# data[].attributes.body
The text "Happy Endings" show, that there is no happy edning. There is a begining and an end, and what happens inbetween is the part that really matter. They will end up dying anyways.

# data[].attributes.body
"Happy Endings" by Margaret Atwood is a short story about love. The purpose of the text is to remind the reader that everything ends with death. No matter what your life looks like or how different your stories are to others, it always ends this way. The story also reminds us that it's the beginning that is the important part.

# data[].attributes.body
In my opinion, Margaret Atwood’s Happy Endings is meant to make us think differently about how stories work and about life in general. She shows us that no matter how different a story may seem, the ending is always the same: people die. What really matters is not the ending, but everything that happens in between. Atwood is criticising the way traditional stories often focus on neat plots and happy endings, instead of the actual experiences, emotions, and struggles that characters go through. She’s also pointing out how unrealistic or shallow some stories can be when they try to simplify life. I think her purpose is to push writers and readers to stop worrying about perfect endings and to start thinking more about the complexity of real life, relationships, and choices. It’s a clever and sarcastic way of saying that stories and life are more than just what happens at the end.

# data[].attributes.body
Across all the narratives, Atwood insists that death is inevitable. No matter how many detours and reroutes, how many hardships or successes, John and Mary die. That death is the only “true” ending. Atwood doesn’t use it merely for shock or drama. She uses it as an above-all truth that exposes how false and fragile all those kinds of story-endings, the ones that promise perfect happiness, really are.

# data[].attributes.body
No matter what, the thing that is going to conclude everybody’s life will be death. So, the things we give incredible value to in life, like the traditional nuclear family, won’t necessarily be perfect, because people themselves or other things will get in the way of our own narrow perception of happiness.

# data[].attributes.body
In the happy endings short story, Margaret Atwood makes use of "joints" throughout the stories, i think that she is trying to show the reader that one can always make a story longer and add "layers" though that wont make it better. The layers in this context is that the love stories that unfold throughout the short stories continue to evolve or devolve by adding a new character or twist.

This is increasing the complexity or adding "layers" to the story.

These different endings to the "same" story gives context to what a happy ending is, since Atwood writes the perspective of both parties, one being happy and the other being misserable, you as the reader gets context as to what actually goes into a "happy ending".

# data[].attributes.body
In Happy Endings by Margaret Atwood, the purpose seems to be to show how stories are structured and how the journey matters more than the ending. Atwood gives different versions of the same story that all end the same way, making us think about how the choices and experiences in life are more important than the outcome. The text suggests that real life is messy and complex, unlike a simple story with a neat ending. Atwood encourages us to question what makes a "happy ending" truly meaningful.

# data[].attributes.body
I think Margaret Atwood is trying to say that whatever happens we're all gonna die in the end. The romantic happiness that most stories, in Margaret's opinion prolong and exagerate is overrated and in some cases decieving or too optimistic and therefore fake.

# data[].attributes.body
In this short story happy endings by Margaret Atwood. I will argue that the purpose of the story is to make it clear that alle endings are the same, we are all going to die eventually.

The focus should be on the "the stretch in between" (p.72, l.31). meaning we have the power to write our own story, within the framework of external factors. When you live your life or write your story no matter what happens you are either going to have a happy life or an intriguing plot and then you are going to die in the ending.

# data[].attributes.body
"Happy Endings" by Margaret Atwood, challenges the conventional idea of a "happy ending" in stories. By writing multiple versions of the same plot, she shows how different scenarios still lead to similar outcomes. She also seems to critique the traditional, happy, love story, as they are the shortest of them all, making it seem more boring compared to the rest of them, as if to her, non-traditional lovestories have more content and character development when writing a story.

# data[].attributes.body
The text "Happy Endings" by Margaret Atwood serves the purpose of sharing a message:

That love, just as life isn't easy and straight forward like a movie. There is no happy endings, but a beginning and an end. The end is to no surprise, that we all perish and die. But that shouldn't be of our concern. We should concentrate on the beginning - on living our life while we are here. Life with all its chaos, plots and twist is worth it without a happy ending, and after all, we only got this 'one'.

# data[].attributes.body
The text "happy endings" suggests that no matter how we want to live our lives, no matter whom we fall in love with, it all ends the same. With death. On one hand it is a very pessimistic text that suggests that no matter how hard you try to live a good life, it really doesn't matter because we are all gonna die. But on the other hand it also takes away the pressure of one self to seek the perfect life. What I thought about is the transition from nihilism to absurdtism. In nihilism there is no hope or meaning, and the only thing you can be sure of is death and taxes. But in absurdtism its also about that life has no meaning, therefore you can create your own meaning, which really sets one free I feel like.

# data[].attributes.body
In my opinion the text tells us that no matter how much we try to create the perfect life with the perfect partner in our search of happiness, it all ends the same way - with death - so why even bother?

# data[].attributes.body
It's a text that are focused on a lot of different ways to have a relationship even though many of them are not healthy or right.
All the small stories all come down to one thing, the fake happy ending that everyone wants. The reality of the world is that it is not that realistic to have a fairytale life where everything goes the way you want it, and at some point you will find yourself in a situation that you need to get out of one way or another.

# data[].attributes.body
The purpose of the text is to show us, in a humouristic way, that we are so focused on having a happy ending in our lives, but the only thing we are sure of, is that our life ends with death. And no matter what kind of a happy end we chase, it can end completely different than we thought. Also, the first story A, which was the happy ending, seemed a bit boring, even though it was seemingly perfect. Life isn't perfect and it never goes as we imagine.

# data[].attributes.body
Magaret Atwood's text "Happy Endings" is a very pessimistic text. It tells us that our lives can be completely different but at the end we will all end up in the same place and that is death.

# data[].attributes.body
These short stories show us that there can alternative endings to each story. Sometimes there are good endings where nothing bad happens and you end with the amazing love story, however it also shows the other side where love doesn't always end up being good. It can take some time before we find the right person and someone who will make us feel loved and seen. Sometimes we choose the right person sometimes the wrong but eventually we will meet the one we were waiting for. I would also add that it shows the reality of some relationships, even if it starts happily it does not mean that the ending of it will be good too, and vice versa.

# data[].attributes.body
As I understand the story "Happy endings": There is a lot of fish in the sea and you have to eat a few rotten fish before you get the delicious well cooked salmon that melts on you tongue.
Said in another way at last you're going to be happy and find the right partner.
I also understand the story as a warning to the ones that thinks love is all about happy endings, real estates, kids and a happy family. It's also unfaitfulness and toxic partners. It's not everybody that can get a happy ending.
The story is also about to be responsible for your life and knowing you worth.

# data[].attributes.body
In Atwood's text "Happy Endings" is there five stories. It points out that just because a happy beginning exists, it will not automatically end with a happy ending. We don’t know. We know nothing. The only thing we know for sure is that the ending always resolves in death

# data[].attributes.body
The story shows some of the issues of being in a relationship and that happy endings is an illusion. It also points out that we are all going to die anyway (kind of depressing actually)

# data[].attributes.body
I think that Atwood's text wants to remind us that love doesn't always have a happy ending. No matter how we started our life with someone we love or the one who loves us, it will all end up anyway, in a sad or a happy ending.

# data[].attributes.body
I have an impression that Margaret Atwood in her short story "Happy Endings" ironically refers to the story of A. The author tries to point out that a happy ending is difficult to achieve, you cannot plan the future and so all stories ultimately end in death. The happy ending of different stories, as in fairy tales for children, may seem too idealized and untrue.

# data[].attributes.body
I think the point she is trying to make in with the story is that as a society we have grown to look at endings, so we are looking for a good ending. However, what we really should be looking for is a good middle part, a good life, because we are going to die in the end nomatter what we do.

# data[].attributes.body
No matter how we live our lives, we will all die in the end. But if we’re lucky, we’ll spend the middle of our lives like what is in this story called A. We’ll have a nice and quiet life with someone we love, and even if our life doesn’t turn out sensational, we should appreciate it as it is, as life could have  turned out much worse.

# data[].attributes.body
The text made us think about how small things can have such a big impact at our's life. It also tells us a lot that you can't judge people without the full story.

# data[].attributes.body
I think that the purpose of this text is to show that it's not about how the story ends, but more about the story on the way. it is the story a long the way that define us.

we all get born and we all die eventualy, so maybe we should make the time we have count.

# data[].attributes.body
The purpose of the text is to show that it's not about how the story ends, but how you get there and the memories in between. We are all born and we all die, but the things we do between those constants are what sets us apart. We only have that one stretch between life and death, so we better make it count and don't waste it on heartbreak and misery.

# data[].attributes.body
It is very different but the same it is very simular. I think that Happy Endings shows us the same story with different action can have the same ending. Lovestorys can be very different but also very alike.

# data[].attributes.body
I think the meaning of this text is to show the reader how every story begins the same and ends the same, but the middle part is different. If you relate this to real life and relationships, I think she wants to make the reader understand that it is always fun in the beginning of a relationship, but the middle part can be very difficult and there will always be challenges. Even though it might hard sometimes, we should remember that there is nothing guaranteed in life expect death.
You can see how we meet the same characters in the stories, but they have different motives and different perspectives.

# data[].attributes.body
In my opinion, the purpose of Atwood's text “Happy Endings”  is to show that no matter how one’s life and relationships go, all people have the same ending, because we will all die, so that instead of focusing on how things will end, that people should enjoy their lives as much as possible because it is that in-between beginnings and endings that are interesting and unique.

# data[].attributes.body
This story has all these different stories, but they all end the same way. Mary and John die. you csan take this as a way of life. no matter how you live it, you end up dead. an in this theme; love - every relationship end somehow.

# data[].attributes.body
According to the writer every relationship would end up the same. Relationships are different and there will always be some challenges.
Sometimes you cannot plan everything as perfect as you want. Things are coming spontant to your life.

# data[].attributes.body
I think the purpose Atwood's text Happy Endings serve is showing everyone ends the same. The one thing that we know for sure is that we are all going to die. At the same way the story also portrays the

# data[].attributes.body
I think the purpose with Happy Endings is to show the ready that everybody ends up the same way. It doesn't matter how you live your life. No matter what, you will end up dead, just like everybody else does. It isn't easy to face the fact that you are going to die but if you keep stressing about everything that is going to happen in your life it just becomes even more stressful to live.

# data[].attributes.body
Magaret Atwood's purpose with the text is to clarify the fact the fact that no matter how wild and and exaggerting your life might be, we'll all end up end the same place. So forget all the expections, just live your life, hope for the very best, and stop planning every detail.

# data[].attributes.body
Margeret Atwood's text 'Happy endings', is perhaps one of the most pessimistic texts i have read. It seems to me, that she is trying to say everyone is the same and that there is no reason to try and be different. Even though some things she say, may be true, she is certianly trying to give the most depression view on love, she could possibly give. So, i think her idea is to annoy you with her pessimistic view, maybe to push you to be different or maybe just to crush your spirit for love.

# data[].attributes.body
A spectaular love story that would never happend.

Margaret Atwood's  "Happy Endings" is a cynical way of treating how we see stereotypical love stories. In the end we see how two characters live out and die with a beautiful house in the fields and a white fence.

But what happend before all of this? What was the build up that caused two hopeless romantics to bond?

In all fair and honesty, it's nothing more then a cynical satire writin, that only serves a purpose of indulges more criticism to story building for love duets.

# data[].attributes.body
Atwood’s literary goal is perhaps to create a detached, emotionless narrative to showcase her mastery and communicate her view of romance and life. But the ultimate goal of the short story is to inspire self-reflection from within the reader. And so I conclude that the conflict lies not within the text but in our own lives.

# data[].attributes.body
The way I see it, Antwood is trying to show us that our focus and or expectations are completely wrong when it comes to love and life in general.
We've all been raised with fairytales that always ended with the famous line "and they lived happily ever after" and therefore, we simply have this collective idea of love as something that is supposed to lead to happy endings, no matter what. In the meanwhile, we forget to look at the actual content and quality of our relationships and with that, we forget the true value of love.
I do believe that Antwood's overall message is that we should pay more attention to our present time and the quality of that, because that is all that really matters. We will never be able to control our ending anyway, because no matter what we do, what path we follow or what life we choose to live, we will all die in the end.

# data[].attributes.body
In the end, we all end up in the same place. Among the dirt, in a cemetery with a tombstone on top. Maybe a quote will be added from your loved ones, to  whom you have departed from. Then a date, a hyphen and then another date.
The only thing that really matters, is what the content of the hyphen contains. Atwood invites the reader to stop and consider, not what-or-where ones journey is directed to, but how and why it might be so. The true journey lies
in the road that leads to the destination.

# data[].attributes.body
Destiny

A.B and C describes different relationships between man and woman.

The 3 Text have the same attitude, and meaning to life and to love, but in the end, all the versions have more or less the same exposition and resolution;

Characters meet and start a relationship, and in the end they die!

# data[].attributes.body
Atwood can be interpreted as being a bit of a cynic But who doesn't love one of those! Love in her stories are described perfectly summoning up a dull way of loooking at love and life. She describes how love and life will end up if it's seen through to the end. I think Her view is very limited to just generalizing what a happy marriage is. She sees the happily ever after as a bland outcome that is impossible not to achieve. Maybe she needs a continuous stream of action to not find the ending of our days dull. I think a lot of people succeed to be stable in their marriages and in their lives without ending up sitting and having a mediocre repeatable love life.

# data[].attributes.body
Atwood makes a statement about savoring the journey instead of focusing on the destination. The only authentic ending is the one provided here: John and Mary die (p.3 ll 27-28). We all know that all life ends with death, so don’t fixate on the ending. It is the in-between that is important and capable of providing us with everything we could possibly wish for.

Yes it will most likely be difficult, but that is a part of life too. True connoisseurs, however, are known to favor the stretch in between, since it's the hardest to do anything with (p.3 ll 30-32). I believe that Atwood is saying that life is a journey to experience with all its ups and downs. It is different for everyone but it is the in-between that matters.

# data[].attributes.body
Margaret shows different sides of a story, but her main point is that people needs to live their life just the way they want to. No matter if you live a great life full of love and succes, you know it will end at some point, and if you live a hard life full of sadness and pain, you still know how it is going to end.

I think that her whole perpose is to say that everybody lives different lives, but none of us i coming out of it alive.

# data[].attributes.body
I think Magaret wants to say that the endings are not the important part of life, because we all know what is and that is we die. “You’ll have to face it, the endings are the same however you slice it” (p.3 ll.23). The important part is the stretch in between and what you choose to do with it, but this will be the hardest part.”True connoisseur, however, are known to favor the stretch in between, since it’s the hardest to do anything with” (p.3 ll.30-33).  I think she is saying living can be hard, but it is the most important part, because we all know how it ends.