# data[].attributes.body
I can turn in my padlet (Barrons).

# data[].attributes.body
I can understand the 5 schedules of reinforcement.
Variable- provide reinforcers after a random
Fixed- reinforce behaviors after a set number of responses
Ratio- reinforcement is based on the # of behaviors required
Interval- reinforcement is based on the passage of time
Continuous- every instance of a behavior is enforced
Fixed ratio: giving a child every time she picks up her time. Getting paid after each car gets sold
Fixed interval: doing a job and receiving a paycheck monthly. Receiving mail at roughly the same time each day
Variable interval: unpredictable reinforcement occurs at a random amount of time. Checking your phone for text messages
Variable ratio: winning the jackpot on the slow machine after a changing number of times playing it. Playing poker. Lottery tickets

# data[].attributes.body
I can analyze Bandura and Seligman
Learned Helplessness: Seligman
Purpose: to see the effect of controllable vs uncontrollable shock
Procedures: Escape group dog could terminate the shock by pressing a panel. No escape group dog shock ended at same time but could not end the shock. When placed in a box where they could easily escape the box to end the shock, the escape group escaped the box while the no escape group did not even try to escape.
Results: the escape group had zero failure while the no escape group had a lot of failure in trying to escape
Relevance: better learned how hopelessness could cause depression, positive psychology
Bandura: Bobo Doll Study
Purpose: discover whether adult models would influence the children
Procedure: 2 groups where either exposed to an adult expressing violent behavior or expressing nonviolent behavior. Another was not exposed to an adult model.
Results: girls were more likely to imitate verbal aggression while boys were more inclined to imitate physical aggression. Boys were more aggressive than girls
Relevance: aggression is a male-typed behavior. increased observation of aggressive behavior can lead to increased probability that a child will react to frustration with violent behavior. Adults being aggressive may show child violent behavior is acceptable.

# data[].attributes.body
I can understand the Pavlov research study.

# data[].attributes.body
I can understand Watson and Garcia research studies.
Classical Conditioning
John Garcia: Conditioned Taste Aversion
Procedure: Control group- rates made sick but not given saccharin beforehand. experimental group- rates given beforehand and then made sick. 1. rats were given saccharine and then 30 min later be exposed to x-irradiation and become sick 2. 3 days later they will be offered saccharin again and the results will be recorded 3. at the same time, another group of rats will be given no saccharine 4. 3 days later they were offered the saccharin again and the results were recorded
Results: when the rats were given the solution that made them sick after drinking the saccharine, they associated that drink with the sickness and they refused to drink it even though the drink and the illness were separated. The rats in the control group drank large quantities of the drink because they had not associated the illness with the drink
Relevance: the type of neutral stimulus does have an influence on the conditioning process. Every biologically predisposed to create certain associations between certain stimulus. If an animal eats a food that makes them ill, they will likely not eat the food for the rest of their life.
John Watson: Little Albert Experiment
Purpose: challenge Freud's theory with Watson's behaviorist theory (explains behavior is caused by environmental and situational stimuli)
Procedure: 1. Albert B.- 9 month old healthy orphan baby 2. Albert was presented with various objects (neutral objects) 3. given objects and then made loud noises given when given the object 4. continued until a response was shown with just the rate 5. became afraid with all fluffy objects
Results: Albert became terrified of the objects that Watson conditioned to be scared of. Proved Watson's point that emotional behavior can be conditioned through stimulus response techniques.
No ethical- never reconditioned, still had fear of fluffy things after experiment
Relevance-
Ex: hearing the bell ring is associated with leaving
Classical Conditioning Diagram
Unconditioned stimulus --> Unconditioned response
Conditioned stimulus + Unconditioned stimulus --> Unconditioned response
Conditioned response --> Conditioned response
Ex: animals- fine. noise and animals- fear from the noise. animals- fear from the animals
Conditioning process- Acquisition: pairing CS and US will make the response greater. Extinction: to the US will make the fear go extinct. Spontaneous recovery: Conditioned response may recover if not reconditioned afterward

# data[].attributes.body
I can understand Thorndike and Skinner's research study.
Operant conditioning
Edward Throndike
-Purpose: see if there was a line between the associated learning in humans versus in animals, and how problem solving is approached by either side.
-Procedure: an animal would be placed in a cage with one way out, the animal would have to push a level to open the cage, after they got out, they wold receive a reward, they would then be placed back in the cage to repeat, each time the animal got out the latency would decrease because the animals started to respond to the stimulus quickly
-latency- delay from input to desire outcome: the cat's delay from exiting the cage
-Results: animals were able to find out how to solve problems set for them which was considered intelligent. The cat wound flounder around until it realized how to get out of the box, it would get the hang of it, and the latency decreased. The time to escaped decreased over time. The cat's response was rewarded with food. High correlation between stimulus and the response. Practice makes habits. Formal discipline- mind could be strengthened by exercises like memorization.
--Law of Effect- a response is more likely to occur again when there is a reward
-Ex: if you get a good grade, you are more likely to do what you did to get a good grade again
Burrhus Skinner
-wanted to find the effects of rewards/ reinforcements on behavior, focused on the things that follow the response
-Procedure: put a hungry or thirsty rat in the Skinner Box and would observe the initial behavior, every time he pulled the level, he would add a positive reinforcement
-Results: the events following the response had a greater influence of the later rate of occurrence. Operant condition- if a response is followed by a reinforcing stimulus, the response strength is increased. Operant- level. Reinforcing stimulus- food
-fixed ration- schedule of reinforcement where a response is reinforced only after a specific number of responses
fixed interval- reinforcement becomes available after a fixed period of time
Relevance- change the behavior if acting obnoxious or inappropriate

# data[].attributes.body
Project work day (Read module 27)

# data[].attributes.body
I can apply behavior modification.
I want to change how my brother always plays video games all day.
4 methods of learning:
1. trial and error- "if at first you don't succeed..."
2. operant conditioning- behaviors consequences
Positve add+ positive punishment(down)Ex: belt, positive reinforcement (up) Ex: giving nail polish
Negative sub- negative punishment(down)Ex: , negative reinforcement (up) Ex: taking away hw
3. classical conditioning- associate learning
4. observational learning (modeling)- "monkey see, monkey do"