# data[].attributes.headline
Feedback for assessment task 3(Manjeet  kaur)

# data[].attributes.subject
Feedback for assessment task 3(Manjeet  kaur)

# data[].attributes.body
For Jinli Zhang
Criteria 1-(4/4)-The outline is very clear that is useful to introduce the topic to readers. It is also well organized like you mentioned you will use both qualitative and quantitative methods to explore the topic.
Criteria 2-(4/4) Literatures that she select is highly related to the topic.
Criteria 3-(2/2)-No obvious spelling errors and its easily understandable.

For Qiuyi Qu
Criteria 1-(3/4)-The topic is very interesting as its new for me. The outline is well organized but according to me its a broad topic you have to narrow it down.
Criteria 2-(4/4) Selection of literature is relevant.
Criteria 3-(2/2)-The outline is error free.

For Jaspreet Kaur
Criteria 1-(4/4)-The outline provides a clear image about the article. It is also interesting point like use will use different nations examples to explore the topic.
Criteria 2-(4/4)-I really appreciate your selection of literature.
Criteria 3-(2/2)-There is no spelling error in the outline.

# data[].attributes.headline
Feedback for Manjeet Kaur from Jinli Zhang

# data[].attributes.subject
Feedback for Manjeet Kaur from Jinli Zhang

# data[].attributes.headline
Feedback for QIUYI QU,   from Jinli Zhang

# data[].attributes.subject
Feedback for QIUYI QU,   from Jinli Zhang

# data[].attributes.body
--QIUYI QU

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Critical analysis of educational changes

# data[].attributes.body
assignment 3
QIUYI QU
s4495469

# data[].attributes.body
Assessment Task 3Community of practice (COP) for report

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Critical Analysis of Globalization and Educational reforms in developing nations

# data[].attributes.body
Use this rubric to provide feedback (a score) to your COP members.