potential to succeed in an advanced high school course. A school district may not require a student to perform at a particular level on the questions adopted under this subsection in order to be eligible to enroll in an advanced high school course.


(c) Repealed by Acts 2015, 84th Leg., R.S., Ch. 934 , Sec. 5(2), eff. June 18, 2015.


(d) The questions adopted under this section may not be administered in a separate section of the end-of-course assessment instrument.


Added by Acts 2007, 80th Leg., R.S., Ch. 1312 (S.B. 1031), Sec. 9, eff. September 1, 2007.


Amended by:


Acts 2009, 81st Leg., R.S., Ch. 895 (H.B. 3), Sec. 51, eff. June 19, 2009.


Acts 2013, 83rd Leg., R.S., Ch. 161 (S.B. 1093), Sec. 4.005, eff. September 1, 2013.


Acts 2013, 83rd Leg., R.S., Ch. 211 (H.B. 5), Sec. 33(a), eff. June 10, 2013.


Acts 2015, 84th Leg., R.S., Ch. 934 (H.B. 2349), Sec. 5(2), eff. June 18, 2015.


Acts 2017, 85th Leg., R.S., Ch. 842 (H.B. 2223), Sec. 2.03, eff. June 15, 2017.


Acts 2019, 86th Leg., R.S., Ch. 597 (S.B. 668), Sec. 1.11, eff. June 10, 2019.


Acts 2019, 86th Leg., R.S., Ch. 943 (H.B. 3), Sec. 3.043, eff. September 1, 2019.


The following section was amended by the 87th Legislature. Pending publication of the current statutes, see H.B. 3261, 87th Legislature, Regular Session, for amendments affecting the following section.



Sec. 39.0234. ELECTRONIC ADMINISTRATION OF ASSESSMENT INSTRUMENTS. The agency shall ensure that assessment instruments required under Section 39.023 are capable of being administered electronically.


Added by Acts 2007, 80th Leg., R.S., Ch. 1312 (S.B. 1031), Sec. 9, eff. September 1, 2007.


Amended by:


Acts 2009, 81st Leg., R.S., Ch. 895 (H.B. 3), Sec. 52, eff. June 19, 2009.


Acts 2019, 86th Leg., R.S., Ch. 1315 (H.B. 3906), Sec. 5, eff. June 14, 2019.


The following section was amended by the 87th Legislature. Pending publication of the current statutes, see H.B. 3261, 87th Legislature, Regular Session, for amendments affecting the following section.



For expiration of this section, see Subsection (d).



Sec. 39.02341. TRANSITION TO ELECTRONIC ADMINISTRATION OF ASSESSMENT INSTRUMENTS. (a) The agency, in consultation with the State Board of Education, shall develop a transition plan to administer all assessment instruments required under Section 39.023 electronically beginning not later than the 2022-2023 school year. The plan must:


(1) evaluate the availability of Internet access for each school district in this state;


(2) identify changes to state law or policy necessary to improve the availability of Internet access described by Subdivision (1);


(3) evaluate the state's experience with administering online assessment instruments, including the occurrence or effects of power outages or other types of disruptions of Internet service, and actions taken by the state to mitigate the occurrence and effect of those disruptions; and


(4) identify and evaluate actions taken by the state to improve the administration of online assessment instruments.


(b) The agency shall implement the transition plan beginning on September 1, 2021. In order to ensure legislative approval of the transition plan, this subsection expires August 31, 2021.


(c) Not later than December 1, 2020, the agency shall submit to the governor, the lieutenant governor, and the members of the legislature a report on the plan developed under Subsection (a). The report must include:


(1) information from school districts assessing the needs of those districts in transitioning to electronic administration;


(2) any recommended changes to state law to assist in the transition; and


(3) a recommended timeline for statewide implementation of electronic administration.


(d) This section expires September 1, 2023.


Added by Acts 2019, 86th Leg., R.S., Ch. 1315 (H.B. 3906), Sec. 6, eff. June 14, 2019.


Sec. 39.0235. TECHNOLOGY LITERACY ASSESSMENT PILOT PROGRAM. (a) In this section, "pilot program" means the technology literacy assessment pilot program.


(b) The commissioner by rule shall establish a pilot program in which a participating school district assesses student technology proficiency.


(c) A school district may apply to the commissioner to participate in the pilot program. The commissioner shall select for participation school districts from both rural and urban areas of the state.


(d) The agency shall adopt an assessment instrument designed to assess an individual student's mastery of the essential knowledge and skills in technology to be administered by a school district participating in the pilot program. The assessment instrument adopted under this subsection must be an existing product that is currently available.


(e) Each school year, the assessment instrument adopted under Subsection (d) shall be administered in a participating school district to each student in either fifth, sixth, seventh, eighth, or ninth grade, with the grade level and time to be determined by the district.


(f) The assessment instrument adopted under Subsection (d) must:


(1) be administered online;


(2) be aligned with the essential knowledge and skills requirements for technology applications; and


(3) incorporate performance-based measures, including a requirement that students perform certain technological tasks and respond to questions based on the completion of those tasks.


(g) An assessment instrument administered by a participating school district must be designed in a manner to provide the district with an automatic report of the technology literacy proficiency of a district student in a format that is compatible with the school district and state data information systems.


(h) A participating school district shall report student performance on the assessment instrument to the agency.


Added by Acts 2007, 80th Leg., R.S., Ch. 1237 (H.B. 2503), Sec. 1, eff. June 15, 2007.


Sec. 39.0236. INTEGRATED FORMATIVE ASSESSMENT PILOT PROGRAM. (a) The agency shall establish a pilot program in which participating school districts administer to students integrated formative assessment instruments for subjects or courses for a grade level subject to assessment under Section 28.006 or 39.023.


(b) A school district may elect to participate in the pilot program.


(c) A school district's participation in the pilot program does not affect the district's obligations regarding the administration of assessment instruments required under Section 39.023.


(d) Not later than December 1 of each even-numbered year, the agency shall submit to the governor, the lieutenant governor, and the members of the legislature a report on the pilot program that includes:


(1) an analysis of whether the administration of integrated formative assessment instruments under the pilot program provided any improvement in instructional support during the preceding two school years; and


(2) a determination of the feasibility of replacing the assessment instruments required under Section 39.023 with integrated formative assessment instruments.


Added by Acts 2019, 86th Leg., R.S., Ch. 1315 (H.B. 3906), Sec. 6, eff. June 14, 2019.


Sec. 39.0237. CONSIDERATION OF PREKINDERGARTEN ASSESSMENT INSTRUMENTS PROHIBITED. Performance on an assessment instrument administered to students in prekindergarten may not be considered for any purpose under this chapter or Chapter 39A.


Added by Acts 2019, 86th Leg., R.S., Ch. 1315 (H.B. 3906), Sec. 6, eff. June 14, 2019.


The following section was amended by the 87th Legislature. Pending publication of the current statutes, see H.B. 4545, 87th Legislature, Regular Session, for amendments affecting the following section.



Sec. 39.0238. ADOPTION AND ADMINISTRATION OF POSTSECONDARY READINESS ASSESSMENT INSTRUMENTS. (a) In addition to other assessment instruments adopted and developed under this subchapter, the agency shall adopt or develop appropriate postsecondary readiness assessment instruments for Algebra II and English III that a school district may administer at the district's option.


(b) To the extent practicable, the agency shall ensure that each postsecondary readiness assessment instrument:


(1) assesses essential knowledge and skills and growth;


(2) is developed in a manner that measures a student's performance under the college readiness standards established under Section 28.008; and


(3) is validated by national postsecondary education experts for college readiness content and performance standards.


(c) In adopting a schedule for the administration of postsecondary readiness assessment instruments under this section, the State Board of Education shall require the annual administration of the postsecondary readiness assessment instruments to occur not earlier than the second full week in May.


(d) The agency shall adopt a policy requiring each school district that elects to administer postsecondary readiness assessment instruments under Subsection (a) to annually:


(1) administer the applicable postsecondary readiness assessment instrument to each student enrolled in a course for which a postsecondary readiness assessment instrument is adopted or developed under Subsection (a), including applied Algebra II; and


(2) report the results of the postsecondary readiness assessment instruments to the agency.


(e) The agency shall annually deliver a report to the governor, the lieutenant governor, the speaker of the house of representatives, and the presiding officers of the standing committees of the legislature with jurisdiction over public education. The report must include a summary of student performance on the preceding year's postsecondary readiness assessment instruments.


(f) The results of a postsecondary readiness assessment instrument administered under this section may not be used by:


(1) the agency for accountability purposes for a school campus or school district;


(2) a school district:


(A) for the purpose of teacher evaluations; or


(B) in determining a student's final course grade or determining a student's class rank for the purpose of high school graduation; or


(3) an institution of higher education:


(A) for admission purposes; or


(B) to determine eligibility for a TEXAS grant.


(g) A school district may not administer an additional benchmark assessment instrument solely for the purpose of preparing for a postsecondary readiness assessment instrument administered under this section. In this subsection, "benchmark assessment instrument" means a district-required assessment instrument designed to prepare students for a postsecondary readiness assessment instrument administered under this section.


(h) The agency shall acknowledge a school district that elects to administer the postsecondary readiness assessment instruments as provided by Subsection (a).


Added by Acts 2013, 83rd Leg., R.S., Ch. 211 (H.B. 5), Sec. 34(a), eff. June 10, 2013.


Sec. 39.024. MEASURE OF COLLEGE READINESS. (a) In this section, "college readiness" means the level of preparation a student must attain in English language arts and mathematics courses to enroll and succeed, without remediation, in an entry-level general education course for credit in that same content area for a baccalaureate degree or associate degree program at:


(1) a general academic teaching institution, as defined by Section 61.003, other than a research institution, as categorized under the Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board's accountability system; or


(2) a postsecondary educational institution that primarily offers associate degrees or certificates or credentials other than baccalaureate or advanced degrees.


(b) Repealed by Acts 2013, 83rd Leg., R.S., Ch. 211, Sec. 78(a)(2), eff. September 1, 2013.


(c) Repealed by Acts 2013, 83rd Leg., R.S., Ch. 211, Sec. 78(a)(2), eff. September 1, 2013.


(d) Repealed by Acts 2013, 83rd Leg., R.S., Ch. 211, Sec. 78(a)(2), eff. September 1, 2013.


(e) Repealed by Acts 2013, 83rd Leg., R.S., Ch. 211, Sec. 78(a)(2), eff. September 1, 2013.


(f) Repealed by Acts 2013, 83rd Leg., R.S., Ch. 211, Sec. 78(a)(2), eff. September 1, 2013.


(g) Repealed by Acts 2013, 83rd Leg., R.S., Ch. 211, Sec. 78(a)(2), eff. September 1, 2013.


(h) Repealed by Acts 2013, 83rd Leg., R.S., Ch. 211, Sec. 78(a)(2), eff. September 1, 2013.


(i) The agency shall gather data and conduct research to substantiate any correlation between a certain level of performance by students on end-of-course assessment instruments and success in:


(1) military service; or


(2) a workforce training, certification, or other credential program at a postsecondary educational institution that primarily offers associate degrees or certificates or credentials other than baccalaureate or advanced degrees.


Added by Acts 1995, 74th Leg., ch. 260, Sec. 1, eff. May 30, 1995. Amended by Acts 1997, 75th Leg., ch. 767, Sec. 2, eff. Sept. 1, 1997; Acts 1999, 76th Leg., ch. 396, Sec. 2.19, eff. Sept. 1, 1999; Acts 1999, 76th Leg., ch. 397, Sec. 4, eff. Sept. 1, 1999; Acts 2001, 77th Leg., ch. 1420, Sec. 4.006, eff. Sept. 1, 2001; Acts 2003, 78th Leg., ch. 1212, Sec. 12, 14, eff. June 20, 2003.


Amended by:


Acts 2009, 81st Leg., R.S., Ch. 895 (H.B. 3), Sec. 53, eff. June 19, 2009.


Acts 2009, 81st Leg., R.S., Ch. 1328 (H.B. 3646), Sec. 40, eff. September 1, 2009.


Acts 2009, 81st Leg., R.S., Ch. 1328 (H.B. 3646), Sec. 105(a)(5), eff. September 1, 2009.


Acts 2013, 83rd Leg., R.S., Ch. 211 (H.B. 5), Sec. 78(a)(2), eff. September 1, 2013.


The following section was amended by the 87th Legislature. Pending publication of the current statutes, see S.B. 2066, 87th Legislature, Regular Session, for amendments affecting the following section.



Sec. 39.0241. PERFORMANCE STANDARDS. (a) The commissioner shall determine the level of performance considered to be satisfactory on the assessment instruments.


(a-1) The commissioner of education, in collaboration with the commissioner of higher education, shall determine the level of performance necessary to indicate college readiness, as defined by Section 39.024(a).


(a-2) Repealed by Acts 2013, 83rd Leg., R.S., Ch. 211, Sec. 78(a)(3), eff. September 1, 2013.


(c) Using funds appropriated for purposes of this subsection, the agency may develop study guides for the assessment instruments administered under Sections 39.023(a) and (c). To assist parents in providing assistance during the period that school is recessed for summer, each school district shall make the study guides available to parents of students who do not perform satisfactorily as determined by the commissioner under Subsection (a) on one or more parts of an assessment instrument administered under this subchapter.


(d) Using funds appropriated for purposes of this subsection, the agency shall develop and make available teacher training materials and other teacher training resources to assist teachers in enabling students of limited English proficiency to meet state performance expectations. The teacher training resources shall be designed to support intensive, individualized, and accelerated instructional programs developed by school districts for students of limited English proficiency.


Added by Acts 2009, 81st Leg., R.S., Ch. 895 (H.B. 3), Sec. 53, eff. June 19, 2009.


Amended by:


Acts 2013, 83rd Leg., R.S., Ch. 211 (H.B. 5), Sec. 78(a)(3), eff. September 1, 2013.


The following section was amended by the 87th Legislature. Pending publication of the current statutes, see H.B. 1603 and H.B. 4545, 87th Legislature, Regular Session, for amendments affecting the following section.



(a-2) The commissioner shall determine a method by which a student's satisfactory performance on an advanced placement test, an international baccalaureate examination, an SAT Subject Test, the SAT, the ACT, or any nationally recognized norm-referenced assessment instrument used by institutions of higher education to award course credit based on satisfactory performance on the assessment instrument shall be used to satisfy the requirements concerning an end-of-course assessment instrument in an equivalent course as prescribed by Subsection (a). The commissioner shall determine a method by which a student's satisfactory performance on the PSAT or the ACT-Plan shall be used to satisfy the requirements concerning an end-of-course assessment instrument in an equivalent course as prescribed by Subsection (a). A student who fails to perform satisfactorily on a test or other assessment instrument authorized under this subsection, other than the PSAT or the ACT-Plan, may retake that test or other assessment instrument for purposes of this subsection or may take the appropriate end-of-course assessment instrument. A student who fails to perform satisfactorily on the PSAT or the ACT-Plan must take the appropriate end-of-course assessment instrument. The commissioner shall adopt rules as necessary for the administration of this subsection.


(a-3) A student who, after retaking an end-of-course assessment instrument for Algebra I or English II, has failed to perform satisfactorily as required by Subsection (a), but who receives a score of proficient on the Texas Success Initiative (TSI) diagnostic assessment for the corresponding subject for which the student failed to perform satisfactorily on the end-of-course assessment instrument satisfies the requirement concerning the Algebra I or English II end-of-course assessment, as applicable. This subsection expires September 1, 2023.


(a-4) The admission, review, and dismissal committee of a student in a special education program under Subchapter A, Chapter 29, shall determine whether, to receive a high school diploma, the student is required to achieve satisfactory performance on end-of-course assessment instruments.


(a-5) Notwithstanding Subsection (a), a student who has failed to perform satisfactorily on end-of-course assessment instruments in the manner provided under this section may receive a high school diploma if the student has qualified for graduation under Section 28.0258. This subsection expires September 1, 2023.


(b) Each time an end-of-course assessment instrument adopted under Section 39.023(c) is administered, a student who failed to achieve a score requirement under Subsection (a) may retake the assessment instrument. A student is not required to retake a course as a condition of retaking an end-of-course assessment instrument.


(b-1) A school district shall provide each student who fails to perform satisfactorily as determined by the commissioner under Section 39.0241(a) on an end-of-course assessment instrument with accelerated instruction in the subject assessed by the assessment instrument.


(b-2) Repealed by Acts 2015, 84th Leg., R.S., Ch. 934 , Sec. 5(3), eff. June 18, 2015.


(c) A student who has been denied a high school diploma under this section and who subsequently performs at the level necessary to comply with the requirements of this section shall be issued a high school diploma.


(c-1) A school district may not administer an assessment instrument required for graduation administered under this section as this section existed:


(1) before September 1, 1999; or


(2) before amendment by Chapter 1312 (S.B. 1031), Acts of the 80th Legislature, Regular Session, 2007.


(c-2) A school district may administer to a student who failed to perform satisfactorily on an assessment instrument described by Subsection (c-1) an alternate assessment instrument designated by the commissioner. The commissioner shall determine the level of performance considered to be satisfactory on an alternate assessment instrument. The district may not administer to the student an assessment instrument or a part of an assessment instrument that assesses a subject that was not assessed in an assessment instrument applicable to the student described by Subsection (c-1). The commissioner shall make available to districts information necessary to administer the alternate assessment instrument authorized by this subsection. The commissioner's determination regarding designation of an appropriate alternate assessment instrument under this subsection and the performance required on the assessment instrument is final and may not be appealed.


(d) Notwithstanding Subsection (a), the commissioner by rule shall adopt one or more alternative nationally recognized norm referenced assessment instruments under this section to administer to a student to qualify for a high school diploma if the student enrolls after January 1 of the school year in which the student is otherwise eligible to graduate:


(1) for the first time in a public school in this state; or


(2) after an absence of at least four years from any public school in this state.


(e) The commissioner shall establish a required performance level for an assessment instrument adopted under Subsection (d) that is at least as rigorous as the performance level required to be met under Subsection (a).


(e-1) Nothing in this section has the effect of prohibiting the administration of an end-of-course assessment instrument listed in Section 39.023(c) to a student enrolled below the high school level who is enrolled in the course for which the assessment instrument is adopted. The commissioner shall adopt rules necessary to ensure that the student's performance on the assessment instrument is considered in the same manner for purposes of this section as the performance of a student enrolled at the high school level.


(f) The commissioner shall by rule adopt a transition plan to implement the amendments made by Chapter 1312 (S.B. No. 1031), Acts of the 80th Legislature, Regular Session, 2007, replacing general subject assessment instruments administered at the high school level with end-of-course assessment instruments. The rules must provide for the end-of-course assessment instruments adopted under Section 39.023(c) to be administered beginning with students enrolled in the ninth grade for the first time during the 2011-2012 school year. During the period under which the transition to end-of-course assessment instruments is made:


(1) for students entering a grade above the ninth grade during the 2011-2012 school year or students repeating ninth grade during the 2011-2012 school year, the commissioner shall retain, administer, and use for purposes of accreditation and other campus and district accountability measures under this chapter the assessment instruments required by Section 39.023(a) or (c), as that section existed before amendment by Chapter 1312 (S.B. No. 1031), Acts of the 80th Legislature, Regular Session, 2007; and


(2) a student subject to Subdivision (1) may not receive a high school diploma unless the student has performed satisfactorily on the SAT, the ACT, the Texas Success Initiative (TSI) diagnostic assessment, or the current assessment instrument or instruments administered for graduation purposes as provided by Subsection (f-1) or on each required assessment instrument administered under Section 39.023(c), as that section existed before amendment by Chapter 1312 (S.B. No. 1031), Acts of the 80th Legislature, Regular Session, 2007.


(f-1) The commissioner shall establish satisfactory performance levels for the SAT, the ACT, the Texas Success Initiative (TSI) diagnostic assessment, and the current assessment instrument or instruments administered for graduation purposes that are equivalent in rigor to the performance level required to be met under Subsection (a), as that subsection existed before amendment by Chapter 1312 (S.B. No. 1031), Acts of the 80th Legislature, Regular Session, 2007, that qualify a student subject to Subsection (f)(1) to receive a high school diploma. Notwithstanding Subsection (f), the commissioner is not required after September 1, 2017, to maintain and administer assessment instruments administered under Section 39.023(c), as that section existed before amendment by Chapter 1312 (S.B. No. 1031), Acts of the 80th Legislature, Regular Session, 2007.


(f-2) A school district shall determine which assessment or assessments described by Subsection (f-1) qualify a student subject to Subsection (f)(1) to receive a high school diploma from the district.


(g) Rules adopted under Subsection (f) must require that each student who will be subject to the requirements of Subsection (a) is entitled to notice of the specific requirements applicable to the student. Notice under this subsection must be provided not later than the date the student enters the eighth grade.


Added by Acts 1995, 74th Leg., ch. 260, Sec. 1, eff. May 30, 1995. Amended by Acts 1997, 75th Leg., ch. 767, Sec. 3, eff. Sept. 1, 1997; Acts 1999, 76th Leg., ch. 397, Sec. 5, eff. Sept. 1, 1999.


Amended by:


Acts 2005, 79th Leg., Ch. 164 (H.B. 25), Sec. 6, eff. May 27, 2005.


Acts 2007, 80th Leg., R.S., Ch. 1312 (S.B. 1031), Sec. 10, eff. September 1, 2007.


Acts 2009, 81st Leg., R.S., Ch. 895 (H.B. 3), Sec. 54, eff. June 19, 2009.


Acts 2011, 82nd Leg., R.S., Ch. 307 (H.B. 2135), Sec. 4, eff. June 17, 2011.


Acts 2013, 83rd Leg., R.S., Ch. 211 (H.B. 5), Sec. 35(a), eff. June 10, 2013.


Acts 2013, 83rd Leg., R.S., Ch. 211 (H.B. 5), Sec. 36(a), eff. September 1, 2014.


Acts 2013, 83rd Leg., R.S., Ch. 211 (H.B. 5), Sec. 78(a)(5), eff. September 1, 2013.


Acts 2015, 84th Leg., R.S., Ch. 5 (S.B. 149), Sec. 4, eff. May 11, 2015.


Acts 2015, 84th Leg., R.S., Ch. 934 (H.B. 2349), Sec. 4, eff. June 18, 2015.


Acts 2015, 84th Leg., R.S., Ch. 934 (H.B. 2349), Sec. 5(3), eff. June 18, 2015.


Acts 2015, 84th Leg., R.S., Ch. 1036 (H.B. 1613), Sec. 2, eff. June 19, 2015.


Acts 2017, 85th Leg., R.S., Ch. 549 (S.B. 463), Sec. 9, eff. June 9, 2017.


Acts 2017, 85th Leg., R.S., Ch. 549 (S.B. 463), Sec. 10, eff. June 9, 2017.


Acts 2017, 85th Leg., R.S., Ch. 549 (S.B. 463), Sec. 11, eff. September 1, 2019.


Acts 2017, 85th Leg., R.S., Ch. 722 (S.B. 1005), Sec. 1, eff. June 12, 2017.


Acts 2017, 85th Leg., R.S., Ch. 842 (H.B. 2223), Sec. 2.04, eff. June 15, 2017.


Redesignated and amended by Acts 2019, 86th Leg., R.S., Ch. 14 (S.B. 213), Sec. 8, eff. May 7, 2019.


Amended by:


Acts 2019, 86th Leg., R.S., Ch. 14 (S.B. 213), Sec. 9, eff. May 7, 2019.


Sec. 39.026. LOCAL OPTION. In addition to the assessment instruments adopted by the agency and administered by the State Board of Education, a school district may adopt and administer criterion-referenced or norm-referenced assessment instruments, or both, at any grade level. A norm-referenced assessment instrument adopted under this section must be economical, nationally recognized, and state-approved.


Added by Acts 1995, 74th Leg., ch. 260, Sec. 1, eff. May 30, 1995.


The following section was amended by the 87th Legislature. Pending publication of the current statutes, see H.B. 1525, 87th Legislature, Regular Session, for amendments affecting the following section.



Sec. 39.0261. COLLEGE PREPARATION ASSESSMENTS. (a) In addition to the assessment instruments otherwise authorized or required by this subchapter:


(1) each school year and at state cost, a school district may administer to students in the spring of the eighth grade an established, valid, reliable, and nationally norm-referenced preliminary college preparation assessment instrument for the purpose of diagnosing the academic strengths and deficiencies of students before entrance into high school;


(2) each school year and at state cost, a school district may administer to students in the 10th grade an established, valid, reliable, and nationally norm-referenced preliminary college preparation assessment instrument for the purpose of measuring a student's progress toward readiness for college and the workplace; and


(3) high school students in the spring of the 11th grade or during the 12th grade may select and take once, at state cost:


(A) one of the valid, reliable, and nationally norm-referenced assessment instruments used by colleges and universities as part of their undergraduate admissions processes; or


(B) the assessment instrument designated by the Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board under Section 51.334.


(b) The agency shall:


(1) select and approve vendors of the specific assessment instruments administered under this section; and


(2) provide reimbursement to a school district for all fees associated with the administration of the assessment instrument from funds appropriated for that purpose.


(c) The agency shall ensure that a school district is not reimbursed under Subsection (b) for the administration of an assessment instrument to a student to whom the assessment instrument is not actually administered. The agency may comply with this subsection by any reasonable means, including by creating a refund system under which a school district returns any payment made for a student who registered for the administration of an assessment instrument but did not appear for the administration.


(d) A vendor that administers an assessment instrument for a district under this section shall report the results of the assessment instrument to the agency. The agency shall:


(1) include a student's results on the assessment instrument in the electronic student records system established under Section 7.010; and


(2) ensure that a student and the student's parent receive a report of the student's results on the assessment instrument.


(e) Subsection (a)(3) does not prohibit a high school student from selecting and taking, at the student's own expense, an assessment instrument described by that subdivision.


(f) The provisions of this section regarding assessment instruments administered under Subsection (a)(1) or (2) apply only if the legislature appropriates funds for those purposes.


Added by Acts 2007, 80th Leg., R.S., Ch. 1312 (S.B. 1031), Sec. 11, eff. September 1, 2007.


Amended by:


Acts 2015, 84th Leg., R.S., Ch. 1006 (H.B. 743), Sec. 3, eff. June 19, 2015.


Acts 2017, 85th Leg., R.S., Ch. 582 (S.B. 825), Sec. 1, eff. June 9, 2017.


Acts 2019, 86th Leg., R.S., Ch. 943 (H.B. 3), Sec. 2.034, eff. June 12, 2019.


Sec. 39.0262. ADMINISTRATION OF DISTRICT-REQUIRED ASSESSMENT INSTRUMENTS IN CERTAIN SUBJECT AREAS. (a) In a subject area for which assessment instruments are administered under Section 39.023, a school district may not administer locally required assessment instruments designed to prepare students for state-administered assessment instruments to any student on more than 10 percent of the instructional days in any school year. A campus-level planning and decision-making committee established under Section 11.251 may limit the administration of locally required assessment instruments under this subsection to 10 percent or a lower percentage of the instructional days in any school year.


(b) The prohibition prescribed by this section does not apply to the administration of a college preparation assessment instrument, an advanced placement test, an international baccalaureate examination, or an assessment instrument administered under Section 39.023.


Added by Acts 2007, 80th Leg., R.S., Ch. 1312 (S.B. 1031), Sec. 11, eff. September 1, 2007.


Amended by:


Acts 2009, 81st Leg., R.S., Ch. 895 (H.B. 3), Sec. 55, eff. June 19, 2009.


Sec. 39.0263. ADMINISTRATION OF DISTRICT-REQUIRED BENCHMARK ASSESSMENT INSTRUMENTS TO PREPARE STUDENTS FOR STATE-ADMINISTERED ASSESSMENT INSTRUMENTS. (a) In this section, "benchmark assessment instrument" means a district-required assessment instrument designed to prepare students for a corresponding state-administered assessment instrument.


(b) Except as provided by Subsection (c), a school district may not administer to any student more than two benchmark assessment instruments to prepare the student for a corresponding state-administered assessment instrument.


(c) The prohibition prescribed by this section does not apply to the administration of a college preparation assessment instrument, including the PSAT, the ACT-Plan, the SAT, or the ACT, an advanced placement test, an international baccalaureate examination, or an independent classroom examination designed or adopted and administered by a classroom teacher.


(d) A parent of or person standing in parental relation to a student who has special needs, as determined in accordance with commissioner rule, may request administration to the student of additional benchmark assessment instruments.


Added by Acts 2013, 83rd Leg., R.S., Ch. 211 (H.B. 5), Sec. 37(a), eff. June 10, 2013.


The following section was amended by the 87th Legislature. Pending publication of the current statutes, see S.B. 2066, 87th Legislature, Regular Session, for amendments affecting the following section.



Sec. 39.027. EXEMPTION.


(a) A student may be administered an accommodated or alternative assessment instrument or may be granted an exemption from or a postponement of the administration of an assessment instrument under:


(1) Section 39.023(a), (b), (c), or (l) for a period of up to one year after initial enrollment in a school in the United States if the student is of limited English proficiency, as defined by Section 29.052, and has not demonstrated proficiency in English as determined by the assessment system under Subsection (e);


(2) Section 39.023(a), (b), (c), or (l) for a period of up to two years in addition to the exemption period authorized by Subdivision (1) if the student has received an exemption under Subdivision (1) and:


(A) is a recent unschooled immigrant; or


(B) is in a grade for which no assessment instrument in the primary language of the student is available; or


(3) Section 39.023(a), (b), (c), or (l) for a period of up to four years, in addition to the exemption period authorized under Subdivision (1), if the student's initial enrollment in a school in the United States was as an unschooled asylee or refugee.


(a-1) For purposes of this section, "unschooled asylee or refugee" means a student who:


(1) initially enrolled in a school in the United States as:


(A) an asylee as defined by 45 C.F.R. Section 400.41; or


(B) a refugee as defined by 8 U.S.C. Section 1101;


(2) has a visa issued by the United States Department of State with a Form I-94 Arrival/Departure record, or a successor document, issued by the United States Citizenship and Immigration Services that is stamped with "Asylee," "Refugee," or "Asylum"; and


(3) as a result of inadequate schooling outside of the United States, lacks the necessary foundation in the essential knowledge and skills of the curriculum prescribed under Section 28.002, as determined by the language proficiency assessment committee established under Section 29.063.


(a-2) Unless a student is enrolled in a school in the United States for a period of at least 60 consecutive days during a year, the student may not be considered to be enrolled in a school in the United States for that year for the purpose of determining a number of years under Subsection (a)(1), (2), or (3).


(b) The State Board of Education shall adopt rules under which a dyslexic student who is not exempt under Subsection (a) may use procedures including oral examinations if appropriate or may be allowed additional time or the materials or technology necessary for the student to demonstrate the student's mastery of the competencies the assessment instruments are designed to measure.


(c) The commissioner shall develop and adopt a process for reviewing the exemption process of a school district or shared services arrangement that gives an exemption under Subsection (a)(1) as follows:


(1) to more than five percent of the students in the special education program, in the case of a district or shared services arrangement with an average daily attendance of at least 1,600;


(2) to more than 10 percent of the students in the special education program, in the case of a district or shared services arrangement with an average daily attendance of at least 190 and not more than 1,599; or


(3) to the greater of more than 10 percent of the students in the special education program or to at least five students in the special education program, in the case of a district or shared services arrangement with an average daily attendance of not more than 189.


(d) Expired.


(e) The commissioner shall develop an assessment system that shall be used for evaluating the academic progress, including reading proficiency in English, of all students of limited English proficiency, as defined by Section 29.052. A student who is exempt from the administration of an assessment instrument under Subsection (a)(1) or (2) who achieves reading proficiency in English as determined by the assessment system developed under this subsection shall be administered the assessment instruments described by Sections 39.023(a) and (c). The performance under the assessment system developed under this subsection of students to whom Subsection (a)(1) or (2) applies shall be included in the indicator systems under Section 39.301, as applicable, the performance report under Section 39.306, and the comprehensive biennial report under Section 39.332. This information shall be provided in a manner that is disaggregated by the bilingual education or special language program, if any, in which the student is enrolled.


(f) In this section, "average daily attendance" is computed in the manner provided by Section 48.005.


Added by Acts 1995, 74th Leg., ch. 260, Sec. 1, eff. May 30, 1995. Amended by Acts 1997, 75th Leg., ch. 767, Sec. 4, eff. Sept. 1, 1997; Acts 1999, 76th Leg., ch. 397, Sec. 6, eff. Sept. 1, 1999; Acts 2001, 77th Leg., ch. 8, Sec. 2, eff. April 11, 2001; Acts 2001, 77th Leg., ch. 725, Sec. 3, eff. June 13, 2001; Acts 2003, 78th Leg., ch. 1276, Sec. 6.007, eff. Sept. 1, 2003.


Amended by:


Acts 2007, 80th Leg., R.S., Ch. 1340 (S.B. 1871), Sec. 4, eff. June 15, 2007.


Acts 2009, 81st Leg., R.S., Ch. 895 (H.B. 3), Sec. 56, eff. June 19, 2009.


Acts 2013, 83rd Leg., R.S., Ch. 211 (H.B. 5), Sec. 38(a), eff. June 10, 2013.


Acts 2013, 83rd Leg., R.S., Ch. 413 (S.B. 377), Sec. 1, eff. September 1, 2013.


Acts 2013, 83rd Leg., R.S., Ch. 1312 (S.B. 59), Sec. 7, eff. September 1, 2013.


Acts 2019, 86th Leg., R.S., Ch. 943 (H.B. 3), Sec. 3.044, eff. September 1, 2019.


Sec. 39.028. COMPARISON OF STATE RESULTS TO NATIONAL RESULTS. The state assessment program shall obtain nationally comparative results for the subject areas and grade levels for which criterion-referenced assessment instruments are adopted under Section 39.023.


Added by Acts 1995, 74th Leg., ch. 260, Sec. 1, eff. May 30, 1995.


Sec. 39.029. MIGRATORY CHILDREN. The State Board of Education by rule may provide alternate dates for the administration of the assessment instruments to a student who is a migratory child as defined by 20 U.S.C. Section 6399. The alternate dates may be chosen following a consideration of migrant work patterns, and the dates selected may afford maximum opportunity for the students to be present when the assessment instruments are administered.


Added by Acts 1995, 74th Leg., ch. 260, Sec. 1, eff. May 30, 1995.


Sec. 39.030. CONFIDENTIALITY; PERFORMANCE REPORTS. (a) In adopting academic skills assessment instruments under this subchapter, the State Board of Education or a school district shall ensure the security of the instruments and tests in their preparation, administration, and grading. Meetings or portions of meetings held by the State Board of Education or a school district at which individual assessment instruments or assessment instrument items are discussed or adopted are not open to the public under Chapter 551, Government Code, and the assessment instruments or assessment instrument items are confidential.


(b) The results of individual student performance on academic skills assessment instruments administered under this subchapter are confidential and may be released only in accordance with the Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act of 1974 (20 U.S.C. Section 1232g). However, overall student performance data shall be aggregated by ethnicity, sex, grade level, subject area, campus, and district and made available to the public, with appropriate interpretations, at regularly scheduled meetings of the board of trustees of each school district. The information may not contain the names of individual students or teachers.


(c) Repealed by Acts 2001, 77th Leg., ch. 767, Sec. 11, eff. June 13, 2001.


Added by Acts 1995, 74th Leg., ch. 260, Sec. 1, eff. May 30, 1995. Amended by Acts 2001, 77th Leg., ch. 767, Sec. 11, eff. June 13, 2001.


Sec. 39.0301. SECURITY IN ADMINISTRATION OF ASSESSMENT INSTRUMENTS. (a) The commissioner:


(1) shall establish procedures for the administration of assessment instruments adopted or developed under Section 39.023, including procedures designed to ensure the security of the assessment instruments; and


(2) may establish record retention requirements for school district records related to the security of assessment instruments.


(a-1) In establishing procedures under Subsection (a)(1) for the administration of assessment instruments, the commissioner shall ensure that the procedures are designed to minimize disruptions to school operations and the classroom environment. In implementing the procedures established under Subsection (a)(1) for the administration of assessment instruments, a school district shall minimize disruptions to school operations and the classroom environment.


(b) The commissioner may develop and implement statistical methods and standards for identifying potential violations of procedures established under Subsection (a) to ensure the security of assessment instruments adopted or developed under Section 39.023. In developing the statistical methods and standards, the commissioner may include indicators of:


(1) potential violations that are monitored annually; and


(2) patterns of inappropriate assessment practices that occur over time.


(c) The commissioner may establish one or more advisory committees to advise the commissioner and agency regarding the monitoring of assessment practices and the use of statistical methods and standards for identifying potential violations of assessment instrument security, including standards to be established by the commissioner for selecting school districts for investigation for a potential assessment security violation under Subsection (e). The commissioner may not appoint an agency employee to an advisory committee established under this subsection.


(d) Any document created for the deliberation of an advisory committee established under Subsection (c) or any recommendation of such a committee is confidential and not subject to disclosure under Chapter 552, Government Code. Except as provided by Subsection (e), the statistical methods and standards adopted under this section and the results of applying those methods and standards are confidential and not subject to disclosure under Chapter 552, Government Code.


(e) The agency may conduct an investigation of a school district for a potential violation of assessment instrument security in accordance with the standards described by Subsection (c). Each school year, after completing all investigations of school districts selected for investigation, the agency shall disclose the identity of each district selected for investigation and the statistical methods and standards used to select the district.


(f) At any time, the commissioner may authorize the audit of a random sample of school districts to determine the compliance of the districts with procedures established under Subsection (a). The identity of each school district selected for audit under this subsection is confidential and not subject to disclosure under Chapter 552, Government Code, except that the agency shall disclose the identity of each district after completion of the audit.


(g) The state auditor may conduct a risk-based audit of a school district at any time to ensure the security of assessment instruments administered under Section 39.023 in the district.


Added by Acts 2007, 80th Leg., R.S., Ch. 1312 (S.B. 1031), Sec. 12, eff. September 1, 2007.


Amended by:


Acts 2013, 83rd Leg., R.S., Ch. 211 (H.B. 5), Sec. 39, eff. June 10, 2013.


The following section was amended by the 87th Legislature. Pending publication of the current statutes, see S.B. 1365, 87th Legislature, Regular Session, for amendments affecting the following section.



Sec. 39.0302. ISSUANCE OF SUBPOENAS. (a) During an agency investigation or audit of a school district under Section 39.0301(e) or (f), an accreditation investigation under Section 39.057(a)(8) or (14), a compliance review under Section 21.006(k), 22.093(l), or 22.096, or an investigation by the State Board for Educator Certification of an educator for an alleged violation of an assessment instrument security procedure established under Section 39.0301(a), the commissioner may issue a subpoena to compel the attendance of a relevant witness or the production, for inspection or copying, of relevant evidence that is located in this state.


(b) A subpoena may be served personally or by certified mail.


(c) If a person fails to comply with a subpoena, the commissioner, acting through the attorney general, may file suit to enforce the subpoena in a district court in this state. On finding that good cause exists for issuing the subpoena, the court shall order the person to comply with the subpoena. The court may punish a person who fails to obey the court order.


(d) All information and materials subpoenaed or compiled in connection with an investigation or audit described by Subsection (a):


(1) are confidential and not subject to disclosure under Chapter 552, Government Code; and


(2) are not subject to disclosure, discovery, subpoena, or other means of legal compulsion for release to any person other than:


(A) the commissioner or the State Board for Educator Certification, as applicable;


(B) agency employees or agents involved in the investigation, as applicable; and


(C) the office of the attorney general, the state auditor's office, and law enforcement agencies.


Added by Acts 2007, 80th Leg., R.S., Ch. 1312 (S.B. 1031), Sec. 12, eff. September 1, 2007.


Amended by:


Acts 2013, 83rd Leg., R.S., Ch. 509 (S.B. 123), Sec. 1, eff. June 14, 2013.


Acts 2015, 84th Leg., R.S., Ch. 1236 (S.B. 1296), Sec. 5.003, eff. September 1, 2015.


Acts 2019, 86th Leg., R.S., Ch. 943 (H.B. 3), Sec. 2A.017, eff. September 1, 2019.


Sec. 39.0303. SECURE ASSESSMENT INSTRUMENTS; CRIMINAL PENALTY. (a) A person commits an offense if:


(1) the person intentionally discloses the contents of any portion of a secure assessment instrument developed or administered under this subchapter, including the answer to any item in the assessment instrument; and


(2) the disclosure affects or is likely to affect the individual performance of one or more students on the assessment instrument.


(b) An offense under this section is a Class C misdemeanor.


Added by Acts 2007, 80th Leg., R.S., Ch. 1312 (S.B. 1031), Sec. 12, eff. September 1, 2007.


The following section was amended by the 87th Legislature. Pending publication of the current statutes, see S.B. 1267, 87th Legislature, Regular Session, for amendments affecting the following section.



Sec. 39.0304. TRAINING IN ASSESSMENT INSTRUMENT ADMINISTRATION. (a) To ensure that each administration of assessment instruments under Section 39.023 is valid, reliable, and in compliance with the requirements of this subchapter, the commissioner may require training for school district employees involved in the administration of the assessment instruments.


(b) The training under Subsection (a) may include a qualifying component to ensure that school district employees involved in the administration of assessment instruments under Section 39.023 possess the necessary skills and knowledge required to administer the assessment instruments.


(c) The commissioner may adopt rules necessary to implement this section.


Added by Acts 2007, 80th Leg., R.S., Ch. 1312 (S.B. 1031), Sec. 12, eff. September 1, 2007.


Sec. 39.031. COST. The cost of preparing, administering, or grading the assessment instruments and releasing the question and answer keys under Section 39.023(e) shall be paid from amounts appropriated to the agency.


Added by Acts 1995, 74th Leg., ch. 260, Sec. 1, eff. May 30, 1995. Amended by Acts 1997, 75th Leg., ch. 767, Sec. 5, eff. Sept. 1, 1997.


Amended by:


Acts 2009, 81st Leg., R.S., Ch. 1328 (H.B. 3646), Sec. 41, eff. September 1, 2009.


Sec. 39.032. ASSESSMENT INSTRUMENT STANDARDS; CIVIL PENALTY. (a) Repealed by Acts 2009, 81st Leg., R.S., Ch. 1210, Sec. 2, eff. June 19, 2009.


(b) Repealed by Acts 2009, 81st Leg., R.S., Ch. 1210, Sec. 2, eff. June 19, 2009.


(c) State and national norms of averages shall be computed using data that are not more than eight years old at the time the assessment instrument is administered and that are representative of the group of students to whom the assessment instrument is administered.


(c-1) The standardization norms computed under Subsection (c) shall be:


(1) based on a national probability sample that meets accepted standards for educational and psychological testing; and


(2) updated at least every eight years using proven psychometric procedures approved by the State Board of Education.


(c-2) The eight-year limitation on data to compute norms under this section does not apply if only data older than eight years is available for an assessment instrument. The commissioner by rule may limit the exception created by this subsection based on the type of assessment instrument.


(d) Repealed by Acts 2009, 81st Leg., R.S., Ch. 1210, Sec. 2, eff. June 19, 2009.


(e) The State Board of Education shall adopt rules for the implementation of this section and for the maintenance of the security of the contents of all assessment instruments.


(f) In this section, "assessment instrument" means a group-administered achievement test.


Added by Acts 1995, 74th Leg., ch. 260, Sec. 1, eff. May 30, 1995.


Amended by:


Acts 2009, 81st Leg., R.S., Ch. 1210 (S.B. 759), Sec. 1, eff. June 19, 2009.


Acts 2009, 81st Leg., R.S., Ch. 1210 (S.B. 759), Sec. 2, eff. June 19, 2009.


Sec. 39.033. VOLUNTARY ASSESSMENT OF PRIVATE SCHOOL STUDENTS. (a) Under an agreement with the agency, a private school may administer an assessment instrument adopted under this subchapter to students at the school.


(b) An agreement under this section must require the private school to:


(1) as determined appropriate by the commissioner, provide to the commissioner the information described by Sections 39.053(c) and 39.301(c); and


(2) maintain confidentiality in compliance with Section 39.030.


(c) A private school must reimburse the agency for the cost of administering an assessment instrument under this section. The State Board of Education shall determine the cost under this section. The per-student cost may not exceed the cost of administering the same assessment to a student enrolled in a public school district.


(d) In this section, "private school" means a school that:


(1) offers a general education to elementary or secondary students; and


(2) is not operated by a governmental entity.


Added by Acts 1995, 74th Leg., ch. 260, Sec. 1, eff. May 30, 1995.


Amended by:


Acts 2009, 81st Leg., R.S., Ch. 895 (H.B. 3), Sec. 57, eff. June 19, 2009.


The following section was amended by the 87th Legislature. Pending publication of the current statutes, see S.B. 2066, 87th Legislature, Regular Session, for amendments affecting the following section.



Sec. 39.034. MEASURE OF ANNUAL IMPROVEMENT IN STUDENT ACHIEVEMENT. (a) The commissioner shall determine a method by which the agency may measure annual improvement in student achievement from one school year to the next on an assessment instrument required under this subchapter.


(b) For students of limited English proficiency, as defined by Section 29.052, the agency shall use a student's performance data on reading proficiency assessment instruments in English and one other language to calculate the student's progress toward dual language proficiency.


(c) The agency shall use a student's previous years' performance data on an assessment instrument required under this subchapter to determine the student's expected annual improvement. The agency shall report that expected level of annual improvement and the actual level of annual improvement achieved to the district. The report must state whether the student fell below, met, or exceeded the agency's expectation for improvement.


(d) The agency shall determine the necessary annual improvement required each year for a student to be prepared to perform satisfactorily on, as applicable:


(1) the grade five assessment instruments;


(2) the grade eight assessment instruments; and


(3) the end-of-course assessment instruments required under this subchapter for graduation.


(d-1) The agency shall report the necessary annual improvement required under Subsection (d) to the district. Each year, the report must state whether the student fell below, met, or exceeded the necessary target for improvement.


(e) Repealed by Acts 2009, 81st Leg., R.S., Ch. 895, Sec. 66(1), eff. June 19, 2009.


(f) Repealed by Acts 2009, 81st Leg., R.S., Ch. 895, Sec. 66(1), eff. June 19, 2009.


(g) Repealed by Acts 2009, 81st Leg., R.S., Ch. 895, Sec. 66(1), eff. June 19, 2009.


Added by Acts 2006, 79th Leg., 3rd C.S., Ch. 5 (H.B. 1), Sec. 3.09, eff. May 31, 2006.


Amended by:


Acts 2007, 80th Leg., R.S., Ch. 1312 (S.B. 1031), Sec. 13, eff. September 1, 2007.


Acts 2009, 81st Leg., R.S., Ch. 895 (H.B. 3), Sec. 58, eff. June 19, 2009.


Acts 2009, 81st Leg., R.S., Ch. 895 (H.B. 3), Sec. 66(1), eff. June 19, 2009.


Sec. 39.035. LIMITATION ON FIELD TESTING OF ASSESSMENT INSTRUMENTS. (a) Subject to Subsection (b), the agency may conduct field testing of questions for any assessment instrument administered under Section 39.023(a), (b), (c), (d), or (l) that is separate from the administration of the assessment instrument not more frequently than every other school year.


(b) Subsection (a) does not limit field testing necessary to develop new assessment instruments required under state or federal law.


(c) Before the beginning of each school year, the agency shall notify each school district regarding the required participation of the district in field testing activities during that school year.


Added by Acts 2007, 80th Leg., R.S., Ch. 1312 (S.B. 1031), Sec. 14, eff. September 1, 2007.


Sec. 39.036. VERTICAL SCALE FOR CERTAIN ASSESSMENT INSTRUMENTS. (a) The agency shall develop a vertical scale for assessing student performance on assessment instruments administered under Sections 39.023(a)(1) and (2) in a manner that allows the agency to compare the performance of a student on the assessment instruments from one grade level to the next.


(b) The commissioner shall adopt rules necessary to implement this section.


(c) Expired.


Added by Acts 2007, 80th Leg., R.S., Ch. 1312 (S.B. 1031), Sec. 14, eff. September 1, 2007.


Sec. 39.037. INTERNATIONAL ASSESSMENT INSTRUMENT PROGRAM. (a) In this section, "program" means the international assessment instrument program.


(b) The commissioner shall establish a program under which a participating school district administers international assessment instruments to students in the district.


(c) A school district may apply to the commissioner to participate in the program. The commissioner shall select for participation school districts from both rural and urban areas of the state. If necessary, the commissioner may require a school district to participate in the program.


(d) A participating school district shall administer international assessment instruments as required by the commissioner.


(e) In administering the program, the commissioner shall:


(1) compare the performance on the international assessment instruments of students in this state with students of the same grade level in other countries;


(2) compare the international assessment instruments with state assessment instruments and state educational goals; and


(3) provide professional development for educators in the interpretation and use of results of the international assessment instruments.


(f) Each biennium the commissioner may use funds appropriated for the Foundation School Program to provide funding for the program in an amount not to exceed $2 million.


(g) Not later than January 1 of each odd-numbered year, the commissioner shall prepare and deliver a report describing the results of student performance on the international assessment instruments to the governor, the lieutenant governor, the speaker of the house of representatives, each member of the legislature, and each school district.


(h) The commissioner may adopt rules necessary to administer this section.


Added by Acts 2007, 80th Leg., R.S., Ch. 754 (H.B. 3259), Sec. 1, eff. June 15, 2007.


Sec. 39.038. RESTRICTION ON APPOINTMENTS TO ADVISORY COMMITTEES. The commissioner may not appoint a person to a committee or panel that advises the commissioner or agency regarding state accountability systems under this title or the content or administration of an assessment instrument if the person is retained or employed by an assessment instrument vendor.


Added by Acts 2013, 83rd Leg., R.S., Ch. 211 (H.B. 5), Sec. 40, eff. June 10, 2013.


Sec. 39.0381. AUDITING AND MONITORING PERFORMANCE UNDER CONTRACTS FOR ASSESSMENT INSTRUMENTS. (a) The agency by rule shall develop a comprehensive methodology for auditing and monitoring performance under contracts for services to develop or administer assessment instruments required by Section 39.023 to verify compliance with contractual obligations.


(b) The agency shall ensure that all new and renewed contracts described by Subsection (a) include a provision that the agency or a designee of the agency may conduct periodic contract compliance reviews, without advance notice, to monitor vendor performance.


(c) The agency shall adopt rules to administer this section.


Added by Acts 2015, 84th Leg., R.S., Ch. 1006 (H.B. 743), Sec. 4, eff. June 19, 2015.


Sec. 39.039. PROHIBITION ON POLITICAL CONTRIBUTION OR ACTIVITY BY CERTAIN CONTRACTORS. (a) A person who is an agent of an entity that has been contracted to develop or implement assessment instruments required under Section 39.023 commits an offense if the person makes or authorizes a political contribution to or takes part in, directly or indirectly, the campaign of any person seeking election to or serving on the State Board of Education.


(b) A person who is an agent of an entity that has been contracted to develop or implement assessment instruments required under Section 39.023 commits an offense if the person serves as a member of a formal or informal advisory committee established by the commissioner, agency staff, or the State Board of Education to advise the commissioner, agency staff, or the State Board of Education regarding policies or implementation of the requirements of this subchapter.


(c) An offense under this section is a Class B misdemeanor.


Added by Acts 2013, 83rd Leg., R.S., Ch. 211 (H.B. 5), Sec. 41(a), eff. June 10, 2013.


SUBCHAPTER C. ACCREDITATION



Sec. 39.051. ACCREDITATION STATUS. Accreditation of a school district is determined in accordance with this subchapter. The commissioner by rule shall determine in accordance with this subchapter the criteria for the following accreditation statuses:


(1) accredited;


(2) accredited-warned; and


(3) accredited-probation.


Added by Acts 1995, 74th Leg., ch. 260, Sec. 1, eff. May 30, 1995. Amended by Acts 1997, 75th Leg., ch. 767, Sec. 6, eff. Sept. 1, 1997; Acts 1999, 76th Leg., ch. 396, Sec. 2.20, eff. Sept. 1, 1999; Acts 1999, 76th Leg., ch. 397, Sec. 7, eff. Sept. 1, 1999; Acts 1999, 76th Leg., ch. 1422, Sec. 3, eff. Sept. 1, 1999; Acts 2001, 77th Leg., ch. 8, Sec. 3, eff. April 11, 2001; Acts 2001, 77th Leg., ch. 725, Sec. 4, 5, eff. June 13, 2001; Acts 2001, 77th Leg., ch. 834, Sec. 10, eff. Sept. 1, 2001; Acts 2001, 77th Leg., ch. 1420, Sec. 4.007, 4.008, eff. Sept. 1, 2001; Acts 2003, 78th Leg., ch. 201, Sec. 26, eff. Sept. 1, 2003; Acts 2003, 78th Leg., ch. 433, Sec. 2, eff. June 20, 2003; Acts 2003, 78th Leg., ch. 805, Sec. 1, eff. Sept. 1, 2003.


Amended by:


Acts 2006, 79th Leg., 3rd C.S., Ch. 5 (H.B. 1), Sec. 3.10, eff. May 31, 2006.


Acts 2006, 79th Leg., 3rd C.S., Ch. 5 (H.B. 1), Sec. 3.11, eff. May 31, 2006.


Acts 2007, 80th Leg., R.S., Ch. 1312 (S.B. 1031), Sec. 15, eff. September 1, 2007.


Acts 2007, 80th Leg., R.S., Ch. 1340 (S.B. 1871), Sec. 5, eff. June 15, 2007.


Acts 2009, 81st Leg., R.S., Ch. 895 (H.B. 3), Sec. 59, eff. June 19, 2009.


Sec. 39.052. DETERMINATION OF ACCREDITATION STATUS OR PERFORMANCE RATING. (a) Each year, the commissioner shall determine the accreditation status of each school district.


(b) In determining the accreditation status of a school district, the commissioner:


(1) shall evaluate and consider:


(A) performance on achievement indicators described by Section 39.053; and


(B) performance under the financial accountability rating system developed under Subchapter D; and


(2) may evaluate and consider:


(A) the district's compliance with statutory requirements and requirements imposed by rule of the commissioner or State Board of Education under specific statutory authority that relate to:


(i) reporting data through the Public Education Information Management System (PEIMS) or other reports required by state or federal law or court order;


(ii) the high school graduation requirements under Section 28.025; or


(iii) an item listed under Sections 7.056(e)(3)(C)-(I) that applies to the district;


(B) the effectiveness of the district's programs for special populations; and


(C) the effectiveness of the district's career and technology program.


(c) Based on a school district's performance under Subsection (b), the commissioner shall:


(1) assign each district an accreditation status; or


(2) revoke the accreditation of the district and order closure of the district.


(d) A school district's accreditation status may be raised or lowered based on the district's performance or may be lowered based on the performance of one or more campuses in the district that is below a standard required under this subchapter.


(e) The commissioner shall notify a school district that receives an accreditation status of accredited-warned or accredited-probation or a campus that performs below a standard required under this subchapter that the performance of the district or campus is below a standard required under this subchapter. The commissioner shall require the district to notify the parents of students enrolled in the district and property owners in the district of the district's accreditation status and the implications of that accreditation status.


(f) A school district that is not accredited may not receive funds from the agency or hold itself out as operating a public school of this state.


(g) This chapter may not be construed to invalidate a diploma awarded, course credit earned, or grade promotion granted by a school district before the commissioner revoked the district's accreditation.


Added by Acts 1995, 74th Leg., ch. 260, Sec. 1, eff. May 30, 1995. Amended by Acts 1999, 76th Leg., ch. 396, Sec. 2.21, eff. Sept. 1, 1999; Acts 1999, 76th Leg., ch. 1514, Sec. 1, eff. June 19, 1999; Acts 2001, 77th Leg., ch. 1420, Sec. 4.009, eff. Sept. 1, 2001; Acts 2003, 78th Leg., ch. 1269, Sec. 2, eff. Sept. 1, 2003.


Amended by:


Acts 2006, 79th Leg., 3rd C.S., Ch. 5 (H.B. 1), Sec. 3.12, eff. May 31, 2006.


Acts 2009, 81st Leg., R.S., Ch. 895 (H.B. 3), Sec. 59, eff. June 19, 2009.


Acts 2015, 84th Leg., R.S., Ch. 1094 (H.B. 2804), Sec. 14, eff. June 19, 2015.


Acts 2017, 85th Leg., R.S., Ch. 807 (H.B. 22), Sec. 7, eff. June 15, 2017.



Sec. 39.053. PERFORMANCE INDICATORS: ACHIEVEMENT. (a) The commissioner shall adopt a set of indicators of the quality of learning and achievement, including the indicators under Subsection (c). The commissioner periodically shall review the indicators for the consideration of appropriate revisions.


(a-1) The indicators adopted by the commissioner under Subsection (a) must measure and evaluate school districts and campuses with respect to:


(1) improving student preparedness for success in:


(A) subsequent grade levels; and


(B) entering the workforce, the military, or postsecondary education;


(2) reducing, with the goal of eliminating, student academic achievement differentials among students from different racial and ethnic groups and socioeconomic backgrounds; and


(3) informing parents and the community regarding campus and district performance.


(b) Performance on the achievement indicators adopted under Subsection (c) shall be compared to state-established standards. The indicators must be based on information that is disaggregated by race, ethnicity, and socioeconomic status.


(c) School districts and campuses must be evaluated based on three domains of indicators of achievement adopted under this section that include:


(1) in the student achievement domain, indicators of student achievement that must include:


(A) for evaluating the performance of districts and campuses generally:


(i) an indicator that accounts for the results of assessment instruments required under Sections 39.023(a), (c), and (l), as applicable for the district and campus, including the results of assessment instruments required for graduation retaken by a student, aggregated across grade levels by subject area, including:


(a) for the performance standard determined by the commissioner under Section 39.0241(a), the percentage of students who performed satisfactorily on the assessment instruments, aggregated across grade levels by subject area; and


(b) for the college readiness performance standard as determined under Section 39.0241, the percentage of students who performed satisfactorily on the assessment instruments, aggregated across grade levels by subject area; and


(ii) an indicator that accounts for the results of assessment instruments required under Section 39.023(b), as applicable for the district and campus, including the percentage of students who performed satisfactorily on the assessment instruments, as determined by the performance standard adopted by the agency, aggregated across grade levels by subject area; and


(B) for evaluating the performance of high school campuses and districts that include high school campuses, indicators that account for:


(i) students who satisfy the Texas Success Initiative (TSI) college readiness benchmarks prescribed by the Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board under Section 51.334 on an assessment instrument in reading or mathematics designated by the coordinating board under that section;


(ii) students who satisfy relevant performance standards on advanced placement tests or similar assessments;


(iii) students who earn dual course credits in the dual credit courses;


(iv) students who enlist in the armed forces of the United States;


(v) students who earn industry certifications;


(vi) students admitted into postsecondary industry certification programs that require as a prerequisite for entrance successful performance at the secondary level;


(vii) students whose successful completion of a course or courses under Section 28.014 indicates the student's preparation to enroll and succeed, without remediation, in an entry-level general education course for a baccalaureate degree or associate degree;


(viii) students who successfully met standards on a composite of indicators that through research indicates the student's preparation to enroll and succeed, without remediation, in an entry-level general education course for a baccalaureate degree or associate degree;


(ix) high school graduation rates, computed in accordance with standards and definitions adopted in compliance with the Every Student Succeeds Act (20 U.S.C. Section 6301 et seq.) subject to the exclusions provided by Subsections (g), (g-1), (g-2), and (g-3);


(x) students who successfully completed an OnRamps dual enrollment course;


(xi) students who successfully completed a practicum or internship approved by the State Board of Education; and


(xii) students who are awarded an associate degree;


(2) in the school progress domain, indicators for effectiveness in promoting student learning, which must include:


(A) for assessment instruments, including assessment instruments under Subdivisions (1)(A)(i) and (ii), the percentage of students who met the standard for improvement, as determined by the commissioner; and


(B) for evaluating relative performance, the performance of districts and campuses compared to similar districts or campuses; and


(3) in the closing the gaps domain, the use of disaggregated data to demonstrate the differentials among students from different racial and ethnic groups, socioeconomic backgrounds, and other factors, including:


(A) students formerly receiving special education services;


(B) students continuously enrolled; and


(C) students who are mobile.


(c-1) An indicator adopted under Subsection (c) that would measure improvements in student achievement cannot negatively affect the commissioner's review of a school district or campus if that district or campus is already achieving at the highest level for that indicator.


(c-2) The commissioner by rule shall determine a method by which a student's performance may be included in determining the performance rating of a school district or campus under Section 39.054 if, before the student graduates, the student:


(1) satisfies the Texas Success Initiative (TSI) college readiness benchmarks prescribed by the Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board under Section 51.334 on an assessment instrument designated by the coordinating board under that section; or


(2) performs satisfactorily on an assessment instrument under Section 39.023(c), notwithstanding Subsection (d) of this section.


(c-3) Any standard for improvement determined by the commissioner as described by Subsection (c)(2)(A) must allow for appropriately crediting a student for growth if the student performs at the highest achievement standard in the previous and current school year.


(d) For purposes of Subsection (c), the commissioner by rule shall determine the period within which a student must retake an assessment instrument for that assessment instrument to be considered in determining the performance rating of the district under Section 39.054.


(d-1) In aggregating results of assessment instruments across grade levels by subject in accordance with Subsection (c)(1)(A)(i), the performance of a student enrolled below the high school level on an assessment instrument required under Section 39.023(c) is included with results relating to other students enrolled at the same grade level.


(e) For purposes of Subsection (c)(3)(A), a student formerly receiving special education services means a student whose enrollment information:


(1) for the preceding school year, as reported through the Public Education Information Management System (PEIMS), indicates the student was enrolled at the campus and was participating in a special education program; and


(2) for the current school year, as reported through the Public Education Information Management System (PEIMS) and as reported on assessment instruments administered to the student under Section 39.023, indicates the student is enrolled at the campus and is not participating in a special education program.


(f) Annually, the commissioner shall define the state standard for the current school year for each achievement indicator adopted under this section. In consultation with educators, parents, and business and industry representatives, as necessary, the commissioner shall establish and modify standards to continuously improve student performance to achieve the goals of eliminating achievement gaps based on race, ethnicity, and socioeconomic status and to ensure this state is a national leader in preparing students for postsecondary success.


(g) In computing dropout and completion rates such as high school graduation rates under Subsection (c)(1)(B)(ix), the commissioner may not consider as a dropout a student whose failure to attend school results from:


(1) the student's expulsion under Section 37.007; and


(2) as applicable:


(A) adjudication as having engaged in delinquent conduct or conduct indicating a need for supervision, as defined by Section 51.03, Family Code; or


(B) conviction of and sentencing for an offense under the Penal Code.


(g-1) In computing dropout and completion rates such as high school graduation rates under Subsection (c)(1)(B)(ix), the commissioner shall exclude:


(1) students who are ordered by a court to attend a high school equivalency certificate program but who have not yet earned a high school equivalency certificate;


(2) students who were previously reported to the state as dropouts, including a student who is reported as a dropout, reenrolls, and drops out again, regardless of the number of times of reenrollment and dropping out;


(3) students in attendance who are not in membership for purposes of average daily attendance;


(4) students whose initial enrollment in a school in the United States in grades 7 through 12 was as an unschooled asylee or refugee as defined by Section 39.027(a-1);


(5) students who are detained at a county pre-adjudication or post-adjudication juvenile detention facility and:


(A) in the district exclusively as a function of having been detained at the facility but are otherwise not students of the district in which the facility is located; or


(B) provided services by an open-enrollment charter school exclusively as the result of having been detained at the facility;


(6) students who are incarcerated in state jails and federal penitentiaries as adults and as persons certified to stand trial as adults; and


(7) students who have suffered a condition, injury, or illness that requires substantial medical care and leaves the student:


(A) unable to attend school; and


(B) assigned to a medical or residential treatment facility.


(g-2) In computing completion rates such as high school graduation rates under Subsection (c)(1)(B)(ix), the commissioner shall exclude students who:


(1) are at least 18 years of age as of September 1 of the school year as reported for the fall semester Public Education Information Management System (PEIMS) submission and have satisfied the credit requirements for high school graduation;


(2) have not completed their individualized education program under 19 T.A.C. Section 89.1070(b)(2) and the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (20 U.S.C. Section 1400 et seq.); and


(3) are enrolled and receiving individualized education program services.


(g-3) In the computation of dropout and completion rates such as high school graduation rates under Subsection (c)(1)(B)(ix), a student who is released from a juvenile pre-adjudication secure detention facility or juvenile post-adjudication secure correctional facility and fails to enroll in school or a student who leaves a residential treatment center after receiving treatment for fewer than 85 days and fails to enroll in school may not be considered to have dropped out from the school district or campus serving the facility or center unless that district or campus is the one to which the student is regularly assigned. The agency may not limit an appeal relating to dropout computations under this subsection.


(g-4) For purposes of the computation of dropout and completion rates such as high school graduation rates under Subsection (c)(1)(B)(ix), the commissioner shall exclude a student who was reported as having dropped out of school under Section 42.006(a-9), and the student may not be considered to have dropped out from the school district or campus in which the student was last enrolled.


(h) Each school district shall cooperate with the agency in determining whether a student is a dropout for purposes of accreditation and evaluating performance by school districts and campuses under this chapter.


(i) Each school district shall submit the data required for the indicators adopted under this section to the commissioner.


Added by Acts 1995, 74th Leg., ch. 260, Sec. 1, eff. May 30, 1995. Amended by Acts 1999, 76th Leg., ch. 510, Sec. 2, eff. Sept. 1, 1999; Acts 1999, 76th Leg., ch. 1417, Sec. 2, eff. June 19, 1999; Acts 2001, 77th Leg., ch. 725, Sec. 6, eff. June 13, 2001; Acts 2001, 77th Leg., ch. 834, Sec. 11, eff. Sept. 1, 2001; Acts 2001, 77th Leg., ch. 1420, Sec. 4.010, eff. Sept. 1, 2001; Acts 2003, 78th Leg., ch. 1055, Sec. 24, eff. June 20, 2003.


Amended by:


Acts 2009, 81st Leg., R.S., Ch. 895 (H.B. 3), Sec. 59, eff. June 19, 2009.


Acts 2011, 82nd Leg., R.S., Ch. 307 (H.B. 2135), Sec. 5, eff. June 17, 2011.


Acts 2013, 83rd Leg., R.S., Ch. 211 (H.B. 5), Sec. 42(a), eff. June 10, 2013.


Acts 2013, 83rd Leg., R.S., Ch. 211 (H.B. 5), Sec. 43(a), eff. June 10, 2013.


Acts 2015, 84th Leg., R.S., Ch. 1094 (H.B. 2804), Sec. 1, eff. June 19, 2015.


Acts 2015, 84th Leg., R.S., Ch. 1094 (H.B. 2804), Sec. 2, eff. June 19, 2015.


Acts 2015, 84th Leg., R.S., Ch. 1094 (H.B. 2804), Sec. 22, eff. June 19, 2015.


Acts 2015, 84th Leg., R.S., Ch. 1222 (S.B. 1867), Sec. 1, eff. June 19, 2015.


Acts 2017, 85th Leg., R.S., Ch. 807 (H.B. 22), Sec. 8, eff. June 15, 2017.


Transferred, redesignated and amended from Education Code, Section 39.054(f) by Acts 2017, 85th Leg., R.S., Ch. 807 (H.B. 22), Sec. 12, eff. June 15, 2017.


Amended by:


Acts 2017, 85th Leg., R.S., Ch. 842 (H.B. 2223), Sec. 2.05, eff. June 15, 2017.


Acts 2017, 85th Leg., R.S., Ch. 890 (H.B. 3075), Sec. 1, eff. June 15, 2017.


Acts 2017, 85th Leg., R.S., Ch. 1088 (H.B. 3593), Sec. 4, eff. June 15, 2017.


Acts 2019, 86th Leg., R.S., Ch. 467 (H.B. 4170), Sec. 5.022, eff. September 1, 2019.


Acts 2019, 86th Leg., R.S., Ch. 467 (H.B. 4170), Sec. 5.023, eff. September 1, 2019.


Acts 2019, 86th Leg., R.S., Ch. 719 (H.B. 330), Sec. 1, eff. June 10, 2019.


Acts 2019, 86th Leg., R.S., Ch. 1060 (H.B. 1051), Sec. 6, eff. June 14, 2019.


For expiration of this section, see Subsection (e).



Sec. 39.0533. EXTRACURRICULAR AND COCURRICULAR STUDENT ACTIVITY INDICATOR. (a) The commissioner shall study the feasibility of incorporating for evaluating school district and campus performance under this subchapter an indicator that accounts for extracurricular and cocurricular student activity. If the commissioner determines that an extracurricular and cocurricular student activity indicator is appropriate, the commissioner may adopt the indicator.


(b) To determine the feasibility of adopting an indicator under this section, the commissioner may require a school district or campus to report requested information relating to extracurricular and cocurricular student activity.


(c) The commissioner may establish an advisory committee to assist in determining the feasibility of incorporating an extracurricular and cocurricular student activity indicator for evaluating school district and campus performance.


(d) Not later than December 1, 2022, the commissioner shall report to the legislature on the feasibility of incorporating an extracurricular and cocurricular student activity indicator, unless the commissioner adopts an indicator under this section before that date.


(e) This section expires September 1, 2023.


Added by Acts 2017, 85th Leg., R.S., Ch. 807 (H.B. 22), Sec. 9, eff. June 15, 2017.


The following section was amended by the 87th Legislature. Pending publication of the current statutes, see S.B. 1365, 87th Legislature, Regular Session, for amendments affecting the following section.



(a-1) For purposes of assigning an overall performance rating for a district or campus under Subsection (a), the commissioner shall:


(1) consider either the district's or campus's performance rating under the student achievement domain under Section 39.053(c)(1) or the school progress domain under Section 39.053(c)(2), whichever performance rating is higher, unless the district or campus received a performance rating of F in either domain, in which case the district or campus may not be assigned a performance rating higher than a B for the composite for the two domains; and


(2) attribute not less than 30 percent of the performance rating to the closing the gaps domain under Section 39.053(c)(3).


(a-2) The commissioner by rule may adopt procedures to ensure that a repeated performance rating of D or F or unacceptable in one domain, particularly performance that is not significantly improving, is reflected in the overall performance rating of a district or campus under this section or a campus under Section 39.0544 and is not compensated for by a performance rating of A, B, or C in another domain.


(a-3) Not later than August 15 of each year, the performance ratings of each district and campus shall be made publicly available as provided by rules adopted under this section.


(b) For purposes of assigning school districts and campuses an overall and a domain performance rating under Subsection (a), the commissioner shall ensure that the method used to evaluate performance is implemented in a manner that provides the mathematical possibility that all districts and campuses receive an A rating.


(b-1) Consideration of the effectiveness of district programs under Section 39.052(b)(2)(B) or (C):


(1) must:


(A) be based on data collected through the Public Education Information Management System (PEIMS) for purposes of accountability under this chapter; and


(B) include the results of assessments required under Section 39.023; and


(2) may be based on the results of a special accreditation investigation conducted under Section 39.057.


(c) Repealed by Acts 2017, 85th Leg., R.S., Ch. 807 (H.B. 22), Sec. 19(1), eff. September 1, 2017.


(d) Repealed by Acts 2015, 84th Leg., R.S., Ch. 1094 , Sec. 22, eff. June 19, 2015.


(d-1) Repealed by Acts 2015, 84th Leg., R.S., Ch. 1094 , Sec. 22, eff. June 19, 2015.


(e) Each annual performance review under this section shall include an analysis of the achievement indicators adopted under Section 39.053, including Subsection (c) of that section, to determine school district and campus performance in relation to standards established for each indicator.


Added by Acts 1995, 74th Leg., ch. 260, Sec. 1, eff. May 30, 1995.


Amended by:


Acts 2009, 81st Leg., R.S., Ch. 895 (H.B. 3), Sec. 59, eff. June 19, 2009.


Acts 2013, 83rd Leg., R.S., Ch. 211 (H.B. 5), Sec. 44(a), eff. June 10, 2013.


Acts 2013, 83rd Leg., R.S., Ch. 211 (H.B. 5), Sec. 45(a), eff. June 10, 2013.


Acts 2015, 84th Leg., R.S., Ch. 1094 (H.B. 2804), Sec. 4, eff. September 1, 2016.


Acts 2015, 84th Leg., R.S., Ch. 1094 (H.B. 2804), Sec. 5, eff. September 1, 2017.


Acts 2015, 84th Leg., R.S., Ch. 1094 (H.B. 2804), Sec. 22, eff. June 19, 2015.


Acts 2017, 85th Leg., R.S., Ch. 807 (H.B. 22), Sec. 10, eff. June 15, 2017.


Acts 2017, 85th Leg., R.S., Ch. 807 (H.B. 22), Sec. 11, eff. June 15, 2017.


Acts 2017, 85th Leg., R.S., Ch. 807 (H.B. 22), Sec. 19(1), eff. June 15, 2017.


Sec. 39.0541. ADOPTION OF INDICATORS AND STANDARDS. The commissioner may adopt indicators and standards under this subchapter at any time during a school year before the evaluation of a school district or campus.


Added by Acts 2017, 85th Leg., R.S., Ch. 807 (H.B. 22), Sec. 13, eff. June 15, 2017.


Sec. 39.0542. EXPLANATORY MATERIALS FOR ACCOUNTABILITY RATING SYSTEM. (a) Each school year, the commissioner shall provide each school district a document in a simple, accessible format that explains the accountability performance measures, methods, and procedures that will be applied for that school year in assigning each school district and campus a performance rating under Section 39.054.


(b) The document provided under Subsection (a) must be provided in a format that a school district is able to easily distribute to parents of students enrolled in the district and other interested members of the public.


(c) The commissioner, in collaboration with interested stakeholders, shall develop standardized language for each domain that does not exceed 250 words and that clearly describes the annual status of a district and campus relating to district and campus performance on the indicators used for that domain to determine the letter performance rating assigned to a district and campus.


Added by Acts 2017, 85th Leg., R.S., Ch. 807 (H.B. 22), Sec. 14, eff. June 15, 2017.


Sec. 39.0544. LOCAL ACCOUNTABILITY SYSTEM. (a) The commissioner shall adopt rules regarding the assignment of campus performance ratings by school districts and open-enrollment charter schools. The rules:


(1) must require a district or school, in assigning an overall performance rating for a campus, to incorporate:


(A) domain performance ratings assigned by the commissioner under Section 39.054; and


(B) performance ratings based on locally developed domains or sets of accountability measures;


(2) may permit a district or school to assign weights to each domain or set of accountability measures described in Subdivision (1), as determined by the district or school, provided that the domains specified in Subdivision (1)(A) must in the aggregate account for at least 50 percent of the overall performance rating;


(3) must require that each locally developed domain or set of accountability measures:


(A) contains levels of performance that allow for differentiation, with assigned standards for achieving the differentiated levels;


(B) provides for the assignment of a letter grade of A, B, C, D, or F; and


(C) meets standards for reliability and validity;


(4) must require that calculations for overall performance ratings and each locally developed domain or set of accountability measures be capable of being audited by a third party;


(5) must require that a district or school produce a campus score card that may be displayed on the agency's website; and


(6) must require that a district or school develop and make available to the public an explanation of the methodology used to assign performance ratings under this section.


(b) The commissioner shall develop a process to approve a request by a school district or open-enrollment charter school to assign campus performance ratings in accordance with this section. Under that process, a district or school must obtain approval of a local accountability plan submitted by the district or school to the agency. A plan may be approved only if:


(1) after review, the agency determines the plan meets the minimum requirements under this section and agency rule;


(2) at the commissioner's discretion, an audit conducted by the agency verifies the calculations included in the plan; and


(3) subject to Subsection (d), a review panel appointed under Subsection (c) approves the plan.


(c) The commissioner shall appoint a review panel for purposes of Subsection (b)(3) that includes a majority of members who are superintendents or members of the board of trustees or governing body of school districts or open-enrollment charter schools with approved local accountability plans.


(d) The requirement under Subsection (b)(3) applies only after performance ratings are issued in August 2019 and only if at least 10 school districts or open-enrollment charter schools have obtained approval of locally developed accountability plans.


(e) A school district or open-enrollment charter school authorized under this section to assign campus performance ratings shall evaluate the performance of each campus as provided by this section and assign each campus a performance rating of A, B, C, D, or F for overall performance and for each locally developed domain or set of accountability measures. Not later than a date established by the commissioner, the district or school shall:


(1) report the performance ratings to the agency; and


(2) make the performance ratings available to the public as provided by commissioner rule.


Added by Acts 2017, 85th Leg., R.S., Ch. 807 (H.B. 22), Sec. 14, eff. June 15, 2017.


The following section was amended by the 87th Legislature. Pending publication of the current statutes, see S.B. 879, 87th Legislature, Regular Session, for amendments affecting the following section.



Sec. 39.0548. EVALUATING DROPOUT RECOVERY SCHOOLS. (a) For purposes of evaluating performance under Section 39.053(c), the commissioner shall designate as a dropout recovery school a school district or an open-enrollment charter school or a campus of a district or of an open-enrollment charter school:


(1) that serves students in grades 9 through 12 and has an enrollment of which at least 50 percent of the students are 17 years of age or older as of September 1 of the school year as reported for the fall semester Public Education Information Management System (PEIMS) submission; and


(2) that meets the eligibility requirements for and is registered under alternative education accountability procedures adopted by the commissioner.


(b) Notwithstanding Section 39.053(c)(1)(B)(ix), the commissioner shall use the alternative completion rate under this subsection to determine the graduation rate indicator under Section 39.053(c)(1)(B)(ix) for a dropout recovery school. The alternative completion rate shall be the ratio of the total number of students who graduate, continue attending school into the next academic year, or receive a high school equivalency certificate to the total number of students in the longitudinal cohort of students.


(d) Notwithstanding Section 39.053(c), for purposes of evaluating a dropout recovery school under the accountability procedures adopted by the commissioner to determine the performance rating of the school under Section 39.054, only the best result from the primary administration or any retake of an assessment instrument administered to a student in the school year evaluated may be considered.


Added by Acts 2013, 83rd Leg., R.S., Ch. 167 (S.B. 1538), Sec. 1, eff. May 24, 2013.


Amended by:


Acts 2015, 84th Leg., R.S., Ch. 1094 (H.B. 2804), Sec. 6, eff. June 19, 2015.


Redesignated from Education Code, Section 39.0545 by Acts 2015, 84th Leg., R.S., Ch. 1236 (S.B. 1296), Sec. 21.001(11), eff. September 1, 2015.


Amended by:


Acts 2017, 85th Leg., R.S., Ch. 807 (H.B. 22), Sec. 15, eff. June 15, 2017.


Added by Acts 2001, 77th Leg., ch. 834, Sec. 12, eff. Sept. 1, 2001. Amended by Acts 2003, 78th Leg., ch. 201, Sec. 27, 61(1), eff. Sept. 1, 2003; Acts 2003, 78th Leg., ch. 903, Sec. 1, 4, eff. Sept. 1, 2003.


Amended by:


Acts 2009, 81st Leg., R.S., Ch. 895 (H.B. 3), Sec. 59, eff. June 19, 2009.


Acts 2013, 83rd Leg., R.S., Ch. 517 (S.B. 306), Sec. 1, eff. June 14, 2013.


Acts 2015, 84th Leg., R.S., Ch. 1094 (H.B. 2804), Sec. 15, eff. June 19, 2015.


Acts 2017, 85th Leg., R.S., Ch. 807 (H.B. 22), Sec. 16, eff. June 15, 2017.


Sec. 39.0552. MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING BETWEEN SCHOOL DISTRICT AND STATE HOSPITAL FOR ACCOUNTABILITY PURPOSES. A memorandum of understanding between a school district and a state hospital under which the district provides educational services to a student who resides in the state hospital must provide that the school district include the performance of the student on an assessment instrument or other achievement indicator adopted under Section 39.053 or a reporting indicator adopted under Section 39.301 in determining the performance of that school district.


Added by Acts 2019, 86th Leg., R.S., Ch. 1109 (H.B. 2210), Sec. 1, eff. June 14, 2019.


The following section was amended by the 87th Legislature. Pending publication of the current statutes, see S.B. 1365, 87th Legislature, Regular Session, for amendments affecting the following section.



Sec. 39.056. MONITORING REVIEWS. (a) The commissioner may direct the agency to conduct monitoring reviews and random on-site visits of a school district at any time as authorized by Section 7.028.


(b) The commissioner shall determine the frequency of monitoring reviews by the agency according to:


(1) annual comprehensive analyses of student performance and equity in relation to the achievement indicators adopted under Section 39.053;


(2) reviews of fiscal reports and other fiscal data as set forth in Section 44.010; or


(3) comprehensive analyses of financial accountability standards under Subchapter D.


(c) In conducting a monitoring review, the agency may obtain information from administrators, other district employees, parents of students enrolled in the school district, and other persons as necessary. The commissioner shall adopt rules for:


(1) obtaining information from parents and using that information in the monitoring review report; and


(2) obtaining information from other district employees in a manner that prevents a district or campus from screening the information.


(d) The agency shall give written notice to the superintendent and the board of trustees of a school district of any impending monitoring review.


(e) The agency shall report in writing to the superintendent and president of the board of trustees of the school district and shall make recommendations concerning any necessary improvements or sources of aid such as regional education service centers.


(f) A district which takes action with regard to the recommendations provided by the agency as prescribed by Subsection (e) shall make a reasonable effort to seek assistance from a third party in developing an action plan to improve district performance using improvement techniques that are goal oriented and research based.


(g) A monitoring review may include desk reviews and on-site visits, including random on-site visits.


(h) The commissioner may at any time convert a monitoring review to a special accreditation investigation under Section 39.057, provided the commissioner promptly notifies the school district of the conversion.


Amended by:


Acts 2009, 81st Leg., R.S., Ch. 895 (H.B. 3), Sec. 59, eff. June 19, 2009.


Acts 2013, 83rd Leg., R.S., Ch. 211 (H.B. 5), Sec. 47, eff. June 10, 2013.


Acts 2015, 84th Leg., R.S., Ch. 1046 (H.B. 1842), Sec. 7, eff. June 19, 2015.


Acts 2015, 84th Leg., R.S., Ch. 1094 (H.B. 2804), Sec. 16, eff. June 19, 2015.


The following section was amended by the 87th Legislature. Pending publication of the current statutes, see S.B. 1365 and H.B. 1603, 87th Legislature, Regular Session, for amendments affecting the following section.



Sec. 39.057. SPECIAL ACCREDITATION INVESTIGATIONS. (a) The commissioner may authorize special accreditation investigations to be conducted:


(1) when excessive numbers of absences of students eligible to be tested on state assessment instruments are determined;


(2) when excessive numbers of allowable exemptions from the required state assessment instruments are determined;


(3) in response to complaints submitted to the agency with respect to alleged violations of civil rights or other requirements imposed on the state by federal law or court order;


(4) in response to established compliance reviews of the district's financial accounting practices and state and federal program requirements;


(5) when extraordinary numbers of student placements in disciplinary alternative education programs, other than placements under Sections 37.006 and 37.007, are determined;


(6) in response to an allegation involving a conflict between members of the board of trustees or between the board and the district administration if it appears that the conflict involves a violation of a role or duty of the board members or the administration clearly defined by this code;


(8) in response to an allegation regarding or an analysis using a statistical method result indicating a possible violation of an assessment instrument security procedure established under Section 39.0301, including for the purpose of investigating or auditing a school district under that section;


(9) when a significant pattern of decreased academic performance has developed as a result of the promotion in the preceding two school years of students who did not perform satisfactorily as determined by the commissioner under Section 39.0241(a) on assessment instruments administered under Section 39.023(a), (c), or (l);


(10) when excessive numbers of students eligible to enroll fail to complete an Algebra II course or any other advanced course as determined by the commissioner;


(11) when resource allocation practices as evaluated under Section 39.0821 indicate a potential for significant improvement in resource allocation;


(12) when a disproportionate number of students of a particular demographic group is graduating with a particular endorsement under Section 28.025(c-1);


(13) when an excessive number of students is graduating with a particular endorsement under Section 28.025(c-1);


(14) in response to a complaint submitted to the agency with respect to alleged inaccurate data that is reported through the Public Education Information Management System (PEIMS) or through other reports required by state or federal law or rule or court order and that is used by the agency to make a determination relating to public school accountability, including accreditation, under this chapter;


(15) when a school district for any reason fails to produce, at the request of the agency, evidence or an investigation report relating to an educator who is under investigation by the State Board for Educator Certification; or


(16) as the commissioner otherwise determines necessary.


(b) If the agency's findings in an investigation under Subsection (a)(6) indicate that the board of trustees has observed a lawfully adopted policy, the agency may not substitute its judgment for that of the board.


(c) The commissioner may authorize special accreditation investigations to be conducted in response to repeated complaints submitted to the agency concerning imposition of excessive paperwork requirements on classroom teachers.


(d) Based on the results of a special accreditation investigation, the commissioner may:


(1) take appropriate action under Chapter 39A;


(2) lower the school district's accreditation status or a district's or campus's accountability rating; or


(3) take action under both Subdivisions (1) and (2).


(e) Regardless of whether the commissioner lowers the school district's accreditation status or a district's or campus's performance rating under Subsection (d), the commissioner may take action under Section 39A.002 or 39A.051 if the commissioner determines that the action is necessary to improve any area of a district's or campus's performance, including the district's financial accounting practices.


Amended by:


Acts 2009, 81st Leg., R.S., Ch. 895 (H.B. 3), Sec. 59, eff. June 19, 2009.


Acts 2013, 83rd Leg., R.S., Ch. 211 (H.B. 5), Sec. 48(a), eff. June 10, 2013.


Acts 2013, 83rd Leg., R.S., Ch. 509 (S.B. 123), Sec. 2, eff. June 14, 2013.


Acts 2015, 84th Leg., R.S., Ch. 1236 (S.B. 1296), Sec. 5.004, eff. September 1, 2015.


Acts 2017, 85th Leg., R.S., Ch. 178 (S.B. 7), Sec. 16, eff. September 1, 2017.


Acts 2017, 85th Leg., R.S., Ch. 324 (S.B. 1488), Sec. 21.003(21), eff. September 1, 2017.


The following section was amended by the 87th Legislature. Pending publication of the current statutes, see S.B. 1365, 87th Legislature, Regular Session, for amendments affecting the following section.



Sec. 39.058. CONDUCT OF SPECIAL ACCREDITATION INVESTIGATIONS. (a) The agency shall adopt written procedures for conducting special accreditation investigations under this subchapter, including procedures that allow the agency to obtain information from district employees in a manner that prevents a district or campus from screening the information. The agency shall make the procedures available on the agency Internet website. Agency staff must be trained in the procedures and must follow the procedures in conducting the special accreditation investigation.


(b) After completing a special accreditation investigation, the agency shall present preliminary findings to any person or entity the agency finds has violated a law, rule, or policy. Before issuing a report with its final findings, the agency must provide a person or entity the agency finds has violated a law, rule, or policy an opportunity for an informal review by the commissioner or a designated hearing examiner.


Amended by:


Acts 2009, 81st Leg., R.S., Ch. 895 (H.B. 3), Sec. 59, eff. June 19, 2009.


Acts 2015, 84th Leg., R.S., Ch. 1046 (H.B. 1842), Sec. 8, eff. June 19, 2015.


The following section was amended by the 87th Legislature. Pending publication of the current statutes, see H.B. 3607, 87th Legislature, Regular Session, for amendments affecting the following section.



Text of section as added by Acts 2019, 86th Leg., R.S., Ch. 870 (H.B. 3007), Sec. 1



For text of section as added by Acts 2019, 86th Leg., R.S., Ch. 871 (H.B. 3011), Sec. 1, see other Sec. 39.059.



Sec. 39.059. DATA TRANSPARENCY. Before the initial release of academic accountability ratings for a school year, the agency shall provide to each school district a copy of all source data as submitted to the agency by an entity other than the district that the agency considers in:


(1) determining the district's accreditation status under Section 39.052; or


(2) assigning performance ratings for the district or the district's campuses under Section 39.054.


Added by Acts 2019, 86th Leg., R.S., Ch. 870 (H.B. 3007), Sec. 1, eff. September 1, 2019.


The following section was amended by the 87th Legislature. Pending publication of the current statutes, see H.B. 3607, 87th Legislature, Regular Session, for amendments affecting the following section.



Text of section as added by Acts 2019, 86th Leg., R.S., Ch. 871 (H.B. 3011), Sec. 1



For text of section as added by Acts 2019, 86th Leg., R.S., Ch. 870 (H.B. 3007), Sec. 1, see other Sec. 39.059.



Sec. 39.059. DATA TRANSPARENCY. (a) In this section:


(1) "Coordinating board" means the Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board.


(2) "Institution of higher education" has the meaning assigned by Section 61.003.


(b) Before the initial release of academic accountability ratings for a school year, the coordinating board shall provide to each school district a copy of all source data as submitted to the coordinating board by an institution of higher education that the coordinating board provides to the agency to consider in:


(1) determining the district's accreditation status under Section 39.052; or


(2) assigning performance ratings for the district or the district's campuses under Section 39.054.


Added by Acts 2019, 86th Leg., R.S., Ch. 871 (H.B. 3011), Sec. 1, eff. September 1, 2019.


SUBCHAPTER D. FINANCIAL ACCOUNTABILITY



Sec. 39.081. DEFINITIONS. In this subchapter:


(1) "Parent" includes a guardian or other person having lawful control of a student.


(2) "System" means a financial accountability rating system developed under this subchapter.


Amended by:


Acts 2009, 81st Leg., R.S., Ch. 895 (H.B. 3), Sec. 59, eff. June 19, 2009.


Sec. 39.082. DEVELOPMENT AND IMPLEMENTATION. (a) The commissioner shall, in consultation with the comptroller, develop and implement separate financial accountability rating systems for school districts and open-enrollment charter schools in this state that:


(1) distinguish among school districts and distinguish among open-enrollment charter schools, as applicable, based on levels of financial performance;


(2) include procedures to:


(A) provide additional transparency to public education finance; and


(B) enable the commissioner and school district and open-enrollment charter school administrators to provide meaningful financial oversight and improvement; and


(3) include processes for anticipating the future financial solvency of each school district and open-enrollment charter school, including analysis of district and school revenues and expenditures for preceding school years.


(b) The system must include uniform indicators adopted by commissioner rule by which to measure the financial management performance and future financial solvency of a district or open-enrollment charter school. In adopting indicators under this subsection, the commissioner shall assign a point value to each indicator to be used in a scoring matrix developed by the commissioner. Any reference to a teacher in an indicator adopted by the commissioner under this subsection means a classroom teacher.


(c) The system may not include an indicator under Subsection (b) or any other performance measure that:


(1) requires a school district to spend at least 65 percent or any other specified percentage of district operating funds for instructional purposes; or


(2) lowers the financial management performance rating of a school district for failure to spend at least 65 percent or any other specified percentage of district operating funds for instructional purposes.


(d) The commissioner shall evaluate indicators adopted under Subsection (b) at least once every three years.


(e) Under the financial accountability rating system developed under this section, each school district or open-enrollment charter school, as applicable, shall be assigned a financial accountability rating. In adopting rules under this section, the commissioner, in consultation with the comptroller, shall determine the criteria for each designated performance rating.


(e-1) The financial performance of a charter school operated by a public institution of higher education under Subchapter D or E, Chapter 12, shall be evaluated using only the indicators adopted under this section determined by the commissioner by rule as appropriate to accurately measure the financial performance of such charter schools.


(f) A district or open-enrollment charter school shall receive the lowest rating under the system if the district or school fails to achieve a satisfactory rating on:


(1) an indicator adopted under Subsection (b) relating to financial management or solvency that the commissioner determines to be critical; or


(2) a category of indicators that suggest trends leading to financial distress as determined by the commissioner.


(g) Before assigning a final rating under the system, the commissioner shall assign each district or open-enrollment charter school a preliminary rating. A district or school may submit additional information to the commissioner relating to any indicator on which performance was considered unsatisfactory. The commissioner shall consider any additional information submitted by a district or school before assigning a final rating. If the commissioner determines that the additional information negates the concern raised by the indicator on which performance was considered unsatisfactory, the commissioner may not penalize the district or school on the basis of the indicator.


(h) The commissioner shall adopt rules for the implementation of this section.


(i) Not later than August 8 of each year, the financial accountability rating of each school district and open-enrollment charter school under the financial accountability rating system developed under this section shall be made publicly available as provided by rules adopted under this section.


Amended by:


Acts 2009, 81st Leg., R.S., Ch. 895 (H.B. 3), Sec. 59, eff. June 19, 2009.


Acts 2013, 83rd Leg., R.S., Ch. 211 (H.B. 5), Sec. 49(a), eff. June 10, 2013.


Acts 2017, 85th Leg., R.S., Ch. 756 (S.B. 1837), Sec. 1, eff. June 12, 2017.


Sec. 39.0821. COMPTROLLER REVIEW OF RESOURCE ALLOCATION PRACTICES. (a) The comptroller shall identify school districts and campuses that use resource allocation practices that contribute to high academic achievement and cost-effective operations. In identifying districts and campuses under this section, the comptroller shall:


(1) evaluate existing academic accountability and financial data by integrating the data;


(2) rank the results of the evaluation under Subdivision (1) to identify the relative performance of districts and campuses; and


(3) identify potential areas for district and campus improvement.


(b) In reviewing resources allocation practices of districts and campuses under this section, the comptroller shall ensure resources are being used for the instruction of students by evaluating:


(1) the operating cost for each student;


(2) the operating cost for each program; and


(3) the staffing cost for each student.


Amended by:


Acts 2009, 81st Leg., R.S., Ch. 895 (H.B. 3), Sec. 59, eff. June 19, 2009.


Sec. 39.0823. PROJECTED DEFICIT. (a) If the commissioner, based on the indicators adopted under Section 39.082 or other relevant information, projects a deficit for a school district or open-enrollment charter school general fund within the following three school years, the agency shall provide the district or school interim financial reports, including projected revenues and expenditures, to evaluate the current budget status of the district or school.


(b) Repealed by Acts 2013, 83rd Leg., R.S., Ch. 211, Sec. 78(b)(5), eff. September 1, 2014.


(c) Repealed by Acts 2013, 83rd Leg., R.S., Ch. 211, Sec. 78(b)(5), eff. September 1, 2014.


(d) The agency may require a district or open-enrollment charter school to submit additional information needed to produce a financial report under Subsection (a). If a district or school fails to provide information requested under this subsection or if the commissioner determines that the information submitted by a district or school is unreliable, the commissioner may order the district or school to acquire professional services as provided by Section 39A.902.


Amended by:


Acts 2009, 81st Leg., R.S., Ch. 895 (H.B. 3), Sec. 59, eff. June 19, 2009.


Acts 2013, 83rd Leg., R.S., Ch. 211 (H.B. 5), Sec. 50(a), eff. June 10, 2013.


Acts 2013, 83rd Leg., R.S., Ch. 211 (H.B. 5), Sec. 78(b)(5), eff. September 1, 2014.


Acts 2017, 85th Leg., R.S., Ch. 324 (S.B. 1488), Sec. 21.003(22), eff. September 1, 2017.


Sec. 39.0824. CORRECTIVE ACTION PLAN. (a) A school district or open-enrollment charter school assigned the lowest rating under Section 39.082 shall submit to the commissioner a corrective action plan to address the financial weaknesses of the district or school. A corrective action plan must identify the specific areas of financial weaknesses, such as financial weaknesses in transportation, curriculum, or teacher development, and include strategies for improvement.


(b) The commissioner may impose appropriate sanctions under Chapter 39A against a district or school failing to submit or implement a corrective action plan required under Subsection (a).


Added by Acts 2013, 83rd Leg., R.S., Ch. 211 (H.B. 5), Sec. 51(a), eff. June 10, 2013.


Amended by:


Acts 2017, 85th Leg., R.S., Ch. 324 (S.B. 1488), Sec. 21.003(23), eff. September 1, 2017.


Sec. 39.083. REPORTING. (a) The commissioner shall develop, as part of the system, a reporting procedure under which:


(1) each school district is required to prepare and distribute an annual financial management report; and


(2) the public is provided an opportunity to comment on the report at a hearing.


(b) The annual financial management report must include:


(1) a description of the district's financial management performance based on a comparison, provided by the agency, of the district's performance on the indicators adopted under Section 39.082(b) to:


(A) state-established standards; and


(B) the district's previous performance on the indicators; and


(2) any descriptive information required by the commissioner.


(c) The report may include:


(1) information concerning the district's:


(A) financial allocations;


(B) tax collections;


(C) financial strength;


(D) operating cost management;


(E) personnel management;


(F) debt management;


(G) facility acquisition and construction management;


(H) cash management;


(I) budgetary planning;


(J) overall business management;


(K) compliance with rules; and


(L) data quality; and


(2) any other information the board of trustees determines to be necessary or useful.


(d) The board of trustees of each school district shall hold a public hearing on the report. The board shall give notice of the hearing to owners of real property in the district and to parents of district students. In addition to other notice required by law, notice of the hearing must be provided:


(1) to a newspaper of general circulation in the district; and


(2) through electronic mail to media serving the district.


(e) After the hearing, the report shall be disseminated in the district in the manner prescribed by the commissioner.


Amended by:


Acts 2009, 81st Leg., R.S., Ch. 895 (H.B. 3), Sec. 59, eff. June 19, 2009.


Acts 2013, 83rd Leg., R.S., Ch. 211 (H.B. 5), Sec. 52(a), eff. June 10, 2013.


Sec. 39.085. RULES. The commissioner shall adopt rules as necessary for the implementation and administration of this subchapter.


Amended by:


Acts 2009, 81st Leg., R.S., Ch. 895 (H.B. 3), Sec. 59, eff. June 19, 2009.


Sec. 39.086. SOFTWARE STANDARDS. (a) The Department of Information Resources, in cooperation with the commissioner, shall adopt performance and interoperability standards for software used by school districts for financial accounting or attendance reporting.


(b) Standards adopted under this section must ensure that the software will enable a school district to share and report information in a timely manner for purposes of financial management, operational decision-making, and transparency of district operations to the public.


(c) The Department of Information Resources:


(1) shall include compliance with standards adopted under this section as a requirement in any solicitation for software anticipated to be used for a purpose described by Subsection (a);


(2) shall require a vendor awarded a contract in response to a solicitation described by Subdivision (1) to certify that the software complies with the standards adopted under this section; and


(3) may negotiate state contract pricing for software that complies with the standards adopted under this section.


Added by Acts 2009, 81st Leg., R.S., Ch. 393 (H.B. 1705), Sec. 2.06, eff. September 1, 2009.


Transferred and redesignated from Education Code, Section 39.205 by Acts 2011, 82nd Leg., R.S., Ch. 91 (S.B. 1303), Sec. 27.001(6), eff. September 1, 2011.


SUBCHAPTER E. ACCREDITATION INTERVENTIONS AND SANCTIONS



Without reference to the amendment of this section, this section was repealed by Acts 2019, 86th Leg., R.S., Ch. 467 (H.B. 4170), Sec. 5.025(b), eff. September 1, 2019.



Sec. 39.102. INTERVENTIONS AND SANCTIONS FOR DISTRICTS.


Text of subsection as amended by Acts 2017, 85th Leg., R.S., Ch. 925 (S.B. 1566), Sec. 15



(1) issue public notice of the deficiency to the board of trustees;


(2) order a hearing conducted by the board of trustees of the district for the purpose of notifying the public of the insufficient performance, the improvements in performance expected by the agency, and the interventions and sanctions that may be imposed under this section if the performance does not improve;


(3) order the preparation of a student achievement improvement plan that addresses each academic achievement indicator under Section 39.053(c) for which the district's performance is insufficient, the submission of the plan to the commissioner for approval, and implementation of the plan;


(4) order a hearing to be held before the commissioner or the commissioner's designee at which the president of the board of trustees of the district and the superintendent shall appear and explain the district's low performance, lack of improvement, and plans for improvement;


(5) arrange a monitoring review of the district;


(6) appoint an agency monitor to participate in and report to the agency on the activities of the board of trustees or the superintendent;


(7) appoint a conservator to oversee the operations of the district;


(8) appoint a management team to direct the operations of the district in areas of insufficient performance or require the district to obtain certain services under a contract with another person;


(9) authorize the district to enter into a memorandum of understanding with an institution of higher education that provides for the assistance of the institution of higher education in improving the district's performance;


(10) if a district has a current accreditation status of accredited-warned or accredited-probation, fails to satisfy any standard under Section 39.054(e), or fails to satisfy financial accountability standards as determined by commissioner rule, appoint a board of managers to exercise the powers and duties of the board of trustees;


(11) if for two consecutive school years, including the current school year, a district has received an accreditation status of accredited-warned or accredited-probation, has failed to satisfy any standard under Section 39.054(e), or has failed to satisfy financial accountability standards as determined by commissioner rule, revoke the district's accreditation and:


(A) order closure of the district and annex the district to one or more adjoining districts under Section 13.054; or


(B) in the case of a home-rule school district or open-enrollment charter school, order closure of all programs operated under the district's or school's charter; or


(12) order the use of the board improvement and evaluation tool as provided by Section 11.182.


Amended by:


Acts 2009, 81st Leg., R.S., Ch. 895 (H.B. 3), Sec. 59, eff. June 19, 2009.


Acts 2015, 84th Leg., R.S., Ch. 1046 (H.B. 1842), Sec. 9, eff. June 19, 2015.


Acts 2015, 84th Leg., R.S., Ch. 1094 (H.B. 2804), Sec. 17, eff. June 19, 2015.


Acts 2017, 85th Leg., R.S., Ch. 324 (S.B. 1488), Sec. 21.002(1), eff. September 1, 2017.


Acts 2017, 85th Leg., R.S., Ch. 823 (H.B. 1553), Sec. 1, eff. June 15, 2017.


Acts 2017, 85th Leg., R.S., Ch. 925 (S.B. 1566), Sec. 15, eff. September 1, 2017.


Acts 2019, 86th Leg., R.S., Ch. 467 (H.B. 4170), Sec. 5.025(b), eff. September 1, 2019.


SUBCHAPTER F. PROCEDURES FOR CHALLENGE OF ACCOUNTABILITY DETERMINATION



The following section was amended by the 87th Legislature. Pending publication of the current statutes, see S.B. 1365, 87th Legislature, Regular Session, for amendments affecting the following section.



Sec. 39.151. REVIEW BY COMMISSIONER: ACCOUNTABILITY DETERMINATION. (a) The commissioner by rule shall provide a process for a school district or open-enrollment charter school to challenge an agency decision made under this chapter relating to an academic or financial accountability rating that affects the district or school.


(b) The rules under Subsection (a) must provide for the commissioner to appoint a committee to make recommendations to the commissioner on a challenge made to an agency decision relating to an academic performance rating or determination or financial accountability rating. The commissioner may not appoint an agency employee as a member of the committee.


(c) The commissioner may limit a challenge under this section to a written submission of any issue identified by the school district or open-enrollment charter school challenging the agency decision.


(d) The commissioner shall make a final decision under this section after considering the recommendation of the committee described by Subsection (b). The commissioner's decision may not be appealed under Section 7.057 or other law.


(e) A school district or open-enrollment charter school may not challenge an agency decision relating to an academic or financial accountability rating under this chapter in another proceeding if the district or school has had an opportunity to challenge the decision under this section.


Amended by:


Acts 2009, 81st Leg., R.S., Ch. 895 (H.B. 3), Sec. 59, eff. June 19, 2009.


SUBCHAPTER G. DISTINCTION DESIGNATIONS



Sec. 39.201. DISTINCTION DESIGNATIONS. (a) Not later than August 8 of each year, the commissioner shall award distinction designations for outstanding performance as provided by this subchapter. A distinction designation awarded to a district or campus under this subchapter shall be referenced directly in connection with the performance rating assigned to the district or campus and made publicly available together with the performance ratings as provided by rules adopted under Section 39.054(a).


(b) A district or campus may not be awarded a distinction designation under this subchapter unless the district or campus has acceptable performance under Section 39.054.


(c) In addition to the condition prescribed by Subsection (b), an open-enrollment charter school may not be awarded a distinction designation under this subchapter if the charter school is evaluated under alternative education accountability procedures adopted by the commissioner.


Added by Acts 2001, 77th Leg., ch. 914, Sec. 1, eff. Sept. 1, 2001.


Amended by:


Acts 2009, 81st Leg., R.S., Ch. 895 (H.B. 3), Sec. 59, eff. June 19, 2009.


Acts 2011, 82nd Leg., R.S., Ch. 662 (S.B. 1484), Sec. 1, eff. June 17, 2011.


Acts 2013, 83rd Leg., R.S., Ch. 211 (H.B. 5), Sec. 53(a), eff. June 10, 2013.


Sec. 39.2011. APPLICABILITY TO CHARTER SCHOOLS. In this subchapter:


(1) a district includes an open-enrollment charter school that operates on more than one campus; and


(2) a campus includes an open-enrollment charter school campus.


Added by Acts 2011, 82nd Leg., R.S., Ch. 662 (S.B. 1484), Sec. 2, eff. June 17, 2011.


Sec. 39.202. ACADEMIC DISTINCTION DESIGNATION FOR DISTRICTS AND CAMPUSES. The commissioner by rule shall establish an academic distinction designation for districts and campuses for outstanding performance in attainment of postsecondary readiness. The commissioner shall adopt criteria for the designation under this section, including:


(1) percentages of students who:


(A) performed satisfactorily, as determined under the college readiness performance standard under Section 39.0241, on assessment instruments required under Section 39.023(a), (b), (c), or (l), aggregated across grade levels by subject area; or


(B) met the standard for annual improvement, as determined by the agency under Section 39.034, on assessment instruments required under Section 39.023(a), (b), (c), or (l), aggregated across grade levels by subject area, for students who did not perform satisfactorily as described by Paragraph (A);


(2) percentages of:


(A) students who earned a nationally or internationally recognized business or industry certification or license;


(B) students who completed a coherent sequence of career and technical courses;


(C) students who completed a dual credit course or an articulated postsecondary course provided for local credit;


(D) students who achieved applicable College Readiness Benchmarks or the equivalent on the Preliminary Scholastic Assessment Test (PSAT), the Scholastic Assessment Test (SAT), the American College Test (ACT), or the ACT-Plan assessment program; and


(E) students who received a score on either an advanced placement test or an international baccalaureate examination to be awarded college credit; and


(3) other factors for determining sufficient student attainment of postsecondary readiness.


Added by Acts 2001, 77th Leg., ch. 914, Sec. 1, eff. Sept. 1, 2001.


Amended by:


Acts 2006, 79th Leg., 3rd C.S., Ch. 5 (H.B. 1), Sec. 2.05, eff. May 31, 2006.


Acts 2009, 81st Leg., R.S., Ch. 895 (H.B. 3), Sec. 59, eff. June 19, 2009.


Acts 2013, 83rd Leg., R.S., Ch. 211 (H.B. 5), Sec. 54(a), eff. June 10, 2013.


Sec. 39.203. CAMPUS DISTINCTION DESIGNATIONS. (a) The commissioner shall award a campus a distinction designation for outstanding performance in improvement in student achievement if the campus is ranked in the top 25 percent of campuses in the state in annual improvement in student achievement as determined under Section 39.034.


(b) In addition to the distinction designation described by Subsection (a), the commissioner shall award a campus a distinction designation for outstanding performance in closing student achievement differentials if the campus demonstrates an ability to significantly diminish or eliminate performance differentials between student subpopulations and is ranked in the top 25 percent of campuses in this state under the performance criteria described by this subsection. The commissioner shall adopt rules related to the distinction designation under this subsection to ensure that a campus does not artificially diminish or eliminate performance differentials through inhibiting the achievement of the highest achieving student subpopulation.


(c) In addition to the distinction designations described by Subsections (a) and (b), a campus that satisfies the criteria developed under Section 39.204 shall be awarded a distinction designation by the commissioner for outstanding performance in academic achievement in English language arts, mathematics, science, or social studies.


(d) In addition to the distinction designations otherwise described by this section, the commissioner may award a distinction designation for outstanding performance in advanced middle or junior high school student achievement to a campus with a significant number of students below grade nine who perform satisfactorily on an end-of-course assessment instrument administered under Section 39.023(c).


Added by Acts 2001, 77th Leg., ch. 914, Sec. 1, eff. Sept. 1, 2001.


Amended by:


Acts 2009, 81st Leg., R.S., Ch. 895 (H.B. 3), Sec. 59, eff. June 19, 2009.


Acts 2011, 82nd Leg., R.S., Ch. 307 (H.B. 2135), Sec. 6, eff. June 17, 2011.


Acts 2013, 83rd Leg., R.S., Ch. 211 (H.B. 5), Sec. 55(a), eff. June 10, 2013.


Sec. 39.204. CAMPUS DISTINCTION DESIGNATION CRITERIA; COMMITTEES. (a) The commissioner by rule shall establish:


(1) standards for considering campuses for distinction designations under Section 39.203(c); and


(2) methods for awarding distinction designations to campuses.


(b) In adopting rules under this section, the commissioner shall establish a separate committee to develop criteria for each distinction designation under Section 39.203(c).


(c) Each committee established under this section must include:


(1) individuals who practice as professionals in the content area relevant to the distinction designation, as applicable;


(2) individuals with subject matter expertise in the content area relevant to the distinction designation;


(3) educators with subject matter expertise in the content area relevant to the distinction designation; and


(4) community leaders, including leaders from the business community.


(d) For each committee, the governor, lieutenant governor, and speaker of the house of representatives may each appoint a person described by each subdivision of Subsection (c).


(e) In developing criteria for distinction designations under this section, each committee shall:


(1) identify a variety of indicators for measuring excellence; and


(2) consider categories for distinction designations, with criteria relevant to each category, based on:


(A) the level of a program, whether elementary school, middle or junior high school, or high school; and


(B) the student enrollment of a campus.


Added by Acts 2001, 77th Leg., ch. 914, Sec. 1, eff. Sept. 1, 2001.


Amended by:


Acts 2009, 81st Leg., R.S., Ch. 895 (H.B. 3), Sec. 59, eff. June 19, 2009.


SUBCHAPTER H. ADDITIONAL REWARDS



Sec. 39.232. EXCELLENCE EXEMPTIONS. (a) Except as provided by Subsection (b), a school campus or district that is rated exemplary under Subchapter G is exempt from requirements and prohibitions imposed under this code including rules adopted under this code.


(b) A school campus or district is not exempt under this section from:


(1) a prohibition on conduct that constitutes a criminal offense;


(2) requirements imposed by federal law or rule, including requirements for special education or bilingual education programs; or


(3) a requirement, restriction, or prohibition relating to:


(A) curriculum essential knowledge and skills under Section 28.002 or high school graduation requirements under Section 28.025;


(B) public school accountability as provided by Subchapters B, C, D, and J and Chapter 39A;


(C) extracurricular activities under Section 33.081;


(D) health and safety under Chapter 38;


(E) purchasing under Subchapter B, Chapter 44;


(F) elementary school class size limits, except as provided by Subsection (d) or Section 25.112;


(G) removal of a disruptive student from the classroom under Subchapter A, Chapter 37;


(H) at risk programs under Subchapter C, Chapter 29;


(I) prekindergarten programs under Subchapter E, Chapter 29;


(J) rights and benefits of school employees;


(K) special education programs under Subchapter A, Chapter 29; or


(L) bilingual education programs under Subchapter B, Chapter 29.


(c) The agency shall monitor and evaluate deregulation of a school campus or district under this section and Section 7.056.


(d) The commissioner may exempt an exemplary school campus under Subchapter G from elementary class size limits under this section if the school campus submits to the commissioner a written plan showing steps that will be taken to ensure that the exemption from the class size limits will not be harmful to the academic achievement of the students on the school campus. The commissioner shall review achievement levels annually. The exemption remains in effect until the commissioner determines that achievement levels of the campus have declined.


Amended by:


Acts 2009, 81st Leg., R.S., Ch. 895 (H.B. 3), Sec. 59, eff. June 19, 2009.


Acts 2017, 85th Leg., R.S., Ch. 324 (S.B. 1488), Sec. 21.003(25), eff. September 1, 2017.


Sec. 39.235. INNOVATION GRANT INITIATIVE FOR MIDDLE, JUNIOR HIGH, AND HIGH SCHOOL CAMPUSES.


(a) From funds appropriated for that purpose, the commissioner may establish a grant program under which grants are awarded to middle, junior high, and high school campuses and school districts to support:


(1) the implementation of innovative improvement programs that are based on the best available research regarding middle, junior high, or high school reform, dropout prevention, and preparing students for postsecondary coursework or employment; and


(2) enhancing education practices that have been demonstrated by significant evidence of effectiveness.


(b) Before awarding a grant under this section, the commissioner may require a campus or school district to:


(1) obtain local matching funds; or


(2) meet other conditions, including developing a personal graduation plan under Section 28.0212 or 28.02121, as applicable, for each student enrolled at the campus or in a district middle, junior high, or high school.


(c) The commissioner may:


(1) accept gifts, grants, or donations from a private foundation to implement a grant program under this section; and


(2) coordinate gifts, grants, or donations with other available funding to implement a grant program under this section.


(d) The commissioner may use funds appropriated under this section to support technical assistance services for school districts and open-enrollment charter schools to implement an improvement program under this section.


Amended by:


Acts 2009, 81st Leg., R.S., Ch. 895 (H.B. 3), Sec. 59, eff. June 19, 2009.


Acts 2013, 83rd Leg., R.S., Ch. 211 (H.B. 5), Sec. 56(a), eff. June 10, 2013.


Acts 2019, 86th Leg., R.S., Ch. 439 (S.B. 1376), Sec. 1.06, eff. June 4, 2019.


Sec. 39.236. GIFTED AND TALENTED STANDARDS. The commissioner shall adopt standards to evaluate school district programs for gifted and talented students to determine whether a district operates a program for gifted and talented students in accordance with:


(1) the Texas Performance Standards Project; or


(2) another program approved by the commissioner that meets the requirements of the state plan for the education of gifted and talented students under Section 29.123.


Amended by:


Acts 2009, 81st Leg., R.S., Ch. 895 (H.B. 3), Sec. 59, eff. June 19, 2009.


SUBCHAPTER I. SUCCESSFUL SCHOOL AWARDS



Sec. 39.261. CREATION OF SYSTEM. The Texas Successful Schools Awards System is created to recognize and reward those schools and school districts that demonstrate progress or success in achieving the education goals of the state.


Amended by:


Acts 2009, 81st Leg., R.S., Ch. 895 (H.B. 3), Sec. 59, eff. June 19, 2009.


Sec. 39.262. TYPES OF AWARDS. (a) The governor may present a financial award to the schools or districts that the commissioner determines have demonstrated the highest levels of sustained success or the greatest improvement in achieving the education goals. For each student in average daily attendance, each of those schools or districts is entitled to an amount set for the award for which the school or district is selected by the commissioner, subject to any limitation set by the commissioner on the total amount that may be awarded to a school or district.


(b) The governor may present proclamations or certificates to additional schools and districts determined to have met or exceeded the education goals.


(c) The commissioner may establish additional categories of awards and award amounts for a school or district determined to be successful under Subsection (a) or (b) that are contingent on the school's or district's involvement with paired, lower-performing schools.


Amended by:


Acts 2009, 81st Leg., R.S., Ch. 895 (H.B. 3), Sec. 59, eff. June 19, 2009.


Sec. 39.263. AWARDS. (a) The criteria that the commissioner shall use to select successful schools and districts must be related to the goals in Section 4.002 and must include consideration of performance on the achievement indicators adopted under Section 39.053(c) and consideration of the distinction designation criteria prescribed by or developed under Subchapter G.


(b) For purposes of selecting schools and districts under Section 39.262(a), each school's performance shall be compared to state standards and to its previous performance.


(c) The commissioner shall select annually schools and districts qualified to receive successful school awards for their performance.


(d) The agency shall notify each school district of the manner in which the district or a school in the district may qualify for a successful school award.


Added by Acts 2007, 80th Leg., R.S., Ch. 1058 (H.B. 2237), Sec. 14, eff. June 15, 2007.


Amended by:


Acts 2009, 81st Leg., R.S., Ch. 895 (H.B. 3), Sec. 59, eff. June 19, 2009.


Acts 2015, 84th Leg., R.S., Ch. 1094 (H.B. 2804), Sec. 18, eff. June 19, 2015.


Acts 2015, 84th Leg., R.S., Ch. 1203 (S.B. 1455), Sec. 2, eff. September 1, 2015.


Sec. 39.264. USE OF AWARDS. (a) In determining the use of a monetary award received under this subchapter, a school or district shall give priority to academic enhancement purposes. The award may not be used for any purpose related to athletics, and it may not be used to substitute for or replace funds already in the regular budget for a school or district.


(b) The campus-level committee established under Section 11.253 shall determine the use of the funds awarded to a school under this subchapter. The professional staff of the district shall determine the use of the funds awarded to the school district under this subchapter.


Amended by:


Acts 2009, 81st Leg., R.S., Ch. 895 (H.B. 3), Sec. 59, eff. June 19, 2009.


Sec. 39.265. FUNDING. The award system may be funded by donations, grants, or legislative appropriations. The commissioner may solicit and receive grants and donations for the purpose of making awards under this subchapter. A small portion of the award funds may be used by the commissioner to pay for the costs associated with sponsoring a ceremony to recognize or present awards to schools or districts under this subchapter. The donations, grants, or legislative appropriations shall be accounted for and distributed by the agency. The awards are subject to audit requirements established by the State Board of Education.


Amended by:


Acts 2009, 81st Leg., R.S., Ch. 895 (H.B. 3), Sec. 59, eff. June 19, 2009.


Sec. 39.266. CONFIDENTIALITY. All information and reports received by the commissioner under this subchapter from schools or school districts deemed confidential under Chapter 552, Government Code, are confidential and may not be disclosed in any public or private proceeding.


Amended by:


Acts 2009, 81st Leg., R.S., Ch. 895 (H.B. 3), Sec. 59, eff. June 19, 2009.


SUBCHAPTER J. PARENT AND EDUCATOR REPORTS



The following section was amended by the 87th Legislature. Pending publication of the current statutes, see H.B. 4545 and S.B. 2066, 87th Legislature, Regular Session, for amendments affecting the following section.



Sec. 39.301. ADDITIONAL PERFORMANCE INDICATORS: REPORTING. (a) In addition to the indicators adopted under Section 39.053, the commissioner shall adopt indicators of the quality of learning for the purpose of preparing reports under this chapter. The commissioner biennially shall review the indicators for the consideration of appropriate revisions.


(b) Performance on the indicators adopted under this section shall be evaluated in the same manner provided for evaluation of the achievement indicators under Section 39.053(c).


(c) Indicators for reporting purposes must include:


(1) the percentage of graduating students who meet the course requirements established by State Board of Education rule for:


(A) the foundation high school program;


(B) the distinguished level of achievement under the foundation high school program; and


(C) each endorsement described by Section 28.025(c-1);


(2) the results of the SAT, ACT, and certified workforce training programs described by Chapter 311, Labor Code;


(3) for students who have failed to perform satisfactorily, under each performance standard under Section 39.0241, on an assessment instrument required under Section 39.023(a) or (c), the performance of those students on subsequent assessment instruments required under those sections, aggregated by grade level and subject area;


(4) for each campus, the number of students, disaggregated by major student subpopulations, that take courses under the foundation high school program and take additional courses to earn an endorsement under Section 28.025(c-1), disaggregated by type of endorsement;


(6) the percentage of students of limited English proficiency exempted from the administration of an assessment instrument under Sections 39.027(a)(1) and (2);


(8) the percentage of students who satisfy the college readiness measure;


(9) the measure of progress toward dual language proficiency under Section 39.034(b), for students of limited English proficiency, as defined by Section 29.052;


(10) the percentage of students who are not educationally disadvantaged;


(11) the percentage of students who enroll and begin instruction at an institution of higher education in the school year following high school graduation; and


(12) the percentage of students who successfully complete the first year of instruction at an institution of higher education without needing a developmental education course.


(d) Performance on the indicators described by Section 39.053(c) and Subsections (c)(3), (4), and (9) must be based on longitudinal student data that is disaggregated by the bilingual education or special language program, if any, in which students of limited English proficiency, as defined by Section 29.052, are or former students of limited English proficiency were enrolled. If a student described by this subsection is not or was not enrolled in specialized language instruction, the number and percentage of those students shall be provided.


(e) Section 39.055 applies in evaluating indicators described by Subsection (c).


Added by Acts 2006, 79th Leg., 3rd C.S., Ch. 5 (H.B. 1), Sec. 3.22, eff. May 31, 2006.


Amended by:


Acts 2009, 81st Leg., R.S., Ch. 895 (H.B. 3), Sec. 59, eff. June 19, 2009.


Acts 2013, 83rd Leg., R.S., Ch. 211 (H.B. 5), Sec. 57(a), eff. June 10, 2013.


Acts 2015, 84th Leg., R.S., Ch. 1094 (H.B. 2804), Sec. 19, eff. June 19, 2015.


Acts 2017, 85th Leg., R.S., Ch. 189 (S.B. 22), Sec. 3, eff. September 1, 2017.


Acts 2017, 85th Leg., R.S., Ch. 807 (H.B. 22), Sec. 18, eff. June 15, 2017.


Sec. 39.302. REPORT TO DISTRICT: COMPARISONS FOR ANNUAL PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT. (a) The agency shall report to each school district the comparisons of student performance made under Section 39.034.


(b) To the extent practicable, the agency shall combine the report of comparisons with the report of the student's performance on assessment instruments under Section 39.023.


Added by Acts 2006, 79th Leg., 3rd C.S., Ch. 5 (H.B. 1), Sec. 3.22, eff. May 31, 2006.


Amended by:


Acts 2009, 81st Leg., R.S., Ch. 895 (H.B. 3), Sec. 59, eff. June 19, 2009.


Sec. 39.303. REPORT TO PARENTS. (a) The school district a student attends shall provide a record of the comparisons made under Section 39.034 and provided to the district under Section 39.302 in a written notice to the student's parent or other person standing in parental relationship.


Amended by:


Acts 2009, 81st Leg., R.S., Ch. 895 (H.B. 3), Sec. 59, eff. June 19, 2009.


Acts 2011, 82nd Leg., 1st C.S., Ch. 6 (S.B. 6), Sec. 63, eff. July 19, 2011.


Sec. 39.304. TEACHER REPORT CARD. (a) Each school district shall prepare a report of the comparisons made under Section 39.034 and provided to the district under Section 39.302 and provide the report at the beginning of the school year to:


(1) each teacher for all students, including incoming students, who were assessed on an assessment instrument under Section 39.023; and


(2) all students under Subdivision (1) who were provided instruction by that teacher in the subject for which the assessment instrument was administered under Section 39.023.


(b) The report shall indicate whether the student performed satisfactorily or, if the student did not perform satisfactorily, whether the student met the standard for annual improvement under Section 39.034.


Amended by:


Acts 2009, 81st Leg., R.S., Ch. 895 (H.B. 3), Sec. 59, eff. June 19, 2009.


Sec. 39.305. CAMPUS REPORT CARD. (a) Each school year, the agency shall prepare and distribute to each school district a report card for each campus. The campus report cards must be based on the most current data available disaggregated by student groups. Campus performance must be compared to previous campus and district performance, current district performance, and state established standards.


(b) The report card shall include the following information:


(1) where applicable, the achievement indicators described by Section 39.053(c) and the reporting indicators described by Sections 39.301(c)(1) through (5);


(2) average class size by grade level and subject;


(3) the administrative and instructional costs per student, computed in a manner consistent with Section 44.0071; and


(4) the district's instructional expenditures ratio and instructional employees ratio computed under Section 44.0071, and the statewide average of those ratios, as determined by the commissioner.


(c) The commissioner shall adopt rules requiring dissemination of the information required under Subsection (b)(4) and appropriate class size and student performance portions of campus report cards annually to the parent, guardian, conservator, or other person having lawful control of each student at the campus. On written request, the school district shall provide a copy of a campus report card to any other party.


Amended by:


Acts 2009, 81st Leg., R.S., Ch. 895 (H.B. 3), Sec. 59, eff. June 19, 2009.


Acts 2015, 84th Leg., R.S., Ch. 1094 (H.B. 2804), Sec. 20, eff. June 19, 2015.


Sec. 39.306. PERFORMANCE REPORT. (a) Each board of trustees shall publish an annual report describing the educational performance of the district and of each campus in the district that includes uniform student performance and descriptive information as determined under rules adopted by the commissioner. The annual report must also include:


(1) campus performance objectives established under Section 11.253 and the progress of each campus toward those objectives, which shall be available to the public;


(2) information indicating the district's accreditation status and identifying each district campus awarded a distinction designation under Subchapter G or considered an unacceptable campus under Chapter 39A;


(3) the district's current special education compliance status with the agency;


(4) a statement of the number, rate, and type of violent or criminal incidents that occurred on each district campus, to the extent permitted under the Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act of 1974 (20 U.S.C. Section 1232g);


(5) information concerning school violence prevention and violence intervention policies and procedures that the district is using to protect students;


(6) the findings that result from evaluations conducted under the Safe and Drug-Free Schools and Communities Act of 1994 (20 U.S.C. Section 7101 et seq.);


(7) information received under Section 51.403(e) for each high school campus in the district, presented in a form determined by the commissioner; and


(8) the progress of the district and each campus in the district toward meeting the goals set in the district's:


(A) early childhood literacy and mathematics proficiency plans adopted under Section 11.185; and


(B) college, career, and military readiness plans adopted under Section 11.186.


(b) Supplemental information to be included in the reports shall be determined by the board of trustees. Performance information in the annual reports on the indicators described by Sections 39.053 and 39.301 and descriptive information required by this section shall be provided by the agency.


(c) The board of trustees shall hold a hearing for public discussion of the report. The board of trustees shall give notice of the hearing to property owners in the district and parents of and other persons standing in parental relation to a district student. The notification must include notice to a newspaper of general circulation in the district and notice to electronic media serving the district. After the hearing the report shall be widely disseminated within the district in a manner to be determined under rules adopted by the commissioner.


(d) The report must also include a comparison provided by the agency of:


(1) the performance of each campus to its previous performance and to state-established standards; and


(2) the performance of each district to its previous performance and to state-established standards.


(d-1) The report must also include the number of school counselors providing counseling services at each campus.


(e) The report may include the following information:


(1) student information, including total enrollment, enrollment by ethnicity, socioeconomic status, and grade groupings and retention rates;


(2) financial information, including revenues and expenditures;


(3) staff information, including number and type of staff by sex, ethnicity, years of experience, and highest degree held, teacher and administrator salaries, and teacher turnover;


(4) program information, including student enrollment by program, teachers by program, and instructional operating expenditures by program; and


(5) the number of students placed in a disciplinary alternative education program under Chapter 37.


(f) The commissioner by rule shall authorize the combination of this report with other reports and financial statements and shall restrict the number and length of reports that school districts, school district employees, and school campuses are required to prepare.


(g) The report must include a statement of the amount, if any, of the school district's unencumbered surplus fund balance as of the last day of the preceding fiscal year and the percentage of the preceding year's budget that the surplus represents.


Amended by:


Acts 2009, 81st Leg., R.S., Ch. 895 (H.B. 3), Sec. 59, eff. June 19, 2009.


Acts 2017, 85th Leg., R.S., Ch. 324 (S.B. 1488), Sec. 21.003(26), eff. September 1, 2017.


Acts 2017, 85th Leg., R.S., Ch. 550 (S.B. 490), Sec. 2, eff. June 9, 2017.


Acts 2019, 86th Leg., R.S., Ch. 943 (H.B. 3), Sec. 2.035, eff. June 12, 2019.


Sec. 39.307. USES OF PERFORMANCE REPORT. The information required to be reported under Section 39.306 shall be:


(2) a primary consideration in school district and campus planning; and


(3) a primary consideration of:


(A) the State Board of Education in the evaluation of the performance of the commissioner;


(B) the commissioner in the evaluation of the performance of the directors of the regional education service centers;


(C) the board of trustees of a school district in the evaluation of the performance of the superintendent of the district; and


(D) the superintendent in the evaluation of the performance of the district's campus principals.


Amended by:


Acts 2009, 81st Leg., R.S., Ch. 895 (H.B. 3), Sec. 59, eff. June 19, 2009.


Sec. 39.308. ANNUAL AUDIT OF DROPOUT RECORDS; REPORT. (a) The commissioner shall develop a process for auditing school district dropout records electronically. The commissioner shall also develop a system and standards for review of the audit or use systems already available at the agency. The system must be designed to identify districts that are at high risk of having inaccurate dropout records and that, as a result, require on-site monitoring of dropout records.


(b) If the electronic audit of a school district's dropout records indicates that a district is not at high risk of having inaccurate dropout records, the district may not be subject to on-site monitoring under this subsection.


(c) If the risk-based system indicates that a school district is at high risk of having inaccurate dropout records, the district is entitled to an opportunity to respond to the commissioner's determination before on-site monitoring may be conducted. The district must respond not later than the 30th day after the date the commissioner notifies the district of the commissioner's determination. If the district's response does not change the commissioner's determination that the district is at high risk of having inaccurate dropout records or if the district does not respond in a timely manner, the commissioner shall order agency staff to conduct on-site monitoring of the district's dropout records.


(d) The commissioner shall notify the board of trustees of a school district of any objection the commissioner has to the district's dropout data, any violation of sound accounting practices or of a law or rule revealed by the data, or any recommendation by the commissioner concerning the data. If the data reflect that a penal law has been violated, the commissioner shall notify the county attorney, district attorney, or criminal district attorney, as appropriate, and the attorney general.


(e) The commissioner is entitled to access to all district records the commissioner considers necessary or appropriate for the review, analysis, or approval of district dropout data.


Amended by:


Acts 2009, 81st Leg., R.S., Ch. 895 (H.B. 3), Sec. 59, eff. June 19, 2009.


The following section was amended by the 87th Legislature. Pending publication of the current statutes, see S.B. 2066, 87th Legislature, Regular Session, for amendments affecting the following section.



Sec. 39.309. TEXAS SCHOOL ACCOUNTABILITY DASHBOARD. (a) The agency shall develop and maintain an Internet website, separate from the agency's Internet website, to be known as the Texas School Accountability Dashboard for the public to access school district and campus accountability information.


(b) The commissioner shall adopt, for use on the Texas School Accountability Dashboard, a performance index in each of the following areas:


(1) student achievement;


(2) student progress;


(3) closing performance gaps; and


(4) postsecondary readiness.


(c) The Texas School Accountability Dashboard developed under Subsection (a) must include:


(1) performance information for each school district and campus in areas specified by Subsection (b) and must allow for comparison between districts and campuses in each of the areas;


(2) a comparison of the number of students enrolled in each school district, including:


(A) the percentage of students of limited English proficiency, as defined by Section 29.052;


(B) the percentage of students who are unschooled asylees or refugees, as defined by Section 39.027(a-1);


(C) the percentage of students who are educationally disadvantaged; and


(D) the percentage of students with disabilities;


(3) a comparison of performance information for each district and campus disaggregated by race, ethnicity, and populations served by special programs, including special education, bilingual education, and special language programs; and


(4) a comparison of performance information by subject area.


Added by Acts 2013, 83rd Leg., R.S., Ch. 211 (H.B. 5), Sec. 58, eff. June 10, 2013.


SUBCHAPTER K. REPORTS BY TEXAS EDUCATION AGENCY



Sec. 39.331. GENERAL REQUIREMENTS. (a) Each report required by this subchapter must:


(1) unless otherwise specified, contain summary information and analysis only, with an indication that the agency will provide the data underlying the report on request;


(2) specify a person at the agency who may be contacted for additional information regarding the report and provide the person's telephone number; and


(3) identify other sources of related information, indicating the level of detail and format of information that may be obtained, including the availability of any information on the Texas Education Network.


(b) Each component of a report required by this subchapter must:


(1) identify the substantive goal underlying the information required to be reported;


(2) analyze the progress made and longitudinal trends in achieving the underlying substantive goal;


(3) offer recommendations for improved progress in achieving the underlying substantive goal; and


(4) identify the relationship of the information required to be reported to state education goals.


(c) Unless otherwise provided, each report required by this subchapter is due not later than December 1 of each even-numbered year.


(d) Subsections (a) and (b) apply to any report required by statute that the agency or the State Board of Education must prepare and deliver to the governor, lieutenant governor, speaker of the house of representatives, or legislature.


(e) Unless otherwise provided by law, any report required by statute that the agency or the State Board of Education must prepare and deliver to the governor, lieutenant governor, speaker of the house of representatives, or legislature may be combined, at the discretion of the commissioner, with a report required by this subchapter.


Amended by:


Acts 2009, 81st Leg., R.S., Ch. 895 (H.B. 3), Sec. 59, eff. June 19, 2009.


The following section was amended by the 87th Legislature. Pending publication of the current statutes, see S.B. 2066, 87th Legislature, Regular Session, for amendments affecting the following section.



Sec. 39.332. COMPREHENSIVE BIENNIAL REPORT. (a) Not later than December 1 of each even-numbered year, the agency shall prepare and deliver to the governor, the lieutenant governor, the speaker of the house of representatives, each member of the legislature, the Legislative Budget Board, and the clerks of the standing committees of the senate and house of representatives with primary jurisdiction over the public school system a comprehensive report covering the two preceding school years and containing the information described by Subsection (b).


(b)(1) The report must contain an evaluation of the achievements of the state educational program in relation to the statutory goals for the public education system under Section 4.002.


(2) The report must contain an evaluation of the status of education in the state as reflected by:


(A) the achievement indicators described by Section 39.053; and


(B) the reporting indicators described by Section 39.301.


(3) The report must contain a summary compilation of overall student performance on academic skills assessment instruments required by Section 39.023 with the number and percentage of students exempted from the administration of those instruments and the basis of the exemptions, aggregated by grade level, subject area, campus, and district, with appropriate interpretations and analysis, and disaggregated by race, ethnicity, gender, and socioeconomic status.


(4) The report must contain a summary compilation of overall performance of students placed in a disciplinary alternative education program established under Section 37.008 on academic skills assessment instruments required by Section 39.023 with the number of those students exempted from the administration of those instruments and the basis of the exemptions, aggregated by district, grade level, and subject area, with appropriate interpretations and analysis, and disaggregated by race, ethnicity, gender, and socioeconomic status.


(5) The report must contain a summary compilation of overall performance of students at risk of dropping out of school, as defined by Section 29.081(d), on academic skills assessment instruments required by Section 39.023 with the number of those students exempted from the administration of those instruments and the basis of the exemptions, aggregated by district, grade level, and subject area, with appropriate interpretations and analysis, and disaggregated by race, ethnicity, gender, and socioeconomic status.


(6) The report must contain an evaluation of the correlation between student grades and student performance on academic skills assessment instruments required by Section 39.023.


(7) The report must contain a statement of the dropout rate of students in grade levels 7 through 12, expressed in the aggregate and by grade level, and a statement of the completion rates of students for grade levels 9 through 12.


(8) The report must contain a statement of:


(A) the completion rate of students who enter grade level 9 and graduate not more than four years later;


(B) the completion rate of students who enter grade level 9 and graduate, including students who require more than four years to graduate;


(C) the completion rate of students who enter grade level 9 and not more than four years later receive a high school equivalency certificate;


(D) the completion rate of students who enter grade level 9 and receive a high school equivalency certificate, including students who require more than four years to receive a certificate; and


(E) the number and percentage of all students who have not been accounted for under Paragraph (A), (B), (C), or (D).


(9) The report must contain a statement of the projected cross-sectional and longitudinal dropout rates for grade levels 9 through 12 for the next five years, assuming no state action is taken to reduce the dropout rate.


(10) The report must contain a description of a systematic, measurable plan for reducing the projected cross-sectional and longitudinal dropout rates to five percent or less.


(11) The report must contain a summary of the information required by Section 29.083 regarding grade level retention of students and information concerning:


(A) the number and percentage of students retained; and


(B) the performance of retained students on assessment instruments required under Section 39.023(a).


(12) The report must contain information, aggregated by district type and disaggregated by race, ethnicity, gender, and socioeconomic status, on:


(A) the number of students placed in a disciplinary alternative education program established under Section 37.008;


(B) the average length of a student's placement in a disciplinary alternative education program established under Section 37.008;


(C) the academic performance of students on assessment instruments required under Section 39.023(a) during the year preceding and during the year following placement in a disciplinary alternative education program; and


(D) the dropout rates of students who have been placed in a disciplinary alternative education program established under Section 37.008.


(13) The report must contain a list of each school district or campus that does not satisfy performance standards, with an explanation of the actions taken by the commissioner to improve student performance in the district or campus and an evaluation of the results of those actions.


(14) The report must contain an evaluation of the status of the curriculum taught in public schools, with recommendations for legislative changes necessary to improve or modify the curriculum required by Section 28.002.


(15) The report must contain a description of all funds received by and each activity and expenditure of the agency.


(16) The report must contain a summary and analysis of the instructional expenditures ratios and instructional employees ratios of school districts computed under Section 44.0071.


(17) The report must contain a summary of the effect of deregulation, including exemptions and waivers granted under Section 7.056 or 39.232.


(18) The report must contain a statement of the total number and length of reports that school districts and school district employees must submit to the agency, identifying which reports are required by federal statute or rule, state statute, or agency rule, and a summary of the agency's efforts to reduce overall reporting requirements.


(19) The report must contain a list of each school district that is not in compliance with state special education requirements, including:


(A) the period for which the district has not been in compliance;


(B) the manner in which the agency considered the district's failure to comply in determining the district's accreditation status; and


(C) an explanation of the actions taken by the commissioner to ensure compliance and an evaluation of the results of those actions.


(21) The report must contain a summary of the information required by Section 38.0141 regarding student health and physical activity from each school district.


(22) The report must contain a summary compilation of overall student performance under the assessment system developed to evaluate the longitudinal academic progress as required by Section 39.027(e), disaggregated by bilingual education or special language program instructional model, if any.


(23) The report must contain an evaluation of the availability of endorsements under Section 28.025(c-1), including the following information for each school district:


(A) the endorsements under Section 28.025(c-1) for which the district offers all courses for curriculum requirements as determined by board rule; and


(B) the district's economic, geographic, and demographic information, as determined by the commissioner.


(24) The report must contain any additional information considered important by the commissioner or the State Board of Education.


(c) In reporting the information required by Subsection (b)(3) or (4), the agency may separately aggregate the performance data of students enrolled in a special education program under Subchapter A, Chapter 29.


(d) In reporting the information required by Subsections (b)(3), (5), and (7), the agency shall separately aggregate the longitudinal performance data of all students identified as students of limited English proficiency, as defined by Section 29.052, or former students of limited English proficiency, disaggregated by bilingual education or special language program instructional model, if any, in which the students are or were enrolled.


(e) Each report must contain the most recent data available.


Amended by:


Acts 2009, 81st Leg., R.S., Ch. 895 (H.B. 3), Sec. 59, eff. June 19, 2009.


Acts 2013, 83rd Leg., R.S., Ch. 211 (H.B. 5), Sec. 59(a), eff. June 10, 2013.


Acts 2013, 83rd Leg., R.S., Ch. 1312 (S.B. 59), Sec. 8, eff. September 1, 2013.


Acts 2013, 83rd Leg., R.S., Ch. 1312, Sec. 9, eff. September 1, 2013.


Acts 2015, 84th Leg., R.S., Ch. 1094 (H.B. 2804), Sec. 21, eff. June 19, 2015.


Sec. 39.333. REGIONAL AND DISTRICT LEVEL REPORT. As part of the comprehensive biennial report under Section 39.332, the agency shall submit a regional and district level report covering the preceding two school years and containing:


(1) a summary of school district compliance with the student/teacher ratios and class-size limitations prescribed by Sections 25.111 and 25.112, including:


(A) the number of campuses and classes at each campus granted an exception from Section 25.112; and


(B) for each campus granted an exception from Section 25.112, a statement of whether the campus has been awarded a distinction designation under Subchapter G or has been identified as an unacceptable campus under Chapter 39A;


(2) a summary of the exemptions and waivers granted to campuses and school districts under Section 7.056 or 39.232 and a review of the effectiveness of each campus or district following deregulation;


(4) an evaluation of accelerated instruction programs offered under Section 28.006, including an assessment of the quality of such programs and the performance of students enrolled in such programs; and


(5) the number of classes at each campus that are currently being taught by individuals who are not certified in the content areas of their respective classes.


Amended by:


Acts 2009, 81st Leg., R.S., Ch. 895 (H.B. 3), Sec. 59, eff. June 19, 2009.


Acts 2013, 83rd Leg., R.S., Ch. 1312 (S.B. 59), Sec. 10, eff. September 1, 2013.


Acts 2017, 85th Leg., R.S., Ch. 324 (S.B. 1488), Sec. 21.003(27), eff. September 1, 2017.


Sec. 39.334. TECHNOLOGY REPORT. The agency shall prepare and deliver to the governor, the lieutenant governor, the speaker of the house of representatives, each member of the legislature, the Legislative Budget Board, and the clerks of the standing committees of the senate and house of representatives with primary jurisdiction over the public school system a technology report covering the preceding two school years and containing information on the status of the implementation of and revisions to the long-range technology plan required by Section 32.001, including the equity of the distribution and use of technology in public schools.


Amended by:


Acts 2009, 81st Leg., R.S., Ch. 895 (H.B. 3), Sec. 59, eff. June 19, 2009.


SUBCHAPTER L. NOTICE OF PERFORMANCE



Sec. 39.361. NOTICE IN STUDENT GRADE REPORT. The first written notice of a student's performance that a school district gives during a school year as required by Section 28.022(a)(2) must include:


(1) a statement of whether the campus at which the student is enrolled has been awarded a distinction designation under Subchapter G or has been identified as an unacceptable campus under Chapter 39A; and


(2) an explanation of the significance of the information provided under Subdivision (1).


Added by Acts 2007, 80th Leg., R.S., Ch. 1058 (H.B. 2237), Sec. 14, eff. June 15, 2007.


Amended by:


Acts 2009, 81st Leg., R.S., Ch. 895 (H.B. 3), Sec. 59, eff. June 19, 2009.


Acts 2017, 85th Leg., R.S., Ch. 324 (S.B. 1488), Sec. 21.003(28), eff. September 1, 2017.


Sec. 39.362. NOTICE ON DISTRICT WEBSITE. Not later than the 10th day after the first day of instruction of each school year, a school district that maintains an Internet website shall make the following information available to the public on the website:


(1) the information contained in the most recent campus report card for each campus in the district under Section 39.305;


(2) the information contained in the most recent performance report for the district under Section 39.306;


(3) the most recent accreditation status and performance rating of the district under Sections 39.052 and 39.054; and


(4) a definition and explanation of each accreditation status under Section 39.051, based on commissioner rule adopted under that section.


Added by Acts 2007, 80th Leg., R.S., Ch. 1058 (H.B. 2237), Sec. 14, eff. June 15, 2007.


Amended by:


Acts 2009, 81st Leg., R.S., Ch. 895 (H.B. 3), Sec. 59, eff. June 19, 2009.


Sec. 39.363. NOTICE ON AGENCY WEBSITE. Not later than October 1 of each year, the agency shall make the following information available to the public on the agency's Internet website:


(1) the letter performance rating assigned to each school district and campus under Section 39.054 and each distinction designation awarded to a school district or campus under Subchapter G;


(2) the performance rating assigned to a school district and each campus in the district by the district under Section 39.0545; and


(3) the financial accountability rating assigned to each school district and open-enrollment charter school under Section 39.082.


Added by Acts 2013, 83rd Leg., R.S., Ch. 211 (H.B. 5), Sec. 60(a), eff. June 10, 2013.


SUBCHAPTER M. HIGH SCHOOL COMPLETION AND SUCCESS INITIATIVE



The following section was amended by the 87th Legislature. Pending publication of the current statutes, see S.B. 1267, 87th Legislature, Regular Session, for amendments affecting the following section.



Redesignated by Acts 2009, 81st Leg., R.S., Ch. 895 (H.B. 3), Sec. 59, eff. June 19, 2009.


Amended by:


Acts 2019, 86th Leg., R.S., Ch. 943 (H.B. 3), Sec. 3.045, eff. September 1, 2019.


The following section was amended by the 87th Legislature. Pending publication of the current statutes, see H.B. 3607, 87th Legislature, Regular Session, for amendments affecting the following section.



Text of section as amended by Acts 2019, 86th Leg., R.S., Ch. 943 (H.B. 3), Sec. 3.046



Without reference to the amendment of this section, this section was repealed by Acts 2019, 86th Leg., R.S., Ch. 439 (S.B. 1376), Sec. 4.01(a)(6), eff. June 4, 2019.



Sec. 39.413. FUNDING FOR CERTAIN PROGRAMS. (a) From funds appropriated, the Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board shall allocate $8.75 million each year to establish mathematics, science, and technology teacher preparation academies under Section 61.0766 and award grants under Section 61.0762(a)(3).


(b) The Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board shall establish mathematics, science, and technology teacher preparation academies under Section 61.0766 and award grants under Section 61.0762(a)(3) in a manner consistent with the goals of this subchapter and the goals in "Closing the Gaps," the state's master plan for higher education.


Added by Acts 2007, 80th Leg., R.S., Ch. 1058 (H.B. 2237), Sec. 14, eff. June 15, 2007.


Amended by:


Acts 2009, 81st Leg., R.S., Ch. 851 (S.B. 2258), Sec. 3, eff. June 19, 2009.


Acts 2009, 81st Leg., R.S., Ch. 852 (S.B. 2262), Sec. 2, eff. June 19, 2009.


Redesignated by Acts 2009, 81st Leg., R.S., Ch. 895 (H.B. 3), Sec. 59, eff. June 19, 2009.


Amended by:


Acts 2019, 86th Leg., R.S., Ch. 439 (S.B. 1376), Sec. 4.01(a)(6), eff. June 4, 2019.


Acts 2019, 86th Leg., R.S., Ch. 943 (H.B. 3), Sec. 3.046, eff. September 1, 2019.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
EDUCATION CODE CHAPTER 39. PUBLIC SCHOOL SYSTEM ACCOUNTABILITY

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
EDUCATION CODE TITLE 2. PUBLIC EDUCATION SUBTITLE H. PUBLIC SCHOOL SYSTEM ACCOUNTABILITY CHAPTER 39. PUBLIC SCHOOL SYSTEM ACCOUNTABILITY SUBCHAPTER A. GENERAL PROVISIONS Sec. 39.001. RULES. (a) The commissioner shall adopt rules as necessary to administer this chapter.

# data[].attributes.body
Source of Law type: State - Administrative

Citation: Participation and Assessment Requirements for Graduation, 19. Tex. Admin. Code § 101.3024

Link to full text: https://texreg.sos.state.tx.us/public/readtac$ext.TacPage?sl=R&app=9&p_dir=&p_rloc=&p_tloc=&p_ploc=&pg=1&p_tac=&ti=19&pt=2&ch=101&rl=3024

Bulleted list describing the law and what it requires related to your topic:

Students enrolled in 9th grade before the 2011-2012 school year or enrolled in grade(s) 10+ during the 2011-2012 school years must fulfill the testing requirements for graduation by successfully completing the assessment tools outlined in TEC § 39.023-025 which discusses approved assessment instruments ie: STAAR End of Course (EOC) exams, TAKS, TAAS, etc.

If a student fails to meet assessment graduation requirements a least three times, they may receive a high school diploma if they are qualified under TEC § 28.02541 which discusses adoption of alternate graduation requirements

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
(a) Students who were first enrolled in Grade 9 prior to the 2011-2012 school year or enrolled in Grade 10 or above in the 2011-2012 school year must fulfill testing requirements for graduation with the assessments required by Texas Education Code (TEC), §39.023(c), as that section existed before amendment by Senate Bill (SB) 1031, 80th Texas Legislature, 2007. For purposes of this section, coursework necessary to graduate means all the coursework required under the student's graduation plan. (b) With the exception of students who meet the criteria described in subsection (c) of this section, students who were enrolled as follows shall fulfill testing requirements for graduation with the assessments as required by TEC, §39.023(c), as that section existed before amendment by SB 1031, 80th Texas Legislature, 2007, with the applicable performance standards established by the commissioner of education and published on the Texas Education Agency (TEA) website: (1) in Grade 9 or higher on January 1, 2001, regardless of when they are scheduled to graduate; or (2) in Grade 8 or lower on January 1, 2001, if they were on an accelerated track and fulfilled all coursework necessary to graduate by September 1, 2004. (c) A student who entered Grade 11 in the 1989-1990 school year or an earlier school year shall fulfill testing requirements for graduation with assessments as required by TEC, §39.023(c), as that section existed before amendment by SB 1031, 80th Texas Legislature, 2007, under an applicable performance standard established by the commissioner of education that corresponds to the performance standard in effect for the exit-level Texas Educational Assessment of Minimum Skills (TEAMS) when the student was first eligible to take the exit-level TEAMS. Performance standards that apply to TEAMS students will be published on the TEA website. (d) A student fulfilling testing requirements under subsection (b) of this section will be required to take only those sections of the exit-level Texas Assessment of Knowledge and Skills (TAKS) that correspond to the subject areas formerly assessed by the exit-level Texas Assessment of Academic Skills (TAAS) (reading, writing, and mathematics) for which the student has not yet met the passing standard. (1) If a student has not yet met the passing standard on TAAS reading, the student will be administered only the reading multiple-choice items from the TAKS English language arts (ELA) test. (2) If a student has not yet met the passing standard on TAAS writing, the student will be administered only the writing prompt and the revising and editing multiple-choice items from the TAKS ELA test. (e) A student fulfilling testing requirements under subsection (c) of this section will be required to take only those sections of the exit-level TAKS that correspond to the subject areas formerly assessed by the exit-level TEAMS (reading and mathematics) for which the student has not yet met the passing standard. If a student has not yet met the passing standard on TAAS reading, the student will be administered only the reading multiple-choice items from the TAKS ELA test. (f) Effective beginning with the 2017-2018 school year, a student who has taken but failed to meet assessment graduation requirements under this section may receive a Texas high school diploma if the student has qualified to graduate in accordance with TEC, §28.02541. A student may not graduate under TEC, §28.02541, if the student did not take each assessment instrument or the part of the assessment instrument for which the student has not performed satisfactorily at least three times. (g) Notwithstanding any of the requirements in subsections (a)-(f) of this section, students who pass all of the required exit-level TAKS tests or meet the alternate assessment requirements of Chapter 101, Subchapter DD, of this title (relating to Commissioner's Rules Concerning Substitute Assessments for Graduation) have fulfilled their testing requirements for graduation. (h) Beginning with the 2011-2012 school year, students first enrolled in Grade 9 or lower must fulfill testing requirements for graduation with the end-of-course assessment instruments, as specified in TEC, §39.023(c), as amended by SB 1031, 80th Texas Legislature, 2007.

Source Note: The provisions of this §101.3024 adopted to be effective May 29, 2012, 37 TexReg 3827; amended to be effective November 5, 2017, 42 TexReg 6144; amended to be effective October 15, 2019, 44 TexReg 5901; amended to be effective August 9, 2022, 47 TexReg 4675

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
(a) Students who were first enrolled in Grade 9 prior to the 2011-2012 school year or enrolled in Grade 10 or above in the 2011-2012 school year must fulfill testing requirements for graduation with the assessments required by Texas Education Code (TEC), §39.023(c), as that section existed before amendment by Senate Bill (SB) 1031, 80th Texas Legislature, 2007.

# data[].attributes.body
Source of Law type: State - Judicial

Citation: GI Forum v. Texas Education Agency (W.D. Texas January 7, 2000).

Link to full text: https://casetext.com/case/gi-forum-v-texas-education-agency-wdtex-2000

Bulleted list describing the law and what it requires related to your topic:

TEA demonstrates educational necessity for assessments as graduation requirements

The state assessment provides an objective evaluation of whether a student has mastered the content required for graduation

High stakes testing motivates students to learn the content they will be tested over

High stakes testing motivates teachers to rise to educational standards

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
GI FORUM v. TEXAS EDUCATION AGENCY, Civil Action No. SA-97-CA-1278-EP | Casetext Search + Citator

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Read GI FORUM v. TEXAS EDUCATION AGENCY, Civil Action No. SA-97-CA-1278-EP, see flags on bad law, and search Casetext’s comprehensive legal database

# data[].attributes.headline
Slide 10 - School or Organization Policy

# data[].attributes.subject
Slide 10 - School or Organization Policy

# data[].attributes.body
School or organization Policy related to topic: End-Of-Course Assessments: Assessment Requirements for Graduation

Citation: Texas Association of School Boards Policy (TASB). 2023. Testing programs: State assessment. Galveston ISD Local Board Policy. https://pol.tasb.org/PolicyOnline/PolicyDetails?key=499&code=EKB#legalTabContent

Link to full text: https://pol.tasb.org/PolicyOnline/PolicyDetails?key=499&code=EKB#legalTabContent

Summary:

A student must meet satisfactory performance on mandated end-of-course assessments (EOC’s) (Algebra 1, Biology, English 1, English 2, US History) in order to be eligible to receive a Texas high school diploma.

The standard in place when the student takes their first EOC is the standard they must meet for graduation

There are a few exceptions:

A student who took separate reading and writing EOC assessments for English 1 or English 2 can meet the assessment requirement if:

They performed satisfactorily on either assessment for the course

Met the minimum score on the other assessment for the course

Earned and overall scale score of 3750 or higher when combining reading and writing scores for that course

An emergent bilingual student may receive a provision for English 1 if they have been enrolled in U.S. schools for 3 or fewer years

A student earned credit for an EOC course prior to enrolling in Texas public schools (ie: credit earned in private school or out of state)

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Policy Code EKB - Testing Programs: State Assessment - Galveston ISD Board Policy Manual - Policy Online

# data[].attributes.body
American School Counselor Association (ASCA). (2019).  ASCA school counselor professional standards and competencies. https://www.schoolcounselor.org/getmedia/a8d59c2c-51de-4ec3-a565-a3235f3b93c3/SC-Competencies.pdf

Link to full text: https://www.schoolcounselor.org/getmedia/a8d59c2c-51de-4ec3-a565-a3235f3b93c3/SC-Competencies.pdf

Mindset 3: Every student should graduate from high school prepared for postsecondary opportunities.

This Mindset from the ASCA School Counselor Professional Standards and Competencies lends itself to the topic of assessment requirements for high school graduation as it first and foremost, implies that it is the goal of all high school counselors to assist each student to achieve graduation (ASCA, 2019). With that goal in mind is the understanding that counselors must be aware of all graduation requirements (ie: assessment requirements), inform students of said requirements, and assist them in creating goals and plans to meet the requirements and achieve graduation.

# data[].attributes.body
Standardized tests assure diploma is meaningful. (2019, March 5). The Columbian (Vancouver, WA).https://www.columbian.com/news/2019/mar/05/in-our-view-standardized-tests-assure-diploma-is-meaningful/

Link to full text: https://www.columbian.com/news/2019/mar/05/in-our-view-standardized-tests-assure-diploma-is-meaningful/

The editorial discusses another state's consideration of doing away with standardized testing as a graduation requirement. Critics of this concept claim that standardized tests lend to the validity and accomplishment of earning a high school diploma. Those who oppose standardized testing as a graduation requirement do see their necessity in curriculum accountability for teachers. The proposed legislation discusses replacing standardized assessments as graduation requirements with alternative options such as apprenticeships or military tests, such as the ASVAB.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
In Our View: Standardized tests assure diploma is meaningful

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Once again, some members of the Legislature are attempting to de-link standardized tests from graduation requirements at public high school throughout the state. And once again, they are selling stude

# data[].attributes.headline
Slide 13 - Recommendations/Best Practices

# data[].attributes.subject
Slide 13 - Recommendations/Best Practices

# data[].attributes.body
The following list describe actions and best practices of school counselors as they navigate and work through state assessments as graduation requirements:

It is imperative for school counselors to familiarize themselves with the graduation requirements of the students;

STAAR End of Course (EOCs) Exams are high-stakes tests that cause anxiety in many high school students, counselors should be providing guidance lessons to provide testing anxiety coping mechanisms;

School counselors should be aware of the resources available in the District and Campus Coordinator Resources that is updated yearly by the Texas Education Agency;

School counselors should know the testing requirements and exceptions for the student populations they work with;

School counselors should actively participate in Individual Graduation Committees as advocates for the student;

School counselors should know which students failed STAAR EOCs and ensure they are enrolled in an accelerated instruction program/course;

School counselors can work to amend state legislature regarding high stakes testing and graduation requirements;

School counselors should monitor the number of times a student unsuccessfully participates in STAAR EOCs and discuss graduation alternatives with them;

School counselors should monitor student progress to ensure all students on their caseload are working toward meeting graduation requirements.