# data[].attributes.body
Everyone backs up there points with evidence and speaks out and kindly disagrees

# data[].attributes.headline
Everyone backs up there points with evidence and speaks out and kindly disagrees 

# data[].attributes.subject
Everyone backs up there points with evidence and speaks out and kindly disagrees 

# data[].attributes.headline
Everyone backs up there points with evidence and speaks out and 

# data[].attributes.subject
Everyone backs up there points with evidence and speaks out and 

# data[].attributes.headline
Everyone backs up there points with evidence and speaks out 

# data[].attributes.subject
Everyone backs up there points with evidence and speaks out 

# data[].attributes.headline
Everyone backs up there points with evidence 

# data[].attributes.subject
Everyone backs up there points with evidence 

# data[].attributes.body
-good job making eye contact within the group
-I liked the rules they thought of
-could improve with asking and responding to questions to promote discussion style  speaking
-started asking more questions towards the middle and end
-made sure their choices matched the criteria

# data[].attributes.body
Abby-good sound strong points
Amelia- well spoken good points set clear rules
Brody- good tone stated opinion backed with facts

# data[].attributes.body
Abby-Didn't hear any quotes but I likes how you put everything with a positive. Amelia-Liked your quote but I didn't hear many other things about horses. Brody- I like how you share the positives and negatives but it seemed kind-of short and choppy. Jenifer- Liked how you talked about your animal by showing all kinds of aspects, maybe just a few more quotes. Natalie- I like how you share positives and the negatives of sheep and how they can be taken care of but didn't hear any quotes. Heather- I liked how you out some quotes in it but you didn't share really much of what you think or want

# data[].attributes.body
Just seeing if this works
P.S hope you're all having a nice day:)

# data[].attributes.body
I liked how they started out with key terms, it helps understand the main factors
The prepared slides for each animal help me to follow their main points
I liked how Jenny reffered back to her role before she explained her points for buying llamas
Good group eye contact
I liked how Abby asked the question about babies knowing that it would strengthen her point
Lots of clarification between group members
Analyzing the problem step got really lengthy, got a little off topic at times
Did a good job re-checking criteria with their solution

# data[].attributes.body
Good job with being prepared
Mentioned articles and cited sources.
Could talk more like it's a discussion and ask questions to others
Good with making eye contact
Went through the steps well.

# data[].attributes.body
Good introducing their roles and their problem or terms we should be aware of. Make sure you site your sources instead of saying "From this article...."
Good stating pros, but make sure to also refer back to cons as well. Also, make sure to refer to your group members in your speaking.
All did a nice job changing up what they wrote on the slide versus what they said in the discussion. Be sure to not interrupt each other. Good clarifying as well. Good being firm and honest with their statements and opinions.

# data[].attributes.body
All have good information. Their rules are really good and make sure that everyone participates. Everyone has good sources and examples. Jeni was thinking of the family when choosing which animal to choose. Natalie and Jeni are thinking about the future with profits and benefits. Amelia was doing a good job moving the discussion along. They all are thinking to the future making sure they can benefit from the animal. Abbey asked questions. Natalie is very knowledgeable about her animal.

# data[].attributes.body
good rules
backing up what is being said
summarizing and moving forward in discussion
questioning to keep the discussion going
Abby
- used a source
- eye contact
Amelia
- used a source
- eye contact
- comfortable tone
Brody
- used a source
- reading tone part of the time
- eye contact
Jenny
- used a source
Natalie
- loud tone
- good eye contact
- used a source
Heather
- quiet
- eye contact
- reading tone

# data[].attributes.body
- They did a good job explaining the rules and roles
- Good job mentioning outside sources
- Explain all the benefits of their choice
- Give logical reasons
- Good eye contact
- Good volume
- Only some state the disadvantages of having their animals
- Sounds like an actual discussion
- It was good that they asked each other questions
-  They are doing a good job with defending their points
- They are still mentioning their disadvantages and others disadvantages which is good
- They are doing a good job staying on track and discussing all the criteria
- Good job asking for clarification
-  Some people are adding to the reasons their animal is the best, others are repeating the same points over and over
- Good job restating the reasons why their choice is the best
- Good job comparing the choices with the criteria
- Good job discussing how to carry out the solution and making a plan

# data[].attributes.body
- The group had good rules to keep their discussion going. They also gave good introductions to help us understand their roles clearly.
- It was helpful that they made slides to help explain what the positives of each animal was.
- Heather was quiet when explaining the positives of getting a bull for the farm.
- Good criteria
-  Logical reasoning when analyzing the problem.
- Stayed on the analyzing step for awhile now and need to move on to the next step.
- Starting to state the same points over again.
- They're doing good when it comes to giving information about their opinionated choice of animals.
- Asked many questions to counter others points.
- It was good that they ran their choice (pig) through their criteria.      - Lots of interrupting throughout the discussion.

# data[].attributes.body
-They did a good job stating their roles
-The whole group did a good job with gathering information

# data[].attributes.body
-  They did a very nice job by  telling us their rules.
- Nice job siting sources!
-  Does a very nice job explaining what the quotes mean in their own words.
-  They all have a good volume and make eye contact.
- They have very well points on each animal.
- Does a nice job reviewing their points that are being made.
-  They all followed their rules with speaking at least 3 times per person.

# data[].attributes.body
They did a good job with their rules and their introductions to help us better understand what the discussion is going to be about. Good at explaining the long term benefits of having pigs, good use of sources and has good eye contact. Had good information on why the Donkey would be a good investment and how useful donkeys can be towards the other animals. Natalie did a good job with her tone and on her opinion on why sheep would be a good animal to have, explains herself well and maintains eye contact. I noticed that Heather was a little quiet but she had good statistics and good evidence to back up her point on why she thinks a bull would be the best choice. I also noticed that Heather had some pauses like she was unsure about the topic or she was looking for it.  They did a good job identifying and going through Dewey's steps. I liked how they are questioning each other and trying to decide which animal would be the best as a group without getting aggressive with each other. It seems like they sort of talk over each other, and don't really take specific individually turns that they can just talk one person at a time.

# data[].attributes.body
Well thought rules and good introductions. Well thought out future benefits for when done with the pig(s). used sources and eye contact. Bit Brief good information on the benefits of horses. Lots of eye contact. good information on how protective a donkey is. But why do kids love them? Good thoughts to think of the future incomes. Where did you get the articles from cause the title is not the article. Little disorganized. Heather: Reading voice, quite, and I did not hear a source, family friendly, low maintenance, low cost, 4 legs, and good during mating season, brings profit to the farm. Question "how many babies do your animals produce at a time". Little bit of back talk, I know it was a joke but might have been a little inappropriate in timing. How much do the animals eat and how much would it be to feed them if they have a specific diet that you have to buy and or make room for on the farm to make. Some talking over each other. 1,000 for sheep , horse is cheap boarding and med bills expensive, Llamas 2,000 ish, 110,000 per bull for boarding and such. Donkeys only cost 200-500, pigs cost 5,000. What evidence do you have that pigs and some of the other animals are child favorites. Backing up and clarifying is pretty ok. Not to much sources listed. Had a good equal spread of discussions through out the group members, seamlessly moved to the next step. Call on each other. Donkeys dont really like people until you start feeding them and then they will start fallowing you. Horses will get attached to one person or their riders, and if they are jumpy they might get kicky. Pigs can get aggressive is they are hungry and if you pick them up off the ground. Bulls are just mean they don't like people they are always territorial, Sheep are temperament, they are nice to people they know but they can be mean to people they don't know. Llamas only need to go to the vet 1-2 times a year. Sheep need to be shaved to remove bugs and to help create new fur, independent. Don't go back to a earlier statement even if you find the article you were missing. all low maintenance. wouldn't test runs on the farm be considered as help needed even though they were thinking along the line of medical purposes. Would the next question be how much damage does the animal do to the farm, the helpers, children, and themselves. Why would you want to open a petting zoo if you want the animals for a farm. what about getting a male animal because the sperm can create a great income depending on the animal. If you want something to protect why not just build a fence or something that could work just as good for keeping animals safe. Pigs might have a lot of piglets but you also have to think of how many will survive and how long the gestation period is per pregnant sow. Lots of interrupting.

# data[].attributes.body
I like  their rules
Good sources
Well prepared

# data[].attributes.body
Abigail: Mentioned article and says benefits of what she thinks.
Amelia: Supports evidence of what she thinks.
Brody: Reading but good information.
Jenny: Good benefits but also talk about use.
Natalie: good on mentioning economic babies. Also mentioned cons.
Heather: Good on mentioning pros and cons.

# data[].attributes.body
(Abby: Has good articles and includes reference to the text. MAde good hand gestures
(Amelia: Makes good eye contact and has well described information
(Brody: Goes in depth about his opinion and why he wants a certain animal. Has good sources
(Jenny: Quotes the article/source. Has some really nice information.
(Natalie: Eye contact. Includes the information of the text
(Heather: Includes the pros and cons on having a bull

# data[].attributes.body
Abby- cites websites. Speaks for a good amount of time. Asks a question for everyone to respond. Moves the discussion.
Brody- supports point by giving reasons why they should chose what he wants
Amelia- Says criteria. Asks Heather a question
Jenny- Cites source. Answers questions with facts from her articles.
Heather- Doesn't just say pros about her point but she also says cons about it.
N- Makes eye contact. Sites source.
There's a lot of good eye contact and everyone is listening to everyone's points. They do a good job of discussing together and letting each of them talk. They clarify things very nice. They say many useful facts that back up their points. They all say pros and cons about their points

# data[].attributes.body
-good job introducing the topic, but I am unsure whether the slides are introducing criteria, or just reasons that promote selecting the animal.
-