# data[].attributes.body
Although malcolm X didn't like to use violence , he used it for self defense and to make racist white people respond to change. this was a time in the south when violence against blacks was not abnormal

# data[].attributes.body
Malcolm X beleive that to gain equality you must take it and earn it for youself and this was the attitude america needed in the 1960's. He made black prove that they were equal to whites through action.

# data[].attributes.body
Malcolm X did not believed James meredith acceptance into university was was right because how much resources were used to put him in a negative environment and the problem should be solved by getting rid of those limiting black in school.

# data[].attributes.body
MLK is saying there is no alternative to non violence and critizes black for using violence but says nothing about violent white organizations. Malcolm x uses violence only as a defense against these white organizations.

# data[].attributes.body
MAlcolm X did not want communities to completely boycott an area because it would only make the area boycotting poorer and another area richer. He wanted black to learn to control the economy to start improving life of blacks.

# data[].attributes.body
Malcolm X beleive in going after equality for yourself and not waiting

for change

# data[].attributes.body
Malcolm X did not beleive that violence was the best option but

only blacks were asked to be peaceful not any white people this showed

the harness of racism because people actions are diddferent from their words

# data[].attributes.body
Malcolm X did not believe that racist white people would respond

to non- violence. Evven if laws are changes that doesnt mean that

racist will start just treating black better all of a sudden

# data[].attributes.body
MLk would often make speeches to keep people motivated and remind them

what they are fighting for. He ispired the people who were working with him

and even some people who were against him but nto all.

# data[].attributes.body
Using non violent protest such as boycotting does work but hurts

the economy of the area and takes a while to make people respond..

# data[].attributes.body
He does not believe in violence no matter what.

He believes that violence in the end leads no where

and is often pointless, but it is not pointless if used in self-defense

like how Malcolm X uses it.

# data[].attributes.body
MLK will not fight back no matter how great the punishment dealt out by

racist,He even says that he will not hate anybody and say he will respond to their

conscious.The one usally willing to go far enough to bomb house and hurt children will

not be persuade by this gesture.

# data[].attributes.body
MLk turned the other cheek to violence against him and people protesting with him, this was bad because how could people feel safe protesting with MLK when he is saying let all your stuff be burned. Even if he did win equality in the classroom people lose their house and lives over this.

# data[].attributes.body
MLK had two main methods of protesting boycotting and marching.Both of them were very slow working and didn't persuade all to join the cause but rather comply with laws against racism

# data[].attributes.headline
Martin Luther King's approach to violence

# data[].attributes.subject
Martin Luther King's approach to violence

# data[].attributes.body
MLK believed in non-violence and turning the other cheekto deal with violence. This left people vulnerable because MLk jusst endured the suffering in stead of defending himself.

# data[].attributes.body
Both Malcolm X and MLK respected each other as civil rights activist pushing for equality.Even though they had two very different approaches to reach their goals.

# data[].attributes.body
Malcolm X was a better choice for America in the 1960's

when compared to MLK, Malcolm X he had a more direct

approach when protesting, and he did back down when

he was threaten with violence he responded with it even

though he did not like violence.