# data[].attributes.body
First,  the study of  European foreign policy is only partly embedded in IR and FPS, implying that feedback of knowledge and insight production remains limited. Second, the field remains more descriptive than analytical and is characterized by a lean towards employing concepts of practice. Third, analytical endeavors have usually not included theory building.  Fourth,  efforts at cumulative knowledge production have not figured prominently, meaning that research has focused on single policies, single cases, and single institutions.

# data[].attributes.body
Mostly a North American thing

# data[].attributes.body
focused on the foreign policy of states.
Doesn't usual have own groups, hangs with IR groups

# data[].attributes.body
The  notable  exception  is  the  neofunctionalist  externalization
hypothesis,  linking  European  domestic  policies  to  international  policies

# data[].attributes.body
UACES, EUSA, ECSA, SGEU, JCMS

Focuses on European and the EU
but also Neo, Transnat and intergov are all liberal IR

# data[].attributes.body
can be seen as a substantive tradition that is
underpinned  by  constructivist methodological  commitments

# data[].attributes.body
Constructivism, post-structuralism, Critical Theory

# data[].attributes.body
Always ethical?

# data[].attributes.body
commerce liberalism, republican liberalism, neoliberal institutionalist theoretical perspective

# data[].attributes.body
ISA, BISA, NISA, CEEISA

# data[].attributes.body
Comprises  notions  of  sovereignty,  democracy,  rights,  legitimacy,  ethical  foreign  policy,  power and morality, the use of  force  and deontology