# data[].attributes.headline
In favour of Kant's criticism of the ontological argument, in support of the fact that existence is more perfect than non-existence. Dawkins sees this as a 'slippery' assumption.   

# data[].attributes.subject
In favour of Kant's criticism of the ontological argument, in support of the fact that existence is more perfect than non-existence. Dawkins sees this as a 'slippery' assumption.   

# data[].attributes.headline
Adding caveats to the thing that we are trying to argue into existence. Like ‘most perfect being’ cannot refer to contingent beings and are necessary. 

# data[].attributes.subject
Adding caveats to the thing that we are trying to argue into existence. Like ‘most perfect being’ cannot refer to contingent beings and are necessary. 

# data[].attributes.headline
“They felt the need to resort to Modal Logic to prove that I was wrong.”

# data[].attributes.subject
“They felt the need to resort to Modal Logic to prove that I was wrong.”

# data[].attributes.headline
In Richard Dawkins' book, "The God Delusion," he references Douglas Gasking's 'Proof' that God does not exist

# data[].attributes.subject
In Richard Dawkins' book, "The God Delusion," he references Douglas Gasking's 'Proof' that God does not exist

# data[].attributes.headline
Gasking doesn't really prove that God does not exist. By the same token, Anselm didn't prove that he does.

# data[].attributes.subject
Gasking doesn't really prove that God does not exist. By the same token, Anselm didn't prove that he does.

# data[].attributes.headline
Automatic deep suspicion of any line of reasoning that reached such a significant conclusion without feeding in a single piece of data from the real world. (no evidence)

# data[].attributes.subject
Automatic deep suspicion of any line of reasoning that reached such a significant conclusion without feeding in a single piece of data from the real world. (no evidence)

# data[].attributes.headline
6. An existing God therefore would not be a being greater than which a greater cannot be conceived because an even more formidable and incredible creator would be a God which did not exist

# data[].attributes.subject
6. An existing God therefore would not be a being greater than which a greater cannot be conceived because an even more formidable and incredible creator would be a God which did not exist

# data[].attributes.headline
5. Therefore if we suppose that the universe is the product of an existent creator we can conceive a greater being namely, one who created everything while not existing.

# data[].attributes.subject
5. Therefore if we suppose that the universe is the product of an existent creator we can conceive a greater being namely, one who created everything while not existing.

# data[].attributes.headline
4. The most formidable handicap for a creator would be non-existence.

# data[].attributes.subject
4. The most formidable handicap for a creator would be non-existence.

# data[].attributes.headline
3. The greater the disability (or handicap) of the creator, the more impressive the achievement.

# data[].attributes.subject
3. The greater the disability (or handicap) of the creator, the more impressive the achievement.

# data[].attributes.headline
2. The merit of an achievement is the product of (a) its intrinsic quality, and (b) the ability of its creator.

# data[].attributes.subject
2. The merit of an achievement is the product of (a) its intrinsic quality, and (b) the ability of its creator.

# data[].attributes.headline
1. The creation of the world is the most marvelous achievement imaginable.

# data[].attributes.subject
1. The creation of the world is the most marvelous achievement imaginable.