# data[].attributes.body
Petitioner contended, the district court decided that Apple did a sort of conspiracy among the publishers to raise ebook prices, that the conspiracy restrained the trade in violation of 1 of the Sherman Act.

# data[].attributes.body
If the Plaintiffs win a verdict in their favor, it would set a dangerous precedent and will discourage business from entering other markets.

# data[].attributes.body
The Plaintiffs have failed to show that the Publishers actually increased e-book prices.

# data[].attributes.body
La visión que tengo para mi área física es que desde ahora hasta que sea un señor de 75 años voy a gozar de una vida sana. Voy a tener conocimientos y experiencia medica y eso me ayudara a mantenerme en forma y con poco desgaste físico durante 60 años.

# data[].attributes.body
Apple argued that it never intended to conspire to raise ebooks prices.

# data[].attributes.headline
United States v Apple Inc Anti-trust case

# data[].attributes.subject
United States v Apple Inc Anti-trust case