# data[].attributes.body
Juvenile death sentence does violate the 8th amendment but in other situation it does not. Some people are not fully developed in the brain and make unusual decisions but should also be punished for taking multiple lives.

# data[].attributes.body
A juvenile's death sentence violates the 8th Amendment because they have their whole life to learn and change. A child's brain continuously develops until they are 25 years old. If a child has committed a crime that is so bad they have been given the death penalty then they are obviously not okay and probably needed to get some help. A child/teen is still learning what is okay and what is not. If they are killed before their life has even begun they won't get to learn these things and change.

# data[].attributes.body
Juvenile death sentence violates the 8th Amendment. The punishment is too cruel for a person whose brain isn't develop yet.

# data[].attributes.body
Yes it does. The main question is, what is the crime that was made that's causing death to be the punishment. Either way it's a juvenile that's under 18. They should deserve at least be given more chances.

# data[].attributes.body
A juvenile's death sentence does violate the 8th Amendment. The eighth Amendment prohibits cruel and unusual punishments and killing a minor or anyone in fact is cruel.

# data[].attributes.body
A juvenile's death sentence does violate the 8th amendment. This is because a juvenile's brain is not fully developed and is more likely to make irresponsible choices and are less rationale then an adult with a fully developed brain.

# data[].attributes.body
It does. The brain is only fully developed at the age of 25, so it does violate the 8th amendment. If a great felony were purposely acted, and if it was great enough, then it is okay.

# data[].attributes.body
A juvenile's death sentence doesn't violate the 8th amendment. There dangerous enough to commit the crime then yes.

# data[].attributes.body
A juvenile's death sentence does violate the Eighth Amendment. The death sentence does seem like a violation of the Eighth Amendment so it seems no different, if more of a violation of the Eighth Amendment.

# data[].attributes.body
The death penalty does not violate the Eighth Amendment's ban on cruel and unusual punishment, but the Eighth Amendment does make sure that  the jury must make sure the   death penalty is  carried out welly. Therefore it is up to how bad the crime or whatever is committed.

# data[].attributes.body
It depends on what the child has done. The eighth amendment will decide wether it should be approved or not.

# data[].attributes.body
If the death sentence isn't considered a violation of the 8th Amendment for adults, then it isn't a violation for juveniles if they committed a deserving crime.

# data[].attributes.body
A juvenile's death sentence does not violate the 8th amendment. As long as the Juvenile did commit a crime that requires the death sentence, the amendment is not violated.

# data[].attributes.body
Well no, not exactly depending on the crime the minor had done. If it makes sense then yea probably it'd be allowed.

# data[].attributes.body
No, peer grading does not violate a student's right to privacy and confidentiality. Peer grading is used to help the teacher and other students.

# data[].attributes.body
The death of a juvenile does not violate the eighth Amendment. As long as they do not perform a cruel and unusual punishment on the juvenile, and they did commit the crime, then it would be okay.

# data[].attributes.body
A juvenile's death does violate the Eight Amendment, because although they committed a crime, the criminal is still a child. The brain is not fully developed and not matured, so their actions shouldn't be punished by death when they could grow into a better person.

# data[].attributes.body
Peer grading doesn't violate a students right. They don't have to give it to the other student.

# data[].attributes.body
Students have the right to privacy. A student has the choice whether they want there work to be shared. The student has rights whether they want there work to be shared with them and there teacher or with other students.

# data[].attributes.body
Yes, required flag salutes do violate the First Amendment. This amendment gives students to right to believe what they want and they can't be forced to salute a flag.

# data[].attributes.body
I have experienced peer grading and don't agree that it is a violation of privacy and confidentiality. Although it could be embarrassing to have a bad mark and your peers are aware, it does more good than bad. If friends know you need help and reach out to give you a helping hand, that is in no way wrong.

# data[].attributes.body
I think that it depends if a juveniles death sentence violates the 8th amendment. I think that if what they did is worthy of a death sentence then it doesn't violate the 8th amendment, and vise versa.

# data[].attributes.body
Yes, compulsory or required flag salutes in public schools do violate the first amendment. So, you should not be required to do so if you do not believe that saluting the flag is necessary to you or your belief.

# data[].attributes.body
Peer grading can be a little embarrassing for other students because they like to keep their grades to themselves. I think that peer grading does violate a students privacy because very closed off students do not like to share their grades/scores to anyone except their parents because they do not want to be judged. Some people don't care who sees their grades and can show whoever they want, but if students don't want to share grades they shouldn't be forced to.

# data[].attributes.body
Yes. death penalty should be used only on cases of proved cold blooded murder, not a teen who stole a pack of gum from seven eleven.

# data[].attributes.body
Peer grading can violate a student right to privacy. If a student is willing to peer grade, that means the students work is not confidential. Required peer grading can violate a student's right to privacy because the student may want to keep his/her work in between him/her and the teacher.

# data[].attributes.body
Yes it does, because it could offend your religion. Some people when they hear "under god" it is SUPER offensive like some people who believe in multiple gods or people who are not Christian.

# data[].attributes.body
In 1943, the United States Supreme Court weighed in on this issue in the matter of West Virginia v. Barnette. It said that all pupils being forced to stand or salute the flag was unconstitutional. We have are rights.

# data[].attributes.body
Required flag salutes in public school do violate the first amendment. Your having the person doing something against there will and they can't express themselves.

# data[].attributes.body
Yes it does. Grading should be the teachers job. How does a kid my same age know so much more than me to the point where they can grade me?