# data[].attributes.body
RLS - interesting choice

You are both confident presenters

KQ- too focused in the realm of arts, but an interesting choice

not necessarily an open ended question

Perspective 1- Philip Roth - clear explanations of perspective

You're sharing of perspectives could be better, so far it seems like on person describes it and the other person links it back to the KQ, when it may be more interesting for you to share what you do so we see that you understand the knowledge and  you are able to describe it

Fantastic use of confidence, no reliance of slides needed which means you know your stuff

# data[].attributes.body
- Fantastic slide for the TOK radar in the way that you drew similar examples to express your point
- Great perspectives

# data[].attributes.body
- Thought-compelling RLS, detailed explanation
- Good justification of "TOK Radar" section
- Very rarely reading from the board / notes; shows knowledge concerning topic
- Perspectives too similar as they agree with each other; maybe find something a bit more contrasting
- Good knowledge of perspectives established through the amount of detail put into explaining them
- Try not to pause and/or say "um/ah/uh/etc" as it somewhat damages the flow of your presentation
- Presentation was very confidently delivered

# data[].attributes.body
RLS: Philip Roth - Human Stain - focuses on the process - believes politics and arts should not overlap
Does art have limits as an art-form - examine
KQ: Does art have a responsibility to express societal issues? - interesting
Significance - it is typical for artist to express societal issues - good example
Connection of KQ and RLS - Roth doesn't seem to agree

P1 - Roth - be free of all the noise - books allow us to leave the societal issues behind
- obligation of art is to break free from society

P2 - Kelly Grovier - art critic - 'art with an agenda is rarely good art'
- agrees with Roth
- looks at human existence not politics - art not strong enough to share political views

Good clear distinction between two people who generally agree

P3 - T. Adorno - 'behind every work of art lies an uncommitted crime'
- Aesthetic Theory
- Dance group
- It is the audience who commit the crime of connection

Conclusion - art does not have a responsibility but more of a choice

- this is a weak conclusion in respect to the perspectives that you have examined.  You mentioned the audiences role in interpreting the message of the work.

Time 16:13

Your first two perspectives were very clear. However, in your third perspective you could have added more depth.

# data[].attributes.body
- Your RLS was interesting and thought-provoking
- Good job with the explanation of the TOK Radar
- I like your confidence, it shows that you know your material well
- Good wrap-up of your presentation in your conclusion

# data[].attributes.body
- Clear links between implicit and explicit claims
- Yes No question, but would still be able to debate

# data[].attributes.body
- Interesting and well explained RLS
- Nice question, but could have made it an open ended question
- Interesting perspectives
- Clearly stated conclusion with a good explanation of why they chose it
- Overall, interesting and well explained.

# data[].attributes.body
-Nice background info
-Cool thought-inducing KQ (could be more open ended though)
-Nice detail when explaining perspectives
-Great job!!! ^ _ ^

# data[].attributes.body
RLS is explained clearly. KQ is good and is broken down to give a clearer meaning. The significance of the KQ is described well, and it is linked back to the RLS well. The second and third perspectives were very good- countering each other. Clear, logical conclusion.

# data[].attributes.body
-Detailed explanation of the  RLS
- Question could be rephrased as it's a yes//no answer
-Good explanation of the significance of KQ
- Good explanations, clear and logical. Very confident in speech as well

# data[].attributes.body
- Interesting RLS
- Good justification
- Interesting KQ
- Well thoughtout Perspectives
- Second perspective is similar to perspective 1, making it a stronger point
- Perspective 3 is also quite well explained.
- Strong conclusion
- Well done!

# data[].attributes.body
- Good links from your RLS to claims
- Interesting KQ
- Interesting discussion of the significance
- Interesting counterpoints between Adorno and Grovier.  I don't know if Philip Roth as a perspective was necessary as you explained his point in his RLS and your second  perspective was very similar.
- Good conclusion to wrap everything up

# data[].attributes.body
- Good link back to your research question (philip roth and the thought that art does not have a responsibility to express societal issues)
- Great explanation of TOK radar
- Good question but not open ended (it does, it does not)
- I like your perspective but I do not think you should have discussed his ideas in two separate parts
- What do you mean by artwork only promoting "human existence"
- Strong conclusion

# data[].attributes.body
- Detailed explanation of RLS
- TOK radar - really clear explanation
- Perspectives all clearly link back to your KQ
- Great execution of the conclusion