# data[].attributes.headline
aqib does not owe a duty of care because there is no reasonable foreseability

# data[].attributes.subject
aqib does not owe a duty of care because there is no reasonable foreseability

# data[].attributes.headline
aqib does not owe a duty of care because of proximity

# data[].attributes.subject
aqib does not owe a duty of care because of proximity

# data[].attributes.headline
aqib does owe a duty of care to ben - natt

# data[].attributes.subject
aqib does owe a duty of care to ben - natt

# data[].attributes.headline
aqib does owe a duty of care to cara - natt

# data[].attributes.subject
aqib does owe a duty of care to cara - natt

# data[].attributes.headline
Aqib does not owe a duty of care to dev because dev injuring himself was not reasonably foreseeable - natt

# data[].attributes.subject
Aqib does not owe a duty of care to dev because dev injuring himself was not reasonably foreseeable - natt

# data[].attributes.headline
Aqib does not owe a duty of care to Emmett because there was no proximity in the sense of having control over Emmet's situation - natt

# data[].attributes.subject
Aqib does not owe a duty of care to Emmett because there was no proximity in the sense of having control over Emmet's situation - natt

# data[].attributes.body
Aqib(driver) owe a duty of care to Ben(road user). As Aqib was using his mobile phone while driving, his act will directly affect and cause injuries to Ben according to the neighbour principle that was stated under 'Donoughue v Stevenson (1932) case. (Kamala)

# data[].attributes.body
Aqib(driver) owe a duty of care to Cara (road user). Aqib could foreseen the possibility of causing direct injuries to the road users like Cara as Aqib was being as an irresponsible road user by using the mobile phone while driving. It also can be seen that Cara is the closest person that will suffer injuries due to Aqib's act. (Kamala)

# data[].attributes.body
Aqib does not owe a duty of care because Dev is not a road user who was directly affected by Aqib's act. There is no possibilities that is foreseen as Dev tripped on the rake as he could have been shocked with the accident. (Kamala)

# data[].attributes.body
Aqib does not owe a duty of care although Emmett is one of the road users because Emmett is not directly involved in the accident. (Kamala)

# data[].attributes.body
Applying the Neighbour Principle as established in Donoghue v Stevenson, Aqib owes Ben a duty of care because it is reasonably foreseeable that an accident could happen as a result of his negligence (distracted while driving) and there is also proximity (one road user to another) -Batrisyia

# data[].attributes.body
Applying the Neighbour Principle as established in Donoghue v Stevenson, Aqib owes Cara a duty of care because it is reasonably foreseeable that an accident could happen as a result of his negligence (distracted while driving). Although Cara's injury was not a direct impact of Aqib's accident, a duty of care is still owed because there is still proximity (one road user to another, including pedestrians)

# data[].attributes.body
Applying the Neighbour Principle as established in Donoghue v Stevenson, it is not reasonably foreseeable that Aqib's accident on the road could cause an injury elsewhere. There is no also proximity as Dev was not a road user at the time. As per, Bourhill v Young, it was held that defendant did not owe a duty of care to the claimant as her miscarriage was not a foreseeable consequence of the death of her husband, there was also no proximity between defendant and claimant. It should be mentioned that duty of care is not owed to the world at large. Hence, Aqib does not owe Dev a duty of care. -Batrisyia

# data[].attributes.body
Applying the Neighbour Principle as established in Donoghue v Stevenson, a duty of care is not owed to Emmett as the Neighbour principle could not be satisfied due to the lack of proximity between Emmett and Aqib, this could be geographical proximity (a mile away) or proximity in time (he was stuck in traffic long after the accident happened) -Batrisyia

# data[].attributes.body
He owes a duty of care.

# data[].attributes.body
He definitely owes a duty of care.

# data[].attributes.body
He doesn't owe a duty of care.

# data[].attributes.body
He definitely does not owe a duty of care.

# data[].attributes.body
Aqib does owe a duty of care toward ben

# data[].attributes.body
Aqib does owe a duty of care toward cara

# data[].attributes.body
Aqib does not owe a duty of care toward dev

# data[].attributes.body
Aqib does not owe a duty of care toward emmett

# data[].attributes.headline
Yes, Aqib owes Ben a duty of care. - Euodia

# data[].attributes.subject
Yes, Aqib owes Ben a duty of care. - Euodia

# data[].attributes.headline
Yes, Aqib owes Cara a duty of care. - Euodia

# data[].attributes.subject
Yes, Aqib owes Cara a duty of care. - Euodia

# data[].attributes.headline
No, Aqib does not owe Dev a duty of care. It was not reasonably foreseeable that the accident would have caused harm to Dev. - Euodia

# data[].attributes.subject
No, Aqib does not owe Dev a duty of care. It was not reasonably foreseeable that the accident would have caused harm to Dev. - Euodia

# data[].attributes.headline
No, Aqib does not owe Emmett a duty of care as it was not reasonably foreseeable that the accident would cause Emmett to be stuck in a traffic jam. - Euodia

# data[].attributes.subject
No, Aqib does not owe Emmett a duty of care as it was not reasonably foreseeable that the accident would cause Emmett to be stuck in a traffic jam. - Euodia

# data[].attributes.body
Aqib owes Ben a duty of care.
it was reasonably foreseeable for the harm to have happened. there was also a relationship of proximity between Aaqib and ben.

# data[].attributes.body
Aqib owes Cara a duty of care.

# data[].attributes.body
Aqib does not owe Dev a duty of care.
it was not reasonably foreseeable for aqib to predict the harm dev suffered.

# data[].attributes.body
Aqib does not owe Emmett a duty of care.
Emmett was not in the location of the accident so, she is not proximate to aqib and he wouldn't in any way predict the harm she could suffer due to the accident.

# data[].attributes.headline
Yes, Aqib owes a duty of care towards Ben as the proximity between them is close. - Umar

# data[].attributes.subject
Yes, Aqib owes a duty of care towards Ben as the proximity between them is close. - Umar

# data[].attributes.headline
Yes, as the proximity between them both is close as well. - Umar

# data[].attributes.subject
Yes, as the proximity between them both is close as well. - Umar

# data[].attributes.headline
No, Aqib does not owe any duty of care towards Dev as the loss suffered by Dev was too remote, and it was unreasonably foreseen. - Umar 

# data[].attributes.subject
No, Aqib does not owe any duty of care towards Dev as the loss suffered by Dev was too remote, and it was unreasonably foreseen. - Umar 

# data[].attributes.headline
No, Aqib does not owe a duty of care to Emmett as the proximity (distance) between the both of them is too far. - Umar

# data[].attributes.subject
No, Aqib does not owe a duty of care to Emmett as the proximity (distance) between the both of them is too far. - Umar

# data[].attributes.body
Aqib definitely owes ben a duty of care - IMRAN

# data[].attributes.body
Like in a similar case as Ben,therefore Aqib also owes Cara a duty of care - IMRAN

# data[].attributes.body
As it was unreasonably foreseen as Dev suffered the injury,therefore Aqib does not owe any duty of care towards Dev. - IMRAN

# data[].attributes.body
The proximity between the two, Emmett and Ben was to far away to regard Aqib at fault so Aqib does not owe a duty of care towards Emmett- IMRAN

# data[].attributes.headline
Aqib owes duty of care to Ben because it was reasonably foreseeable that Aqib's negligent could cause harm to other road users. - Perevein

# data[].attributes.subject
Aqib owes duty of care to Ben because it was reasonably foreseeable that Aqib's negligent could cause harm to other road users. - Perevein

# data[].attributes.headline
Aqib owes duty of care to Cara because the the relationship of proximity between Aqib and Cara is close. - Perevein

# data[].attributes.subject
Aqib owes duty of care to Cara because the the relationship of proximity between Aqib and Cara is close. - Perevein

# data[].attributes.headline
Aqib does not owes duty of care to Dev because Dev is not a primary or secondary victim of the accident caused by Aqib's negligent. Therefore, the injury caused to Dev was not reasonably foreseeable. - Perevein

# data[].attributes.subject
Aqib does not owes duty of care to Dev because Dev is not a primary or secondary victim of the accident caused by Aqib's negligent. Therefore, the injury caused to Dev was not reasonably foreseeable. - Perevein

# data[].attributes.headline
Aqib does not owes duty of care to Emmet, because according to the neighbour principle, there is lack of proximity (time, place) between both of them. - Perevein

# data[].attributes.subject
Aqib does not owes duty of care to Emmet, because according to the neighbour principle, there is lack of proximity (time, place) between both of them. - Perevein

# data[].attributes.headline
Aqib owes a duty of care towards Ben who is riding his bike on the other side of the road due to the relationship of geographical proximity between them - Syarmitra

# data[].attributes.subject
Aqib owes a duty of care towards Ben who is riding his bike on the other side of the road due to the relationship of geographical proximity between them - Syarmitra

# data[].attributes.headline
Aqib owes a duty of care towards Cara on the basis of reasonable foreseeability. Aqib's reckless actions poses an extremely high probability of inflicting injury towards a road user such as a pedestrian (Cara) in this context.         - Syarmitra

# data[].attributes.subject
Aqib owes a duty of care towards Cara on the basis of reasonable foreseeability. Aqib's reckless actions poses an extremely high probability of inflicting injury towards a road user such as a pedestrian (Cara) in this context.         - Syarmitra

# data[].attributes.headline
Aqib does not owe a duty of care towards Dev. According to The Neighbour Principle, the foregrounds of reasonable foreseeability and proximity is not applicable to this situation. The consequences of Aqib's actions has not directly affected Dev, hence nullifying the fact that Aqib owes a duty of care towards Dev.      - Syarmitra

# data[].attributes.subject
Aqib does not owe a duty of care towards Dev. According to The Neighbour Principle, the foregrounds of reasonable foreseeability and proximity is not applicable to this situation. The consequences of Aqib's actions has not directly affected Dev, hence nullifying the fact that Aqib owes a duty of care towards Dev.      - Syarmitra

# data[].attributes.headline
Aqib does not owe a duty of care towards Emmett. The elements of reasonable foreseeability and proximity do not run parallel in this circumstance. Aqib and Emmett's situations take on independent perspectives, thus reinforcing the fact that Aqib indeed does not owe a duty of care towards Emmett.         - Syarmitra  

# data[].attributes.subject
Aqib does not owe a duty of care towards Emmett. The elements of reasonable foreseeability and proximity do not run parallel in this circumstance. Aqib and Emmett's situations take on independent perspectives, thus reinforcing the fact that Aqib indeed does not owe a duty of care towards Emmett.         - Syarmitra  

# data[].attributes.headline
Aqib owes a duty of care towards Ben - Aleeya 

# data[].attributes.subject
Aqib owes a duty of care towards Ben - Aleeya 

# data[].attributes.headline
Aqib owes a duty of care to Cara -Aleeya

# data[].attributes.subject
Aqib owes a duty of care to Cara -Aleeya

# data[].attributes.headline
Aqib does not owe Dev a duty of care as it was not reasonably forseeable nor was the gardening injury could be predicted by Aqib.  -Aleeya

# data[].attributes.subject
Aqib does not owe Dev a duty of care as it was not reasonably forseeable nor was the gardening injury could be predicted by Aqib.  -Aleeya

# data[].attributes.headline
Aqib does not owe Emmet any duty of care -Aleeya

# data[].attributes.subject
Aqib does not owe Emmet any duty of care -Aleeya

# data[].attributes.body
Yes Aqib owes a duty of care to Ben

# data[].attributes.body
No Dev is beyond the duty of care Aqib owes

# data[].attributes.body
Emmett too is beyond the duty of care owed by Aqib as a driver due to his distance/proximity

# data[].attributes.body
Yes, Aqib owes a duty of care to a pedestrian which is Cara in this situation

# data[].attributes.headline
Yes, Aqib owes a duty of care to Cara - Janice

# data[].attributes.subject
Yes, Aqib owes a duty of care to Cara - Janice

# data[].attributes.headline
No, Aqib does not owe Dev a duty of care - Janice

# data[].attributes.subject
No, Aqib does not owe Dev a duty of care - Janice

# data[].attributes.headline
Aqib does not owe Emmett a duty of care because his actions did not directly affect Emmett - Janice

# data[].attributes.subject
Aqib does not owe Emmett a duty of care because his actions did not directly affect Emmett - Janice

# data[].attributes.headline
Aqib doen not own duty of care to emmett

# data[].attributes.subject
Aqib doen not own duty of care to emmett

# data[].attributes.headline
Yes, he owes a duty of care to Cara because of the neighbour principle, and the fact that all drivers do owe a duty to care to the road users around him or her. - luna

# data[].attributes.subject
Yes, he owes a duty of care to Cara because of the neighbour principle, and the fact that all drivers do owe a duty to care to the road users around him or her. - luna

# data[].attributes.body
Aqib does not owe a duty to care to Emmett because there is no proximity between the claimant and the defendant.

# data[].attributes.body
Aqib owes a duty of care to Ben -El

# data[].attributes.body
Aqib owes a duty of care to Cara -El

# data[].attributes.body
Aqib does not owe a duty of care to Dev because it was not foreseeable that Aqib would have harmed Dev. -El

# data[].attributes.body
Aqib does not owe a duty of care to Emmett -El

# data[].attributes.body
Aqib owes a duty of care to Ben (britney)

# data[].attributes.body
Aqib also owes a duty of care to Cara (britney)

# data[].attributes.body
No, Aqib does not owe Dev a duty of care (britney)

# data[].attributes.body
Aqib does not owe a duty of care to Emmett (britney)

# data[].attributes.body
Yes, Aqib does owe Ben a duty of care.
- Soniya

# data[].attributes.body
Yes, Aqib does owe Cara a duty of care.
- Soniya

# data[].attributes.body
No, Aqib does not owe Dev a duty of care. Dev's injury was not reasonably foreseeable as he was not directly involved in or affected by the accident.
- Soniya

# data[].attributes.body
No, Aqib does not owe Emmett a duty of care. The proximity between the two is too large for Emmett's lateness and missing his interview to be reasonably foreseeable.
- Soniya